generalized gaussian wave packet dynamics integrable and
play

Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics: integrable and chaotic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics: integrable and chaotic systems Steven Tomsovic Washington State University, Pullman, WA USA work supported by: US National Science Foundation


  1. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics: integrable and chaotic systems Steven Tomsovic Washington State University, Pullman, WA USA work supported by: US National Science Foundation Collaborators Harinder Pal, postdoc, WSU Manan Vyas, postdoc, WSU both now in T. H. Seligman’s group, Mexico Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  2. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Today’s Thread of Logic 1) Gaussian wave packet dynamics a) Linearized wave packet dynamics (Heller, 1975-7) b) Method of steepest descents - GGWPD (Huber, Heller, Littlejohn, 1988) Saddle points – classical trajectories with complex (q,p) Equivalence to complex, time-dependent WBK Implementation challenges c) Off-center real trajectory sums Chaotic - heteroclinic orbits (Tomsovic, Heller, 1991-3) Integrable - shearing orbits (Barnes, Nockleby, Tomsovic, Nauenberg, 1994) 2) Off-center real trajectories = ⇒ complex saddle points a) Geometry b) Newton-Raphson equations 3) Illustration using a simple dynamical system a) Kicked rotor b) Chaotic regime c) Near-integrable regime Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  3. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Linearized wave packet dynamics For wave packets � 1 � 2 D Det ( b α ) 4 q α ) T · b α · ( � q α )+ i e − ( � x − � x − � � � p α · ( � x − � q α ) φ α ( � x ) = π D two typical dynamical quantities of interest are the time propagation of φ α ( � x ) and its overlap with a final state � x φ ∗ C βα ( t ) = d � β ( � x ) U ˆ H ( t , 0 ) φ α ( � x ) Linearizing the dynamics about the wave packet center generates an approximation depending exclusively on classical mechanical information. The center of the wave packet, ( � q α ,� p α ) , is the initial condition for the classical trajectory used in the approximation. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  4. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Linearized wave packet dynamics (cont.) Advantageous properties Only requires a single classical trajectory whose initial conditions are known, i.e. no root search. Can propagate, and calculate stabilities and Maslov index. Analytical dynamical expressions require only evaluating Gaussian integrals. Can be implemented in any number of degrees of freedom. Can be quite accurate. Limitations Effectively, can only work up to an Ehrenfest time scale. No way to improve the approximation without introducing many complications. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  5. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Wave packet propagation example Ehrenfest time ends in upper right frame Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  6. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Method of steepest descents The ultimate semiclassical approximation Exponential arguments are complex functions, thus roots are generally expected to be saddle points. Saddle points are classical trajectories with complex initial conditions ( � Q 0 , � P 0 ) . Essential ambiguity of wave packet center: D D k + i q α ) k + i � � � � � � � � 2 [ b α ] jk Q α P α j = 2 [ b α ] jk ( � � ( � p α ) j � k = 1 k = 1 equal to Lagrangian manifold condition � P 0 ( � Q 0 ) = ∇S 0 ( � Q 0 ) . This approximation called generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics (GGWPD) turns out to be equivalent to a complexified time-dependent WBK. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  7. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Method of steepest descents (cont.) Challenges: Requires finding saddle points, which are intersections of two 2 D -dimensional infinite hyperplanes in 4 D -dimensional space. ( D = number of degrees of freedom) The geometry of complexified classical mechanics is rather complicated. For example, some trajectories lead to infinite momenta in finite times and generate Stokes phenomena. The number of saddle points must increase at least linearly with increasing time for integrable systems, and at least exponentially fast for chaotic systems. Implemented in a couple of works for a D = 1 Morse oscillator, that’s it. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  8. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Off-center real trajectories: heteroclinic orbits Dynamics in chaotic (K-) systems is generally hyperbolic and there is a convergence zone extendable to infinity along the asymptotes. Identify the unstable manifold of the phase point ( � q α ,� p α ) and the stable manifold of ( � p β ) . q β ,� If “ � ” is small enough, all relevant classical transport follows the unstable manifold away from ( � p α ) and the q α ,� stable manifold toward ( � q β ,� p β ) . The complete transport problem is solved as a sum over heteroclinic orbits found at the intersections of the two manifolds. Whether one thinks about it this way or not, using a stability analysis around a heteroclinic orbit constructs a saddle that is just a complicated Gaussian integral. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  9. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Heteroclinic chirp illustration Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  10. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Off-center real trajectories: shearing orbits Dynamics in integrable systems generally involves shearing locally. All transport follows tori. To transport from the phase space region locally surrounding ( � q α ,� p α ) to the region surrounding ( � p β ) , one needs only to identify those tori q β ,� that intersect both regions. Ideally in action-angle variables, construct the surfaces of constant angle variables with varying actions that intersect the points ( � p α ) and ( � p β ) , respectively. q α ,� q β ,� Propagate the former and find the intersections with the latter; gives a complete solution to the classical transport problem as a sum over shearing orbits. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  11. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Geometrical considerations A complex saddle point trajectory must satisfy the Lagrangian manifold conditions: D k + i � � � � � � � 2 [ b α ] jk Q 0 − � q α P 0 − � p α = 0 � j k = 1 D k − i � � � � � � � [ b β ] ∗ Q t − � P t − � = 2 q β p β 0 jk � j k = 1 meaning that the initial condition is on the initial manifold and the propagated point is on the final manifold. This won’t be true for any of the real off-center trajectories, but can use stability matrix: � M 11 � � � � � δ � δ � P t M 12 P 0 = δ � δ � M 21 M 22 Q t Q 0 Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  12. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Newton-Raphson Scheme This generates the Newton-Raphson Scheme (after some algebra): D k + i � � � � � � � � δ � δ � − C 0 = [ b α ] jk Q 0 P 0 2 � j j k = 1 D � � � � � � M 21 δ � P 0 + M 22 δ � [ b β ] ∗ = k + − C t 2 Q 0 jk j k = 1 i � � M 11 δ � P 0 + M 12 δ � Q 0 � j These equations are used iteratively. The first time through, they give a complex deviation to the off-center real trajectory in either the shearing or heteroclinic trajectory sums. Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  13. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor The Kicked Rotor The classical Hamiltonian and mapping equations: ∞ p 2 2 − K � H = 4 π 2 cos ( 2 π q ) δ ( t − n ) n = −∞ p i − K p i + 1 = 2 π sin 2 π q i mod 1 = q i + p i + 1 q i + 1 mod 1 The quantum unitary propagator is: � 2 π ( n ′ + α ) � iNK �� U nn ′ = 1 N exp 2 π cos N N − 1 − π i ( m + β ) 2 � + 2 π i ( m + β )( n − n ′ ) � � × exp N N m = 0 Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  14. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Chaotic Regime 0.5 p 0.0 -0.5 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 q Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  15. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Chaotic Regime (cont.) off-center trajectories off-center trajectories saddle points saddle points -2 10 -1 10 |C QM - C SC | -4 10 | φ QM - φ SC | -2 10 -6 10 -3 10 -8 10 -4 10 -10 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 N -5 10 100 200 300 400 600 700 500 N 1.4 off-center trajectories 1.2 saddle points A QM /A SC 1.0 0.8 0.6 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 N Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  16. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Near-integrable Regime 1.0 0.9 p 0.8 0.7 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 q Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

  17. Wave packets Real/complex trajectories Kicked rotor Near-integrable Regime (cont.) off-center trajectory off-center trajectory saddle point saddle point -3 10 |C QM - C SC | | φ QM - φ SC | -4 10 -4 10 -5 10 -5 10 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 N 100 200 300 400 600 700 500 N 1.000 0.999 off-center trajectory A QM /A SC saddle point 0.998 0.997 0.996 0.995 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 N Generalized Gaussian wave packet dynamics

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend