imaginaries in pseudo p adically closed fields
play

Imaginaries in pseudo- p -adically closed fields Joint with Samaria - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Imaginaries in pseudo- p -adically closed fields Joint with Samaria Montenegro Silvain Rideau UC Berkeley July / L A field extension K B L is totally p-adic if every p -adic valuation of K L A field K is


  1. Imaginaries in pseudo- p -adically closed fields Joint with Samaria Montenegro Silvain Rideau UC Berkeley July    / 

  2. L A field extension K B L is totally p-adic if every p -adic valuation of K L A field K is pseudo-p-adically closed if it is existentially closed (as a L A field is bounded if it has finitely many extensions of any given Bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields Definition positive valutation. can be extended to a p -adic valuation of L . ring) in every regular totally p -adic extension. degree. Proposition (Montenegro) Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed field. There are finitely many p -adic valuations on K and they are definable in the ring language.  /  L A valuation is p-adic if the residue field is F p and p has minimal

  3. L A field K is pseudo-p-adically closed if it is existentially closed (as a L A field is bounded if it has finitely many extensions of any given Bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields Definition positive valutation. can be extended to a p -adic valuation of L . ring) in every regular totally p -adic extension. degree. Proposition (Montenegro) Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed field. There are finitely many p -adic valuations on K and they are definable in the ring language.  /  L A valuation is p-adic if the residue field is F p and p has minimal L A field extension K B L is totally p-adic if every p -adic valuation of K

  4. L A field is bounded if it has finitely many extensions of any given Bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields Definition positive valutation. can be extended to a p -adic valuation of L . ring) in every regular totally p -adic extension. degree. Proposition (Montenegro) Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed field. There are finitely many p -adic valuations on K and they are definable in the ring language.  /  L A valuation is p-adic if the residue field is F p and p has minimal L A field extension K B L is totally p-adic if every p -adic valuation of K L A field K is pseudo-p-adically closed if it is existentially closed (as a

  5. Bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields Definition positive valutation. can be extended to a p -adic valuation of L . ring) in every regular totally p -adic extension. degree. Proposition (Montenegro) Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed field. There are finitely many p -adic valuations on K and they are definable in the ring language.  /  L A valuation is p-adic if the residue field is F p and p has minimal L A field extension K B L is totally p-adic if every p -adic valuation of K L A field K is pseudo-p-adically closed if it is existentially closed (as a L A field is bounded if it has finitely many extensions of any given

  6. Bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields Definition positive valutation. can be extended to a p -adic valuation of L . ring) in every regular totally p -adic extension. degree. Proposition (Montenegro) Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed field. There are finitely many p -adic valuations on K and they are definable in the ring language.  /  L A valuation is p-adic if the residue field is F p and p has minimal L A field extension K B L is totally p-adic if every p -adic valuation of K L A field K is pseudo-p-adically closed if it is existentially closed (as a L A field is bounded if it has finitely many extensions of any given

  7. L The geometric language L G has sorts F , S n and T n for all n C . It also s n � GL n � F � � S n and t n � GL n � F � � T n . p eliminates imaginaries in L G (HMR). L L We define S n � � GL n � K �~ GL n � O � and T n � � GL n � K �~ GL n n � O � . S  � and s  can be identified with the valuation. L Algebraically closed valued fields eliminate imaginaries in L G The geometric language Definition (Geometric sorts) contains the ring language on F , the canonical projections Remark Theorem (HHM).  /  Let � K , v � be a valued field.

  8. p eliminates imaginaries in L G (HMR). L L The geometric language L G has sorts F , S n and T n for all n C . It also s n � GL n � F � � S n and t n � GL n � F � � T n . S  � and s  can be identified with the valuation. L Algebraically closed valued fields eliminate imaginaries in L G The geometric language Definition (Geometric sorts) contains the ring language on F , the canonical projections Remark Theorem (HHM).  /  Let � K , v � be a valued field. L We define S n � � GL n � K �~ GL n � O � and T n � � GL n � K �~ GL n , n � O � .

