outreach and engagement spec survey webcast series
play

Outreach and Engagement SPEC Survey Webcast Series December 5, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Outreach and Engagement SPEC Survey Webcast Series December 5, 2018 Introductions Sarah LeMire Shannon L. Farrell Kristen L. Mastel Stephanie J. Graves Texas A&M University of University of Texas A&M University University


  1. Outreach and Engagement SPEC Survey Webcast Series December 5, 2018

  2. Introductions Sarah LeMire Shannon L. Farrell Kristen L. Mastel Stephanie J. Graves Texas A&M University of University of Texas A&M University University Minnesota Minnesota stephaniegraves@tamu.edu slemire@tamu.edu sfarrell@umn.edu meye0539@umn.edu #ARLSPECKit361 2 Association of Research Libraries

  3. How Did We Get Here? Forming our outreach community : • All working on outreach activities • Struggling with issues of oversight, staffing, and assessment • Trying to demonstrate value of our work to stakeholders • Difficulty finding programmatic models for outreach in librarianship #ARLSPECKit361 3 Association of Research Libraries

  4. The SPEC Survey Survey ran in summer of 2018 : • 125 ARL member institutions • 46% (57) response rate • Limitations: o Variant nature of responding institutions o One representative responding from each institution o Non-organizational structure of outreach makes the survey structure difficult #ARLSPECKit361 4 Association of Research Libraries

  5. What is Outreach? #ARLSPECKit361 5 Association of Research Libraries

  6. Definition of Outreach There is no agreed upon definition of outreach or activities at ARL institutions. #ARLSPECKit361 6 Association of Research Libraries

  7. Outreach to Specific Populations #ARLSPECKit361 7 Association of Research Libraries

  8. Activities During the Previous Year #ARLSPECKit361 8 Association of Research Libraries

  9. Institutional Support #ARLSPECKit361 9 Association of Research Libraries

  10. Outreach in Library Mission and Vision Statements #ARLSPECKit361 10 Association of Research Libraries

  11. Outreach Budgeting as Ad Hoc • 72% did NOT have a defined Outreach budget 83% reported using central library o budget, but no line item for outreach o Departmental and special funds were prevalent sources Who managed outreach funds o varied greatly, but was most common amongst administrators, managers, or committees. Difficulty reporting annual o expenditures (graph) without central management and defined budgets #ARLSPECKit361 11 Association of Research Libraries

  12. Establishing Goals and Outcomes #ARLSPECKit361 12 Association of Research Libraries

  13. Developing Outreach Goals and Outcomes #ARLSPECKit361 13 Association of Research Libraries

  14. Responsibility for Outreach Goals and Outcomes #ARLSPECKit361 14 Association of Research Libraries

  15. Common Outreach Goals and Outcomes Goal/Outcome Frequency promote services 9 collaboration and partnerships 6 engagement 7 student success and retention 5 collections 3 information literacy 3 promote resources 3 access 2 membership and participation 2 social media 2 use of library 2 user experience 2 welcoming 2 #ARLSPECKit361 15 Association of Research Libraries

  16. Planning Outreach Activities #ARLSPECKit361 16 Association of Research Libraries

  17. Timelines for Planning Outreach #ARLSPECKit361 17 Association of Research Libraries

  18. Approval for Outreach Events #ARLSPECKit361 18 Association of Research Libraries

  19. Frequency of Constraints #ARLSPECKit361 19 Association of Research Libraries

  20. Staffing Outreach #ARLSPECKit361 20 Association of Research Libraries

  21. Outreach Leadership Activities #ARLSPECKit361 21 Association of Research Libraries

  22. Outreach Staffing Outreach staffing operationalized: • 95% have personnel with outreach responsibilities in their position descriptions • 84% evaluate personnel on outreach activities, with more structure if it is directly embedded in job duties • Public services librarians and employees tend to staff outreach events more frequently • Many still rely on calls for volunteers from across the library #ARLSPECKit361 22 Association of Research Libraries

  23. Outreach Challenges #ARLSPECKit361 23 Association of Research Libraries

  24. Collaboration #ARLSPECKit361 24 Association of Research Libraries

  25. Collaboration Across ARL Institutions #ARLSPECKit361 25 Association of Research Libraries

  26. Assessment and Reporting #ARLSPECKit361 26 Association of Research Libraries

  27. Assessment Methods Assessment Method % Responses • Libraries are using a variety of Headcounts 98.21% 55 assessment methods Surveys 82.14% 46 • Most are quick, unobtrusive, Interviews 28.57% 16 and less resource-intensive Focus groups 37.50% 21 Minute papers 19.64% 11 Observations 94.64% 53 Collecting comments 82.14% 46 Compiling social media comments 58.93% 33 Feedback from outreach volunteers and partners 87.50% 49 Usage statistics 78.57% 44 Other method, please briefly describe 16.07% 9 #ARLSPECKit361 27 Association of Research Libraries

  28. Assessment Responsibility #ARLSPECKit361 28 Association of Research Libraries

  29. Assessment Leadership Responsible for assessing overall outreach program % Responses Library dean/director 10.71% 6 • Majority response: No one Other library Administrator 12.50% 7 person was responsible for Department head 3.57% 2 assessing overall outreach Outreach head/director/librarian 12.50% 7 program Assessment librarian or dedicated assessment staff person 8.93% 5 • Of those institutions who Library event planner 0.00% 0 had a primary person Event planning committee 3.57% 2 responsible, they were: Communications and marketing staff 3.57% 2 o Administrators (13) Parent institution assessment unit 0.00% 0 o Outreach librarians (7) No one is responsible for overall program o Assessment librarians (5) assessment at this time 26.79% 15 Other individual or group, please specify 17.86% 10 #ARLSPECKit361 29 Association of Research Libraries

  30. Using Assessment Data & Reporting Impact • Majority of respondents have canceled/discontinued (38, or 68%), or made changes (49, or 88%) to events based on assessment data • Outreach activities are typically reported in performance evaluations (44, or 79%) & assessment data is used to respond to admin requests (32, or 57%) • Reports are provided to administrators on a regular basis (28, or 50%) • Majority do not have a defined time frame to demonstrate success or impact (34, or 61%) #ARLSPECKit361 30 Association of Research Libraries

  31. Case Studies #ARLSPECKit361 31 Association of Research Libraries

  32. Case Study Findings • Types of Events: o Resource Fairs o Open House Events o Finals De-Stressing Activities o “Human Library” Events • Collaborations and Partnerships: o Academic Departments o Student Support Units Writing Centers  Wellness Centers  • Budgets: o Vary from $0 to $50,000 per event #ARLSPECKit361 32 Association of Research Libraries

  33. Recommendations #ARLSPECKit361 33 Association of Research Libraries

  34. Recommendations cont. • Define what outreach means for your institution. • Institutions should establish a programmatic approach to outreach; coordinate, budget, plan, and staff at the program level • A variety of assessment methods should be used and mapped back to goals • Library staff would benefit from more training around both goal writing and assessment strategies for outreach #ARLSPECKit361 34 Association of Research Libraries

  35. Questions & Discussion Join the conversation by typing questions in the chat box in the lower left corner of your screen

  36. Thank you!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend