SLIDE 20 Introduction Methods Results Summary Input datasets Comparison of different association scores Top-scoring mutations Compensatory mutations
Comparison on mtu173 and mtu broad datasets
0.25 0.30 0.35
Barplots for AUC; mtu173; positives: 94; negatives: 860
M I O R H R B M ( M I , O R , H ) W S T G H R B M ( W S , T G H ) R B M ( A L L )
0.42 0.44 0.46 0.48 0.50 0.52
Barplots for AUC; mtu_broad; positives: 212; negatives: 667
M I O R H R B M ( M I , O R , H ) W S T G H R B M ( W S , T G H ) R B M ( A L L )
0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50
Barplots for AUC; mtu173; positives: 39; negatives: 452
M I O R H R B M ( M I , O R , H ) W S T G H R B M ( W S , T G H ) R B M ( A L L )
0.50 0.55 0.60
Barplots for AUC; mtu_broad; positives: 74; negatives: 475
M I O R H R B M ( M I , O R , H ) W S T G H R B M ( W S , T G H ) R B M ( A L L )
Rysunek : High-confidence mutations from TBDreamDB are used as positives.
Michal Wozniak GWAMAR: drug resistance-associated mutations