HAZARDOUS BACKWARD IN TIME CON- TINUATION IN NONLINEAR PARABOLIC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

hazardous backward in time con tinuation in nonlinear
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

HAZARDOUS BACKWARD IN TIME CON- TINUATION IN NONLINEAR PARABOLIC - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

HAZARDOUS BACKWARD IN TIME CON- TINUATION IN NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS AND DEBLURRING NON- LINEARLY BLURRED IMAGERY . by ALFRED S. CARASSO, ACMD Identify sources of groundwater pollution Solve Advection Dispersion Equation back- ward in


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HAZARDOUS BACKWARD IN TIME CON- TINUATION IN NONLINEAR PARABOLIC EQUATIONS AND DEBLURRING NON- LINEARLY BLURRED IMAGERY. by ALFRED S. CARASSO, ACMD

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Identify sources of groundwater pollution Solve Advection Dispersion Equation back- ward in time, given present state g(x, y): Ct = ∇.{D∇C} − ∇.{vC}, 0 < t ≤ T, C(x, y, T) = g(x, y). (1)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

DEBLURRING HUBBLE GALAXY IMAGES

Original Tadpole Deblurred Image

Solve logarithmic diffusion equation back- ward in time, given blurred image g(x, y): wt = −

  • λ log{1 + γ(−∆)β}
  • w,

0 < t ≤ T, w(x, y, T) = g(x, y). (2)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

BACKWARD PARABOLIC EQNS VERY ILL-POSED BACKWARD UNIQUENESS AND STABILITY ??? Linear or nonlinear parabolic equn wt = Lw, t > 0. Let w1(x, t), w2(x, t) be any two solutions. Let F(t) = w1(., t) − w2(., t) 2 (L2 norm) Logarithmic Convexity techniques lead to F(t) ≤ {F(0)}1−µ(t){F(T)}µ(t), 0 ≤ t ≤ T. H¨

  • lder exponent µ(t) satisfies 0 ≤ µ(t) ≤ 1, µ(T) = 1,

µ(0) = 0, µ(t) > 0 for t > 0, and µ(t) ↓ 0 as t ↓ 0. If solutions satisfy prescribed bound w(., 0) 2≤ M, then F(0) ≤ 2M. Hence F(T) = 0 ⇒ F(t) = 0 on [0, T]. This implies Backward Uniqueness. Fix any small δ > 0. Then F(T) ≤ δ ⇒ F(t) ≤ 2M 1−µ(t)δµ(t)

  • n [0, T]. This implies Backward Stability.
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Precarious backward stability F(t) ≤ 2M1−µ(t)δµ(t).

Autonomous, selfadjoint ⇒ µ(t) = t/T. Otherwise, µ(t) sublinear in t, possibly with fast decay to zero.

Autonomous, linear self adjoint problem Nonlinear problem

Behavior of Holder exponent in backward problems

wt = ectwxx, 0 < x < π, wx(0, t) = wx(π, t) = 0, t ≥ 0. µ(t) = {1 − exp(ct)}/{1 − exp(cT)}, 0 ≤ t ≤ T.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

wt = 0.05 e(0.025x+0.05t)wx

  • x + {sin(4πx)} wx, t ≥ 0,

wred(x, 0) = e3x sin2(3πx), w(−1, t) = w(1, t) = 0.

t=0 t=0 t=1 Effective non uniqueness in non self adjoint case

Either red or green initial values at t=0, terminate on black curve at t=1 to within 1.4E−3 pointwise, and L2 relative error = 2.3E−4.

slide-7
SLIDE 7

THE FUNNEL CONJECTURE

FUNNEL EFFECT IN PARABOLIC EQUATIONS

slide-8
SLIDE 8

EXPLORE 2D BACKWARD CONTINUATION

Nonlinear parabolic initial value problem on Ω × (0, T) wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awwx, +b(wcos2w)wy, w(x, y, 0) = g(x, y). Ω square 0 < x, y < 1, T > 0, Zero Neumann on ∂Ω. r(w) = exp(0.025w), q(x, y, t) = e10t(1 + 5e2ysinπx). γ = 8.5×10−4, a, b constants ≥ 0, yet to be prescribed. FIND INTERESTING INITIAL VALUES g(x, y) ????

slide-9
SLIDE 9

EXAMPLES OF DATA

Gaussian inital data More interesting data

slide-10
SLIDE 10

MORE EXAMPLES OF DATA 8 bit images with values between 0 and 255.

MRI Brain image Pyramids image

slide-11
SLIDE 11

NONLINEAR PARABOLIC IMAGE BLURRING wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awwx + b(wcos2w)wy Forward problem well-posed in L2(Ω). For any initial value w(x, y, 0) = g(x, y), unique solution w(x, y, T) ex- ists at time T. Nonlinear solution operator ΛT well- defined on L2(Ω) by formula ΛTg(x, y) = w(x, y, T). w(x, y, T) ∈ very restricted class of smooth functions. Restrict attention to 256×256 images. Using centered space differencing, with ∆x = ∆y = 1/256, ∆t = 3.0E−7, march forward 400 time steps to T = 1.2E−4, using following explicit finite difference scheme W n+1 = W n + ∆tγR(W n)∇.{Qn∇W n} + aW nW n

x

+ b(W ncos2W n)W n

y ,

n = 0, 399, W 0 = g(x, y). (3) Discrete nonlinear solution operator ΛT

d well-defined

  • n 256 × 256 images by formula ΛT

d W 0 = W 400.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

NONLINEAR BACKWARD CONTINUATION Very little known about nonlinear multidimensional backward in time parabolic equations. Computation of such problems lies in uncharted waters. wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awwx + b(wcos2w)wy Solution operator ΛTg(x, y) = w(x, y, T), defined on L2. VanCittert iterative procedure Originated in Spectroscopy in 1930’s. 1D Linear con- volution integral equations, with explicitly known ker- nels, assumed to have positive Fourier transforms. With f(x, y) ≈ w(x, y, T), fixed 0 < λ < 1, consider hm+1(x, y) = hm(x, y)+λ

  • f(x, y) − ΛThm(x, y)
  • , m ≥ 1,

where h1(x, y) = λf(x, y). Convergence ⇒ ΛTh∞(x, y) = f(x, y). Mathematically impossible with noisy data f(x, y).

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Nevertheless, Van Cittert is valuable tool in large va- riety of 2D nonlinear backward equations. In many cases, L∞ norm of residual, f − ΛThm ∞, decays quasi-monotonically to small value after a finite num- ber N of iterations, and hN(x, y) is useful approximation to w(x, y, 0). Cases also exist where method fails !!!. VANCITTERT NONLINEAR DEBLURRING Given 256 × 256 blurred image f(x, y) ≈ w(x, y, T), use above centered difference scheme to do ∗ ∗ ∗ Hm+1 = Hm + λ

  • f(x, y) − ΛT

d Hm

, m ≥ 1, ∗ ∗∗ where H1 = λf(x, y). Here, ΛT

d Hm means marching ex-

plicit difference scheme 400 time steps forward, using image Hm(x, y) as initial data W 0. Self-regularizing property of VanCittert Deblurring Iterative process recovers low frequency information in first several iterations. Many more iterations needed to recover high-frequency information. Interactively stopping iteration after finitely many steps, can recover deblurred image relatively free from noise. (Unless method fails for that image !!!)

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Diagnostic image metrics L1 and TV norms Blurring and deblurring experiments will use following norms to evaluate results f 1=

  • (256)−2 256

x,y=1 |f(x, y)|

  • ,

∇f 1= (256)−2 255

x,y=1

  • {fx(x, y)}2 + {fy(x, y)}21/2 .

Peak signal to noise image quality metric (PSNR) ASSUMES KNOWN IDEAL IMAGE k(x, y). Let h(x, y) be degraded version of ideal k(x, y), ∗ ∗ ∗ PSNR = −20 log10{ h − k 2 /255} ∗ ∗∗. PSNR = ∞ if h(x, y) = k(x, y), and PSNR decreases monotonically as h(x, y) diverges from k(x, y).

slide-15
SLIDE 15

wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w}+awwx+b(wcos2w)wy

r(w) = exp(0.025w), q(x, y, t) = e10t(1 + 5e2ysinπx).

