Utility Perspective on SMRs Presented by Jack A. Bailey VP Nuclear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

utility perspective on smrs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Utility Perspective on SMRs Presented by Jack A. Bailey VP Nuclear - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Utility Perspective on SMRs Presented by Jack A. Bailey VP Nuclear Generation Development NRC Commission Briefing March 29, 2011 TVAs Renewed Vision Reflects Interests of Many Utilities Provide Cleaner Low-Cost Power Cleaner Air High


slide-1
SLIDE 1

NRC Commission Briefing

March 29, 2011

Utility Perspective on SMRs

Presented by Jack A. Bailey VP Nuclear Generation Development

slide-2
SLIDE 2

FY2020 Generation

Provide Cleaner Low-Cost Power

Cleaner Air Low Rates Greater Energy Efficiency More Nuclear Generation High Reliability Responsible Stewardship

TVA’s Renewed Vision Reflects Interests

  • f Many Utilities

2

FY2010 Generation

Coal Nuclear Hydro Gas/Oil Renewables/EE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Small Modular Reactors Potential Benefits

  • Simplified “passive safety” LWR
  • Underground containment and used

fuel storage

  • Four years or more between

refuelings

  • Shop fabricated, rail shipped
  • Incremental generation when and

where its needed

  • Lower transmission system impacts

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

SMR Challenges

4

  • Overcoming economy of scale challenges.

– Regulations and industry practices designed for larger plants.

  • Realizing goal of adding incremental modules efficiently when

needed.

– License multiple modules before needed, so that can build when needed.

  • Providing adequate and effective manufacturing oversight

and inspection

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Lessons Learned From Advanced Reactor Programs Apply

  • Standardization

– Achieve and maintain

  • Design Centered Working Groups

– One issue one review – Design specific through industry team – Generic issues through NEI

  • Industry Teams

– Stay committed through both licensing and construction

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • 10CFR50 is suitable for first-of-a-kind designs
  • Increased potential risk of 10CFR50 can be managed by:

– Completing substantial engineering prior to construction – Clear identification and early NRC review of critical design features

  • 10CFR50 and 10CFR52 both need to ensure standardization of

new designs

  • 10CFR52 clear preference for long-term standardized deployment

First Mover Consideration of 10CFR50 versus 10CFR52

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY CY 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021

Prepare CPA

Clinch River Project – 10CFR50 Process

Submit CPA

NRC CPA Review

CP DSER Construction Permit Issuance PSAR ER

Prepare Operating License Application

Submit OL Application

NRC Review Operating License Applic.

FSER Issued

Pre-Op Testing

Operating license Issuance Fuel Load

Start-up Testing

Submit DCA

NRC DCA Review (36 mos. To FSER)

DCA Scope Freeze

DC Rule

Final DC Rulemaking FSER Issued 1st Unit

Time Is Now

7

mPower DCD and COLA – 10CFR52 Process

Prepare Design Certification Application

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Main Discussion Points

  • Many articulated reasons for considering SMRs along with larger

ALWRs.

  • While similar in design to large reactors, large margins to safety

expected to be met with simpler and fewer plant systems.

  • Industry working with NRC to right size certain regulatory

requirements commensurate with the risk of SMRs, using lessons learned from advanced new plant activities.

  • Successful navigation among the possible regulatory paths just as

critical to successful deployment of SMRs as managing total construction costs.

8