HAWTHORNE PUBLIC SCHOOLS
TESTING PRESENTATION OCTOBER 2018
HAWTHORNE PUBLIC SCHOOLS TESTING PRESENTATION OCTOBER 2018 NJ - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
HAWTHORNE PUBLIC SCHOOLS TESTING PRESENTATION OCTOBER 2018 NJ Required Standardized Assessments PARCC (Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers) New Jersey Student Learning Assessment - Science (NJSLA-S) DLM
TESTING PRESENTATION OCTOBER 2018
College and Careers)
(NJSLA-S)
The 2018 PARCC ELA was administered to all students grades 3-11 and the PARCC Math was administered to students in grades 3-8, as well as those enrolled in Algebra I, Geometry, and Algebra II. Students in grades 5, 8 and 11 participated in an inaugural administration of the New Jersey Student Learning Assessment - Science (NJSLA-S). Special Education Students with significant challenges participated in alternate assessments for English Language Arts, Math, and Science (DLM). All students in the Class of 2021 and beyond must pass PARCC ELA Grade 10 and PARCC Algebra I.
The purpose of this analysis is to answer these questions:
How well did this particular group of students do in comparison to peers across the state? How have we improved at each grade level from one year to the next, keeping in mind the tested population is different? How did the same group of students grow and change from
Where are our strengths and what skills are in the greatest need of improvement?
Spring Administration 2018
A Glimpse at Hawthorne Students’ Performance on PARCC ELA
Demographic Data: Percent of Students in Subgroups Who Met
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 9 Grade 10 Grade 11 Female 69.8 77.5 75.6 67.5 69.9 72 43.8 41.7 66.7 Male 57.5 61.1 63.4 45.6 51.6 55.7 30.3 35.1 34.2 Economically Disadvantaged 41.9 61 55.4 38 35 60.7 17.1 16.3 26.8 Students with Disabilities 31.3 39.4 26.3 19.2 27.5 26.5 17.4 13.6 33.3 ELL 16.7 37.5 33.3 100
Longitudinal Data: Performance Over 4 Years
ELA 3-5 Comparison of Performance Levels by School, District & State
GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5
ELA 6-8 Comparison of Performance Levels by School & State
GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8
ELA 9-11 Comparison of Performance Levels by School & State
GRADE 9 GRADE 10 GRADE 11
Cohort Data: Student Performance between 2015-2018
PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Balanced Literacy Approach- Phonics First, Workshop Models Data Analysis - Vertical articulation, LinkLogic, PARCC Data groups Remediation & Enrichment - Achieve3000, Smarty Ants, SNAP & READ, NWEA MAP Literacy Consultants - Coaching & Modeling Best Practices Targeted Support - BSI, ELL Morning and lunchtime intervention Student-Centered Classroom & Positive Behavior Intervention Strategies (PBIS)
Spring Administration 2018
A Glimpse at Hawthorne Students’ Performance on PARCC MATH
Demographic Data: Percent of Students in Subgroups Who Met or Exceeded Expectations
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Algebra 1 Geometry Algebra II Female
50.5 48.9 46.3 40 38.4 33.3 40.6 29.1 16.1
Male
53.4 47.4 47.6 35.9 39.8 28.2 36.1 13.3 6.5
Economically Disadvantaged
34.1 28.3 32.1 28 17.5 26.7 27.3 10.5
Students with Disabilities
28.1 33.3 21.1 15.4 12.5 18.2 7.4
ELL
11.1
MATH 3-5 Comparison of Performance Levels by School, District & State
GRADE 3 GRADE 4 GRADE 5
MATH 6-8 Comparison of Performance Levels by School & State
GRADE 6 GRADE 7 GRADE 8
MATH Algebra I, Geometry, & Algebra II Comparison of Performance Levels by School & State
Algebra I Geometry Algebra II
A Deeper Look at Algebra 1 - Cohort 2021, 2022, 2023
Cohort Data: Student Performance between 2015-2018
PROGRAMS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Remediation & Enrichment - IXL, KHAN ACADEMY, BIG IDEAs, EDUCERE Data Analysis - Vertical articulation, LinkLogic, PARCC Data groups Curricular revisions and alignment Conquer Mathematics K-8 & Algebra 1 - All grades and schools represented Targeted Support - BSI, ELL, Algebra 1 morning and lunchtime intervention Station to Station: Small Group Instruction in a Diverse Math Classroom, The Student-Centered Classroom & Positive Behavior Intervention Strategies (PBIS)
I LOVED the training. We began with Algebra, and I loved the hands-on strategy that Nancy showed us for rounding. She had us balance the base ten blocks on top of one another felt like it was the first time I had a VISUAL for my students who do not understand rounding. I knew that my colleagues and I were teaching rounding starting on the day after my training, so I made sure to rush to each classroom at 8:30 a.m. to show them the base 10 techniques. The Conquer Math workshop was fantastic!Since going to Nancy's workshop, I have been allowing my students more time with manipulatives, and focusing on the second stage of learning, before going to the symbolic stage. It has given me better insight into what my students truly know in math. I can't wait to go to the second work shop. The class was great - chuck full of great information I
where I let the students persevere through literal
them try to figure things out but we are committed to doing more and more of that.
Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Grade 8 Grade 11 ELA - # of Students Tested
5 6 3 2 3 2 5
ELA - % of Students At or Above Target
40 100 33 50 100 50 40
Math - # of Students Tested
5 6 3 2 3 2 5
Math - % of Students At or Above Target
40 83 50 50 40
Science - # of Students Tested
3 2 5
Science - % of Students At or Above Target
33 50 40
statements for each standard and identifying strengths and weaknesses.
professional development will align to the district’s Strategic Plan.