FET dans Horizon 2020 IECB, Bordeaux, 5 fvrier 2016 Technologies - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Technologies Futures et Emergentes

Future Emerging Technologies

FET

dans

Horizon 2020

IECB, Bordeaux, 5 février 2016

Technologies Futures et Emergentes

I – Contexte § FET dans H2020 II – FET-OPEN

§ Un programme « ouvert » / les résultats 2014-2015 / Cartographie des projets / le programme de travail 2016-2017 / modalités de soumission et d'évaluation

III – FET-PROACTIVE

§ Un programme thématique / les résultats 2014-2015 / le programme de travail 2016-2017 /

L’esprit FET Un programme en 3 volets

En savoir plus § Le dispositif national MRSEI (ANR) § Liens et documents utiles § Le PCN FET

ESRs, une première analyse

Le programme FET

Ø Un programme initié il y a 24 ans Ø Géré par la DG-CONNECT Ø Historiquement la partie « amont » du programme TIC Ø Ouverture à toutes les technologies avec Horizon 2020

« Future and Emerging Technologies will help Europe to grasp leadership early on in new and emerging technology areas that promise to renew the basis for European competitiveness and growth and that will make a difference for society in the decades to

• come. »

è Objectif long-terme è Recherche exploratoire

I – CONTEXTE

FET DANS H2020

FET rejoint le pilier Excellence scientifique et s’étend à tous les champs disciplinaires

Mais programme toujours géré par la DG CNECT

(Direction Générale Réseaux et Communication, contenu et technologies; en charge de la recherche dans les TIC)

Le programme FET ?

Ø Projets collaboratifs uniquement : au moins 3 entités légales (publiques et/ou privées) dans 3 pays-membres de l’UE ou associés à Horizon 2020 (Israël, Suisse, Balkans etc.) Ø 3 sous-programmes dont un programme ouvert, non thématique (FET Open) Ø Recherche exploratoire mais le critère « impact » est important

L’esprit du programme FET

Le programme technologies futures et émergentes (FET) a pour ambition de transformer l’excellence scientifique de l’Europe en un avantage compétitif. Ce programme veut promouvoir la recherche au-delà des connaissances, de ce qui est accepté et largement adopté et soutiendra les idées visionnaires et nouvelles pour ouvrir des voies prometteuses vers des technologies fortes. La recherche financée sera interdisciplinaire et se positionnera entre défis scientifiques, défis sociétaux et compétitivité industrielle rapprochant la science et l’ingénierie.

… des idées novatrices pour des technologies radicalement nouvelles

Emergence Fondateur Vision long terme Interdisciplinarité Novateur Rupture Haut risque

Roadmap-based research Open, light and agile

La structure – Un programme en 3 volets

High-Performance Computing (HPC) Strategy FET Open

Individual research projects

Early Ideas

FET Proactive

Open research clusters

Incubation

FET Flagships

Common research agendas

Large-Scale Initiatives

Future and Emerging Technologies

Exploring Developing Addressing novel ideas topics & communities grand challenges

Un programme OUVERT

Les types d’actions du programme FET

Research and Innovation Action (RIA) = projet de recherche collaborative classique à Financement à 100% pour tous types de partenaires + 25% de coûts indirects à Entre 2 et 4 millions d’€par consortium Coordination and Support Action (CSA) = projets divers de soutien à la recherche par l’analyse d’impact, l’organisation d’événements de promotions, la mise en place de réseaux à un ou plusieurs partenaires selon l’appel à Financement à 100% pour tous types de partenaires + 25% de coûts indirects à Entre 300 et 500 K€ sauf exception Framework Partnership Agreement (FPA) = ne concerne que les grandes initiatives (Flagships) – Pas de « Innovation Actions » (IA) dans le programme FET

II – FET OPEN « Exploring novelideas »

FET Open

FET Open est un appel blanc, «bottom-up» visant à explorer des idées visionnaires et prometteuses susceptibles de répondre aux défis technologiques à long terme de l’Europe. Sa souplesse autorise l’exploration d’idées, d’approches et de concepts nouveaux et

• interdisciplinaires. ”Bottom-up, but targeted - not blue sky research”

(TRL 1-3). FET Open porte une attention particulière à l’interdisciplinarité et aux collaborations non conventionnelles. Ø FET Open soutient des projets collaboratifs de petite taille (entre 2 et 4 M€/projet). 'Open is open'

Scope:

[…] Proposals are sought for collaborative research with all of the following characteristics ('FET gatekeepers'):

• Long-term vision
• Breakthrough scientific and

technological target

• Novelty
• Foundational
• High-risk
• Interdisciplinary

Future and Emerging Technologies Interdisciplinary Novelty S&T targeted Foundational High-Risk Long-term vision

FET-Open Research and Innovation Actions

§ Partie A en ligne : infos administratives § Partie B : document de (15+1) pages max pour FET OPEN

Ø page de couverture (1 page) Ø Section 1: S&T Excellence Ø Section 2: Impact Ø Section 3: Implémentation

