ice structure interaction at the
play

Ice-Structure Interaction at the Confederation Bridge Pier Dhruba - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Ice-Structure Interaction at the Confederation Bridge Pier Dhruba Tripathi Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary Calgary, Canada Overview Confederation Bridge Introduction Monitoring Direct, indirect, and


  1. Ice-Structure Interaction at the Confederation Bridge Pier Dhruba Tripathi Department of Civil Engineering, University of Calgary Calgary, Canada

  2. Overview  Confederation Bridge Introduction  Monitoring – Direct, indirect, and observations  Pressure panels  Data analysis  Activation Analysis  Detailed Pressure Distribution Analysis  Correlation Analysis  Conclusion 5/18/2010 Tripathi 2

  3. Confederation Bridge 5/18/2010 Tripathi 3

  4. Confederation Bridge  12.9 km long  100 years design life  40 m above water (typical)  4.5m to14m deep precast concrete box girder  Bridge Footings- Gravity foundation on bedrock 5/18/2010 Tripathi 4

  5. Ice Force Monitoring  Direct measurement of ice pressure  Indirect measurement of the global ice force  Observation of ice kinematics 5/18/2010 Tripathi 5

  6. Indirect measurement of ice force  Tilt meters measure displacements  Stiffness of the pier determined by a pull test 5/18/2010 Tripathi 6

  7. Ice load on the Bridge  Limit stress (ice failure)  Vertical structures – Crushing failure of ice  Conical ice shield – flexural failure – causes lower load  Limit force (ice driving force) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 7

  8. Ice Load History 5/18/2010 Tripathi 8

  9. Real-Time Monitoring  Computers at the bridge can be accessed through internet  Ice load – live chart at website updated every 15 minutes (http://ice.ucalgary.ca)  Real-time access - videos from four cameras for the observation of ice-structure interaction 5/18/2010 Tripathi 9

  10. Direct measurement of ice pressure 20 panels Covering 40m 2 5/18/2010 Tripathi 10

  11. Ice Force Panels (IFPs) 1 10 2 9 3 8  A total of 160 4 5 6 7 sectors in 20 11 20 12 19 13 18 14 17 panels on the 15 16 cone 5/18/2010 Tripathi 11

  12. Typical Panel  8 sectors (~500 x 500 mm)  ~ 30 button on each sector  2 buttons instrumented  Best represents average pressure 5/18/2010 Tripathi 12

  13. Data  120 channels – upper cone (level ice and rubble)  40 channels – lower cone (Thick ice)  64 channels – pier shaft (Large keels)  Tiltmeter data – Global ice force (comparison)  4 time-lapse video data, upward-looking sonar 5/18/2010 Tripathi 13

  14. Ice Structure Interaction What happens at the ice structure interface? Pressure zones ( hpz ) ICE ? STRUCTURE Spatial and temporal pressure distribution ? 5/18/2010 Tripathi 14

  15. Data  Electrical signals  Average data- every 17 seconds  Full Ice season – continuous recording  Triggered data- every 34 milliseconds  For Events only 5/18/2010 Tripathi 15

  16. Typical data header (120 data channels) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 16

  17. Panel Reliability 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120  4 panels and 10 sectors  42 sectors bad in 1998  7 panels and 16 sectors  72 sectors bad in 2003 5/18/2010 Tripathi 17

  18. Events selection and Panels  Events selection  Ice forces – (tiltmeter data)  Availability of pressure panel data  Video analysis, when available  Panels  Panels on cone for interaction of level ice  Waterline panels – level ice impact  Panels above water-line – Rubble piles 5/18/2010 Tripathi 18

  19. Data Conversion 93 94 89 90 113 114 109 110 2.5 LEGEND 2 89 90 93 94 Pressure, y ip (MPa) 109 110 113 114 1.5 1 0.5 0 -0.5 -1 09:04.3 09:13.0 09:21.6 09:30.2 09:38.9 09:47.5 09:56.2 10:04.8 Time stamp (min.) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 19

  20. Baseline  Unrealistic negative pressure  Baselines differ in different channels  Clear pressure peaks (sustained pressure for longer duration – very rare)  Baselines changed over time 5/18/2010 Tripathi 20

  21. Baseline Correction- Trimmed 5/18/2010 Tripathi 21

  22. 5/18/2010 Tripathi 22

  23. 5/18/2010 Tripathi 23

  24. 5/18/2010 Tripathi 24

  25. Ice pressure and ice force 5/18/2010 Tripathi 25

  26. Data Analysis Activation Analysis  Sector considered active  [pressure peak] > [a threshold] Detailed Pressure Distribution Analysis  Peaks – supported by at least 5 adjacent peaks in each side 5/18/2010 Tripathi 26

  27. Horizontal and vertical pressure distribution 93 94 89 90 113 114 109 110 5/18/2010 Tripathi 28

  28. Activation, Integrated load 5 0.6 Integrated load =∑[ y i a i cos( α i )] 0.5 4 Panel Activation (No.) Integrated Load (MN) 0.4 3 0.3 2 0.2 1 0.1 0 0 09:09.3 09:11.9 09:14.4 09:17.0 09:19.6 09:22.2 09:24.8 09:27.4 09:30.0 09:32.5 09:35.1 09:37.7 09:40.3 09:42.9 09:45.5 09:48.0 09:50.6 09:53.2 89 90 93 94 109 110 113 114 Panel Activation Integrated Load 5/18/2010 Tripathi 29

  29. Horizontal Pressure Distribution 5/18/2010 Tripathi 30

  30. Horizontal Distribution 5/18/2010 Tripathi 31

  31. Vertical pressure distribution 5/18/2010 Tripathi 32

  32. Detailed Pressure Distribution Analysis 2 2 Sector 90 Sector 89 Sector Pressure (MPa) Sector Pressure (MPa) 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 -2 -2 12:09 12:09 Time (HH:MM) Time (HH:MM) 2 2 Sector 93 Sector 94 Sector Pressure (MPa) Sector Pressure (MPa) 1 1 0 0 -1 -1 -2 -2 12:09 12:09 Time (HH:MM) Time (HH:MM) 89 90 93 94 109 110 113 114 5/18/2010 Tripathi 33

  33. Probability of exceedance 5/18/2010 Tripathi 34

  34. Correlation Analysis • Strength and direction of a linear relationship of pressure between different sectors • Activation correlation • Time-series corrleation 5/18/2010 Tripathi 35

  35. Time-series correleation 1 81 0.8 Correlation Coefficient 82 0.6 83 0.4 84 0.2 85 0 86 -0.2 89 -0.4 90 81 90 82 89 83 86 s 84 85 r o t c 85 84 e S 86 83 89 82 90 81 5/18/2010 Tripathi 36

  36. Limitations  Pressure panels readings - representation of absolute pressure  Many of the sectors were damaged  Availability of video data at night (apparently, the largest events occur at night) 5/18/2010 Tripathi 37

  37. Further works  Test the results by using numerical methods like finite element method.  Process limit driving force events  Add some more events to refine the result. 5/18/2010 Tripathi 38

  38. Acknowledgements Dr. Tom Brown Noorma Shrestha Susan Tibbo Kelly Obert Mohamed El-Seify Derek Myane Dambar Tiwari May 29, 2009 39

  39. Thank You ! Questions ?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend