(Grade 11) Learning Services Team Districts Five Year Trend Grades - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

2014 Transitional Colorado Assessment Program (TCAP) Student Achievement Results (Grade 3 – 10) and Colorado ACT (Grade 11)

Learning Services Team

District’s Five Year Trend – Grades 3-10 Reading

Grades 3-10

Writing

Grades 3-10

TSD Continues to outperform State in Reading and Writing

69% 74% 54% 56% 69% 75% 56% 60% 70% 75% 55% 58% 70% 73% 55% 56% 69% 72% 54% 56%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% STATE DISTRICT STATE DISTRICT 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

District’s Five Year Trend – Grades 3-10 Math

Grades 3-10

TSD Continues to outperform State in Math

56% 60% 56% 59% 56% 60% 57% 58% 56% 57%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% STATE DISTRICT 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

District 5 year trend

Content Area 2010 P+% 2011 P+% 2012 P+% 2013 P+% 2014 P+% Reading 74 75 75 73 72 Writing 56 60 58 56 56 Math 60 59 60 58 57 Reading, Writing and Math performance stable over 5 years.

Benchmarked Grades 3-10 Reading TCAP Results at a Glance

No Score Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced State 2013 1% 9% 20% 62% 8% State 2014 1% 10% 20% 62% 7% District 2013 1% 7% 18% 65% 9% District 2014 1% 8% 19% 64% 8%

TSD outperforming state in the % of Unsatisfactory, Partially Proficient, Proficient & Advanced

District % performance levels relative to state

• 3
• 2
• 1

1 2 3 4 No Score Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced 2014 2013

Benchmarked Grades 3-10 Writing TCAP Results at a Glance

No Score Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced State 2013 1% 5% 39% 46% 9% State 2014 1% 5% 40% 45% 9% District 2013 2% 4% 38% 48% 8% District 2014 1% 4% 39% 47% 9% District % performance levels relative to state

TSD outperforming state in the % of Unsatisfactory, Partially Proficient, and Proficient

• 1.5
• 1
• 0.5

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 No Score Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced 2014 2013

Benchmarked Grades 3-10 Math TCAP Results at a Glance

TSD outperforming state in the % of Unsatisfactory and Proficient

No Score Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced State 2013 1% 16% 27% 33% 23% State 2014 1% 16% 26% 33% 24% District 2013 2% 14% 26% 34% 24% District 2014 1% 15% 27% 34% 23%

• 2.5
• 2
• 1.5
• 1
• 0.5

0.5 1 1.5 No Score Unsatisfactory Partially Proficient Proficient Advanced 2014 2013

41% 36% 27% 43% 43% 14% 40% 33% 59% Inc 64% 73% Inc 57% Dec 57% 86% 60% 67% Inc

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade

2014 Reading - Percent of Schools At or Above and Below State Proficiency Levels

% of Schools Below State % of Schools Above State

32% 32% 45% 43% 57% 43% 40% 67% 68% Inc 68% Inc 55% Dec 57% 43% 57% Dec 60% 33% Dec

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade

2014 Writing - Percent of Schools At or Above and Below State Proficiency Levels

% of Schools Below State % of Schools Above State

27% 50% 41% 29% 43% 43% 60% 67% 73% Inc 50% 59% Dec 71% 57% 57% 40% 33% Dec

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade 9th Grade 10th Grade

2014 Math - Percent of Schools At or Above and Below State Proficiency Levels

% of Schools Below State % of Schools Above State

2013-2014 Elementary Systemic Changes & Results

• Additional support (fte, professional development,

coaching) to targeted schools

• Effective use of district literacy experts to provide

professional development, provide principal and teacher coaching, conduct literacy audit, establish extended learning opportunities, and initiate literacy core program pilots

2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support Results

3rd Grade Reading

• 50% of schools saw an increase in

the percent of proficient students

• 1% increase in 3rd grade district

reading scores 5th Grade Writing

• 40% of schools saw an increase in

the percent of proficient students

• 4th to 5th Cohort - 60% of schools

saw an increase in the percent of proficient students

• 4th to 5th Cohort - 2% increase in 5th

grade district reading scores

2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support in 4th Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Results

Namaqua Elementary School

• 16% increase in the percent of proficient

students in reading

• 13% increase in the percent of proficient

students in writing

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 11% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 15% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing Ponderosa Elementary School

• 10% increase in the percent of proficient

students in reading

• 4% increase in the percent of proficient

students in writing

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 11% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 10% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing

2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support in 5th Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Results

Cottonwood Plains Elementary School

• 14% increase in the percent of proficient

students in reading

• 12% increase in the percent of proficient

students in writing

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 3% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 3% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing Truscott Elementary School

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 3% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 16% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing

2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support in 4th & 5th Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Results

Ivy Stockwell Elementary School

• 14% increase in the percent of proficient

students in 4th grade reading

• 9% increase in the percent of proficient

students in 5th grade reading

• 5% increase in the percent of proficient

students in 4th grade writing

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 9% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 6% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing

• 4th to 5th Cohort – 17% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 4th to 5th Cohort – 7% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing

2013-2014 Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support in 4th & 5th Grade Reading & Writing in Specific Schools Results

Coyote Ridge Elementary School

• 11% increase in the percent of proficient

students in 4th grade reading

• 9% increase in the percent of proficient

students in 4th grade writing

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 3% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 3rd to 4th Cohort – 14% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing

• 4th to 5th Cohort – 8% increase in the

percent of proficient students in reading

• 4th to 5th Cohort – 8% increase in the

percent of proficient students in writing

2013-2014 Secondary Systemic Changes & Results

• Continued Implementation of the Literacy Design

Collaborative

• Continued Implementation of the Math Design

Collaborative

• Targeted interventions driven by data
• Integrate literacy across all content areas
• PLC Work

2013-2014 Secondary Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support Results

LDC - Writing

• 7th – 10

th grade saw an increase in extended

writing:

• 7

th(+6%); 8 th(+11%);

9

th(+4%); 10 th(+47%)

• Quasi Cohort

7

th to 8 th (+19%); 8 th to 9 th (+18%);

9

th to 10 th (+7%)

• 80% of the Middle Schools 6

th to 7 th grade cohort

saw an increase in writing

• 60% of the Middle Schools saw an increase in

the percent of proficient students in 8

th grade

• 80% of the High Schools saw an increase in the

percent of proficient students in 10

th grade

2013-2014 Secondary Systemic Changes & Results

Intentional District Support Results

MDC - Math

• 60% of the Middle Schools 7

th to 8 th grade

cohort saw an increase in math

• 80% of the Middle Schools saw an

increase in the percent of proficient students in 6

th grade

• 80% of the Middle Schools saw an

increase in the percent of proficient students in 8

th grade

• TMS saw an increase in math for all 3

grade levels 6

th(+3%); 7 th(+7%);

8

th(+10%)

Instructional Implications

• Data Transparency supports Professional Learning Communities,

Collaboration and student growth.

• Data supports schools and teachers to meet Thompson to Life goals.
• Quality Foundation of Learning
• Personal Learning Pathways
• Post Secondary Access for All
• The District will provide data and resources to schools and teachers in
• rder to support them in formative learning, progress monitoring, goal

setting and academic growth for all students.

Next Steps

• Continue focus on Educator Effectiveness
• Guaranteed & viable curriculum
• Formative data to plan/instruct instruction
• Foundational and content literacy
• Professional Learning Communities
• Assure intervention block and strategic use of interventions for all students

(GT, ESS, EL…)

• District Professional Learning Team will support professional learning in

data literacy and instruction.

• District will provide feedback training to all evaluators focused on

curriculum, instruction and student engagement.

2014 Colorado ACT

Five Year Trend - Colorado ACT

School Site ACT Trends

PLAN to ACT Growth

BHS, LHS, MVHS and TVHS all increased the composite score from the PLAN exam taken as Sophomores to ACT taken as Juniors.

Next Steps

• All TSD High Schools implemented ACT Academy during the 2013-2014

school year

• We have seen success in growth with the same cohort of

students for two years.

• Create District Systems to support the ACT Academy process in

2014-2015

• New High School Schedule
• Students will be provided additional opportunities for support

through advisory and interventions.