Hometown Stockholm Focus on Air Traffic Management Si ATM own - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Hometown Stockholm Focus on Air Traffic Management Si ATM own - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Founded in 1981 Hometown Stockholm Focus on Air Traffic Management Si ATM own products Operational ATM systems Simulators ATM related tools Christer Schrling Managing Director Moscow ATC centre , the 80ths Area, Approach, Aerodromes
Moscow ATC centre, the 80’ths Area, Approach, Aerodromes and Simulator Life prolongation updates The system is still operational
New Hong Kong ATM System, UFS
ATRACC ATM system Riga FIR Area, Approach, Aerodromes and Simulator First contract 1996 Developed in close cooperation with user
New Hong Kong ATM System, UFS ARES; ATM Radar Emergency System Systems to Zagreb, Pula, Zadar, Split & Dubrovnik
Bahrain Jeddah Muscat Dammam Doha Riyad Kuwait Teheran Abu Dabi BATMAS – FDPS for Bahrain FIR Next Previous Return
MAATS – Moldavian Advanced Air Traffic Management System
- Centralised Multi Sesnor Tracker
- Enhanced Mode-S, ADS-B, MLAT
- Fully Automatic FDP
- Complete Safety Nets
- Full OLDI
- CFMU / IFPS
- Controller HMI
- Redundant Architecture
- Latest Equipment Technology
- CPDLC = Controller Pilot Data Link Com.
- Test and Development System
- SESAR Compliant
- Operational 2013
New Functionality – ongoing developments
- CPDLC
- Free Route Airspace
- Expanded OLDI
- Network Manager FSA, AFP, CPR
- LARA / PRISMIL
- AIXM 5.1
- AMAN
- DMAN
- CDM
- SESAR Compliance in general, EC 716/2014
ATC Simulators
Quality & Safety Management
ISO certified since 2006-10-30. Work in accordance with EC regulations:
- No 1032/2006 (OLDI)
- No 633/2007 (FMTP)
- No 73/2010 (AIXM 5.1)
- No 1206/2011 (Mode-S)
- No 29/2009 (CPDLC, ATN)
- No 482/2008 (SW Safety
Ass.)
- Eurocontrol ESARR 6
- No 716/2014 and
and other relevant standards.
Fallback / Contingency Systems
London-wide air traffic control failure was caused by an unprecedented computer fault
The computer error that caused the skies over London to be cleared of planes had never been seen by engineers before, according to the company in charge of the system. Air traffic control firm NATS said the computer error had restricted air traffic controllers’ ability to deal with high volumes of aircraft. NATS said its systems were up and running again last night but that knock-on effects were still affecting airports today. Travel problems continue into weekend after glitch at air traffic control centre that transport secretary calls ‘unacceptable’!
The Independent Saturday 13 December 2014
General on FBS
Main purpose of FBS is to perform in case of: 1) Emergency; Failure in main 2) Planned shorter switch-off of main 3) Longer unavailability of main 4) Replacement of main
Requirements on FBS
- Constantly available
- Not fail when main fails
- Aligned operational context
- Sufficient functionality
- Functionality & HMI similar as main
- Easily maintainable
- Use the working positions of main
- Possible to develop further
Si ATM solution
- Reuse of well-proven Si ATM products
- Software different from main
- Same surveillance input
- Functionality; MST, SNET, CWP, FDP ….
- Emulate HMI of main
- Main FBS connection
- KVM switch
- Redundant, Si ATM advanced functions
Contingency Systems
1) Clear the skies UFS Hong Kong 2) Continued reduced operations ARES Croatia 3) Continued full operations To be discussed
Hong Kong Ultimate Fallback System (UFS)
- Clear the sky
- One operational system and one test
configuration
- Single servers
- Online system with 86 CWP + 6 tech. supervisors
- Voice recording and playback
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs
AIDC
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Mini FPLs FDP Surveillance data Alignment UFS
AIDC
AT3
IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Mini FPLs FDP Surveillance data UFS
UFS Overview
No software, computers or network equipment in common with the main system - but uses the same monitors, keyboards, mouses and loudspeakers. Each controller can individually select which system; main, fallback or UFS, that shall provide information on his/her monitors using a KVMA-switch
UFS Overview (contimued)
- Surveillance data; dual serial lines + network
connections. 5 radar stations and two ADS-B feeds, True multi-sensor tracking
- Weather data; from radars
- Flight information; is continuously fed from the main
systems keeping a database of abbreviated flight plans up to date.
- QNH; direct from met-office.
- Safety Nets; STCA, MSAW, APW, and APM
- Controller HMI; adapted to AT3
- Recording; of data for playback and
recording of voice from main VCS and from the Direct Radio Communication System (DRCS) for playback.
