How children become moral 9.46 See The contact principle and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

how children become moral
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

How children become moral 9.46 See The contact principle and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

How children become moral 9.46 See The contact principle and utilitarian moral judgments in young children 10/20/14 (Pellizzoni, Siegel, & Surian, 2009) 1. What three features does Hamlin claim cooperative systems require? Which


slide-1
SLIDE 1

How children become moral

9.46 10/20/14

See “The contact principle and utilitarian moral judgments in young children” (Pellizzoni, Siegel, & Surian, 2009)

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • 1. What three features does Hamlin claim cooperative

systems require?

  • Which does Warneken & Tomasello (2013) address?
  • Which do Hamlin’s "morality plays" address?
slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • 1. What three features does Hamlin claim cooperative

systems require?

  • Which does Warneken & Tomasello (2013) address?
  • Which do Hamlin’s "morality plays" address?

Moral goodness Moral understanding & evaluation Retribution Moral behavior Moral judgment

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Plan for today

  • 1. Early moral judgment
  • 2. Early moral behavior
  • 3. A little bit about learning
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Distinguishing helping and hindering

Caress Hit Help Hinder Premack & Premack (1997)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Distinguishing helping and hindering

Caress Hit Help Hinder Premack & Premack (1997)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Distinguishing helping and hindering

Caress Hit Help Hinder Premack & Premack (1997)

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Distinguishing helping and hindering

Habituation Dishabituation (to horizontal hit) Premack & Premack (1997)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Preferring helping to hindering

Hamlin & Wynn (2011)

Square hinders Triangle helps Child chooses

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Preferring helping to hindering

Hamlin, Wynn, & Bloom(2007)

  • 2. How does

Hamlin check whether infants are responding to "low level cues"?

% infants choosing character who…

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Preferring helping to hindering

Hamlin, Wynn, & Bloom (2007) % infants choosing character who…

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Preference for retribution

5-month-olds 8-month-olds 19-month-olds Hamlin et al. (2011)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Preference for retribution

5-month-olds 8-month-olds 19-month-olds Hamlin et al. (2011)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Preference for retribution

5-month-olds 8-month-olds 19-month-olds Hamlin et al. (2011)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Mental state matters

Preference-knowledge Preference-ignorance Nopreference-knowledge Hamlin et al. (2013)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Mental state matters

Preference-knowledge Preference-ignorance Nopreference-knowledge

Hamlin et al. (2013)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Mental state matters

Preference-knowledge Preference-ignorance Nopreference-knowledge

Hamlin et al. (2013)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Mental state matters

Preference-knowledge Preference-ignorance Nopreference-knowledge

Hamlin et al. (2013)

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Mental state matters

Preference-knowledge Preference-ignorance Nopreference-knowledge

Hamlin et al. (2013)

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Mental state matters

Hamlin et al. (2013)

3. Imagine infants are doing something simpler, e.g.:

a) They like elephants who want to help the lion, and figure everyone knows what the lion wants. b) They like elephants who help the lion get what the lion has chosen before c) They like elephants who help the lion get what the elephant knows the lion has chosen before. c) They like elephants who open doors for the lion. That is so nice!

Re-draw the choice plot.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Mental state matters

  • As soon as infants can DO the

mental state work it seems to be tied in to morality.

  • What would happen with induced

false beliefs, which infants seem to have some implicit access to without being able (much later) to answer explicit questions?

Baillargeon et al., 2010

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Expectations of fairness

16-month-olds look longer at (and choose!) the fair distributor Is this really a “moral” consideration?

Geraci & Surian (2011)

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Expectations of fairness

Is this really a “moral” consideration? Yes—effect vanishes when the recipients are inanimate

Geraci & Surian (2011)

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Moral behavior

“Parental presence and encouragement do not influence helping in young children” (Warneken & Tomasello, 2013)

  • 3. Which finding relies on accepting a null

hypothesis? Which findings don’t?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Moral behavior

  • 4. What if infants help more in the presence of a

parent, but also take into account that their parent isn’t helping? Devise an experiment that would distinguish between this hypothesis and the one advanced by the authors (i.e., that infants help spontaneously and the parent’s presence doesn’t matter).

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Moral behavior: instrumental helping

Warneken & Tomasello, 2006

  • 18 month olds, novel situations
  • Control: same situation but adult has a

neutral facial expression and never indicates there’s a problem

  • 22 of 24 infants helped at least once
  • Almost always before adult makes eye

contract or speaks

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Material rewards reduce helping

Warneken & Tomasello, 2008

  • Neutral: no response at all to the child.
  • Praise: “Thank you, [CHILD’S NAME]; that’s really nice!”
  • Reward: “For this, you get a cube.”
slide-28
SLIDE 28

Toddlers reward and punish

19-23 month olds Hamlin et al., 2011

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Connecting judgment and performance

  • Sheskin et al., 2014: “Life-history theory explains childhood moral

development”

– Infants don’t need to behave morally in order to get resources; older children do. – Natural selection has timed moral development based on typical social environments in childhood.

  • Warneken & Tomasello, 2009: “This developmental timeline makes

sense as infants initially act mainly within the protected environment of their family and do not have to self-regulate via social norms because they are supervised by adults. However, during middle childhood, when they start to act more autonomously with a larger number of people, they need to be concerned with whether the target of their altruistic act reciprocates or judges their reputation according to internalized social norms.”

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Learning does occur… somehow.

  • 5. "The claim that specific socialization practices are not the
  • nly source of prosocial behaviors is not in conflict with the

fact that growing up in a "normal" social environment contributes positively to children’s behavioral development more generally, as prosocial behaviors are one of the various behaviors that may be affected if children's social interactions are disrupted." (Warneken & Tomasello, 2013)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

So what are parents doing?

  • Common caveat: “The present studies therefore rule out

formal moral instruction and experience in complex social institutions as sources of the cooperative principles, but they cannot tease apart the effects of children’s own

  • bservational learning, directions from parents and other

adults, feedback from other children, and intrinsically guided developmental processes.” (Olson & Spelke, 2007)

  • Even very careful observational studies can’t get beyond

correlation.

  • “Inductive parenting” promotes prosocial behavior

(Hoffman, 2000): adult highlights causal structure (e.g., excluding another child makes him feel hurt or sad) but doesn’t need to help with motivation.

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • 6. Come up with a thesis statement connecting

these findings about early moral cognition to either (a) the contribution of reasons vs. emotion to moral judgment or (b)the question of whether moral cognition is uniquely moral.