SLIDE 1
Figures from Zorich, 2008 Some low-dimensional dynamical systems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Figures from Zorich, 2008 Some low-dimensional dynamical systems - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Genus 2 translation surface obtained by identifying parallel sides of the regular octagon Conical singularity, cone angle 6 Figures from Zorich, 2008 Some low-dimensional dynamical systems induce a dynamical system of the same class on
SLIDE 2
SLIDE 3
SLIDE 4
SLIDE 5
SLIDE 6
Figures from Zorich, 2008 Conical singularity, cone angle 6π Genus 2 translation surface obtained by identifying parallel sides
- f the
regular
- ctagon
SLIDE 7
SLIDE 8
Some low-dimensional dynamical systems induce a dynamical system of the same class
- n a restriction of the original domain
Figures from Viana, CIM-COIMBRA
Rauzy induction on IETs
Iterating this renormalization operator creates a dynamics on the class of dynamical systems Renormalization of the flow yields a renormalization of the symbolic dynamics as well Correspondence between flow renormalization and combinatorial renormalization well understood for IETs
Figures from Vsmillie-Ulcigrai
Torus
(classical)
Regular Octagon Regular 2n-gon
(Smillie- Ulcigrai)
What about the (π/n)-isosceles triangles that tile regular 2n-gons?
SLIDE 9
Fixing one exterior side of the 2n-gon as the lift of the triangle base gives a well defined map of linear trajectories from the 2n-gon to the triangle and a well-defined lift of billiard trajectories from the triangle to the 2n-gon
SLIDE 10
SLIDE 11
Can go back and forth between codings for ∑0 trajectories on 2n- gon and isosceles using λ,ρ-augmented transition diagrams
(and adding / dropping subscripts and superscripts)
SLIDE 12
This presents a potential problem for direct translation of combinatorial renormalization rules from the punctured 2n-gon to the isosceles triangle
In our case, the required subword length on the 2n-gon will be at most 5, Independent of n. However, the required subword length for the translated rule
- n the apex-π/n isosecles
grows quadratically in n
We will return to this later if time permits.…
SLIDE 13
SLIDE 14
SLIDE 15
SLIDE 16
SLIDE 17
SLIDE 18
SLIDE 19
SLIDE 20
SLIDE 21
SLIDE 22
SLIDE 23
Need stronger notion of admissibility
SLIDE 24
SLIDE 25
SLIDE 26
SLIDE 27
SLIDE 28
SLIDE 29
SLIDE 30
SLIDE 31
SLIDE 32
SLIDE 33
SLIDE 34
SLIDE 35
SLIDE 36
Unlike in the genus 1 case: not all infinitely deriveable words are realizable as cutting sequences
SLIDE 37
Generation ‘Inverting ‘ Derivation: Interpolating Words
SLIDE 38
The realizable infinitely deriveable words also satisfy a set of coherence conditions
SLIDE 39
The proof is somewhat complicated. See Section 4.3.1
SLIDE 40
Proof again somewhat complicated, uses properties of the sequence of sectors that successive derivations of an Infinitely deriveable word are admissible in. See Section 4.3.1.
SLIDE 41
Extras and Appendices
SLIDE 42
SLIDE 43
SLIDE 44
SLIDE 45
SLIDE 46
SLIDE 47
SLIDE 48
SLIDE 49
SLIDE 50