Hollow electron lenses for HL-LHC Miriam Fitterer (FNAL) US LHC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hollow electron lenses for hl lhc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Hollow electron lenses for HL-LHC Miriam Fitterer (FNAL) US LHC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Hollow electron lenses for HL-LHC Miriam Fitterer (FNAL) US LHC Users Association Meeting, 02 November 2017 Many thanks to: R. Bruce, D. Perini, S. Redaelli, J. Wagner (CERN), G. Apollinari, G. Stancari, A. Valishev (FNAL) M. Fitterer


slide-1
SLIDE 1
  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

Hollow electron lenses for HL-LHC

Miriam Fitterer (FNAL)

US LHC Users Association Meeting, 02 November 2017 Many thanks to: R. Bruce, D. Perini, S. Redaelli, J. Wagner (CERN), G. Apollinari, G. Stancari, A. Valishev (FNAL)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

logo area

What is an electron lens?

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

logo area

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

3

Electron gun (DC or pulsed) HL-LHC: 10 keV, 5 A Superconducting solenoid HL-LHC: 2-6 T collector

Circulating proton beam is affected by electromagnetic field of electron beam

Electron lens (TEL-2) in the Tevatron tunnel

slide-4
SLIDE 4

logo area

Why do we need a hollow electron lens for HL-LHC?

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

logo area

Halo, core and luminosity

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

5

§ goal HL-LHC: increase luminosity by a factor of 10 beyond the original design value (from 300 to 3000 fb–1) § luminosity is generated by the particles in the beam core § halo particles do not contribute to the luminosity, but they generate unwanted losses § stored beam energy increases by factor 2 compared to LHC or factor 350 compared to the Tevatron § prediction for HL-LHC: 33.6 MJ are stored in tails = 15 x Tevatron beam Þ electron lens controls losses with no luminosity loss

stored beam energy [MJ] Tevatron 2 LHC 2016 250 nominal LHC 362 HL-LHC 692

slide-6
SLIDE 6

logo area

Passive halo control

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

6

  • 1. passively intercept particles with

collimation system

slide-7
SLIDE 7

logo area

Active halo control

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

7

  • 1. actively regulate diffusion speed (e-lens)
  • 2. intercept particles with collimation system
slide-8
SLIDE 8

logo area

Why do we need active halo control for HL-LHC?

§ HL-LHC: factor 2 larger losses for same loss assumption as for LHC § parameters and operational scenarios pushed well beyond LHC

§ Doubled bunch intensity in smaller emittance § Operation with crab cavities, no experience with protons § Luminosity levelling

Þ Extrapolation of loss from LHC complex § Concerns from fast failures (crab cavities) in presence of over- populated tails

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

8

electron lens provides margin and thus reduces risk Þ inclusion in HL-LHC baseline strongly considered (see e-lens reviews 1 & 2)

slide-9
SLIDE 9

logo area

Due to radial symmetry the hollow electron lens yields a strong non-linear field for halo particles and no field at core region Þ active halo control Past and future research: § concept first tested at the Tevatron for antiprotons in 2011 § experiments at RHIC in spring 2018 with ions § simulations to model experiments and predict performance for HL-LHC

Controlling halo with an e-lens without affecting the core

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

9

  • G. Stancari

Collimator Collimator

slide-10
SLIDE 10

logo area

BUT: Imperfections in the profile can break the radial symmetry Þ residual field at the beam core § DC operation no problem § pulsed operation induces noise on halo (wanted) and core (not wanted) Þluminosity loss

Controlling halo with an e-lens without affecting the core

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

10

  • G. Stancari

Past and future research: § experiments at LHC in 2016 and 2017 using the kicker of the transverse damper and aiming at defining tolerances on field imperfections § simulations to model experiments and define tolerances for HL-LHC

slide-11
SLIDE 11

logo area

Summary

§ HL-LHC pushes parameters and operational scenarios § extrapolation of losses to these new parameters is not trivial § electron lenses provide margin for machine protection through active halo control § strong consideration to include hollow electronlens in HL-LHC baseline § first proof of principle of hollow electron lens collimation at the Tevatron (2011) § experiments at the LHC to study effect on beam core in pulsed

  • peration (2016-2017)

§ further experiments at RHIC (2018) § simulations to predict performance of the elecron lens for HL-LHC

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

logo area

Questions?

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

logo area

How to further increase luminosity in the LHC – the HL-LHC upgrade

1. 1.9× number of particles 𝑂$ 2. 0.4× beam size at IP 𝜏 3. 2× crossing angle 𝜄 → 0.3× luminosity reduction R 4. Crab Cavities for luminous area control → L=19×1034 cm-2s-1 too high! 5. Luminosity levelling by dynamically changing focusing (b*=0.7→0.15m) in store → L=5×1034 levelled

13

𝑴 = 𝒐𝒄𝑶𝒒

𝟑𝒈𝟏

𝟓𝝆 𝝉𝟑 𝑺 𝝉𝒜, 𝜾

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

instantaneous lumi [1034 cm-2s-1]

slide-14
SLIDE 14

logo area

LHC vs HL-LHC

14

LHC nominal HL-LHC Beam energy 7 TeV Number of bunches 2808 (25 ns) 2748 (25 ns) protons / bunch [1011] 1.15 (0.58A) 2.2 (1.09A) Energy in one beam [MJ] 360 680 gex,y [µm], rms 3.75 2.5 b* [m] at IP1-5 0.55 0.15 X-angle [µrad], separation 285, 9.3s 590, 12.5s Geometrical Luminosity loss factor 0.83 0.3 Crab Cavities→0.83 Quadrupole bore [mm], gradient [T/m] 70, 215 150, 132.6 Peak luminosity [1034] 1.0 5.0 Pile up 25 138 Line pile up density [mm-1] 0.1 1.25 Machine state during HEP store static dynamically changing focusing – b * levelling

slide-15
SLIDE 15

logo area

What is an electron lens

§ DC or pulsed low-energy e-beam § circulating beam affected by electromagnetic field of e-beam § e-beam confined and guided by strong solenoids

  • M. Fitterer – Hollow electron beam collimation for HL-LHC – US LUA Meeting 2017

15

superconducting solenoid (2-6 T) 3m overlap region Gun (10 keV, 5 A) Collector p-beam e-beam gun/collector solenoid (0.2-0.4 T)