#getmoving2020 getmoving2020.org Corridor conversations Regional - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

getmoving2020
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

#getmoving2020 getmoving2020.org Corridor conversations Regional - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

#getmoving2020 getmoving2020.org Corridor conversations Regional Transportation Funding Task Force April 24, 2019 A story of the community (SNAPSHOT VIDEO LINK) Annadiana: http://vimeo.com/331825170 3 One journey, many moments Before


slide-1
SLIDE 1

#getmoving2020

getmoving2020.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Regional Transportation Funding Task Force April 24, 2019

Corridor conversations

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

  • (SNAPSHOT VIDEO LINK)

A story of the community

Annadiana: http://vimeo.com/331825170

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

One journey, many moments

May 2019 Task Force corridor recommendation May 2019 Metro Council corridor direction Summer 2019 Corridor projects: Local teams, engagement Summer 2019 Task Force: Region- wide programs November 2019 Task Force package recommendation Late 2019 Metro Council approves draft package Early 2020 Engagement & research: Draft package Spring 2020 Final Task Force recommendation May 2020 Metro Council referral Summer/Fall 2020 Independent campaign November 2020 Election Day Key engagement period Before today Climate Smart Regional Transportation Plan Council direction Task Force values

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Engagement update

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

One journey, many moments

May 2019 Task Force corridor recommendation May 2019 Metro Council corridor direction Summer 2019 Corridor projects: Local teams, engagement Summer 2019 Task Force: Region- wide programs November 2019 Task Force package recommendation Late 2019 Metro Council approves draft package Early 2020 Engagement & research: Draft package Spring 2020 Final Task Force recommendation May 2020 Metro Council referral Summer/Fall 2020 Independent campaign November 2020 Election Day Key engagement period Before today Climate Smart Regional Transportation Plan Council direction Task Force values

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Corridor evaluation map

  • 75 corridor map
slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Creating an evaluation

Council Direction Task Force Values Outcomes

  • Corridors
  • Projects

Criteria

  • Corridors
  • Projects
slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

One piece of the puzzle

Your Corridor Priorities

Staff corridor evaluation Your expertise & experience Maps and

  • ther data

What you’re hearing

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

What about the SW Corridor? What about SW Corridor?

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Tier 1: High potential to advance

  • utcomes, project readiness

Tier 2: Less potential and/or less readiness – could be further developed and included in corridors Tier 3: Least potential and/or readiness

Looking closer at corridors

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Results of corridor exercise

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Results of corridor exercise

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Results of corridor exercise

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Results of corridor exercise

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Results of corridor exercise

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Results of corridor exercise

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

What could these achieve?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

  • Columbia Blvd
  • NE/SE MLK/Grand Ave*
  • Tualatin-Valley

Highway*

  • I-5, downtown

Portland*

  • SW 185th Ave*
  • Downtown Portland*
  • SE Foster Blvd
  • SE Powell Blvd*
  • NE/SE 122nd Ave*
  • NE/SE 162nd Ave
  • N/NE Columbia Blvd

Corridors of Interest: High concentration of equity focus areas

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

  • 82nd Ave*
  • Tualatin Valley

Highway*

  • SE McLoughlin Blvd*
  • SE Powell Blvd*
  • Burnside Street *
  • Downtown Portland*
  • NE/SE Martin Luther

King Jr. Blvd./Grand Ave*

  • NE/SE 122nd*
  • Sandy Blvd
  • SW 185th Ave*

Corridors of interest: High transit ridership potential

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

  • SE Division St*
  • 82nd Ave*
  • 122nd Ave*
  • Powell Blvd*
  • NE/SE MLK/Grand*
  • SW 185th Ave*
  • 181/C2C*
  • Sandy Blvd
  • Burnside Ave*

Corridors of interest: High safety need

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

  • What values are well advanced by this

potential group of corridors?

  • Are there values that could be better

reflected?

Small Group Discussion

slide-23
SLIDE 23

#getmoving2020

getmoving2020.org

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

  • What values are well advanced by this

potential group of corridors?

  • Are there values that could be better

reflected?

Small group report back

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Next week: Public survey launches May 15: Further corridor discussion May 29: Task Force corridor recommendation June 4: Metro Council work session Early June: Local Investment Teams

Next steps

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Overview: Project Identification, Readiness and Needs

Transportation Funding Task Force April 24, 2019

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Identifying projects and opportunities

  • First: 2018 Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) project list
  • Second: Local planning or agency programs

Is there a project or project concept in the local TSP or local plans on a corridor? Is there project or project concept developed as a focused program? (e.g., ODOT Leverage program, Enhanced Transit Concept program)

  • Third: Opportunities on the corridor

Is there an opportunity to link projects across the corridor, or meet outcomes along the corridor by linking or extended project boundaries?

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Project Readiness

  • Planning
  • Design
  • Construction

Project Need

  • High-level cost estimates
  • % of project that is or might be funded by local, state or federal sources
  • % of project that could be eligible for federal funding,

e.g., FTA Small Starts

Project readiness and need

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

High-level scoring on readiness Examples of readiness factors:

  • Environmental review
  • Quality of scoping and cost estimate
  • Right-of-way analysis/work
  • Complexity of project

Readiness and risk factors

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

With performance- based design, design elements support street functions to achieve desired

  • utcomes

Performance- Based Design

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Draft

slide-32
SLIDE 32

#getmoving2020

getmoving2020.org