ICAO/ACI Symposium on Implementation of the New Global Reporting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
icao aci symposium on implementation of the new global
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ICAO/ACI Symposium on Implementation of the New Global Reporting - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 16, 2023 109 likes •303 views

ICAO/ACI Symposium on Implementation of the New Global Reporting Format for Runway Surface Condition (GRF2019) TALPA IMPLEMENTATION EVOLUTION ICAO/ACI GLOBAL REPORTING FORMAT Presented to: (GRF2019) REGIONAL OFFICE CONFERENCE By: U. S.

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Presented to: By: Date:

ICAO/ACI Symposium on Implementation of the New Global Reporting Format for Runway Surface Condition (GRF2019)

TALPA IMPLEMENTATION EVOLUTION

ICAO/ACI GLOBAL REPORTING FORMAT (GRF2019) REGIONAL OFFICE CONFERENCE

  • U. S. Federal Aviation Administration
slide-2
SLIDE 2

TALPA Evolution

  • History

– Airplane landing and excursion on contaminated surface – NTSB set in motion various recommendations – Originated as a Aviation Rulemaking Committee Initiative – Implemented via voluntary efforts – Created tools, guidance documents, and capabilities to assess surface conditions – Tied assessed condition to airplane performance

2 June 22-24, 2019

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • Airplane Operators
  • Part 121

 ABX Air  Alaska  American Eagle  American  Continental  Delta  Express Jet  Federal Express  Northwest  Pinnacle  Southwest  United  UPS  US Airways

TALPA Evolution

  • Other Organizations

Air Transport Association Airline Pilots Association Airports Council International Allied Pilots Association National Air Carrier Association National Business Aviation Association National Transportation Safety Board Neubert Aero Corporation Regional Airline Association Southwest Airlines Pilot Association Allied Pilots Association

  • Regulatory Authorities

FAA (Airports, Flight Standards, Certification, NOTAMS, Rulemaking, Legal) Transport Canada Brazilian Certification Authority EASA (Limited Participation)

  • Airplane Manufacturers

Airbus Boeing Bombardier Cessna Eclipse Embraer Gulfstream Hawker

  • Airports

Cherry Capital Chicago Airport System Chicago O’Hare Grand Rapids Regional Minneapolis/St. Paul Airport System

  • Airplane Operators
  • Part 91-K/125/135

Alpha Flying, Inc Bombardier Flexjet Chantilly Air Flight Works Jet Solutions Conoco Phillips Alaska Net Jets Pogo Jet, Inc

June 22-24, 2019 3

Stakeholder Participants

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4 June 22-24, 2019

TALPA Evolution

Airport Operator RCAM Version Aircraft Operator RCAM Version

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Presented to: By: Date:

TALPA – Aircraft Operator

ICAO/ACI Symposium on GRF2019

  • U. S. Federal Aviation Administration

US FAA Transport Standards

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Airplane Performance

  • FAA Goal – Data Basis

– Same basis for all manufacturers and operators

  • One set of assumptions when manufacturers create

data

  • One set of guidelines for operators

– ICAO adopted same time-of-arrival landing performance basis

  • Manufacturer supplied performance data is based on

the same assumptions (one minor exception)

  • Operator guidance the same

6 June 22-24, 2019

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Airplane Performance

  • Two important parts

– Manufacturer data to support implementation of TALPA

  • Takeoff – non-issue, AC’s consistent to the greatest degree

possible with EASA contaminated runway certification requirements (AC 25-31)

  • Landing – Time of Arrival performance data (AC 25-32)

– Guidance for operators on implementation of performance data

  • Safety Alert For Operators

– Operational guidance for TALPA operations - SAFO 19001 » Guidance also in FAA Order 8900 – Recommendations for ops in heavy rain - SAFO 15009

June 22-24, 2019 7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Best Practices Operational Data and Guidance

  • FAA TALPA is voluntary for operators therefore the operational

information provided are – “best practices for conducting a landing distance assessment at time of arrival” – Timeliness

  • Typically top of descent
  • Determine how much field conditions can deteriorate and still

land – Safety Margin

  • 15% recommended

– Autobrake Usage

  • Guidance on when A/B data should be factored

June 22-24, 2019 8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Best Practices Operational Data and Guidance

