www.georgiawaterplanning.org Welcome/Introductions/Approve - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
georgiawaterplanning org welcome introductions approve
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

www.georgiawaterplanning.org Welcome/Introductions/Approve - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dec 04, 2023 348 likes •1.3k views

Council Meeting # 4 Coastal Georgia Regional Water Planning Council February 24, 2017 Richmond Hill City Center, Richmond Hill, Georgia www.georgiawaterplanning.org Welcome/Introductions/Approve Agenda/Meeting Objectives

slide-1
SLIDE 1

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Council Meeting # 4

Coastal Georgia Regional Water Planning Council

February 24, 2017 Richmond Hill City Center, Richmond Hill, Georgia

slide-2
SLIDE 2

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Welcome/Introductions/Approve Agenda/Meeting Objectives

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Council Meeting Agenda

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Council Meeting 4

  • Meeting Summary from Nov 17, 2016 Council Meeting

(CM3)

  • Approve Meeting Agenda for CM4
slide-5
SLIDE 5

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Regional Water Development and Conservation Plan 5-year Review and Revision – Review of Deliverables

slide-6
SLIDE 6

2016 – 2017 Regional Water Plan Review and Revision Schedule

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Completing Draft Plan Update

  • Final Demand Forecast

Technical Memorandum

  • Draft Section 3 - Water

Resources of the Coastal Georgia Region

  • Draft Section 4 -

Forecasting Future Water Resource Needs

  • Draft Section 5 -

Comparison of Available Resource Capacity and Future Needs

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Demand Forecast Technical Memorandum (TM)

  • Items addressed from

council input

– Regional gpcd value vs. county specific – Industrial forecast not being updated but methodology will be considered for update next plan update round – County demands presented in tabular format – County specific Agricultural demands updated by Mark Masters and documented in the TM

  • Seeking Council Approval
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Overview of Plan Content

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Report Sections 3, 4 & 5 – Review by Editing Committee

  • Section 3 - Water

Resources of the Coastal Georgia Region

  • Section 4 - Forecasting

Future Water Resource Needs

  • Section 5 - Comparison of

Available Resource Capacity and Future Needs

Editing Committee Assignments

slide-11
SLIDE 11

BREAK

slide-12
SLIDE 12

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Report Out Shared Resources Subcommittee Meetings on Groundwater and Surface Water

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Groundwater Subcommittee Invited Participants

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Groundwater Subcommittee Meeting Objectives

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Surface Water Subcommittee Invited Participants

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Surface Water Subcommittee Meeting Objectives

slide-17
SLIDE 17

LUNCH BREAK

slide-18
SLIDE 18

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Review 2011 Decision Process

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Coastal Georgia RWPC Vision

Conserve and manage our water resources in order to sustain and enhance our unique coastal environment and economy of Coastal Georgia.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Management Practices Definition

  • Any program or activity that:
  • Helps meet the regional vision and goals
  • Can be employed to ensure that there is sufficient

water (surface and groundwater quantity) and assimilative capacity (surface water quality) to sustainably meet future needs

  • Management practices can increase

resource capacity and/or adjusts forecasted demands (i.e., water efficiency measures)

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Management Practice Selection Process

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Management Practice Selection Process

slide-23
SLIDE 23

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Review and Discuss Management Practices

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Management Practices

  • The Coastal Council identified 86 Management

Practices (MPs) in 2011 RWP

– Water Conservation – Water Supply and Management – Wastewater and Water Quality – Information Needs

  • Step Back and Highlight Primary Drivers for MPs
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Potential Surface Water Gaps

  • Regional Council

and Local Drainage Area (LDA) Boundaries – Claxton, Eden and Kings Ferry Planning Nodes

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Kings Ferry Planning Node Surface Water Forecast by Region and County

1 – Acres irrigated with surface water by County and planning node were obtained from the Irrigated Acreage GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016) 2 – Surface water withdrawals by County were obtained from 2050_Final_Yearly_Withdrawals_MGD_Atlantic GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016) 3 – MGD represents average annual day demands

  • - No surface water irrigated acres reported for County within LDA

Counties That Are Located (whole or in part) Within the Local Drainage Area Candler Emanuel Evans Tattnall Bryan Bulloch Chatham Effingham Liberty Long Jenkins Acreage of County Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node 11,225 2,258 88,106 22,355 184,718 269,498 9,412 5,369 116,784 47,550 1,750 % of County Land Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node 7.0% 0.5% 73.6% 6.4% 63.4% 61.1% 2.9% 1.7% 33.2% 18.4% 0.8% Acreage of SW Irrigated Land Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node1 105 148 3,789 616

  • 5,449
  • 31

263 194 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Withdrawals for Portion

  • f County That Drains

to Planning Node2, 3 (MGD) 0.04 0.08 2.45 0.52

  • 2.72
  • 0.02

0.12 0.11 Councils That Are Within the Local Drainage Area with Potential Gaps Ogeechee River Altamaha Coastal Georgia Savannah-Upper Ogeechee

2050 Withdrawals by County and Region

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Surface Water Management Practice Categories

Data Collection/Additional Research (DCAR) Current and Future Surface Water Needs (SW) Water Conservation (WC) Additional/Alternate to Existing Surface Water Supply Sources (ASWS) Agricultural Best Management Practices for Crop and Pasture Lands (NPSA)

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Groundwater Gaps

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Changes Since Completion of 2011 Water Plan

Red and Yellow Zone Forecasted Water Needs Reduction in Groundwater Use to Improve Management of the Floridan Aquifer

Implement Reduction Strategy Implement Proactive Local and Regional Planning

  • Developing alternate water supply strategies is vital

to meet future needs

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Aquifer Permit Limits vs. Forecasted Demand

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050

MGD

Red Zone Floridan Aquifer Permit Limit verse Forecasted Demand

Public Municipal Demand Industrial Demand Red Zone Permit Limit Notes: Fifty percent of the Effingham County municipal and industrial demands are assumed to come from the Red Zone. Demand assumed to be supplied from the Brunswick aquifer has not been included (0.44 MGD in 2015; 0.53 MGD in 2050) 1.9 MGD 10.1 MGD 12.9 MGD 15.6 MGD

2015 Actual = 48 MGD

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Aquifer Permit Limits vs. Forecasted Demand

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 MGD

Yellow Zone Floridan Aquifer Permit Limit verse Forecast Demand

Public Municipal Demand Base Industrial Demand Alt Industrial Demand Yellow Zone Permit Limit 1.5 MGD

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Groundwater Water Management Practice Categories

Data Collection/Additional Research (DCAR) Current and Future Groundwater Needs (GW) Water Conservation (WC) Municipal Groundwater Permit Capacity (MGWPC) Additional/Alternate to Existing Surface Water Supply Sources (ASWS) Industrial Groundwater Permit Capacity (IGWPC) Future Educational Needs (EDU)

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Surface Water Quality Resource Assessment Follow- Up

  • Identification of gaps within the region

– Dissolved Oxygen Assimilative Capacity – Identification of specific reaches not meeting assimilative capacity

  • Category 5R on the 2014 305(b)/303(d) list, the EPA

withdrew the dissolved oxygen TMDL for the Savannah Harbor in favor of the alternative restoration approach outlined

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Assimilative Capacity Results (November 2016 Meeting)

Coastal Region – Results of DO Assimilative Capacity Reaches within the Coastal Georgia Planning Council that have exceeded their full assimilative capacity under the current conditions assessment include:

– Taylors Creek, Canoochee Creek, and Little Ogeechee River in the Ogeechee Basin – Beards Creek, Doctors Creek, Jones Creek and the lower portion of the Altamaha River main stem in the Altamaha Basin; and – The main stem of the Saint Marys River in the St. Marys Basin.

It is important to note that exceedance of assimilative capacity on a reach could be the result of a point source discharge, non-point source loading,

It is important to note that exceedance of assimilative capacity on a reach could be the result of a point source discharge, non-point source loading, or a naturally low DO condition.

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Assimilative Capacity Results (November 2016 Meeting)

  • Coastal Region – Results of DO Assimilative Capacity

Current Conditions Updated Future Condition (2050)

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Environmental Fluid Dynamics Code (EFDC) Model Results

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Water Quality Management Practice Categories

Existing Impairments and Total Maximum Daily Load Listed Streams (TMDL) Current and Future Surface Water Needs (SW) Point Sources – Dissolved Oxygen (PSDO) Water Quality Nonpoint Source Needs (NPS) Best Management Practices (NPSU, NPSR, NPSF, NPSA) Future Educational Needs (EDU)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Detailed Discussion of Management Practices

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Water Conservation is a Priority Management Practice

http://www.georgiawaterplanning.org/documents/DetailedGuidance https://epd.georgia.gov/sites/epd.georgia.gov/GWSA

slide-40
SLIDE 40

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

No Revision Needed (NRN) Additional Discussion Required (ADR) Revise or Eliminate (ROE)

slide-41
SLIDE 41

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-42
SLIDE 42

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-43
SLIDE 43

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-44
SLIDE 44

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-45
SLIDE 45

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-46
SLIDE 46

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-47
SLIDE 47

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-48
SLIDE 48

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-49
SLIDE 49

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-50
SLIDE 50

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-51
SLIDE 51

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-52
SLIDE 52

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-53
SLIDE 53

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-54
SLIDE 54

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-55
SLIDE 55

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-56
SLIDE 56

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-57
SLIDE 57

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-58
SLIDE 58

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

https://rivercenter.uga.edu/project/coastal-wastewater-planning-and-management/

slide-59
SLIDE 59

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

Septic?

slide-60
SLIDE 60

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-61
SLIDE 61

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-62
SLIDE 62

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-63
SLIDE 63

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-64
SLIDE 64

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-65
SLIDE 65

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-66
SLIDE 66

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-67
SLIDE 67

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-68
SLIDE 68

www.georgiawaterplanning.org

Next Steps, Subcommittee Discussion, and Schedule for Revising/Updating the Regional Water Plan

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Water Planning and the Importance of Plans

slide-70
SLIDE 70

2016 – 2017 Regional Water Plan Review and Revision Schedule

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Subcommittee and Schedule for Completion

  • Editing Subcommittee Assignment

– Sections 3, 4 and 5 (Under Review By Council) – Sections 6, 7 and 8 (Next up for Drafting) – Section 1 and 2 + ES

  • Schedule for Completion
  • Tentative Final Editing Subcommittee meeting for Fri.

March 10th

  • Need to have final draft by Fri. March 17th
  • EPD Review Comments by Fri. March 24th
  • Publish Draft for 45-Day Public Review March 31st
  • May 15th to June 1st – Respond to Comments
  • Month of June – Final + Council Vote + EPD

Approval

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Public Comments / Elected Official Comments

  • Public Comments
  • Elected Official Comments
  • Wrap Up
slide-73
SLIDE 73

Thank You!

Questions? Comments? Need More Information?

Christine.Voudy@dnr.ga.gov jeff.larson@dnr.ga.gov woodsh@cdmsmith.com brownrl1959@gmail.com

slide-74
SLIDE 74

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-75
SLIDE 75

2011 RWP Recommended Management Practices

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Broad Categories of Management Practices

  • Water Conservation
  • Additional Surface Water Use

– Savannah River – Ogeechee River

  • Groundwater

– From the Green Zone – From other Aquifers

  • Brackish or Saline Water Sources
  • Institutional Considerations
slide-77
SLIDE 77

Broad Management Practice Categories

Data Collection/Sound Science Aquifer Storage and Recovery Water Conservation (WC) Reuse Additional Surface Water New Sources Additional Surface Water Existing Facilities Institutional Options for Regional Cooperation/ Water System Optimization Green Zone Additional Groundwater Reverse Osmosis Desalination Floridan Aquifer in Green Zone Additional/ Alternative Aquifers in Red and Yellow Zones Institutional Options for Regional Cooperation/ Water System Operation Red and Yellow Zones NON-STRUCTURAL STRUCTURAL Reuse

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Claxton Planning Node Surface Water Forecast by Region and County

1 – Acres irrigated with surface water by County and planning node were obtained from the Irrigated Acreage GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016) 2 – Surface water withdrawals by County were obtained from 2050_Final_Yearly_Withdrawals_MGD_Atlantic GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016) 3 – MGD represents average annual day demands

Councils That Are Within the Local Drainage Area with Potential Gaps Canoochee River Altamaha Coastal Georgia Savannah-Upper Ogeechee Counties That Are Located (whole or in part) Within the Local Drainage Area Candler Emanuel Evans Tattnall Bulloch Jenkins Acreage of County Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node 133,561 143,497 31,606 37,832 11,120 1,594 % of County Land Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node 83.8% 32.5% 26.4% 10.8% 2.5% 0.7% Acreage of SW Irrigated Land Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node1 3,695 757 864 1,859 564 29 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Withdrawals for Portion of County That Drains to Planning Node2, 3 (MGD) 2.75 0.50 0.47 1.26 0.27 0.02

2050 Withdrawals by County and Region

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Eden Planning Node Surface Water Forecast by Region and County

1 – Acres irrigated with surface water by County and planning node were obtained from the Irrigated Acreage GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016) 2 - Warren County has municipal surface water withdrawals (0.17 MGD) in addition to agricultural surface water withdrawals (Source: Round 2 Statewide Aggregation spreadsheet, Arcadis, 2016) 3 – Surface water withdrawals by County were obtained from 2050_Final_Yearly_Withdrawals_MGD_Atlantic GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016) 4 – MGD represents average annual day demands
  • - No surface water irrigated acres reported for County within LDA

Councils That Are Within the Local Drainage Area with Potential Gaps Ogeechee River Altamaha Coastal Georgia Savannah-Upper Ogeechee Upper Oconee Counties That Are Located (whole or in part) Within the Local Drainage Area Emanuel Bryan Bulloch Effingham Burke Glascock Jefferson Jenkins Screven Taliaferro Warren2 Greene Hancock Washington Acreage of County Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node 85,902 8,566 160,722 75,983 201,286 85,063 275,388 210,099 179,344 45,087 101,551 23,158 86,595 168,745 % of County Land Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node 19.4% 2.9% 36.4% 24.6% 37.6% 92.0% 81.2% 93.1% 42.7% 36.0% 55.3% 8.9% 28.3% 38.5% Acreage of SW Irrigated Land Area Within the LDA That Drains to Planning Node1 67

  • 2,609

23 3,771 143 4,149 3,194 2,443 33 95

  • 14

1,159 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Withdrawals for Portion of County That Drains to Planning Node3, 4 (MGD) 0.05

  • 1.28

0.01 2.24 0.05 1.95 1.94 1.46 0.01 0.22

  • 0.02

1.4

2050 Withdrawals by County and Region

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Surface Water Resource Forecast and Potential Gaps

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Claxton Planning Node - Surface Water Forecast and Summary

  • f Potential Gaps by Region
1 – Represents average annual demand 2- Source: Surface Water Availability Resource Assessment Updates: Current and Future Conditions, November 17, 2016 Council Member Handout, Savannah and Ogeechee Basins 3 - Surface water withdrawals by County were obtained from 2050_Final_Yearly_Withdrawals_MGD_Atlantic GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016)

Councils and Associated Counties That Are Within in the Local Drainage Area with Potential Gaps Canoochee River

Altamaha – Candler, Emanuel, Evans, Tattnall Coastal Georgia - Bulloch Savannah Upper Ogeechee - Jenkins

Total 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Demand at Planning Node Summarized by Sector (MGD)1

Agriculture: 4.98 Agriculture: 0.27 Agriculture: 0.02

2050 Potential Gap Information: Average Daily Flow Deficit per Gap Event Summarized by Planning Node2 1-7 Day Duration

2 MGD (3 cfs) 51% of all potential gap events

8 - 14 Day Duration

3 MGD (5 cfs) 20.4% of all potential gap events

TOTAL: 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Withdrawals Summarized by Planning Council3 (MGD)

4.98 0.27 0.02 5.26 26

Surface Water Resource Forecast and Potential Gaps

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Eden Planning Node - Surface Water Forecast and Summary of Potential Gaps by Region

1 – Represents average annual demand 2- Source: Surface Water Availability Resource Assessment Updates: Current and Future Conditions, November 17, 2016 Council Member Handout, Savannah and Ogeechee Basins 3 - Surface water withdrawals by County were obtained from 2050_Final_Yearly_Withdrawals_MGD_Atlantic GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016)

Councils and Associated Counties That Are Within in the Local Drainage Area with Potential Gaps Ogeechee River

Altamaha - Emanuel Coastal Georgia – Bryan, Bulloch, Effingham Savannah-Upper Ogeechee – Burke, Glascock, Jefferson, Jenkins, Screven, Taliaferro, Warren Upper Oconee – Greene, Hancock, Washington

Total 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Demand at Planning Node Summarized by Sector (MGD)1

Agriculture: 0.05 Agriculture: 1.29 Agriculture: 7.7 Municipal Water: 0.17 Agriculture: 1.42

2050 Potential Gap Information: Average Daily Flow Deficit per Gap Event Summarized by Planning Node2 1-7 Day Duration 7 MGD (11 cfs) 61.1% of all potential gap events 8 - 14 Day Duration 10 MGD (15 cfs) 16.7% of all potential gap events 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Withdrawals Summarized by Planning Council3 (MGD)

0.05 1.29 7.87 1.42

10.64 TOTAL:

Surface Water Resource Forecast and Potential Gaps

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Kings Ferry Planning Node - Surface Water Forecast and Summary of Potential Gaps by Region

1 – Represents average annual demand 2 – Source: Surface Water Availability Resource Assessment Updates: Current and Future Conditions, November 17, 2016 Council Member Handout, Savannah and Ogeechee Basins 3 – Surface water withdrawals by County were obtained from 2050_Final_Yearly_Withdrawals_MGD_Atlantic GIS layer (Georgia Water Planning & Policy Center, 2016)

Councils and Associated Counties That Are Within in the Local Drainage Area with Potential Gaps Ogeechee River

Altamaha – Candler, Emanuel, Evans, Tattnall Coastal Georgia – Bryan, Bulloch, Chatham, Effingham, Liberty, Long Savannah-Upper Ogeechee – Jenkins

Total 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Demand at Planning Node Summarized by Sector (MGD)1

Agriculture: 3.09 Agriculture: 2.86 Agriculture: 0.11

2050 Potential Gap Information: Average Daily Flow Deficit per Gap Event Summarized by Planning Node2 1-7 Day Duration

13 MGD (20 cfs) 58.0% of all potential gap events

8 - 14 Day Duration

27 MGD (41 cfs) 13.0% of all potential gap events

TOTAL: 2050 Forecasted Surface Water Withdrawals Summarized by Planning Council3 (MGD)

3.09 2.86 0.11

6.05

Surface Water Resource Forecast and Potential Gaps

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Developing Information for Regional Water Planning Councils

  • Did you find the meeting information useful in helping

improve your understanding of the planning process?

  • Do you have any suggestions or observations that you

think would benefit the Regional Water Planning Councils?

  • Do you have any additional thoughts for enhancing

communications with agricultural water users or other public or private entities?

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Aquifer Permit Limits vs. Projected Demand

10 20 30 40 50 60 70 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050

MGD

Chatham County Floridan Aquifer Permit Limit verse Projected Demand

Public Municipal Demand Industrial Demand Energy Demand Red Zone Permit Limit Notes: Demand assumed to be supplied from the Brunswick aquifer has not been included (0.44 MGD in 2015; 0.53 MGD in 2050) 3.8 MGD 11.4 MGD 13.9 MGD 16.4 MGD

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Aquifer Permit Limits vs. Projected Demand

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050

MGD

Effingham County Floridan Aquifer Permit Limit verse Projected Demand

Public Municipal Demand Industrial Demand Red Zone Permit Limit Notes: Fifty percent of the Effingham County municipal and industrial demands are assumed to come from the Red Zone.

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Aquifer Permit Limits vs. Projected Demand

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050 MGD

Bryan County Floridan Aquifer Permit Limit verse Projected Demand

Public Municipal Demand Base Industrial Demand Alt Industrial Demand Yellow Zone Permit Limit

2.6 MGD 1.0 MGD

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Aquifer Permit Limits vs. Projected Demand

5 10 15 20 25 2015 2020 2030 2040 2050

MGD

Liberty County Floridan Aquifer Permit Limit verse Projected Demand

Public Municipal Demand Base Industrial Demand Alt Industrial Demand Yellow Zone Permit Limit

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Regional Water Planning Councils

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Steps in the Development of the Regional Water Plan

Resource Assessments

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Identification of Gaps

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Coastal Georgia Region Gap Summary (cont.)

  • Groundwater Resource

– Consistent with Round 1, there are no gaps in the modeled portions of the Floridan Aquifer (outside Red and Yellow Zones) – The 4 County Red and Yellow Zones are subject to a moratorium

  • n future withdrawals and municipal, industrial, and energy

permit holders have had reductions to their permit limits

  • Potential gaps in groundwater in this portion of the region
  • Consider increased coordination & discussion within the region and

between Councils

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Developing a Water Plan Decision Framework

Water Supply

  • Storage
  • Retiming flows
  • Demand management
  • New Supplies

Wastewater

  • Water quality
  • Reuse
  • Return flow

management

Stormwater

  • Flood control
  • Water supply
  • Water quality

Best Management Practices Water Treatment Practices Water Management Practices

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Management Practices are not Self Implementing

Data Collection and Review Education and Discussion Water Conservation Voluntary Incentives Specific Requirements Permitting