Hunter Business Chamber Emerging Challenges to Port Development and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hunter business chamber
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hunter Business Chamber Emerging Challenges to Port Development and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hunter Business Chamber Emerging Challenges to Port Development and Sustainability Newcastle, 19 September 2013 David Anderson CEO Ports Australia Ports Australia: Long history (1916) under various guises Typical business model for a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Hunter Business Chamber

Emerging Challenges to Port Development and Sustainability

Newcastle, 19 September 2013 David Anderson CEO Ports Australia

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Ports Australia:

  • Long history (1916) under various guises

Typical business model for a peak industry body

  • Represent both private and publicly owned ports and regulatory

agencies Core business

  • Advocacy (primarily on national stage)
  • Advice to Members on statutory & regulatory developments

Sharing of information & best practice across 9 working groups with strong Member participation High level of agreement about what is important

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Board of Ports Australia

Gary Webb CEO, Newcastle Port Corporation Chairman (30 Sept 2013) Vincent Tremaine CEO, Flinders Ports South Australia Chairman Elect Chris Leatt-Hayter CEO, Fremantle Ports Deputy Chair Steve Lewis CEO, Dampier Port Authority Member Terry O’Connor CEO, Darwin Port Corporation Member Brad Fish CEO, North Queensland Bulk Ports Member Russell Smith CEO, Port of Brisbane Pty Ltd Member Stephen Bradford CEO, Port of Melbourne Corporation Member Jim Cooper CEO, Port of Portland Pty Ltd Member Grant Gilfillan CEO, Sydney Ports Corporation Member Paul Weedon CEO, Tasmanian Ports Corporation Member

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • Total 70 Ports, of which 65 Regional
  • Main 16 Regional Ports handle 85% of Task
  • Main 20 Ports handle 95% of Task

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Emerging Challenges

  • 1. The Conversation about Ports and Freight
  • 2. Growth, Planning and Land Use Conflicts
  • 3. Supply Chain Coordination and Productivity
  • 4. Environmental Management and Regulation
  • 5. Port Governance and Privatisation
  • 6. Skills and Workforce
  • 7. The Future of Coastal Shipping

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

An initial and key goal for Ports Australia was to ramp up priority accorded to ports on the political and public policy radar

  • spreading the conversation about ports and freight among

key agencies and other stakeholders

  • safe and efficient movement of freight in communities is a

major public policy issue

  • transport networks is about moving freight as well as

moving people 1. Ports and Freight – The Dialogue

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8
  • GDP1 (2012) - $A 1,620 billion
  • Total Exports and Imports (2012) = $A 490.2 billion
  • Fourth largest shipping task in the world
  • Australia - 10% of global seaborne trade
  • Shipping growth in the order of 80% over next decade
  • 42 commercial ports, 20 of significant scale
  • Emerging LNG trade (63 mt by 2016/17)

Australia – Why are Ports Important?

  • 1. Source - Dept of Foreign Affairs & Trade

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Source: Draft NSW Freight and Ports Strategy, November 2012

2. Growth, Planning and Land Use Conflicts

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Source: BITRE

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Source: BITRE

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

7,848,787 13,557,706 15,542,982

  • 2,000,000

4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 14,000,000 16,000,000 18,000,000

FY 95/96 FY 96/97 FY 97/98 FY 98/99 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 02/03 FY 03/04 FY 04/05 FY 05/06 FY 06/07 FY 07/08 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 FY 16/17 FY 17/18 FY 18/19 FY 19/20 FY 20/21 FY 21/22 FY 22/23 FY 23/24 FY 24/25 FY 25/26 FY 26/27 FY 27/28 FY 28/29 FY 29/30 FY 30/31 FY 31/32 FY 32/33 FY 33/34 FY 34/35 FY 35/36 FY 36/37 FY 37/38 FY 38/39 FY 39/40

Total Container Trade

actual Low Growth Likely Growth Strong Growth

Sydney’s Growth Projections – 30 Year

Source: Sydney Ports

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Source: GHD

National container port requirements @ 5% compound growth

Capacity and growth

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Dampier

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Planning Failures and Land Use Conflicts

Residential Apartments 2.5 – 25m from rail freight line. Rail Freight Line

Rail Freight Line – Little High Street, Fremantle

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

3. Supply Chain Coordination and Productivity

  • Getting the best from existing assets and skills
  • Fragmentation of supply chain interests, and lack of

transparency, drives inefficiency, and in some cases bad behaviours

  • Port authorities/corporations well positioned to make

"disinterested" interventions and drive cooperation

  • Building on Hunter Valley Supply Chain Coordination, and

Port Botany Landside Improvement Strategy

  • Application of Smart Technology to freight management
  • many examples of "single window" approach driving

transparency and eliminating unnecessary transactions

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • Addressing both productivity of capital assets and workforces
  • move to automation a "classic" response
  • introduction of third stevedore – will it make a difference?
  • Combative IR environment a serious issue
  • FWA and tightness in sectors of labour market only part of

the cause

  • policy support from previous Federal Government to

unions regulating workplace

  • 1990s demonstrated balance is achievable
  • engagement with newly elected Government may bring

changes.