NONLINEAR PARABOLIC BLURRING OF SHARP MRI BRAIN IMAGE (A) Original sharp image (B) Blur with a=b=0 (C) Blur with a=1.25, b=0.6

Behavior in above nonlinear blurring Image f 1 ∇f 1 PSNR Sharp A 59 3360 ∞ Blurred B 55 1740 25 Blurred C 55 1770 20

slide-16
SLIDE 16

wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awwx + b(wcos2w)wy

(B) Blur with a=b=0 (C) Blur with a=1.25, b=0.6 After 10 VanCittert iterns. After 100 VanCittert iterns.

NONLINEAR DEBLURRING OF MRI BRAIN IMAGE

Behavior in above nonlinear deblurring Image f 1 ∇f 1 PSNR Deblurred B 59 2980 34 Deblurred C 63 4780 17

slide-17
SLIDE 17

wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w}+awwx+b(wcos2w)wy

NONLINEAR PARABOLIC BLURRING OF SHARP FACE IMAGE (D) Original sharp image (E) Blur with a=0, b=0.6 (F) Blur with a=0.83, b=0.6

Behavior in above nonlinear blurring Image f 1 ∇f 1 PSNR Sharp D 107 3100 ∞ Blurred E 101 1580 24 Blurred F 101 1550 20

slide-18
SLIDE 18

wt = γr(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awwx + b(wcos2w)wy

(E) Blur with a=0, b=0.6 (F) Blur with a=0.83, b=0.6 After 20 VanCittert iterns. After 100 VanCittert iterns.

NONLINEAR DEBLURRING OF FACE IMAGE

Behavior in above nonlinear deblurring Image f 1 ∇f 1 PSNR Deblurred E 106 2580 29 Deblurred F 112 5800 18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

wt = γs(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w}+c

  • |w|wx+d(wcos2w)wy

s(w) = 1.0 + 0.00125w2, q = e10t(1 + 5e2ysinπx).

NONLINEAR PARABOLIC BLURRING OF SHARP CARRIER IMAGE (G) Original sharp image (H) Blur with c=2.5, d=0.3 (I) Blur with c=2.5, d=1.5

Behavior in above nonlinear blurring Image f 1 ∇f 1 PSNR Sharp G 139 4760 ∞ Blurred H 134 1720 20 Blurred I 134 1770 20

slide-20
SLIDE 20

wt = γs(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + c

  • |w|wx + d(wcos2w)wy

(H) Blur with c=2.5, d=0.3 (I) Blur with c=2.5, d=1.5 After 100 VanCittert iterns. After 100 VanCittert iterns.

NONLINEAR DEBLURRING OF CARRIER IMAGE

Behavior in above nonlinear deblurring Image f 1 ∇f 1 PSNR Deblurred H 137 3700 23 Deblurred I 141 7700 18

slide-21
SLIDE 21

wt = γs(w)∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + c

  • |w|wx + d(wcos2w)wy

DEBLURRING CARRIER IMAGE WITH FALSE VALUES

After 100 VanCittert iterations Use false c=2.5, d=0.3, to deblur image blurred with c=2.5, d=1.5. FAILED BLIND DECONVOLUTION EXPERIMENT

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Original M51 After Linnik deblur Blind deconvolution of KITT PEAK M51 image

slide-23
SLIDE 23

LINEAR NONSELFADJOINT PARABOLIC PDE

wt = γr∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awx + bwy

r = 30, q = e10t(1 + 5e2ysinπx) a = 65, b = 35.

LINEAR NONSELFADJOINT PARABOLIC BLURRING Original sharp Sydney image Blurred Sydney image

slide-24
SLIDE 24

LINEAR NONSELFADJOINT PARABOLIC PDE

wt = γr∇.{q(x, y, t)∇w} + awx + bwy

r = 30, q = e10t(1 + 5e2ysinπx) a = 65, b = 35.

Blurred Sydney image After 20 VanCittert iterations LINEAR NONSELFADJOINT PARABOLIC DEBLURRING