HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index Quality Workplace Index - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

headlinejobs quality workplace index quality workplace
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index Quality Workplace Index - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index Quality Workplace Index HeadlineJobs st Half ) ( 2009 1 st Half ) ( 2009 1 Reported by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept. (July 2009) Stop Searching, Start Matching HKUPOP Agenda Agenda Stop


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Stop Searching, Start Matching

HKUPOP

HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index Quality Workplace Index

( 2009 1 ( 2009 1st

st Half )

Half )

Reported by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept. (July 2009)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

1

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Agenda Agenda

  • Survey Methodology

Survey Methodology

  • Survey Findings

Survey Findings – – Job seeking rate amid economic recession Job seeking rate amid economic recession – – Job satisfaction amid economic recession Job satisfaction amid economic recession – – Work stress amid economic recession Work stress amid economic recession

  • Q&A

Q&A 1.

  • 1. Employees

Employees 2.

  • 2. Job

Job-

  • seekers

seekers 3.

  • 3. Employers

Employers

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

2

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Survey Methodology Survey Methodology

Interviewing Approach Computer-Aided Telephone Interview (CATI) May 11-20, 2009 Fieldwork Period Target Respondents HK working population of age 18 or above Sample Size N = 1,006 Survey Design Co-developed by HeadlineJobs and HKUPOP Target Respondents HeadlineJobs visitors (N=339) Main Survey: Working Class Main Survey: Working Class Supplementary Survey: Active Job Supplementary Survey: Active Job-

  • Seekers

Seekers Interviewing Approach Online survey Weighting Information sourced from C&SD - General Household Survey (Jan-Mar 2009) on HK working population of age 15+

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

3

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

5 Main Drivers to 5 Main Drivers to Job Satisfaction Job Satisfaction

Compensation Compensation Recognition Recognition Relationship Relationship Job Nature Job Nature Advancement Advancement

  • Safe Working Environment
  • Job Security
  • Salary
  • Benefit
  • Work Flexibility
  • Relationship with Supervisor/Management
  • Management Recognition
  • Full play to Potentials and Autonomy
  • Relationship with Co-workers
  • Networking
  • Contribution to the Organization
  • Job Nature and Meaningfulness
  • Job Variety
  • Corporate Culture
  • Professional Development
  • Career Advancement Opportunities

Employees Employees’ ’ Job Job Satisfaction Satisfaction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

4

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Survey Findings on Survey Findings on Overall Job Overall Job-

  • seeking Rate

seeking Rate

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

5

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

HK working population of age 18 or above HK working population of age 18 or above Job seeking rate amid economic recession Job seeking rate amid economic recession

23% 20% 20% 16% 17%

3.3% 3.3% 3.6% 3.8% 5.3%

0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%

08Q1 08Q2 08Q3 08Q4 09H1

% of Job-seeker among employed population

0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16%

C&SD unemployment rate (%)

% of Job-seeker among working population C&SD unemployment rate (Provisional figures for Feb-Apr 09)

* Small sample size (<30) Base: HK working population of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

Changes from 08Q2 to 09H1

  • Directors/VPs* (19% 27%)
  • Managers/Dept Heads (20% 16%)
  • Officers (22% 18%)
  • Clericals (21% 17%)
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

6

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Survey Findings on Survey Findings on Employees Employees

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

7

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employees Employees Importance of Importance of 16 factors 16 factors of job satisfaction amid economic recession

  • f job satisfaction amid economic recession

Impor-

tance

08Q2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Salary Safe Working Environment Relationship with Co-workers Job Security Management Recognition Relationship with Supervisor/Management Benefits Professional Development Full Play to Potentials and Autonomy Contribution to the Organization Job Nature and Meaningfulness Career Advancement Opportunities Corporate Culture Networking Job Variety Work Flexibility

Base: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

“Importance” refers to the level of importance of the 16 rated factors of job satisfaction.

