sage department update
play

Sage Department Update July 18, 2018 2018-2019 Sage Data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sage Department Update July 18, 2018 2018-2019 Sage Data Elementary 2018-2019 Sage Data Secondary 2018-2019 Demographic Sage Data 2018-2019 Demographic Sage Data 2018-2019 Budget--Staffing Elementary Teachers: 4.5 Middle School


  1. Sage Department Update July 18, 2018

  2. 2018-2019 Sage Data Elementary

  3. 2018-2019 Sage Data Secondary

  4. 2018-2019 Demographic Sage Data

  5. 2018-2019 Demographic Sage Data

  6. 2018-2019 Budget--Staffing Elementary Teachers: 4.5 Middle School Teachers: 3.0 Department Head Secretarial Support through Office of Teaching and Learning

  7. 2018-2019 Budget -- Expenses Curriculum Materials: $5,618 Dues (WordMasters, New England Math League): $1,100 Travel Reimbursement - Mileage: $515 Screening: $14,000

  8. Department Review History -- 2011 Task Force Goals of the Task Force: “Review current and past practices” ❖ “Consider programming options that best meet the needs” ❖ “Recommend program elements given the current staffing or additional ❖ staffing”

  9. Department Review History -- 2011 Task Force The Review Identified The Following Challenges: Inability to service profoundly gifted students in K-1 ❖ Large number of students per teacher ❖ Itinerant nature of programming ❖ Amount of time per building ❖ Reduced hours of direct services and integrative services ❖ Placement of students across all classrooms ❖

  10. Department Review History -- 2011 Task Force The Review Identified The Following Challenges: Training of new district teachers and administrators ❖ Facilitation of programs such as WordMasters and Math League ❖ Limited time available to support independent investigation ❖ Resources and policies for curriculum acceleration ❖

  11. Department Review History --2011 Task Force The Review Identified The Following Recommendations : Train teachers on differentiation across the curriculum ❖ Train teachers in cluster and flexible grouping practices ❖ Provide accelerated learning options ❖ Continue and expand pull out services ❖ Offer Independent Investigation ❖ Conduct early identification and intervention ❖

  12. Department Review History --2011 Task Force The Review Identified the Following as Optimum Services:

  13. Department Review History --2011 Task Force The Review Identified the Following as Optimum Services: Centralize Sage services in support of district goals ❖ Full-time Director ➢ Secretary ➢ Screening all Kindergarten students town-wide, grades 1-11 as needed ❖ 120 minutes per week pull out model in elementary ❖

  14. 2017-2018 Sage Department Review Gathered responses from parents, teachers and administrators ❖ Conditional survey for parents ❖ Customized questions based on respondents’ answers ➢ Survey open to ALL parents ➢ Static survey for teachers ❖ School district visits ❖ Brookline ➢ Bedford ➢ Presentation by member of Massachusetts Association for Gifted Education ❖ (MAGE) Sent two Sage teachers to Association for Supervision and Curriculum ❖ Development (ASCD) conference on Differentiated Learning Formation of Sage Council ❖

  15. 2017-2018 Sage Department Review Findings and Concerns Many issues from 2011 still exist although the following additional concerns were identified: Issues with communication ❖ Lack of clarity and understanding among classroom teachers about gifted ❖ learners Lack of clarity among families about Sage ❖ Screening process may be biased ❖ Student demographics do not reflect school populations ❖ Department needs strong leadership ❖

  16. 2017-2018 Sage Department Review Recommendations Different model for elementary and middle ❖ Scheduling differences ➢ Change in social and emotional needs as students enter preteen years ➢ Content specific classes at middle school level ➢ Elementary: ❖ Multiple screening tools PLUS portfolio ➢ Sage teacher consults with classroom teacher to provide support ➢ Development of a Classroom Strategies list for differentiation and flexible grouping ➢ Parent Information Sessions twice per year ➢ Pull out services 2 hours per week ➢ Independent Investigation continues with stronger focus on solutions-oriented problem ➢ solving; includes community involvement Integration services continue ➢ Sage teachers meet monthly with grade level teams ➢ Move toward universal screening over time in Grade 1 with a watch list in Kindergarten ➢

  17. 2017-2018 Sage Department Review Recommendations Middle School: ❖ Middle school Sage teachers work with elementary Sage teachers on transition to grade 6 ➢ Middle school Sage teachers and DH work with Sage students on transition to grade 9 ➢ Development of Sage checklist for students showing need for services in middle school ➢ Checklist will be created using current research ■ Middle school teachers will be trained in use of checklist ■ Elementary screening tools will be used if additional information is needed ■ Sage services offered on a continuum of tiered interventions in alignment with Multi Tiered ➢ System of Supports (MTSS) Direct services to students 25% of time ➢ 3 hours per grade level per 6-day cycle ■ Work with teachers through collaboration, coaching and integration 75% of time ➢ Students monitored through multiple indicators ➢ Mastery of content ■ Demonstration of higher order thinking skills ■ Growth in subject and social-emotional realms ■

  18. 2017-2018 Sage Department Review Next Steps Hire Department Head ❖ Create professional development plan for Sage teachers ❖ Review screening tools and research alternatives ❖ Create and implement a communication plan - administration, teachers ❖ and parents Develop a plan for universal screening to begin in the 2020-2021 school ❖ year Collaborate with new Department Head on finalizing the vision and ❖ mission statements as well as the role of the Sage Council Identify data to be collected for next Sage Department review in ❖ 2023-2024

  19. Thank you!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend