for 2018 CERN-RRB-2019-032 cf. CERN-RRB-2019-033 A. Charkiewicz, - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

M&O Expenditure for 2018

• A. Charkiewicz, RRB-48, 15 April 2019

CERN-RRB-2019-032

• cf. CERN-RRB-2019-033

15 April 2019 CERN-RRB-2019-032 2

CMS is growing …

Several Institutes have joined CMS since the last RRB meeting, and more are in the application process. This obviously means more resources and more partners to share the costs

ASSOCIATED

 University of Bath, UK  University of Wisconsin-Madison, Computing Sciences Department, USA  University of Bahrain, Bahrain

COOPERATING

 Bethel University, USA

FULL MEMBERS

 Kyung Hee University, Korea  Universidad de Antioquia, Medellin, Colombia  Istanbul University, Turkey  Zhejiang University (ZJU), China

Introduction This is the 17th time the CMS Collaboration presents a M&O Expenditure report Reported expenses are for payments

(open commitments, related to delivered goods or services, are reported globally)

Expenses are compared to budgets approved by the RRB

3 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

M&O-A 2015-2018 Contributions

 M&O-A contributions for 2018 amount to 98% of the total due (outstanding total 2015-18 is 518 kCHF) and for 2019 already 62.2% has been received to date  The amount of outstanding contributions remained stable

• ver the last two years and has been reduced since 2015

 CMS thanks Funding Agencies for the timely payments of their M&O-A obligations

4 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

Budget Year

2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Invoiced kCHF 925 1'765 2'498 3'692 6'565 8'847 10'984 11'216 12'742 13'366 14'051 14'537 14'406 13'224 13'321 12'880 13'127

Paid before following year April RRB (kCHF)

805 1'549 2'302 3'372 6'384 8'839 10'664 10'977 12'711 13'329 13'203 13'541 13'095 12'333 12'939 12'488 12'867

Outstanding % before following year April RRB

12.9% 12.3% 7.9% 8.7% 2.8% 0.1% 2.9% 2.1% 0.2% 0.3% 6.0% 6.9% 9.1% 6.7% 2.9% 3.0% 2.0%

M&O-A 2018 Expenditures Overview (1)

 M&O-A expenditures in 2018 show an overspend of 203 kCHF corresponding to 1.6% of the total budget  This

• verspend

is mainly due to the unexpectedly intensive work programme during the 2017-2018 Year-end Technical Stop (YETS) which turned out to be more costly due to a number of factors:

5 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

• Actions to deal with the failures in the Pixel DC-DC Converter system
• The extended shutdown which increased the cost of maintenance facilities
• The additional manpower cost of a team of technicians

There were also two other categories, in which expenditures exceeded the budgetary allocation:

• Secretariat costs where higher, partly due to maternity leave replacement
• Gas consumption has exceeded the allocation – this was not expected since,

in past years, CMS has managed to limit gas expenditures

M&O-A 2018 Expenditures Overview (2)

462 kCHF of outstanding commitments are to be paid in 2019

8 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

2018 Budgeted Costs Budget kCHF Expenditure 2018 A.1. Detector related costs 3'916 3'999 A.2. Secretariat 312 319 A.3. Communications 130 130 A.4. On-line computing 3'565 3'561 A.5. Test beams, calibration facilities 96 95 A.6. Laboratory operations 584 656 A.7. General services 1'853 1'918 A.9. Core Computing Infrastructure & Services 1'964 1'946 M&O-A without Power Cost 12'420 12'623 A.8. Electricity 1'700 1'700 Total 14'120 14'323 Μ&Ο-Α

M&O-A 2018 Expenditures Overview (3)

The current status of the Online Account and the current estimated expenditure profile 2019-2023

7 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

Year 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Budget allocation 1'905 2'818 1'900 2'918 2'618 3'000 2'046 2'600 2'560 2'360 2'500 2'500 2'500 Expenditure/ Expenditure plan 609 489 1'441 3'191 4'183 2'770 728 3'116 3'100 5'500 1'500 3'300 3'300 Deposits/Withdrawls from Special DAQ Account 1'296 2'329 459

• 273
• 1'565

230 1'318

• 516
• 540
• 3'140

1'000

• 800
• 800

Cumulative Cash Balance - Special DAQ Account 1'296 3'625 4'084 3'811 2'246 2'476 3'794 3'278 2'738

• 402

598

• 202
• 1'002

M&O-B 2018 Expenditures Overview

 As CMS does not centrally invoice for M&O-B, the Collaboration is reporting qualitatively on these expenses. A large part of them are in-kind contributions from participating institutes  The overall Subsystem arrangements made in 2018 have functioned satisfactorily

8 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 No major problems have been encountered by the Subsystems in

• btaining

funding for their M&O-B budgets  A detailed qualitative assessment

• f expenditure, per Subsystem, is

included in the Expenditure Report

CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019 9

Summary

 The RRB is invited to take note of the present M&O Expenditure Report for 2018  In view of the operational

nature of CMS expenses we kindly ask Funding Agencies to ensure that payments are made as early as possible

Preliminary Draft Budget for M&O 2020

• A. Charkiewicz, RRB-48, 15 April
• Cf. CERN-RRB-2019-034

2019

Introduction

 The CMS Collaboration is presenting a Preliminary 2020 Draft Budget Request both for M&O Category A and Category B  The cost sharing presented in document CERN-RRB- 2019-034 is preliminary and for information only (based on

the latest PhDs list from September 2018) and will change for the

October 2019 RRB  The M&O-A costs will be reviewed by the CMS Finance Board and further input from the Scrutiny Group will be taken into account in the elaboration of the October M&O Draft Budget for 2020

11 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 The final M&O-A budget request for 2020 (and the projection until 2023) will be revised after discussions with the RRB Scrutiny Group in the course of the

• summer. It is very likely to present an increase, compared to the projection,

shown to the RRB at the October 2018 meeting  The proposed modifications in the allocation are due to the following factors  Implemented in the Preliminary Draft Budget Request

 Still requiring a more precise estimate

12 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

• New shiftwork scheme for LS2 at Point 5, as the weaknesses of the

present arrangements for providing shift crew are evident

• Implications of new rules on irradiated material applicable to CERN

2020 M&O-A Preliminary Draft Budget Overview

• Issues related to the CMS Control Room already discussed last year with

the Scrutiny Group, for which an initial allocation was already granted

(additional 180 kCHF in Cat. A.1.17 Counting and Control Rooms)

• New request from CERN specialized services for charging of cleaning the

experimental areas, provided free of charge until now (additional 102 kCHF in Cat.

A.1.12) Shutdown Activities)

 Thorough analyses have clearly demonstrated that the

• nly viable

solution is the construction of a new facility in the vicinity of the existing Control Room  Proposal of a building with a 445 m2 footprint including:

• Main control room – 28 work stations
• Visitor Viewing Gallery
• Services

room – Storage, engineering services, etc.

• Bathrooms and other facilities

 Functional Specification derived from User Requirements Document  Layouts proposed to demonstrate that the space is sufficient to meet user requirements

13 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

Proposal for new CMS Control Room

2020 M&O-A Preliminary Draft Budget Overview

 The M&O-A cost estimates have changed with respect to the October 2018 RRB meeting  The budget projection up to the year 2021 shows the budgetary implications of LS2  The increases in the budget are approximately at the same level as in LS1  After 2021, the total M&O-A allocation will decrease to a level corresponding to the 2017 and 2018 allocation

14 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

1 002 1 888 2 659 3 835 7 395 9 698 11 959 12 208 13 711 14 353 15 035 15 439 15 346 14 160 14 257 13 816 14 120 15 497 15 577 14 208 14 208 14 058

2 000 4 000 6 000 8 000 10 000 12 000 14 000 16 000 18 000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

M&O-A Budget Evolution

Apr-19

The total estimated budget for M&O-A excluding power is 13’877 kCHF The total estimated budget for M&O-A with power is 15’577 kCHF

2020 M&O-A Preliminary Draft Budget

15 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

2020 Description Budget in kCHF A.1. Detector related costs 5'129 A.2. Secretariat 312 A.3. Communications 130 A.4. On-line computing 3'325 A.5. Test beams, calibration facilities 96 A.6. Laboratory operations 649 A.7. General services 2'272 A.9. Core Computing Infrastructure & Services 1'964 Total without Power Cost 13'877 A.8. Electricity 1'700 Grand Total 15'577 M&O-A

M&O-B Budget

Implications of the Phase-2 Upgrade

15 April 2019 CERN-RRB-2019-032 16

 CMS R&D and CORE budget of the Phase-2 will not cover the operation and maintenance of the upgraded areas and facilities needed for assembly and

• peration

 CMS is currently working on establishing some common rules/guidelines with respect to requesting M&O-B funds for costs resulting from the implementation of the Phase-2 Upgrade  One should note that the Muon M&O-B already has a component related to the GEM GE1/1 Project which is part of the Phase-2 Upgrade  Some examples of items relevant to the pre-production and production period:

• Spares for operation and maintenance of new components (not in CORE), and for

those not replaced as part of the upgrade

• Operation and maintenance of infrastructure and systems used during production

 This request will be discussed in detail with the RRB Scrutiny Group, especially in view of the fact that the HGCal System would need an M&O-B Budget to be established for 2020

2020 M&O-B Preliminary Draft Budget Overview

 With respect to the forecast of the M&O-B budget for 2020, as presented at the October 2018 RRB, the budget has decreased by 25 kCHF amounting to 5’545 kCHF  All subsystems have substantially used their carry-over funds in accordance with agreement with the RRB Scrutiny Group  As requested by the RRB, the M&O-B expenditures will undergo formal scrutiny by the RRB Scrutiny Group as in previous years (following an internal CMS Scrutiny

process)

 Below is the current M&O-B forecast for the next four years

17 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

1'320 4'355 5'644 6'073 6'262 5'827 6'464 6'033 6'418 6'639 5'915 5'997 5'463 5'582 5'414 4'908 5'491 5'545 5'241 5'166 5'219

• 1'000

2'000 3'000 4'000 5'000 6'000 7'000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023

M&O-B Budget Evolution

Apr-19

2020 M&O-B Preliminary Draft Budget

18 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

Description Ref. Details Tracker ECAL HCAL Muon Trigger BRIL PPS Core Computing Grand Total B.1.01 Mechanics 10 20 5 2 37 B.1.02 Gas-system 59 33 92 B.1.03 Cryo-system

• B.1.04

Cooling system 95 4 3 102 B.1.05 FE electronics 7 5 6 18 B.1.06 Standard electronics, PS (LV, HV) 73 50 7 157 10 7 304 B.1.07 Standard electronics, Crates 17 20 40 4 3 84 B.1.08 Standard electronics, RO Modules 10 17 52 50 16 17 162 B.1.09 Controls, (DCS, DSS) 16 10 15 13 2 56 B.1.10 Sub-Detector Spares 115 42 56 6 219 B.1.11 Areas 25 10 42 1 1 79 B.1.12 Communications 40 10 25 50 5 8 5 143 B.1.13 Store Items 25 20 21 50 5 8 4 133 B.1.14 Hired Manpower @ CERN 780 350 920 1'344 279 180 264 4'117

1'248 450 1'067 1'788 379 295 318 5'545

B.2.01 Technical Manpower @ CERN B.2.02 Core Computing Manpower @ CMS 8 8 8 8 Human Resources Total

2020 M&O-B Budget Request

Detector Amount (kCHF/FTE) Material Resources

Material Resources Total

Human Resources

Review of M&O-B Sharing

15 April 2019 19 CERN-RRB-2019-032

• Following a request from the RRB Scrutiny Group, the RRB invited CMS to

review its M&O-B sharing scheme with a view to finding ways to reduce discrepancies in the per-capita cost of M&O-B to FAs

• This issue was discussed in detail during successive meetings of the CMS

Finance Board. It was noted that any such global revision could potentially have major implications for FA-specific cost as well as for the Subsystems

• Consequently,

a more detailed assessment

• f

the current system is necessary to better understand the issues and potential implications

• One should note that this is not a straightforward exercise as there is no

single CMS M&O-B sharing method. There is a general guideline that this should be determined by the annually-revised PhD List. This is applied by most Subsystems, but not by all (some take into account FA responsibility for

initial construction)

• CMS has to include the new systems where the community is still building

up, with the majority of physicists still involved in already well-established systems

• The Scrutiny Group will be informed of progress in the related discussions

CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019 20

Summary

 The total M&O-A Preliminary Draft Budget 2020 amounts to 15’577 kCHF  The M&O-B Preliminary Draft Budget 2020 amounts to 5’545 kCHF and some 8 FTEs

• f

Collaborating Institutes manpower (for Core Computing)  CMS is currently analysing the implications of the Phase-2 Upgrade, in the long-term, on the M&O-B Budget  The RRB is invited to take note of the present, unscrutinized, cost estimates for M&O-A and M&O-B

Upgrade Status Report

• A. Charkiewicz, RRB-48, 15 April
• Cf. CERN-RRB-2019-035

2019

Status of Phase-1 Upgrade

 The CMS Phase-1 Upgrade Project is now in its final stage and will be completed during the Long Shut-down 2 (LS2)  There is no change to the overall budget of the Phase-1 Upgrade as the estimated cost at completion corresponds to approximately 65 MCHF for all CMS Subsystems  There are no specific problems related to funding

22 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 New systems, installed in LS1

• r

subsequent stops,

• perated

very smoothly in the course of last year, providing very high-quality data from a higher than ever fraction of active channels  The remaining detector upgrade work is described in more detail below and concerns the Pixel Tracker and HCAL  The Phase-1 DAQ Upgrade is foreseen to be finalized towards the end of LS2

0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Pixel Tracker HCAL HF - Phototubes Muon CSC Muon DT Muon RPC DAQ Trigger

Updated Cost Profile for all the Subsystems

Status of the Phase-1 Upgrade Budget

Subsystem Projects (1)

The Phase-1 Upgrade is completed for Trigger and Muons within cost estimates and schedules specified in their respective TDRs

23 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

0,00 1,00 2,00 3,00 4,00 5,00 6,00 7,00 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Pixel Tracker HCAL Trigger

 Pixel Upgrade:

• The construction and installation of the Phase-1 Pixel detector was completed at the beginning of
• 2017. Corrective actions and progressive diagnosis prevented the DC-DC converter fault from

affecting 2018 operations and it is being permanently corrected during LS2

• The project funds also cover the construction of a replacement for the innermost layer during LS2,

required because of deterioration due to radiation (a provision of 520 kCHF has been made)

Cost Profile for the TDR Projects (MCHF/year)

 HCAL Upgrade:

• The HE Phase-1 installation was completed in 2018,

a year ahead of schedule, including the replacement

• f HPDs with SiPM photodetectors
• The last remaining part of

Phase-1 Upgrade is the HB photo-detectors and front-end electronics

 DAQ Upgrade:

• The upgrade addresses the read-out of the new

back-end electronics, which was implemented in LS1 for Trigger and subsequently for other upgraded sub-detectors: Pixel, Muon, and Hadron Calorimeter. The system performed reliably in Run-2

• The inclusion of the outer Hadron Calorimeter will be

done in LS2

Status of the Phase-1 Upgrade Budget

Common Items

 The Common Fund has been almost fully paid with only one Funding Agency contribution missing  As for the rest of the Phase-1 Upgrade, the Common Infrastructure part, currently fully financed from the Upgrade Common Fund, is in the final stage of completion  It was nevertheless possible to make some savings, which, in agreement with the RRB Scrutiny Group, are being used to launch some useful items descoped from the Phase-1 Upgrade to keep estimated costs within the available ceiling

24 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 Among them are Magnet protection facilities, a hydraulic

• pening

system and a second bridge crane in the experimental cavern  The last of these is installed and in use in LS2, allowing for simultaneous operation in 2 zones  The principal remaining activity is the connection and integration of all systems by the end of LS2

0,00 0,20 0,40 0,60 0,80 1,00 1,20 1,40 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 Magnet power and cryo Beam Instrumentation Infrastructure Test Beam Facilities Upgrade Safety systems upgrade Electronics Integration Engineering Integration

Cost Profile for the Upgrade Common Items (MCHF/year)

CMS Phase-2 Upgrade

 The Phase-2 Upgrade Project of CMS is intended to adapt the experiment to the unprecedented luminosity levels foreseen in the High Luminosity LHC era  Efforts to ensure readiness for this new stage in the life of the experiment, expected to start sometime in the middle of 2026, have been ongoing already since several years  The foreseen technical configuration of the future experiment has been described in the Technical Proposal  More detailed descriptions of each of the Detector Systems were contained in the subsequent Technical Design Reports (TDRs) for each Subsystem Upgrade  The cost estimate for the CMS Phase-2 Upgrade has already been presented to the RRB in its October 2018 Meeting

25 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

TDR MoU Addenda

 Four new MoU Addenda (to the Memorandum of

Understanding for the Construction of CMS) have been

finalized:  They will now be transmitted to participating Funding Agencies for signature

26 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

Addendum No. 11 to the Memorandum of Understanding

• n the one hand,

• n the other hand.

Addendum No. 12 to the Memorandum of Understanding

• n the one hand,

• n the other hand.

Addendum No. 13 to the Memorandum of Understanding

• n the one hand,

• n the other hand.

Addendum No. 14 to the Memorandum of Understanding

• n the one hand,

• n the other hand.
• 1. MoU Addendum No.11 for Tracker

(CERN-MoU-2019-006)

MoU Addendum No. 12 for Barrel Calorimeter

• 3. MoU Addendum No.13 for Muons

(CERN-MoU-2019-008)

• 2. MoU Addendum No.12 for Barrel Calorimeter

(CERN-MoU-2019-007)

• 4. MoU Addendum No.14 for the Endcap

Calorimeter (HGCal)

(CERN-MoU-2019-009)

Phase-2 Upgrade Money Matrix (1)

27 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 The CMS Phase-2 Money Matrix has been updated in the process of finalizing the MoU Addenda  The resulting changes show an increase of the funding available for the Phase-2 Upgrade  The cost was not changed although a revision on MIP Timing Detector (MTD) is expected in the coming months

FA/Subsystem EC-CALO Barrel - CALO Muons Tracker MIP-TD BRIL TDAQ Common Fund Total Phase-2

CORE Costs (kCHF) 67'127 13'255 25'187 111'900 15'796 2'600 18'500 25'000 279'365

Austria 900 800 326 2'026 Belgium FNRS 100 4'800 489 5'389 Belgium FWO 5'000 417 5'417 Brazil/FAPESP 1'291 127 1'418 Brazil/RENAFAE 380 380 Bulgaria 360 181 541 CERN 21'500 2'000 1'524 19'500 1'200 4'500 1'322 51'546 China 900 1'450 400 254 3'004 Colombia 80 72 152 Croatia 1'350 145 1'495 Cyprus 127 127 Egypt 200 54 254 Estonia 522 54 576 Finland 150 1'100 1'000 236 2'486 France-CEA 1'000 1'815 500 308 3'623 France-IN2P3 6'400 600 4'600 924 12'524 Germany BMBF 1'920 9'450 1'196 12'566 Germany Helmholtz 100 9'107 500 634 10'341 Greece 350 1'400 1'000 326 3'076 Hungary 225 300 150 225 181 1'081 India 2'060 1'479 2'000 250 598 6'387 Iran 1'390 145 1'535 Ireland 36 36 Italy 1'900 5'150 14'000 3'600 200 3'007 27'857 Korea 2'056 562 2'618 Lithuania 348 36 384 Malaysia 870 91 961 Mexico 1'000 199 1'199 New Zealand 70 36 106 Pakistan 1'100 550 1'600 36 3'286 Poland 300 272 572 Portugal 420 460 960 109 1'949 RDMS-DMS-Russia 8'200 629 350 1'522 10'701 Serbia 80 54 134 Spain 1'500 1'200 200 100 779 3'779 Switzerland 2'500 9'113 1'000 707 13'320 Taipei 2'600 272 2'872 Thailand 100 54 154 Turkey 2'094 217 2'311 United Kingdom 3'500 500 2'500 500 1'033 8'033 USA-DOE 14'500 2'698 13'691 5'000 3'886 5'431 45'206 USA-NSF 4'194 2'199 12'512 900 1'381 21'186 USA-DOE-NP 5'305 525 5'830 Ecuador 36 36 Montenegro 190 36 226 Sri Lanka 760 72 832 Latvia 380 36 416 Qatar 300 300 Georgia 500 36 536

Funding (kCHF) 69'014 13'449 26'320 113'964 12'410 1'845 18'711 25'071 280'784 Uncertainty low 90% 99% 84% 96% 92% 100% 63% 100% 92% Uncertainty Medium 6% 1% 14% 4% 8% 0% 7% 0% 5% Uncertainty High 4% 0% 1% 0% 0% 0% 30% 0% 3% Funding/CORE Costs 103% 101% 104% 102% 79% 71% 101% 100% 101% Funding-CORE Costs 1'887 194 1'133 2'064

• 3386
• 755

211 71 1'419

CMS Phase-2 Internal Money Matrix (in kCHF), 15 April 2019

Phase-2 Upgrade Money Matrix (2)

28 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 The MM presented to the RRB includes a color-coding scheme, common to all experiments with three levels:

• GREEN - The FA agrees to the targeted

funding and includes this in their spending plan

• The FA is processing the

request as a target to work towards

• GREY - A formal request for funding, as

described in the MM, has been submitted to the FA or is considered to form the basis for further discussion

 Funding Agencies have reviewed their funding confidence level, with significant progress, as many have recently ‘upgraded’ their colour code to one designating a higher confidence level

92% 5% 3%

Uncertainty level

Uncertainty low Uncertainty Medium Uncertainty High

Phase-2 Upgrade Common Fund

 The CMS Phase-2 Upgrade requires a substantial investment in new, specific infrastructure facilities, collectively used systems and commonly executed integration and installation tasks. These are covered by the Upgrade Common Items category, financed chiefly through the Common Fund  The level of the Common Fund has been established at 25 MCHF (below 9%

• f the total Upgrade cost), which is financed by contributions from Funding

Agencies, based on the same sharing system as applied for the M&O-A, using the proportion of PhD authors  The formal framework for this is stipulated in the Addendum No. 10 to the Construction MoU (CERN-RRB-2017-060). This document has been elaborated at the end of 2017 and already signed by the majority of CMS Funding Agencies  By now, 5.8 MCHF have been collected into the Common Fund, with several Funding Agencies already having covered their full contribution  Expenditures from the Common Fund are already ongoing since the beginning of 2018 and these will be reported on a regular basis to the Scrutiny Group and to the RRB

15 April 2019 CERN-RRB-2019-032 29

Status of the Phase-2 Upgrade Budget

Subsystem Projects

30 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

 The Subsystem Projects are already advancing in preparations for the construction phase of the Upgrade. Most of them are already engaging some expenditures.  The most advanced of the Phase-2 projects are the Muon GEM and CSC  Invitation to tender for the Tracker and HGCal sensors is out to be ready for the June Finance Committee and hopefully issuance of contract in October  The MTD TDR, which has been recently finalized, is under review by the

• LHCC. This will be followed by a UCG review in September, following

which, an Addendum to the MoU will be prepared.  The TDR for the BRIL Phase-2 Upgrade is planned to be submitted at the end of 2020  A Letter of Intent for PPS is under discussion and supported by LHCC. It should be noted that this project is not in current scope of the Phase-2 Upgrade.

• All the GE1/1 detectors have been assembled and validated and procurement of the

electronics is on-going. The super-chamber assembly has started.

• The CSC on-chamber electronics refurbishment started in March 2019 and is

proceeding according to schedule

• 90% of the GE 1/1 and 60% of the CSC budget has been spent in accordance with the

foreseen expenditure profile

Conclusion

31 CERN-RRB-2019-032 15 April 2019

CMS expresses thanks to Funding Agencies for their continued provision for the maintenance and

• peration of the detector and its

subsystems. Furthermore, for support enabling the upgrades necessary to carry out a top quality physics programme at HL-LHC