09H1 Safe Working Environment Job Security Salary Relationship with Co-workers Relationship with Supervisor/Management Management Recognition Benefits Professional Development Full Play to Potentials and Autonomy Contribution to the Organization Job Nature and Meaningfulness Corporate Culture Networking Career Advancement Opportunities Job Variety Work Flexibility

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

8

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employees Employees Job satisfaction level amid economic recession Job satisfaction level amid economic recession

54% 49% 54% 55% 58% 9% 9% 11% 12% 10%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

08Q1 08Q2 08Q3 08Q4 09H1

Percentage (%) Satisfied Employees Dissatisfied Employees

“Satisfied” refers to the percentage of respondents who were very satisfied or quite satisfied with their current post of work. “Dissatisfied” refers to the percentage of respondents who were not quite satisfied or not satisfied at all with their current post of work.

Base: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

9

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employees Employees Layoff or salary reduction to mitigate downturn? Layoff or salary reduction to mitigate downturn?

Base: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

Em ployees Layoff

17% 17%

Salary reduction

79% 79%

Don’t know

4% 4%

In face of poor economy, would you rather see your In face of poor economy, would you rather see your company company lay off some staffs lay off some staffs or

  • r reduce salary for all

reduce salary for all? ?

Q

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

10

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employees Employees Work stress amid economic recession Work stress amid economic recession

Has your job become Has your job become more more stressful, stressful, less less stressful or stressful or remained remained unchanged unchanged amid the global economic tsunami? amid the global economic tsunami?

Base: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

Em ployees More stressful

43% 43%

Unchanged

54% 54%

Less stressful

3% 3% Q

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

11

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Chief Executives* Chief Executives* Directors/Vice Presidents* Directors/Vice Presidents* Supervisors/Executives/Officers Supervisors/Executives/Officers Managers/Department Heads Managers/Department Heads

0% 0% 73% 73% 55% 55% 49% 49%

Serving Staffs/Shop Sales Serving Staffs/Shop Sales Clerks/Administrators Clerks/Administrators

47% 47% 42% 42%

Employees Employees Work stress by Work stress by job position job position amid economic recession amid economic recession

* Small sample size (<30) Base: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

More stressful (%) More stressful (%)

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

12

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Male: 46% Male: 46% With child under 16: With child under 16: 46% 46% Age 60+*: 53% Age 60+*: 53%

Overall: 43% Overall: 43%

Employees Employees Work stress by Work stress by demographic groups demographic groups amid economic recession amid economic recession

More stressful (%) More stressful (%)

* Small sample size (<30) Target: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

13

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employees Employees Work stress by Work stress by industry industry amid economic recession amid economic recession

Insurance*: 68% Insurance*: 68% Banking/Finance: Banking/Finance: 60% 60% Mass Media*: 66% Mass Media*: 66% Restaurant/Hotel/Tourism: Restaurant/Hotel/Tourism: 54% 54% Telecommunication*: 68% Telecommunication*: 68% Manufacturing: Manufacturing: 67% 67%

* Small sample size (<30) Target: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

More stressful (%) More stressful (%)

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

14

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employees Employees Cause of increased work stress amid economic recession Cause of increased work stress amid economic recession

What cause your increase of workplace stress? What cause your increase of workplace stress? 53% 4 5% 4 3% 31% 30 % 26 % 12%

Heavier Workload Dem ands from Supervisors Fear of Layoff Low Morale in Workplace Stress in Life Fear of Salary Reduction Conflict with Co-workers

Base: Employees who became more stressful amid the global economic tsunami

Q

Target: Employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

15

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Survey Findings on Survey Findings on Active Job Active Job-

  • seekers

seekers ( (HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Visitors) Visitors)

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

16

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Visitors (active job Visitors (active job-

  • seekers)

seekers) Job satisfaction level amid economic recession Job satisfaction level amid economic recession

54% 49% 54% 55% 58%

25% 27% 22%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

08Q1 08Q2 08Q3 08Q4 09H1

% Satisfied

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%

Employees HeadlineJobs Visitors

“% Satisfied” refers to the percentage of respondents who were very satisfied or quite satisfied with their current post of work.

HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Visitors Visitors 64% Female 64% Female 81% Age 18 81% Age 18-

  • 39

39 65% Tertiary Educated 65% Tertiary Educated 8% Senior 8% Senior-

  • Management

Management 21% Mid 21% Mid-

  • Management

Management 37% Executive/ Supervisor 37% Executive/ Supervisor

Source1: HeadlineJobs visitors, HeadlineJobs Online Quality Workplace Index Source2: Employees of age 18 or above, HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

17

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Visitors (active job Visitors (active job-

  • seekers)

seekers) Importance of Importance of 16 factors 16 factors of job satisfaction amid economic recession

  • f job satisfaction amid economic recession

Impor tance

Employee 1 Safe Working Environment Job Security Salary Relationship with Coworker Relationship with Supervisor/ Management Management Recognition Benefits Professional Development Full play to Potentials and Autonomy Contribution to the Organization Job Nature & Meaningfulness Corporate Culture Networking Career Advancement Opportunities Job Variety Work Flexibility 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

“Importance” refers to the level of importance of the 16 rated factors to job satisfaction.

HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Visitors Visitors 64% Female 64% Female 81% Age 18 81% Age 18-

  • 39

39 65% Tertiary Educated 65% Tertiary Educated 8% Senior 8% Senior-

  • Management

Management 21% Mid 21% Mid-

  • Management

Management 37% Executive/ Supervisor 37% Executive/ Supervisor

HeadlineJobs Visitors Salary Job Security Relationship with Supervisor/ Management Benefits* Management Recognition* Relationship with Coworker Career Advancement Opportunities Professional Development Safe Working Environment Full play to Potentials and Autonomy Job Nature & Meaningfulness Contribution to the Organization Corporate Culture Networking Job Variety Work Flexibility

* Same ranking Source1: HeadlineJobs visitors, HeadlineJobs Online Quality Workplace Index Source2: Employees of age 18 or above, HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

18

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

HeadlineJobs HeadlineJobs Visitors (active job Visitors (active job-

  • seekers)

seekers) Work stress amid economic recession Work stress amid economic recession

Has your job become Has your job become more more stressful, stressful, less less stressful or stressful or remained remained unchanged unchanged amid the global economic tsunami? amid the global economic tsunami?

Em ployees HeadlineJobs Visitors More stressful

43% 43% 58% 58%

Unchanged

54% 54% 29% 29%

Less stressful

3% 3% 7% 7% Q

HeadlineJob HeadlineJob Visitors Visitors 64% Female 64% Female 81% Age 18 81% Age 18-

  • 39

39 65% Tertiary Educated 65% Tertiary Educated 8% Senior 8% Senior-

  • Management

Management 21% Mid 21% Mid-

  • Management

Management 37% Executive/ Supervisor 37% Executive/ Supervisor

Source1: HeadlineJobs visitors, HeadlineJobs Online Quality Workplace Index Source2: Employees of age 18 or above, HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

19

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Survey Findings on Survey Findings on Employers Employers

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

20

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employers Employers Perceived employees Perceived employees’ ’ job satisfaction amid economic recession job satisfaction amid economic recession

54% 49% 54% 55% 58% 80% 71% 82% 70% 63%

20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

08Q1 08Q2 08Q3 08Q4 09H1

% Satisfied Employees' Perspective Employers' Perspective

“% Satisfied” refers to the percentage of respondents who were very satisfied or quite satisfied with their current post of work. Target: Employers and employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

21

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Employers Employers Work stress amid economic recession Work stress amid economic recession

Has your job become Has your job become more more stressful, stressful, less less stressful or stressful or remained remained unchanged unchanged amid the global economic tsunami? amid the global economic tsunami?

* Small sample size (<30) Target: Employers and employees of age 18 or above Source: HKUPOP, HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index

Em ployees Em ployers More stressful

43% 43% 54% 54% 3% 3% 62% 62%

Unchanged

35% 35%

Less stressful

4% 4% Q

Causes of increased work stress* 35% Fear of layoff 32% Workload 32% Stress in life

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

22

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Dr Chung Dr Chung’ ’s Observations s Observations

  • This quality workplace index reflects the psychological impact of the current economic

situation on employers and employees.

  • These figures reflect our workforce’s quality of life and have a high reference value.

Employers can now better understand the changes in their staff’s mentality during the economic downturn.

  • This will help them take prompt and appropriate actions to maintain staff morale.
  • Employees can also make use of the survey findings to fine tune their expectations

and attitudes.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

23

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Q&A Q&A

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Prepared by Sing Tao Research and Development Dept (Jul 09)

24

HeadlineJobs Quality Workplace Index 2009H1 – Presentation

Stop Searching, Start Matching

Thank You! Thank You!