  9. p eliminates imaginaries in L G (HMR). L S  � and s  can be identified with the valuation. L Algebraically closed valued fields eliminate imaginaries in L G The geometric language Definition (Geometric sorts) contains the ring language on F , the canonical projections Remark Theorem (HHM).  /  Let � K , v � be a valued field. L We define S n � � GL n � K �~ GL n � O � and T n � � GL n � K �~ GL n , n � O � . L The geometric language L G has sorts F , S n and T n for all n C . It also s n � GL n � F � � S n and t n � GL n � F � � T n .

  10. p eliminates imaginaries in L G (HMR). L L Algebraically closed valued fields eliminate imaginaries in L G The geometric language Definition (Geometric sorts) contains the ring language on F , the canonical projections Remark Theorem (HHM).  /  Let � K , v � be a valued field. L We define S n � � GL n � K �~ GL n � O � and T n � � GL n � K �~ GL n , n � O � . L The geometric language L G has sorts F , S n and T n for all n C . It also s n � GL n � F � � S n and t n � GL n � F � � T n . S  � Γ and s  can be identified with the valuation.

  11. p eliminates imaginaries in L G (HMR). L The geometric language Definition (Geometric sorts) contains the ring language on F , the canonical projections Remark Theorem (HHM).  /  Let � K , v � be a valued field. L We define S n � � GL n � K �~ GL n � O � and T n � � GL n � K �~ GL n , n � O � . L The geometric language L G has sorts F , S n and T n for all n C . It also s n � GL n � F � � S n and t n � GL n � F � � T n . S  � Γ and s  can be identified with the valuation. L Algebraically closed valued fields eliminate imaginaries in L G

  12. The geometric language Definition (Geometric sorts) contains the ring language on F , the canonical projections Remark Theorem (HHM).  /  Let � K , v � be a valued field. L We define S n � � GL n � K �~ GL n � O � and T n � � GL n � K �~ GL n , n � O � . L The geometric language L G has sorts F , S n and T n for all n C . It also s n � GL n � F � � S n and t n � GL n � F � � T n . S  � Γ and s  can be identified with the valuation. L Algebraically closed valued fields eliminate imaginaries in L G L Q p eliminates imaginaries in L G (HMR).

  13. L Let L i denote n copies of L G , with sorts G i , sharing the sort F . L Let K  l K , L � � i L i 8 K  and T � Th L � K � . L Let M � T , M i be the algebraic closure of M with an extension of v i and M i be the p -adic closure of M inside M i Let U i x g be v i -open, then � i U i x g . Let K  b A b F � M � and s i t i > S i n � M � . If � i s i � M i L i � A � t i � s i � i B n � M L � A � � t i � i B n then An orthogonality result Proposition Remark  /  L Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields with n p -adic valuations � v i � i B n .

  14. L Let K  l K , L � � i L i 8 K  and T � Th L � K � . L Let M � T , M i be the algebraic closure of M with an extension of v i and M i be the p -adic closure of M inside M i Let U i x g be v i -open, then � i U i x g . Let K  b A b F � M � and s i t i > S i n � M � . If � i s i � M i L i � A � t i � s i � i B n � M L � A � � t i � i B n then An orthogonality result Proposition Remark  /  L Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields with n p -adic valuations � v i � i B n . L Let L i denote n copies of L G , with sorts G i , sharing the sort F .

  15. L Let M � T , M i be the algebraic closure of M with an extension of v i and M i be the p -adic closure of M inside M i Let U i x g be v i -open, then � i U i x g . Let K  b A b F � M � and s i t i > S i n � M � . If � i s i � M i L i � A � t i � s i � i B n � M L � A � � t i � i B n then An orthogonality result Proposition Remark  /  L Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields with n p -adic valuations � v i � i B n . L Let L i denote n copies of L G , with sorts G i , sharing the sort F . L Let K  l K , L � � i L i 8 K  and T � Th L � K � .

  16. Let U i x g be v i -open, then � i U i x g . Let K  b A b F � M � and s i t i > S i n � M � . If � i s i � M i L i � A � t i � s i � i B n � M L � A � � t i � i B n Proposition then An orthogonality result Remark  /  L Let K be a bounded pseudo- p -adically closed fields with n p -adic valuations � v i � i B n . L Let L i denote n copies of L G , with sorts G i , sharing the sort F . L Let K  l K , L � � i L i 8 K  and T � Th L � K � . L Let M � T , M i be the algebraic closure of M with an extension of v i and M i be the p -adic closure of M inside M i

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend