high field dipoles for accelerators
play

High Field Dipoles for accelerators Etienne Rochepault PhD student - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEA Saclay - Irfu High Field Dipoles for accelerators Etienne Rochepault PhD student Etienne Rochepault Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 1 Background 2009: Graduated from Ecole Normale Suprieure French famous school for


  1. CEA Saclay - Irfu High Field Dipoles for accelerators Etienne Rochepault PhD student Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 1

  2. Background • 2009: Graduated from “ Ecole Normale Supérieure ”  French famous school for higher education and research. • 2009: Master degree in Electrical Engineering, University of Paris-Sud • PhD thesis at CEA Saclay  Center for Atomic Energy, great research institution  Paris area  My department, IRFU, involved in many CERN projects • 2012, September: PhD defense • Teaching charge at university, during the PhD Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 2

  3. Outline I. Some issues in high field magnets 1. High field magnets for LHC 2. Innovative insulations II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design 2. 3D coil-ends design III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation Developments 1. Critical current measurements 2. Improvement outlooks IV. Conclusion 1. Contribution to high field magnet 2. Interests in LARP Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 3

  4. I. Some issues in high field magnets Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 4

  5. I. Some issues in high field magnets 1. High field magnets for LHC • LHC upgrades  Increase energy: HE-LHC  Increase luminosity: HiLumi • Increase the bending field: NbTi limited, use Nb3Sn Cross- section designs • Beam stability  Good field homogeneity • Avoid magnet quenching  Operational margins • Nb3Sn very sensitive to stress  Manage forces • Connect the straight parts  end-parts Coil-ends • Respect the bending limits of the cable design • Keep field homogeneity and margin Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 5

  6. I. Some issues in high field magnets 2. Innovative insulations • Ceramic insulation developed at CEA [2 patents, 2001 & 2003] - Porous material  excellent heat evacuation  [S. Pietrowicz, B. Baudouy, ICMC 2011] - Ceramic  withstands the 650 °C heat treatment   good resistance to irradiation   good electrical resistance  - Wind, Impregnate & React Drying  less risks  Thickness control tube by laser - Tests on small solenoids OK • Issues: Ceramic Is the mechanical strength solution sufficient ?  Magnetic Desized Impregnated agitation What is the electrical behavior tape roller tape roller of insulated cables ? Impregnation process Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 6

  7. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 7

  8. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design • 2D model for the computation of field, harmonics and forces  Analytic formulas for infinite rectangular blocks [G. Aubert, forthcoming book]  Suitable for block design, Rutherford cables, ribbons • Method to optimize cross-sections [E. Rochepault et al., IEEE 2011]  4 degrees of freedom/block  Minimization of volume, forces…  Easy to implement, fast, precise   No need for Fourier decomposition   No analytical form for saturated iron  Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 8

  9. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design FRESCA2 specifications: [HFM Magnet Design Working Group] • Nb3Sn • 100 mm aperture • 13 T bore field Conductor section minimization: • 13 % margin • harmonics < 1 unit • stress < 100 Mpa Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 9

  10. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 1. 2D cross-section design HE-LHC specifications: [Rossi, Todesco] • Bi2212, Nb3Sn, NbTi • Grading • 40 mm aperture • 20 T bore field Financial cost Nb3Sn high J minimization: Nb3Sn low J • 20 % margin Bi2212 • aligned blocks NbTi Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 10

  11. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design • 3D model for the computation of field in space  Analytic formulas for blocks & arcs [G. Aubert, forthcoming book]  Suitable for a block design + “pancake model” + = Straight part • Method to optimize dipole ends [E. Rochepault et al., Numelec 2012]  6 degrees of freedom/block  Minimization of the harmonic integrals along the tube  Need for Fourier decomposition  Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 11

  12. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design 2D optimization : 3D optimization : • 4 layers • 5 pancakes • 100 mm aperture • ∫B 3 dz = 0 • 13 T bore field • ∫B 5 dz = 0.145 T.m • 13 % margin • B 3 = B 5 = B 7 = B 9 = B 11 = 0 500 mm end  Tricky cutting Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 12

  13. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design • 3D model for the computation of harmonic integrals  Analytic formulas for geodesic strips [G. Aubert, forthcoming book]  Suitable for ribbons, approximation of Rutherford cables Radial Horizontal  Sector coils  Block design • Method to optimize dipole ends  1 degree of freedom/strip  Formulas for integrated harmonics  Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 13

  14. II. Theoretical work : Magnetic Design 2. 3D coil-ends design 2D optimization : 3D optimization : • 1 angular sector • 2 parts • 100 mm aperture • minimum length • 1.15 T bore field • ∫B 3 dz = 0 • B 3 = 0 350 mm end Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 14

  15. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 15

  16. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 1. Critical current measurements Are quenches stable when the pressure is applied ? Does cooling has a beneficial effect on quenches ? • CEA experiment: design of a new sample holder  U shape, adjustable force on the cable  Current measurement on a strand  Background field: up to 11 T  Ceramic insulation FEM Modeling Drawing Assembly Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 16

  17. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 1. Critical current measurements • Collaboration with CERN: FRESCA experiment  2 cables, soldered at the bottom  Adjustable pressure  Quench measurement on the cable  Background field: up to 9 T  3 types of insulation Ceramic Epoxy impregnated Wrapped Impregnation Strand Tape Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 17

  18. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 1. Critical current measurements • No degradation Quenches at high fields Vs applied pressure 1,2 at very low pressure 1,0 • Unacceptable degradation Impregnated at low pressure Wrapped 0,8 0,75 Ceramic Iq/Ic0 • Irreversible degradation Ceramic strand 0,6 when pressure released 0,4 50-130 10-50 0,2 0,0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Pressure sensitive films after 40 MPa P (MPa) [E. Rochepault et al., IEEE 2012], [S. Le Naour, CERN report, 2012]  Non-impregnated cables cannot withstand even a small pressure consistent with observations reported in literature Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 18

  19. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 2. Improvement outlooks Sintered ceramics can resist potentially up to 5 GPa pressures ! How to increase the mechanical strength of a ceramic insulation ? • Improve the sintering  650°C too low for ceramic sintering  maybe applicable to other superconductors (Nb3Al, MgB2, HTS…) ? • Fill the inter-strand interstices Strand Tape Ceramic Old process Aim • The more mechanical strength, the less porosity  heat evacuation   but thermal conductivity still 10-20x higher than resins ! Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 19

  20. III. Experimental work : Ceramic Insulation 2. Improvement outlooks • Tests on different materials, different processes  Mechanical characterizations on cable stacks and mini-racetracks Cable stack Deformation under the press  Presently no ceramic insulation withstands pressures > 40 MPa Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 20

  21. IV. Conclusion Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 21

  22. IV. Conclusion 1. Contribution to high field magnets • Theoretical work:  Development of a 2D code and two 3D codes for magnet optimization  Proposition of 2D designs for actual projects  Proposition of 3D designs for Nb3Sn dipoles • Experimental work:  Design of an experiment to measure critical current of Nb3Sn cables  Experimental testing of Nb3Sn cables  Research on new insulation methods Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 22

  23. IV. Conclusion 2. Interests in LARP • Skills acquired in high field magnets design, both theoretical…  Mastering of field computation formulas  Computation of high field magnet configurations  Good knowledge of optimization programming … and experimental  Design of an experiment  Preparation & testing of superconducting cables (with all the issues !) • A good experience (and a lot of interest) in high field magnets:  I already worked with CERN  I followed an high field dipole project • LARP is a great opportunity:  High field magnets projects  Strong CERN partnership  4 laboratories of excellence with famous records in magnet technology Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 23

  24. Thanks for your attention ! Some questions ? Etienne Rochepault – Toohig Presentation 07/05/12 24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend