H AMPTON R OADS C ROSSING S TUDY S UPPLEMENTAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

h ampton r oads c rossing s tudy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

H AMPTON R OADS C ROSSING S TUDY S UPPLEMENTAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agenda Items #16B and #17 H AMPTON R OADS C ROSSING S TUDY S UPPLEMENTAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT S TATEMENT S TATUS R EPORT October 20, 2016 Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization: Robert Crum, HRTPO Executive Director


slide-1
SLIDE 1

HAMPTON ROADS CROSSING STUDY

SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

STATUS REPORT

October 20, 2016

Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization: Robert Crum, HRTPO Executive Director Kevin Page, HRTAC Executive Director

Agenda Items #16B and #17

slide-2
SLIDE 2

ALTERNATIVE A

  • Improvements to I-64

between I-664 (Hampton) and I-564 (Norfolk)

  • Widens existing facility to six-

lanes

  • Improvements would be

largely confined to existing right-of-way

  • Cost: $3.3 Billion (2016$)

– includes a 40% Contingency

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

ALTERNATIVE B

Includes:

  • All Alternative A

improvements

  • New bridge/tunnel across

Elizabeth River

  • New highway along east

side of Craney Island to Route 164 (Portsmouth)

  • Widen Route 164 to I-664
  • Cost: $6.6 Billion (2016$)

– includes a 40% Contingency

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ALTERNATIVE C

Includes:

  • Widen I-664 from I-64

(Hampton) to I-264 (Chesapeake)

  • New connector between I-664

and I-564

  • New highway along east side
  • f Craney Island to Route 164

(Portsmouth)

  • Transit only lanes
  • Cost: $12.5 Billion (2016$)

– includes a 40% Contingency

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ALTERNATIVE D

  • Includes all components of

Alternatives B and C without transit only lanes

  • Cost: $11.9 Billion (2016$)

– includes a 40% Contingency

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

OBSERVATIONS

  • Alternatives C and D appear to have major

challenges that could prevent them from being the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA)

  • Alternatives C and D can not meet fiscal

constraint within the Long Range Transportation Plan

  • Alternatives A and B seem to have the most

potential to be the LEDPA

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

SELECTED ALTERNATIVE MUST BE:

  • Able to be constructed
  • Able to be Permitted and Funded in

constrained plan

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

NEPA PROCESS: PHASED APPROACH

FOR IMPLEMENTATION

Preferred Alternative LEDPA FEIS Phased ROD

8

Segment 1 ROD – April 2014

FEIS Approved November 2013 Project Length: 75 Miles Estimated Total Project Cost: $4.7B - $7.3B (2017$)

I-64 Corridor Project: Hampton Roads to Richmond

HRCS SEIS

Map Source: Google

Segment 2 ROD – February 2016 Segment 3 ROD – August 2016 Richmond ROD requested – August 2016

slide-9
SLIDE 9

INPUT FROM LOCALITIES

  • Improvements needed to HRBT
  • Transit connections across water are

important

  • Alternative D represents a long-term vision

for the region

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

LRTP VISION PLAN

  • Alternative D represents the projects that

will meet the Region’s long term needs

  • While there are permitting and financing

challenges, we need to start advancing in segments

  • One approach:

– Incorporate Alternative D projects into LRTP Vision Plan – Identify a LEDPA to begin construction of projects based on project readiness

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

HRTAC ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS OBSERVATIONS

11

  • The accelerated HRTF bonding and bi-furcated credit

structure improves financial feasibility

  • Scenarios that do not work within the 2040 FCLRTP as

Adopted by the HRTPO

– SEIS Plan of Finance Alt B-1 & B-2 can be completed as well as HRB II by 2040 to keep constrained, other approved 2040 FCLRTP projects are impacted – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt C includes project components that are outside of HRTAC’s scope – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt D, the complete HCP can not be completed by 2040, but some segments can with impacts to the approved 2040 FCLRTP

slide-12
SLIDE 12

HRTAC ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS OBSERVATIONS

  • Scenarios that work within the 2040 FCLRTP as

Adopted by the HRTPO

– SEIS Plan of Finance Alt A Modified as proposed delivers HRBT, HRB II and Bowers Hill (added), Ft. Eustis Boulevard Interchange, and 460/58/13. can be completed under the approved 2040 FCLRTP without impact to other projects – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt B-3 as proposed delivers HRBT, HRB II and Bowers Hill (added), Ft. Eustis Interchange, and 460/58/13. The second segment of Alternative B, I-564 Connector/VA 164 is delivered by 2048 (with HOT tolls) and 2052 (no HOT tolls) following further project development

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Approved Projects HRBT (seg. 8&9) HRB II Bower's Hill Interchange Rt 460/58/13

  • Ft. Eustis

Interchange Total FV Cost Funded by HRTF Bonds Funded by Toll Bonds Funded by HRTF Pay-Go Funded by Other Pay- Go 2040 FCLRTP with HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,031 $1,493 $568 $368 $297 Fiscally Constrained Construction End Year 2022 2024 2031 2031 2035 2035 2040 FCLRTP without HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,131 $1,529 $583 $368 $297 Fiscally Constrained Construction End Year 2022 2025 2032 2032 2035 2035 $8,484 $5,500 $2,234 $8,333 $4,912 $347 $2,324 $750 $750