§ Information complémentaire

ØCapacité opérationnelle · E.g. entités légales, CV, sous-traitance, ... ØSection éthique

15

Soumission / évaluation en 1 étape

Modalités de soumission et d’évaluation

• S/T quality weight 60%, threshold 4/5
• Impact weight 20%, threshold 3,5/5
• Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5

Critères d’évaluation Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)

• Excellence weight 40%, threshold 3/5
• Impact weight 40%, threshold 3/5
• Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5

Actions de coordination et de soutien (CSA)

• Single stage procedure
• High quality peer review by 4 expert evaluators
• Interdisciplinary final panel review
• Time table for evaluation and GA signature
• Time to Inform (TTI) - outcome of the evaluation within 5 months
• Time to Grant (TTG) - signature of the GA within 8 months
• Eligibility and admissibility conditions - parts B and C of

the General Annexes to the Work Programme

• Grant Agreement Preparation (GAP) - grant completely based
• n proposal (no negotiation)

Conditions for the Call – FET Open

17

FETOPEN EVALUATION

FETOPEN EVALUATION 1 step submission and evaluation

Feedback in 5 months Ethics screening/ assessment Panel review Cross-reading Quality check Remote evaluations Expert selection Eligibility check

Applicant Research Executive Agency

Proposal submission

18

• Collation of all evaluators' comments, per sub-criterion,

which may be mutually contradicting (no consensus) - full transparency

• Final score per criteria is decided by the final panel review
• Total final score for the proposal is calculated as the weighted

sum of the final scores from the 3 evaluation criteria

• Final panel review adds also some additional comments

Feedback to proposers - Evaluation Summary Report (ESR)

19

FETOPEN EVALUATION

FETOPEN Résultats

*first cut-off in 2014: 640 eligible RIA proposals - 77M€ budget - success rate ~3,75%

Overview of topics covered*

20

Cluster A: proposals mainly from Electronics, ICT, Systems and Communication Engineering Cluster B: proposals mainly from Chemistry, Materials, Energy and Environment Cluster C: mainly Physics, but also few proposals from Mathematics, Sociology and Economics Cluster D: proposals mainly from Life Sciences

Répartition thématique des propositions pour les panels*

Mais pour l’évaluation : un seul panel, un seul budget et une seule liste classée

*Session FET-OPEN de sept. 2014

Summary evaluation outcome: RIA

Cut-off Eligible Proposals received Above threshold proposals Grant requested by above threshold proposals Retained Proposals Grant requested by retained proposals Success rate

SEPT 2014

643 254 805 M€ 24 78,1 M€ 3,7%

MAR 2015

665 326 1079 M€ 11 41 M€ 1,7%

SEPT 2015

799 Max 38,5 M€ 1,1%- 1,3% (est.)

FETOPEN Résultats

FET OPEN : un programme très compétitif

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Sept-2014 March-2015

389 344 230 315

24 11

Main list Below available budget Below threshold

643 670

3,7% Cut 4,65 1,7% Cut 4,9

41 M€ 78,1 M€

FET OPEN : un programme très compétitif

100 200 300 400 500 600 700

Sept-2014 March-2015

389 344 230 315

24 11

Main list Below available budget Below threshold

643 670

3,7% Cut 4,65 1,7% Cut 4,9

41 M€ 78,1 M€

61% des propositions de 09/2014 au-dessus du seuil ont resoumis en 03/2015 12% des propositions inéligibles ou en dessous du seuil ont resoumis en 03/2015

FET open 2 – CSA Sujets : Observatory, Communication, Exchange, Conference, Prizes, Impact 3M€ 0,3 to 0,5M€ par sujet jusqu’à 1M€ pour la Conférence FET FET open 3 – CSA Sujets : exchange, take-up 0,3 to 0,5M€ par sujet 1,5M€ - 31/3/2015 1,5M€ - 29/9/2015 Résultats CSA Soumissions : 31 Propositions éligibles : 30 Propositions au-dessus du seuil : 20 Budget total demandé par les propositions au-dessus du seuil : 10,8 M€ Propositions retenues : 4 Soumissions : 21 Propositions retenues : 3

Pays bénéficiaires

669 propositions 2 Md€ demandés 3037 participations par 1500 participants dont 130 FR 280 propositions à participation FR 211 M€ demandés par FR 10,5% 28 projets retenus - 80 M€ 12 projets à participation FR dont 1 CSA, 13,5 M€ - 16,9%

FR 2ème bénéficiaire taux de sélection de 7%

*Session FET-OPEN (RIA + CSA) de

• sept. 2014

Focus sept.2014

Principaux bénéficiaires

17 « Private for profit » sur 141 participants

*Session FET-OPEN (RIA + CSA) de

• sept. 2014

Focus sept.2014

Principaux bénéficiaires FR

13 bénéficiaires FR dont 3 industriels (hors consultant) 23 participations FR à 12 projets dont 6 coordinations (1 CSA)

*Session FET-OPEN (RIA + CSA) de

• sept. 2014

Focus sept.2014

FET-OPEN mars 2015 Focus FR

q La France est le 4ème participant (derrière UK, DE, IT) et le 5ème bénéficiaire (derrière DE, UK, ES, IT). q Il y a 7 partenaires français retenus (dont 1 entreprise) qui participent à 5 projets. q L'Institut Curie est le seul coordinateur FR (projet Magneuron). q Le taux de succès (en projets) est de 1,9% (1,6% en budget).