– Source of Data

  • Manufacturer historical (adjusted if necessary) or based
  • n AC 25-32
  • If no data available – Generic factors maybe applied to

unfactored AFM dry

– Additional Guidance

  • Use of dispatch data
  • Touchdown point

June 22-24, 2019 9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Operational Performance Implementation Issues

  • Manufacturer’s TALPA data/guidance not available

– Default to factor’s and by nature conservative

  • Multiple contaminants reported

– Primarily takeoff issue – Data provided by manufacturer for single contaminant on the runway – Different airplanes have different critical contaminant for performance – Consensus, operators handle the choosing of the critical contaminant for performance purposes

June 22-24, 2019 10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Presented to: By: Date:

Airport Operator TALPA Implementation

ICAO/ACI Symposium on GRF2019

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Implementation Tools

  • Advisory Circular 150/5200-30D, Airport Field Condition Assessments and Winter

Operations Safety

  • Advisory Circular 150/5200-28F, Notices to Airmen (NOTAMs) for Airport Operators
  • Enhanced tool for producing RwyCCs and reporting Field Condition NOTAMs (FICON)

– Modified system on how surface conditions will be reported based on the RCAM criteria – System reduces subjectivity and standardizes how the RwyCC is generated and published – System calculates and generates RwyCCs based on contaminant information input by the airport operator

  • System comprised of simple dropdown menu selections for the airport operator
  • Established a demo system for testing and familiarity

– System business rules and methods are transferrable

  • Prepared to coordinate with implementation teams
  • FAA Order 7930.2, Notices To Airmen (NOTAMs), is governing document

June 22-24, 2019 12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Awareness Campaign

  • Time is critical for a successful implementation

– Developed information for operators and stakeholders to use/supplement existing training and guidance documents – Conducted outreach nationally via webinars, conferences, industry forums and informational bulletins for airport operators and other stakeholders – Recorded narrated presentations on process for utilizing the RCAM for field condition assessment and reporting – Sought industry participation to publish articles in trade publications on field condition assessment and reporting – Built websites to make information available to industry and stakeholders – Held FAA Industry Day ahead of implementation to seek feedback and address stakeholders concerns

June 22-24, 2019 13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Challenges

  • Enough time to meet implementation

expectations

  • Impact of change on airport operators
  • Break with traditional way of assessing

conditions

  • Understanding use of existing friction

measuring tools after implementation

  • Instituting new terminology
  • Applying RwyCC upgrade/downgrade

actions

June 22-24, 2019 14

Best Practices

  • Development of a website for information

and a bank of Frequently Asked Questions

  • Capability to accept/answer stakeholders
  • n-going questions throughout

implementation

  • Usable template as a basic framework

that can be used to train stakeholders

  • Information distribution capability to reach

and receive feedback from numerous stakeholders simultaneously

  • Data gathering source for GRF analysis

after implementation

  • Organic Website

https://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/talpa/

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Presented to: By: Date:

Air Traffic Controller TALPA Implementation

ICAO/ACI Symposium on GRF2019

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ATC Guidance Documents

  • Order JO 7110.65 – Air Traffic Control

– Added Runway Condition Codes (RwyCC) – “0” (worst) to “6” (best) – Replaced “Fair” reportable braking action report with ICAO “Medium” – Introduced new categories: “Good to Medium” and “Medium to Poor”

  • Order JO 7210.3 – Facility Operation and Administration
  • Order JO 7110.10 – Flight Services
  • Aeronautical Information Manual (AIM)
  • Aeronautical Information Publication (AIP) ICAO
  • Pilot/Controller Glossary

16 June 22-24, 2019

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Air Traffic Controller Required Training

  • Develop Training and Training Guidance

– Appropriate timelines and methods must be established – Training and updates must be consistent state-wide – Recommend establishing a training framework/template for standardization

  • Brief Procedural Changes to All Controllers

– Terminal facilities – EnRoute facilities – Both state run and non-government facilities

17 June 22-24, 2019

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Emphasize Controller Procedures Not Affected

  • Controllers will still solicit braking action reports from pilots after/upon

landing

  • Controllers will disseminate to Airport Operators, and pilots, pertinent

changes to surface/landing conditions received via PIREPS/NOTAMS

  • Controllers will disseminate new information via ATIS broadcasts like

Runway Condition Codes.

  • Controllers will NOT add the complete FICON NOTAMs to the ATIS

broadcast

18 June 22-24, 2019

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusion & Thank you!

19 June 22-24, 2019