HRTAC ANALYSIS - SEIS ALTERNATIVE A MODIFIED, 2040 FCLRTP

WITH HRBT AS ‘HARBOR CROSSING PROJECT PHASE I’ - BOWERS HILL

ADDED CONCURRENT WITH HIGH RISE BRIDGE PHASE II – SEPTEMBER 2016 ANALYSIS

13

  • HRBT is the only Harbor Crossing component in Alternative A
  • Alt A can be completed under the approved 2040 FCLRTP without impact

to other projects

  • HRBT, HRB II/Bowers Hill Interchange, the Rt 460/58/13 and the Ft. Eustis

Boulevard Interchange can all be completed within 2040 FCLRTP 2040 FCLRTP

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Approved Projects HRBT (seg. 8&9) HRB II Bower's Hill Interchange Rt 460/58/13

  • Ft. Eustis

Interchange I-564 Connectors (seg. 10&12) VA 164 (seg. 13&14) Total FV Cost Funded by HRTF Bonds Funded by Toll Bonds Funded by HRTF Pay-Go Funded by Other Pay- Go 2040 FCLRTP with HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,031 $1,493 $568 $368 $297 Fiscally Constrained Construction End Year 2022 2024 2031 2031 2035 2035 2040 FCLRTP without HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,131 $1,529 $583 $368 $297 Fiscally Constrained Construction End Year 2022 2025 2032 2032 2035 2035 Approved Projects HRBT (seg. 8&9) HRB II Bower's Hill Interchange Rt 460/58/13

  • Ft. Eustis

Interchange I-564 Connectors (seg. 10&12) VA 164 (seg. 13&14) Total FV Cost Funded by HRTF Bonds Funded by Toll Bonds Funded by HRTF Pay-Go Funded by Other Pay- Go Post 2040 vision plan with HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $6,315 $1,214 Fiscally Constrained Construction End Year 2048 2048 Post 2040 vision plan without HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $6,971 $1,341 Fiscally Constrained Construction End Year 2052 2052 $8,484 $5,500 $2,234 $8,333 $4,912 $347 $2,324 $750 $750 $7,529 $4,448 $1,716 $1,365 $8,312 $5,356 $1,510 $1,447

HRTAC ANALYSIS – ALTERNATIVE B-3 – 2040 FCLRTP WITH HRBT AS

FIRST OF TWO COMPONENTS OF ‘HARBOR CROSSING PROJECT PHASE I’ -

BOWERS HILL ADDED CONCURRENT WITH HIGH RISE BRIDGE PHASE II – SEPTEMBER 2016 ANALYSIS

14

  • HRBT, HRB II/Bowers Hill Interchange, the Rt 460/58/13 and the Ft. Eustis Boulevard Interchange can

all be completed within the 2040 FCLRTP.

  • In the HOT version, a cash injection of $2.9 billion in the 2033/34 time frame from federal grants, state

grants, private equity, or other non-HRTAC sources could accelerate the I-564/VA164 project to a 2040

  • completion. Further study is needed to determine if excess project toll revenue (after TIFIA debt service)

will support returns on private equity near the amount of cash injection needed.

2040 Vision Plan 2040 FCLRTP

slide-15
SLIDE 15

HAMPTON ROADS BELTWAY

PM PEAK HOUR CONGESTION, JUNE 2016

Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Interchange I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge

Programmed for Construction

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Interchange I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge HOV to HOT – Segment 2

Programmed for Construction Under Study

US 460/58/13 Connector 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Interchange I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge HRCS SEIS Alternative A HOV to HOT – Segment 2 US 460/58/13 Connector 18

Programmed for Construction HRCS SEIS Alternative A and Bowers Hill Under Study

Bowers Hill

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Interchange I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge Alternative A Remaining Segments of Alternative D HOV to HOT – Segment 2

Programmed for Construction HRCS SEIS Alternative A and Bowers Hill Under Study Remaining Segments

  • f Alternative D

19 US 460/58/13 Connector Bowers Hill

slide-20
SLIDE 20

REGIONAL PROJECTS: FISCAL-CONSTRAINT

YEAR PROJECT YOE COST ($M) 2018-2022 I-64 Peninsula – Segments 1, 2, and 3 $624 2019-2021 I-64/I-264 Interchange – Phases I & II $347 2020 I-64 Southside/High-Rise Bridge – Phase I $600 2019 US 460/58/13 Connector – PE $5 2024 HRBT $4,031 2031 I-64 Southside/High-Rise Bridge – Phase II $1,493 2031 Bowers Hill Interchange $568 2035 US 460/58/13 Connector $368 2035 I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange $297 Vision Plan I-564/I-664 Connectors (Patriots) I-664/MMMBT VA 164/164 Connector

20