ICAO SEACG/ ICAO SEACG/18 ICAO SEACG/18 ICAO SEACG/ 18 WP/ 18 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
icao seacg icao seacg 18 icao seacg 18 icao seacg 18 wp
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ICAO SEACG/ ICAO SEACG/18 ICAO SEACG/18 ICAO SEACG/ 18 WP/ 18 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Oct 12, 2023 361 likes •609 views

SEACG/18 Appendix B to the Report ICAO SEACG/ ICAO SEACG/18 ICAO SEACG/18 ICAO SEACG/ 18 WP/ 18 WP/ WP/17 WP/17 17 17 Draft Report of the Mekong ATM Draft Report of the Mekong ATM Coordination Group Meeting (MK ATMCG) Coordination

slide-1
SLIDE 1

ICAO SEACG/ ICAO SEACG/18 18 WP/ WP/17 17 ICAO SEACG/ ICAO SEACG/18 18 – WP/ WP/17 17 Draft Report of the Mekong ATM Draft Report of the Mekong ATM Coordination Group Meeting (MK Coordination Group Meeting (MK ATMCG) ATMCG) Coordination Group Meeting (MK Coordination Group Meeting (MK‐ATMCG) ATMCG)

24 24‐26 26 April April 2011 2011: Bang : Bang Saen Saen, Chon , Chon Buri Buri, Thailand , Thailand

1

SEACG/18 Appendix B to the Report

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Key Discussion Items Key Discussion Items Key Discussion Items Key Discussion Items

Seamless ASEAN Sky Initiative Air Traffic Management (ATM) Matter

Airspace Management (ASM)

  • Review of ATS Route Proposals
  • SEA‐RR/TF Follow‐Up Items: A1/A202
  • En‐Route PBN Harmonization

ff l ( )

Air Traffic Flow Management (ATFM)

  • Cooperative Traffic Demand Sharing

Collaborati e Decision Making (CDM)

  • Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Review of ATS Route Proposals Review of ATS Route Proposals Review of ATS Route Proposals Review of ATS Route Proposals

Previously Coordinated Routes Recently Proposed Routes Previously Coordinated Routes

U‐Tapao – ENREP (M754)

  • M904 name accepted
  • M904 – N891 traffic sharing

Recently Proposed Routes

Lao PDR

LPB‐CMA A206 Extension

  • Coordination when necessary

HAN‐RGN / NAN‐TATEL

  • PAE‐TATEL considered instead of

NAN‐TATEL due to existing PAE‐NAN

  • Formal letter received from

DCA Lao

VTN – TANGO

  • CMA‐BGO not considered due to

danger area being crossed

VTN‐SAV

  • Formal letter received from DCA Lao

t MK ATMCG VTN – TONPEUNG

Thailand

NAN SAGAG

at MK‐ATMCG

SRE‐UBON‐VILAO

  • Discussion postponed due to security

situation along Cambodia‐Thailand border area NAN – SAGAG KKN – HAN

  • Concern on military activities

S th f NOB

border area

South of NOB

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

REVIEW OF ROUTE PROPOSALS REVIEW OF ROUTE PROPOSALS REVIEW OF ROUTE PROPOSALS REVIEW OF ROUTE PROPOSALS

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

M754 754 M754 754

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

HAN HAN RGN / NAN RGN / NAN TATEL TATEL HAN HAN‐RGN / NAN RGN / NAN‐TATEL TATEL

D42

TATEL

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

VTN VTN SAV SAV VTN VTN‐SAV SAV

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

SRE SRE UBL UBL VILAO VILAO SRE SRE‐UBL UBL‐VILAO VILAO

VILAO

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Recently Proposed Routes Recently Proposed Routes Recently Proposed Routes Recently Proposed Routes

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

SEA SEA‐RR/TF FOLLOW RR/TF FOLLOW‐UP ITEMS UP ITEMS SEA SEA RR/TF FOLLOW RR/TF FOLLOW UP ITEMS UP ITEMS

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A1 1/A /A202 202 Route Proposal at SEA Route Proposal at SEA‐RR/TF RR/TF / p /

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Key City Pair Traffic Flow on A Key City Pair Traffic Flow on A1 Key City Pair Traffic Flow on A Key City Pair Traffic Flow on A1

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

A1 1 Realignment and Parallel CDR Realignment and Parallel CDR

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

A1/A /A202 202 Arrangement Arrangement A1/A /A202 202 Arrangement Arrangement

A1 Arrangement

Short Term: reduced spacing from 40NM to 30NM Medium Term: realignment and/or RNAV 5 re‐

designation

Longer Term: parallel route south of current A1

  • RNAV 5 with ≤ 30NM spacing

A202 Arrangement

Reduced radar spacing from 40NM to 30NM

  • Agreed at MK‐ATMCG pending coordination with China

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

En En Route PBN Harmonization Route PBN Harmonization En En‐Route PBN Harmonization Route PBN Harmonization

Routes within Surveillance Coverage

RNAV 5

Routes outside Surveillance Coverage

RNP 10 RNP 4 at a later stage

Start evaluation of routes crossing more than g two FIRs

Traffic more likely equipped for RNAV 5 / RNP0

y q pp /

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

COOPERATIVE TRAFFIC DEMAND COOPERATIVE TRAFFIC DEMAND COOPERATIVE TRAFFIC DEMAND COOPERATIVE TRAFFIC DEMAND SHARING SHARING

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing

Flight Plans and ATS Messages

Can be converted to FIR Boundary Crossings Represent latest “traffic demand” before

  • perations

Mechanisms available to process FPLs

What can be exchanged?

Flight Plan and ATS Messages Processed traffic demand

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Cooperative Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Traffic Demand Data Sharing Cooperative Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Traffic Demand Data Sharing

Phase 1: Static Flight Plan Log Exchange

Time Frame: Week starting on 3rd Sunday of

h month

Message Types: FPL Return Information: Cross‐FIR traffic demand

Phase 2: Dynamic Flight Plan Forwarding

FIR‐Boundary Crossing traffic demand views Traffic information at major international airports

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Cooperative Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Traffic Demand Data Sharing Cooperative Cooperative Traffic Demand Data Sharing Traffic Demand Data Sharing

Use of Traffic Demand

Optimize use of ATS route

  • Separation or spacing in use

– Assist in planning need for reduced spacing

Flight Level Allocation (Still needed?)

  • Flight Level Allocation (Still needed?)

Operational Staff Planning Sectorization Planning Sectorization Planning

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Collaborative Collaborative Decision Making (CDM Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Collaborative Decision Making (CDM Decision Making (CDM)

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

Phase 1 Bangkok Departures with BOBCAT Slot Phase 1: Bangkok Departures with BOBCAT Slot

Collaborative Departures Planner (CDP) Rich data sharing between Bangkok ATFMU, Bangkok ACC

d bh and Suvarnabhumi Tower

Assist in collaborative planning of several airport CDM

milestones

  • Target Take Off Time window (TTOTw)
  • Planned FL Exiting FIR Boundary

Phase 2: Airline Involvement

Airlines Providing “Departures Flexibility Window” (earliest

and latest feasible departure)

Airlines provided TTOT window

p

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Collaborative Departures Planner (CDP) Collaborative Departures Planner (CDP) Collaborative Departures Planner (CDP) Collaborative Departures Planner (CDP)

Fusing information from to enable CDM information sharing Fusing information from… …to enable CDM information sharing Bangkok Bangkok

TECOS Airport Stats

Bangkok ATFMU Bangkok ATFMU

Fused Information

FPL & ATS BOBCAT Slot

Web

FPL & ATS Messages e.g. DEP

VTBS Tower VTBS Tower Bangkok ACC Bangkok ACC

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

CDM Meeting with Singapore CAAS (June 2011)

Discussion of possible CDM Trial for Bangkok –

Singapore city pair

Potential involvement of DCA Malaysia Potential application of CDP on departures from

Singapore / Malaysia with BOBCAT slots

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24