Cartographie des résultats

Vue d’ensemble

Sept 2014 : 24 projets RIA Mars 2015 : 11 projets RIA

5 10 15 20 25 36 mois 42 mois 48 mois 60 mois

Distribution en durée

Montant d’Aide De 1,9 M€ à 4M€ 3,4 M€ en moyenne

Vue d’ensemble

Sept 2014 : 24 projets RIA Mars 2015 : 11 projets RIA

5 10 15 4 5 6 7 8 9

Distribution nb partenaires Higher or Secondary Education; 119; 58% Research Organisation; 53; 26% Private for Profit; 32; 16% Public body; 1; 0% TYPE DE PARTENAIRES

*first cut-off in 2014: 640 eligible RIA proposals - 77M€ budget - success rate ~3,75%

Overview of topics covered*

33

Vue d’ensemble

Electronics, Telecom, Optics, Hardware, Sensors, Devices; 2; 18% Energy, Transport, Environment; 1; 9%

Life Science, Medicine, Biology, NeuroBio; 8; 73% Bio-Robotics and HCI ; 1; 4% Computer Science, Bio- informatics, Complexity, Data mining; 5; 21% Electronics, Telecom, Optics, Hardware, Sensors, Devices; 3; 12% Energy, Transport, Environment; 1; 4% Life Science, Medicine, Biology, NeuroBio; 3; 13% Materials, Chemistry; 6; 25% Nanoscience, Quantum Physics, Astrophysics; 5; 21%

Sept.2014 Mars.2014

Vue d’ensemble

Sept 2014 : 24 projets RIA et Mars 2015 : 11 projets RIA Bio-Robotics and HCI ; 1; 3% Computer Science, Bio-informatics, Complexity, Data mining; 5; 14% Electronics, Telecom, Optics, Hardware, Sensors, Devices; 5; 14% Energy, Transport, Environment; 2; 6% Life Science, Medicine, Biology, NeuroBio; 11; 32% Materials, Chemistry; 6; 17% Nanoscience, Quantum Physics, Astrophysics; 5; 14% RÉPARTITION PAR DOMAINE

Les projets retenus

COMMISSARIAT A L ENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES FR DEDALE Data Learning on Manifolds and Future Challenges 2 702 398 € CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY UK InnoSMART An Innovative Method for Improving the Structural Integrity using SMA Revolutionary Technology 1 995 113 € ASSOCIACAO DO INSTITUTO SUPERIOR TECNICO PARA A INVESTIGACAO E PT VOXEL volumetric medical x-ray imaging at extremely low dose 3 996 875 € CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE FR ULTRAQCL Ultrashort Pulse Generation from Terahertz Quantum Cascade Lasers 2 798 445 € JULIUS-MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITAET WUERZBURG DE DIACAT Diamond materials for the photocatalytic conversion of CO2 to fine chemicals and fuels using visible 3 872 980 € STICHTING VU-VUMC NL CHROMAVISI ON Super-resolution visualisation and manipulation of metaphase 3 567 026 € TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF IL MRG- GRammar Massive Reverse Genomics to Decipher Gene Regulatory Grammar 3 999 661 € CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY UK CompInnova An Advanced Methodology for the Inspection and Quantification of Damage on Aerospace Composites and Metals using an Innovative 2 495 863 € INSTITUTO SUPERIOR DE ENGENHARIA DO PORTO PT Symbiotic INNOVATIVE AUTONOMOUS ELECTRICAL BIOSENSOR SYNERGISTICALLY ASSEMBLED INSIDE A PASSIVE DIRECT METHANOL FUEL CELL FOR SCREENING CANCER 3 346 660 € WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE IL NanoSmell NanoSmells: Artificial remote- controlled odorants 3 979 069 € FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HELLAS EL LiNaBioFluid Laser-induced Nanostructures as Biomimetic Model of Fluid Transport in the Integument of Animals 2 750 812 € CHALMERS TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLA AB SE RECORD-IT Reservoir Computing with Real-time Data for future IT 4 193 148 €

UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID ES IBSEN Bridging the gap: from Individual Behaviour to the Socio-tEchnical 2 663 238 € CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE FR MAGicSky Magnetic Skyrmions for Future Nanospintronic Devices 3 396 441 € THE UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM UK NEMF21 Noisy Electromagnetic Fields - A Technological Platform for Chip-to- Chip Communication in the 21st 3 419 638 € THE UNIVERSITY OF EXETER UK ABIOMATER Magnetically actuated bio-inspired metamaterials 2 978 883 € THE CHANCELLOR, MASTERS AND SCHOLARS OF THE UK QCUMbER Quantum Controlled Ultrafast Multimode Entanglement and Measurement 3 219 722 € TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITEIT NL Phoenix Exploring the Unknown through Reincarnation and Co-evolution 3 632 487 € CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE FR Zoterac Zinc Oxide For TeraHertz Cascade Devices 3 795 878 € TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET WIEN AT nuClock Towards a nuclear clock with Thorium-229 3 970 328 € NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS - EL HELENIC-REF Hybrid Electric Energy Integrated Cluster concerning Renewable Fuels 2 578 386 € UNIVERSIDAD DEL PAIS VASCO/ EUSKAL HERRIKO UNIBERTSITATEA ES 2D-INK Redesigning 2D Materials for the Formulation of Semiconducting Inks 2 962 661 € FONDATION PIERRE- GILLES DE GENNES POUR FR Microflusa Fabricating colloidal materials with microfluidics 3 027 638 € TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITAET GRAZ AT CONQUER Contrast by Nuclear Quadrupole Enhanced Relaxation 2 488 975 €

FONDAZIONE ISTITUTO ITALIANO DI TECNOLOGIA IT PROSEQO PROtein SEQuencing using Optical single molecule real-time detection 2 906 802,00 € AALTO- KORKEAKOULUSAATIO FI BREAKBEN Breaking the Nonuniqueness Barrier in Electromagnetic Neuroimaging 3 998 793,00 € AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH AT MARA Molecular Analytical Robotics Assays 3 996 478,00 € FONDAZIONE BRUNO KESSLER IT SUPERTWIN All Solid-State Super-Twinning Photon Microscope 3 925 922,00 € UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE UK LIAR Living Architecture 3 216 555,00 € FUNDACIO CENTRE DE REGULACIO GENOMICA ES CellViewer A cell viewer: super-resolution systems microscopy to assess pluripotency and differentiation of 3 988 753,00 € MAX PLANCK GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FOERDERUNG DER DE FutureAgricultu re Transforming the future of agriculture through synthetic photorespiration 4 871 411,00 € UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO PT GOTSolar New technological advances for the third generation of Solar cells 2 993 404,00 € STARLAB BARCELONA SL ES LUMINOUS Studying, Measuring and Altering Consciousness through information theory in the electrical brain 3 925 589,00 € KOBENHAVNS UNIVERSITET DK MSmed Mass spectrometric technology for next generation proteomics in systems medicine 3 672 625,00 € INSTITUT CURIE FR MAGNEURON Hijacking cell signalling pathways with magnetic nanoactuators for remote-controlled stem cell therapies of neurodegenerative disorders 3 473 026,00 €

q La même structure en 3 volets q Un nouvel instrument FET Innovation Launchpad q Des critères d’évaluation plus différenciés entre FETOPEN et FET PROACT. Mêmes poids et seuils. q Un budget en augmentation >+35% (624,5M€) Ciblée sur FET OPEN (RIA) 154 252 M€ q Attention : des dates d’échéance différentes !

Le programme de travail FET 2016-2017 – En un mot

FET WP 2016-2017 - Structure et budget

q FET Open

§ FETOPEN 1 – 2016/2017 : FET-Open Research projects (RIA)

− 84 M€ en 2016 – 11/05/2016 − 168 M€ en 2017 – 17/01/2017 et 28/09/2017

§ FETOPEN 2 – 2016 : FET-Open Coordination and Support Actions

− 3 M€ - 11/05/2016 − FET Communication (16), FET Exchange (16), FET Conference (16), FET Innovation Greenhouse (16)

§ FETOPEN 3 – 2017 : FET-Open Coordination and Support Actions

− 1,5 M€ - 17/01/2017 − FET Futures (17), FET Exchange (17)

§ FETOPEN 4 – 2016/2017: FET Innovation Launchpad

− CSA < 100 k€ − 1,2 M€ - 28/10/2016 − 1,8 M€ - 27/10/2017

• S/T quality weight 60%, threshold 4/5

− Novelty of long-term vision, and clarity, ambition and concreteness of the targeted breakthrough towards achieving that vision. − Foundational character of the targeted breakthrough and novelty, nonincrementality and plausibility of the proposed research for achieving it. − Appropriateness of the research methodology and its suitability to address high scientific and technological risks. − Range and added value from interdisciplinarity, including measures for exchange, cross-fertilisation and synergy.

• Impact weight 20%, threshold 3,5/5

− Importance of the new technological outcome with regards to its transformational impact on technology and/or society. − Impact on future European scientific and industrial leadership, notably from involvement of new and high potential actors. − Quality of methods and measures for achieving impact beyond the research world and for establishing European though leadership, as perceived by industry and society.

Critères d’évaluation FETOPEN 2016-2017 Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)

• Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5

− Soundness of the workplan and clarity of intermediate targets. − Relevance of expertise in the consortium. − Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (personmonths, equipment, budget).

Critères d’évaluation 2016-2017 Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)

FET-Open Innovation Launchpad

• New topic in WP2016-17

This topic aims at funding further innovation related work (i.e. activities which were not scheduled to be funded by the

• riginal project) to verify and substantiate the innovation

potential of ideas arising from FET funded projects and to support the next steps in turning them into a genuine social

• r economic innovation.
• Coordination and Support Action, 18 months, up to 100k€
• Single step submission, '1+7' pages, 2 deadlines

FETOPEN-04-2016-2017

43

Dream Reality FET and innovation? New knowledge New technologies and their applications

An innovation engine

44

FET-Open Innovation Launchpad

• Scope
• Short and focused actions (18 months indicative, 100K€ funding)
• Early innovation steps to improve market- and investor-readiness
• Based on results from an ongoing or recently finished FET project
• Any FET-funded project from FP7 or H2020, ongoing or maximum 1 year from end-date of
• riginating project to call deadline
• The link with the originating project is to be substantiated in the proposal
• No additional S&T research
• Actions not foreseen in originating project
• No direct link needed with originating consortium
• Single participant possibility
• Assurance on necessary intellectual property rights and agreements

to be stated in the proposal

FETOPEN-04-2016-2017

45

FET-Open Innovation Launchpad

• Expected Impacts
• Increased innovation potential from FET projects

(is there evidence that the chance of succeeding will be increased through this action?)

• Creation of concrete innovations (start-up or otherwise)

(concreteness of the innovation idea to move closer to market than in the originating project)

• Stimulating entrepreneurial mindset in FET research world

(is this providing a strong role model for going beyond the research world?)

• Seeding growth and the creation of jobs

(is there a credible pathway presented towards a more inclusive society, growth and jobs?)

FETOPEN-04-2016-2017

46

Topic Budget 2016 (€ Million) Budget 2017 (€ Million) Deadlines Opening FETOPEN-01-2016-2017 (RIA) 84.0 84.0 26.5 (+57.5) 11 May 2016 17 Jan 2017 27 Sep 2017 8 Dec 2015 FETOPEN-02-2016 (CSA) 3.0 11 May 2016 8 Dec 2015 FETOPEN-03-2017 (CSA) 1.5 17 Jan 2017 20 Sep 2016 FETOPEN-04-2016-2017 (CSA - ILP) 1.2 1.8 29 Sep 2016 27 Sep 2017 1 Mar 2016 Total: 88.2 113.8

En résumé - appels FET-Open - WP 2016-17

47

FET-OPEN : est-ce le bon programme pour votre projet ?

• Check out LEIT and Societal Challenges workprogrammes
• FET is not ERC: collaboration, science and technology are all

essential ingredients

• It is not because something has not been done before that it is

sufficiently novel for FET

• FET is not long-term end of an established industry’s road-map

(radical novelty, interdisciplinary,...)

• An exciting long-term vision is essential, but also a new and

plausible idea on how to get there

• Writing a good FET-Open proposal is probably as hard as writing a

good scientific publication

III – FET PROACTIVE

Roadmap-based research Open, light and agile

La structure – Un programme en 3 volets

High-Performance Computing (HPC) Strategy FET Open

Individual research projects

Early Ideas

FET Proactive

Open research clusters

Incubation

FET Flagships

Common research agendas

Large-Scale Initiatives

Future and Emerging Technologies

Exploring Developing Addressing novel ideas topics & communities grand challenges

FET – PROACTIVE

§ Global Systems Science (GSS) – 10M€ § Knowing, doing and being: cognition beyond problem solving – 15 M€ § Quantum Simulation – 10M€

Complété par une action spéciale “Towards exascale High Performance Computing” FET-HPC Public-Private Partnership (ETP4HPC)

FET Proactive 2014 – Trois thématiques

Budget total (2014-2015) hors HPC: 35 M€ 3-4 M€ / projet durée possible du projet jusqu’à 5 ans

53

Topic Code Submitted Proposals - RIA Total % Eligible Proposals Ineligible % ineligible FETPROACT- 1-2014 52 28,3% 51 1 1,9% FETPROACT- 2-2014 110 59,8% 108 2 1,8% FETPROACT- 3-2014 22 12,0% 17 5 22,7% TOTAL 184 100,0% 176 8 4,3% Total Participants EU Requested Contribution Total SMEs % 1053 495 828 858 € 19 1,8%

FR 4ème participant (après DE, UK, IT) avec 85 participations (12,9%) dont 11 coordinations

Soumissions

FET Proactive 2014

Reason(s) for Ineligibility

The Part B (1-3 sections) is 19 pages long, and exceeds 16 pages limit set for the call. The opinion of the evaluators and of the panel is that the proposal consists essentially in the development of industrial management tool informed by AI methods and does not address any of the three aspects of the call on "Knowing, Doing, Being: Cognition beyond problem solving". The proposal might be worthwhile under some other program. The part including the cover page and the sections 1, 2 and 3 is longer than 16 pages. The opinion of the majority of experts in the panel is that the proposal content does not sufficiently address the scope defined by the call on "Quantum Simulations". The panel via majority vote decided that the proposal is out of scope

FET Proactive 2014

55

FR 2ème bénéficiaire (après DE) avec 11 participations dont 1 coordination, pour un montant total de 4,75 Meuros

Topic Code Number of Proposals Number

• f

particip ations EU Requested Contribution Evaluated %

Retained for Funding

%

Success Rate

FETPROACT- 1-2014

51 29,0% 3 30,0% 5,9% 29 9 505 569 €

FETPROACT- 2-2014

108 61,4% 4 40,0% 3,7% 25 13 042 650 €

FETPROACT- 3-2014

17 9,7% 3 30,0% 17,6% 28 9 157 875 € TOTAL 176 100,0% 10 100,0% 5,7% 82 31 706 094 €

FET Proactive 2014 - Résultats

Liste des projets retenus (RIA)

DOLFINS DistributedGlobal Financial Systems for Society CIMPLEX Bringing CItizens, Models and Data together in Participatory, Interactive SociaL EXploratories GRACeFUL Global systems Rapid Assessment tools through Constraint FUnctional Languages socSMCs Socialising Sensori-Motor Contingencies flora robotica Flora Robotica: Societies of Symbiotic Robot-Plant Bio-Hybrids as Social Architectural Artifacts TIMESTORM Mind and Time: Investigation of the Temporal Traits of Human- Machine Convergence DREAM DeferredRestructuringof Experience in Autonomous Machines RYSQ Rydberg Quantum Simulators QUIC Quantum simulations of insulators and conductors AQuS Analog quantum simulators for many-body dynamics UNIVERSITAET ZUERICH CH DEUTSCHES FORSCHUNGSZENTRUM FUER KUENSTLICHE INTELLIGENZ GMBH DE UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE CATALUNYA ES UNIVERSITAETSKLINIKUM HAMBURG- EPPENDORF DE UNIVERSITAET PADERBORN DE FOUNDATION FOR RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HELLAS EL UNIVERSITE PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE - PARIS 6 FR UNIVERSITAET ULM DE LABORATORIO EUROPEO DI SPETTROSCOPIE NON LINEARI IT RUPRECHT-KARLS-UNIVERSITAET HEIDELBERG DE

FET Proactive 2014

Les thématiques Proactive – Le programme de travail

Ø Comité de programme (RCP – Guillaume FUSAI, MENESR) Ø L’exemple de FET Proactive:

Large consultation en mai 2014. 491 contributions reçues Une analyse des retours est accessible ici: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/news/consultation- new-fet-proactive-topics-first-analysis

Ø FET Advisory Group (FETAG)

Provided for in the legislative text to give consistent and consolidated advice on relevant objectives and S&T&I priorities during the WP preparations 26 members selected from an open call for candidates Balanced composition in terms of countries, gender, stakeholders, disciplines, age.

A consulter régulièrement : http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regexpert/index.cfm?do=groupDetail.groupDetail&gro upID=2963

§ FET PROACT 1 – 2016 : FET-Proactive: emerging themes and communities − Area 1 - Future technologies for societal change:

· Being human in a technological world, · New science for a globalised world

− Area 2 - Biotech for better life:

· Intra- and inter-cell bio-nano-chem technologies, · Bio-electronic medicines and therapies, · Cognitive neuro-technologies, − Area 3 - Disruptive information technologies: · New computing paradigms and their technologies, · Quantum engineering, · Hybrid opto-electro-mechanical devices at the nano-scale,

− Area 4 - New technologies for energy and materials:

· Ecosystem engineering, · Complex bottom-up construction, − RIA entre 4-10 M€ − 12/04/2016 − Budget total de 80 M€ avec max. 20 M€ (1 et 4), 30 M€ (2 et 3)

FET PROACTIVE WP 2016-2017 - Thèmes et budget

q FET Proactive (suite)

§ FET PROACT 2 – 2017: FET ERANET Cofund

− 5 M€ - 24/01/2017

§ FET PROACT 3 – 2016: FET ERANET Cofund in Quantum Technologies

− 10 M€ - 12/04/2016

FET WP 2016-2017 – Thèmes et budget

• S/T quality weight 60%, threshold 4/5

− Clarity of targeted breakthrough and its specific science and technology contribution towards a long-term vision. − Novelty ; level of ambition and foundational character. − Range and added value fro interdisciplinarity − Appropriatness of the research methods

• Impact weight 20%, threshold 3,5/5

− Importance of the new technological outcome with regards to its transformational impact on technology and or society − Quality of measures for achieving impact on science, technology and/or society − Impact from empowerment of new and high potential actors towards future technological leadership

• Implementation weight 20%, threshold 3/5

− Clarity of the workplan and clarity of intermediate targets − Relevant expertise in the consortium. − Appropriate allocation and justification of resources (person-months, equipment, budget).

Critères d’évaluation FETPROACT 2016-2017 Actions de Recherche et d’Innovation (RIA)

Journée d’information FET

• OPEN et FET
• PROACTIVE - 25 janvier 2015,

Bruxelles

http://ec.europa.eu/rea/pages/fet_open_and_fet_proactive_ info_day_en.htm

62 FET-Open 259,5M FET-OpenRIA (RIA) 2016-2017 252M FET-OpenCSA (CSA) 2016 3M FET-Open CSA (CSA) 2017 1,5M FET Innovation Launchpad (CSA) 2016-2017 < 100K 3M FET-Proactive – boosting emerging technologies 95M Emerging themes and communities (RIA) 2016 80M FET ERANET Cofund CHIST-ERA 2017 5M FET ERANET Cofund on quantum technologies (ERANET) 2016 10M FET Proactive – High Performance Computing 85M Co-design of HPC systems and applications (RIA) 2016 41M Transition to Exascale Computing (RIA) 2017 40M Exascale HPC ecosystem development (CSA) 2017 4M FET-Flagships 185M Partnering environment for FET Flagships 2016

• ERA-NET Cofund action (ERANET)

8M

• Coordination and Support Action (CSA)

1M Core project funding (through 'Other Actions') (RIA) 2017 176M

Budget 624,5M

Le programme de travail FET 2016-2017 – En résumé

EN SAVOIR PLUS

§ Le dispositif national MRSEI (ANR) § Liens et documents utiles § Le PCN FET

L’instrument MRSEI (ANR)

« Mo Montage de de réseaux scientifiqu ques europé péens

• u
• u in

internatio ionaux »

Faciliter l’accès des chercheurs français aux programmes de financement européens (Horizon 2020) Renforcer le positionnement de la France à l’international par la coordination française de projets scientifiques Dynamiser et accompagner les chercheurs dans le montage de leurs projets européens ou internationaux

Objectifs

Un montant d’aide de 30 keuros (max.) pour des dépenses liées au montage du réseau/projet (missions, workshop, prestations (<10keuros)) Un seul bénéficiaire, le porteur du MRSEI, futur coordinateur du projet européen (organisme de recherche publique)

Mise en oeuvre

Un accès simplifié au financement : sélection et conventionnement accélérés

• 1. Pertinence, originalité et innovation du sujet ainsi que

son adéquation avec l’appel européen visé

• 2. Qualité et crédibilité du réseau envisagé
• 3. Qualification du coordinateur scientifique
• 4. Qualité de la planification de montage du réseau
• 5. Impact prévisionnel de l’aide

Critères d’évaluation

Ø 84 propositions ont été évaluées par le comité

Appel MRSEI session juillet 2015

Excellence' scien*fique,'29' Défis'sociétaux,' 30' Primauté' industrielle,'10' Science'avec'et' pour'la'société,'1' Interna*onaux,'3' Sans'appel'ou' appel'clos,'9' Mul*Bappels,'1' ERABNet,'1'

NMP 2 LEIT-ICT 5 LEIT-Biotec 1 PPP 1 JTI-BBI 1 ERC 1 MSCA 12 FET 12 Infra 4

SC1 - « Santé, démographie, bien-être » 14 SC2 - « Sécurité alimentaire, agriculture,…, bioéconomie » 4 SC5 - « Action pour le climat, environnement,… » 3 SC6 – « Sociétés inclusives, innovantes et réflexives » 9

15# 16# 4# 1# 29# 30# 10# 3#

Excellence#scien2fique# Défis#sociétaux# Primauté#industrielle# Interna2onaux#

Ø 36 propositions retenues, soit un taux de sélection global de 42,8%

Appel MRSEI session juillet 2015

Ø 9 propositions FET retenues sur 12

Deuxième appel lancé le 19 novembre 2015 Appel clos le 12 janvier 2015, 13 heures Page de l’appel : http://www.agence-nationale- recherche.fr/MRSEI-2015 Contact : Maurice Héral, Responsable du programme Angèla Samaan, Coordinatrice scientifique Adresse mail : mrsei@agencerecherche.fr

En savoir plus sur les MRSEI

LIENS ET DOCUMENTS UTILES

Mieux comprendre ce qui est attendu en terme d’interdisciplinarité

LIVING INTERDISCIPLINARITY – FET UNIT

HTTP://EC.EUROPA.EU/DIGITAL-AGENDA/EN/NEWS/FET-LIVING-INTERDISCIPLINARITY

71

H2020 website

http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/

Participant portal

http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/opportunities/ h2020/index.html

Les fiches des projets financés 2014

http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/result_en?q=%28contenttype=%27project %27%20OR%20/result/relations/categories/resultCategory/code=%27brief %27,%27report%27%29%20AND%20programme/pga=%27H2020- EU.1.2.*%27&num=10&srt=Relevance:decreasing

Contact FET Twitter

CNECT-FET@ec.europa.eu

@FET_EU

Quelques liens utiles

http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid75605/compte-rendu-session-nationale-fet- technologies-futures-emergentes.html

Témoignage d’évaluateurs FET FET

• OPEN Infoday à Bruxelles – 6 juillet 2015

https://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/news/information-day-fet-open-call

WP 2016-2017

http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid92386/le-p.c.n.-fet-publie-le-projet-de- programme-de-travail-des-appels-2016-17.html

Conférence ICT 2015, 20-22 octobre 2015, Lisbonne

http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/events/cf/ict2015/item- display.cfm?id=17370

Journée dédiée à l’évaluation (MSCA/FET) – 3 novembre 2015 (Paris, MENESR)

http://www.horizon2020.gouv.fr/cid95061/retour-sur-la-journee-d- information-evaluation-des-projets-fet-et-marie-s.-curie.html

PCN – Technologies Futures et Emergentes

Coordination – Martine Garnier-Rizet, responsable scientifique Pascale Massiani, DR, Chargée de mission partenariats Européens, CNRS, Institut de Chimie Catherine Gilles-Pascaud, chargée de mission Mariama Cottrant, chargée d’affaires, Université Paris 13 Subbarao Bassava, responsable des relations internationales Nicolas Lecompte, chargé d’affaires Europe Nacer Boubenna, chargé de mission pôle relations européennes Guillaume Fusai, représentant Comité de programme, MENESR Catherine Marais, chargée de Mission Coopération Européenne, Pôle Relations Européennes

Abonnez-vous à la Lettre d'information et aux alertes !

ESRs, première analyse

ESRs : première analyse

Corpus qMain list: all RIA projects

§ 24 (2014) + 11 (2015)

qBelow available budget: projects with FR as coordinator

§ 30 (2014) + 30 (2015)

qBelow threshold: projects with FR as coordinator

§ 44 (2014) + 31 (2015)

Excellence

Strengths weaknesses

Ø Clarity: Good description of the methodology, Cutting-edge technology, with breakthrough, promising, realistically achievable, targeted breakthrough, long term vision, Ambitious and feasible, Sound and

timely, immediate applications, Results are tangible and verifiable Ø Involvement of SMEs

Ø Novelty/foundational: Beyond the state

• f the art, potential to create a paradigm

shift, several novel concepts ambitious,

• riginal and innovative, very challenging,

Innovative approach, strong ambition, simple and powerful Ø Totally new applications, Ø Very risky, huge payback

Ø Interdisciplinarity: Genuine

interdisciplinarity

Ø Continuation to ongoing work Ø Insufficient information Ø Many risks, not all of them with mitigation actions Ø Foundational character not convincing because of the prior developments in the field Ø The computational aspects are not clearly described Ø Lack of precision in the description of

• ne technical phase

Ø Lack of survey of the state of the art Ø Poor research methodology Ø Barely interdisciplinary Ø Not quantified Ø Expensive materials in use

Ø High impact on European and world economy and market, Potential to be commercialized, New technological

• utcome, New line of technology, final

industrial application, Several applications, patents, Proof of principle, Dedicated WP for exploitation Ø Beneficial to the whole mankind, Multi benefits to education and research, Economic and social impact, Close contacts with users Ø Support of research knowledge transfer team, Market research analysis, Concise but proper measures, realistic numbers Ø Good dissemination and data management plan, New media (online new, RSS feed service), Popular press, Communication activities for the general public, Presentation at technical fairs, Creation of a MOOC, Wikipedia article, video Ø The technological actors are not specified, Technological impact not clearly described Ø No mention of technology transfer, Commercial aspects not well described, Vague business plan, Ø Potential startup failure, No direct involvement of an SME, Usual academic channels, No RTD SME or end users Ø Missing screening of IP activities Ø Dissemination prejudiced by confidentiality issues, Communication plan not well addressed, No dissemination and exploitation task Ø Measures towards general public could be improved

Impact

Strengths Weaknesses

Ø Publications in high impact factor journals Ø Involvement of a company, Startup participation, Involvement of a high-tech SME, Follow-up projects with industry Ø Addition of postdocs, intention to hire, High fraction of the WP leaders are young researchers and female researchers, Gender balance is good, At least one young PdD researcher, Scientific work performed by young researchers, Young scientists as principal investigators, Training for young researchers, Woman coordinator

Impact

Strengths Weaknesses

Implementation

Strengths Weaknesses

Ø Good work plan, Clear milestones, Contingency plan, Well structured, clear vision Ø Complementarity and expertise in the consortium, ERC winning researcher, Experience in managing European projects Ø SME Partner Ø Appropriate allocation of resources, Justified resources Ø Too many participants so money may not be sufficient, Role of the partners not clearly described in the work packages, Repartition of the leadership of the WPs unequal between partners, Unclear division of tasks, Limited number of milestones, Resource levels not derived from research objectives Ø Project management structure and decision making procedures not sufficiently described Ø Available preliminary results too limited Ø Lack of quantitative benchmarks Ø Risk analysis too general Ø Absence of end users, absence of industrial partner

Merci de votre attention !