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Smit, Suzanne (2003/2004) A Comparison of Port Community Systems: A framework to compare Port Community Systems and an application of the Port Community Systems of Hamburg, Rotterdam and Antwerp. Erasmus University Rotterdam

Transaction Pattern post–Port Community System Transaction Pattern pre-Port Community System

25

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Sources: UK Office for National Statistics, Salary.com, Ernst & Young, SupplyChainReview.com.au, www.oanda.com Notes: Numbers represent the full stevedoring remuneration package. UK salary is for 2011 and is inflated at the average of the previous two years’ increases, Australian salary is 2011 but is not inflated as it was

  • nly given as a broad estimate.

Comparison of International Stevedoring Salaries (Real 2012 AUD)

Country 2012 Annual Remuneration at Current Exchange Rates 2012 Annual Remuneration at 2005 Exchange Rates United Kingdom 37,929 61,450 United States of America 62,574 88,552 New Zealand 71,886 84,065 Australia

  • Approx. 100,000
  • Approx. 100,000

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Salary levels and Future Competitiveness

Hays Oil and Gas predict if wages rise further some projects might be delayed. Local wage levels second highest in sector.

Top 10 oil & gas salaries by country ($) Contractor day rates ($ per day)

Average annual salary Operator/ Local Imported technician 1 Norway 180,300 122,800 1 Australasia 630 2 Australia 164,000 173,100 2 North America 410 3 Brunei 140,500 94,400 3 Northern Europe 410 4 Netherlands 138,500 n/a 4 Western Europe 350 5 Canada 128,700 123,300 5 West Africa 310 6 US 124,000 119,200 6 North East Asia 310 7 Brazil 119,600 106,700 7 South America 300 8 New Zealand 116,500 112,400 8 CIS 300 9 Saudi Arabia 102,900 67,100 9 North Africa 280 10 France 92,100 118,400 10 East/South Africa 280

Source: Hays Oil & Gas Salary Guide

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

4. Environmental Management and Regulation

  • Sovereign risk now emerging as more prominent in Australian

context

  • accept community expectations are high re environment

standards

  • Agency culture and capricious regulation a significant cost to the

economy

  • detached from macro-economic goals of governments
  • Emerging ideological underpinning of environmental movement
  • anti-development per se rather than conservation minded
  • goal is to close down supply chains (Queensland)

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30
  • Dredging subject of particular
  • channels are key pieces of national economic infrastructure

and their capacity determines supply chain performance

  • dredging is not an indulgence, it is an economic imperative
  • in Queensland currently under-focussed attack with little

scientific foundation

  • Ports Australia undergoing project to better inform

community about impacts of dredging

  • Ports community using best endeavours to work constructively

with environmental agencies

  • takes highly precautionary approach to risk
  • looking for better processes, not less rigour

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31
  • Active monitoring programs
  • eg dust off stock piles
  • water quality
  • ports taking pro-active approach

to harmonising standards and developing capacity to monitor for marine pests.

  • Biofouling and marine pests increasing in significance

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

5. Port Governance and Privatisation

  • Good governance is a pre-condition for getting other key things

right, such as planning, pricing and investment

  • Historically the prevailing Australian model has been public
  • wnership, with ports acting as landlords and strategic managers

subject to statutory and government oversight

  • have subsequently been structural and other changes
  • Ports Australia does not have a position that advocates

privatisation, it has a position that advocates sound governance models

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33
  • As a general rule state governments have not been good

shareholders

  • and the cost of government ownership has been high
  • eg. if the port business is sitting on the state balance sheet it

can result in poor, or sub-optimal investment expenditure decisions and port balance sheets that do not attract private investors

  • This has lead to a discussion about governments providing better

governance models

  • with lukewarm results
  • Consequently the debate has leaped to privatisation
  • Current motivation more about budget deficits and selling mature

assets to fund new infrastructure

  • recent Queensland Commission of Audit Report has

enlivened discussion in that state around Gladstone and Townsville

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

7. The Future of Coastal Shipping Tonnage (million tonnes) Freight task (billion TKM) Coastal Shipping 52.1 114.7 TOTAL 2,959.6 565.7 Percentage of coastal shipping 1.8% 20.3%

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35
slide-36
SLIDE 36

Thank You David Anderson danderson@portsaustralia.com.au