- Monitoring and control using SNMP
UFS, Controller Functions
- Same track symbols as in AT3, labels configurable
- Automatic and manual coupling
- Flight jurisdiction
- Coordination between sectors
- Flight lists (inbound/outbound), configurable
- SNET alerts same presentation as in AT3
- Prediction lines
- Separation probe
- QDM
- Weather radar presentation
- Presentation filters
- Maps
- Pointer symbol communication
- Status of interfaces
UFS Context
UFS Flight Plan Data
Main Active Main Standby Fallback Active Fallback Standby UFS
- Aircraft Identity
- Status
- EOBT
- ADEP
- ADES
- Assigned SSR-code
- Aircraft type
- Wake turbulence
- Owner (controlling
sector)
- CFL
- RVSM status
- FIR exit point
- FIR exit level
- Coordination target
- Coordinated level
- Arrival runway
- Notes
CWP
Databases synchronization
At connection; clear database and download Operative flight plans. After the initial establishment of the connection, the AT3 system will send a Flight Data Message
- any time a new flight is created with a Flight Plan State of
Operative,
- when a flight’s Flight Plan State changes to Operative,
- when an existing Operative flight’s data is modified or a flight’s
Flight Plan State changes to Cancelled. A flight plan becomes Operative when either the EOBT or the FIR entry time is within this VSP time of current system time.
Croatia ATM Radar Emergency System (ARES)
- Clear the sky and continued reduced operations
- Five operational installations + one test configuration
- Two redundant configurations and four with single
servers
- Zagreb online with 55 CWP + one technical
supervisor
ATM Radar Emergency System (ARES) Croatia
COOPANS Zagreb Test Zagreb ONL Pula ONL Zadar ONL Split ONL Dubrov ONL AFTN
- ------------------------- Radars, ADS-B and Multilateration--------------------------
IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Reduced FPLs FDP Surveillance data Alignment AFTN/ AMHS
OLDI
ARES COOPANS
IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Reduced FPLs FDP Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS
IFPL,ICHG, ICNL,IDLA IAPL,IACH
ARES
ARES Surveillance Data Processing ARES is dimensioned for
- 8 surveillance sources via network or serial
ports. Currently six connected and seven configured.
- 1.000 simultaneous fully labeled aircraft targets.
- 2.000 plots or ADS-B reports per second
- True multi-sensor tracking
- Track broadcasted to external systems (e.g.
SASS-C)
ARES Functional Overview
- Flight Data Processing
- Essential flight data from COOPANS and AFTN
(ADEXP)
- HMI similar to main system
- Safety Nets
- Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA)
- Minimum Safe Altitude Warning (MSAW)
- Area Proximity Warning (APW)
ARES Functional Overview (continued)
- Information data processing
- QNH from METAR/SPECI
- Map data handling (editing, etc)
- Operational supervisor functions
- Center configuration similar as main system
- TSA management
- Recording and playback
- System data recording and playback
- System monitoring and control
- Centralized monitoring from Zagreb based upon SNMP
ARES, Controller Functions
- Same track symbols as in main system, labels
configurable
- Automatic and manual coupling
- Flight jurisdiction same as main system
- Coordination between sectors same as in main
system
- Coordination with next FIR
- Flight lists (FPL and Sector), configurable
- SNET alerts same presentation as in main system
- Separation probe
- Prediction lines (speed vector)
- QDM
- Presentation filters
- Maps
- Status of interfaces
ARES Context
ARES
ATC Controller Sensors AFTN NTP servers Technical supervisor
I_Sensors I_AFTN I_NTP
Operational supervisor External clients
I_TrackOut
FIXER Radar WAM ADS-B CroATMS
I_KVM I_Logs I_XML
ARES Connection to Main System
- Manually open channel from technical supervisor
- Show main system status
- Manually start synchronizing
- Deletes all flight plans
- Insert flight plans from main system
- Synch ready message
- When synchronized
- All changes in main system sends update data.
- Controlling sector not included in the data
ARES Flight Plan Data
Full operational contingency
- Continued full operations
- To be discussed referencing the figures.
ICAO & ADEXP, Flow, etc
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Full FPLs FDP Surveillance data Alignment AFTN/ AMHS MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL
OLDI
Full Cont.
Full FPLs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Surveillance data AFTN/ AMHS ATS Units MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL FDP Data Link CWPs SDP MST STCA MSAW APW APM Full FPLs FDP Surveillance data Alignment? AFTN/ AMHS MTCD MONA AMAN ADS-C CPDLC DCL ATS Units Data Link Full Cont.
Conclusions
- Contingency systems are becoming mandatory
- Si ATM has solutions for all the three levels
- Si ATM has plug-and-play solution for COOPANS