FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE School Board Progress Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE School Board Progress Presentation - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
FACILITIES ADVISORY COMMITTEE School Board Progress Presentation March 05, 2019 Facilities Advisory Committee 1. FAC Introduction Agenda 1. FAC Introduction Monty Sabin, NTPS 2. FAC Workshop Series Monty Sabin, NTPS 3. FAC Hot Topics
Facilities Advisory Committee
2
- 1. FAC Introduction
Agenda
- 1. FAC Introduction
Monty Sabin, NTPS
- 2. FAC Workshop Series
Monty Sabin, NTPS
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Dean Martinolich, NTPS Joel Davis, SES Courtney Schrieve, NTPS Monty Sabin, NTPS
- 4. Questions?
All
- 5. Wrap-up
Joel Davis, SES
Facilities Advisory Committee
3
- 1. FAC Introduction
Introductions
Facilities Advisory Committee
4
Thank you to the FAC for their commitment.
- 1. FAC Introduction
Facilities Advisory Committee
5
FAC Volunteers
- Advisory role, not directive
- Additional perspectives and input
- 1. FAC Introduction
Roles and Purpose
Facilities Advisory Committee
6
FAC Guidance Committee
- Monty Sabin, Courtney Schrieve, Dean
Martinolich, Joel Davis, Sam Wright
Säzän Environmental Services
- FAC workshop facilitators
- K-12 facilities consultant
- Pre-bond planning facilitator
- 1. FAC Introduction
Roles and Purpose
Facilities Advisory Committee
FAC Information Online: https://www.nthurston.k12.wa.us/fac
7
- 1. FAC Introduction
Information: Previous Workshops
Facilities Advisory Committee
8
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase I – Informational Background Workshops (2017-2018)
Phase I Workshops:
- October 2017: Overview of the OSPI
School Construction Assistance Program (SCAP)
- February 2018: FAC Goals and NTPS
District Facts
- June 2018: Robinson Co. K12
Construction Costs Presentation
Facilities Advisory Committee
9
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase I – Informational Background Workshops (2017-2018)
Facilities Advisory Committee
10
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase II – Technical Background Workshops (2018)
Phase II Workshops:
- October 2018: FAC Overview/FCA
Findings
- November 2018: Bond Issue Planning,
Facility Cost Analysis Update, Building Conditions Summary
- December 2018: Outreach/Needs,
Past Performance
Facilities Advisory Committee
11
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase II – Technical Background Workshops (2018)
Facilities Advisory Committee
12
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase III – Pre-Bond Planning Workshops (2019)
Phase III Workshops to date:
- January 2019: Security and Safety
- February 2019: Community Programs,
Education/Demographics, and District- Wide Upgrades
Facilities Advisory Committee
13
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase III – Pre-Bond Planning Workshops (2019)
Facilities Advisory Committee
14
- 2. FAC Workshops Series
Phase III – Pre-Bond Planning Workshops (2019)
Upcoming Phase III Workshops:
- March 2019: Planning/Visioning and
Facilities Concepts
- April 2019: Options Analysis/Prioritization
- May 2019: FAC Recommendation Review
- June 2019: TBD
Facilities Advisory Committee
15
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
WA State SCAP for Priority 1 Facilities
Estimated Available SCAP Funding: River Ridge HS $21.7M Aspire MS $3.2M Komachin MS $12.5M Horizons ES $7.1M Meadows ES $5.8M Seven Oaks ES $7.8M TOTAL $58.2M
Facilities Advisory Committee
15-YEAR COST PROJECTIONS (2018 – 2033)
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
16
Facilities Advisory Committee
15-YEAR COST PROJECTIONS (2018 – 2033)
- 3. Facility Cost Analysis Update
17
ESTIMATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES + SAFETY UPGRADES + PROGRAM UPGRADES FOR THE SIX PRIORITY FACILITIES Capital Expenditures: $94.4 Million Safety Upgrades: $5.6 Million Program Upgrades: $80.6 Million TOTAL CapEx + Upgrades $181 Million
Facilities Advisory Committee
18
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Capital Levy vs Capitol Bond?
The FAC recommends a capitol bond.
- NTPS is making strides to overcome the 15-year capital funding
gap (1991-2006)
- Goal: maintain low, consistent tax rates (bond only):
- 2018 Baseline: $2.12/$1,000
- $100M: $2.14/$1,000
- $200M: $2.52/$1,000
- $300M: $2.84/$1,000
Facilities Advisory Committee
19
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Prioritizing District Needs: Outreach Surveys
Community Survey: Good Stewardship
Facilities Advisory Committee
20
1.Class Sizes 2.School Safety 3.Mental Health Services 4.Future Growth
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Prioritizing District Needs: Outreach Surveys
Facilities Advisory Committee
21
20 40 60 80 Community Programs Activities/Fine Arts/Athletics Unique Programs / Trends Major System Upgrades Multi-Purpose Areas Safety Communications Playfields Site Safety and Security
- 1. Site Safety and Security
- 2. Safety Communications/Playfields
- 3. Multi-purpose Areas
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Prioritizing District Needs: Outreach Surveys
Principal’s Survey
Facilities Advisory Committee
22
20 40 60 80 Community Programs Multi-Purpose Areas Unique Programs / Trends Activities/Fine Arts/Athletics Safety Communications Playfields Major System Upgrades Site Safety and Security
- 1. Safety & Security
- 2. Major Systems Upgrades
- 3. Safety Communications /
Playfields
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Prioritizing District Needs: Outreach Surveys
FAC Survey
Facilities Advisory Committee
23
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Prioritizing District Needs: Outreach Surveys
Primary Issues Secondary Issues
- 1. Safety & Security
- 1. ADA
- 2. Future Growth
- 2. Class Sizes
- 3. Playfields
- 3. Major Systems Upgrades
- 4. Sustainability/Energy
Efficiency
- 5. Mental Health
- 6. Multi-purpose Areas
Facilities Advisory Committee
24
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Community Programs
Key Takeaways, City of Lacey:
- 2017 Comp Plan, Identified Needs:
- More fields (4 softball, 4 soccer)
- RAC Phase 3 – Baseball/Soccer
Stadium
- Indoor Sports Arena feasibility
- RAC Phase 4
Facilities Advisory Committee
25
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Community Programs
Key Takeaways, City of Lacey:
- NTPS Field Use increased 50% 2017 to
2018
- NTPS Indoor Facility Use decreased
36% 2017 to 2018
Facilities Advisory Committee
26
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Recent Enrollment Trends
- Expected to remain at elevated levels through 2020.
- Back to average growth rate for subsequent 20 years.
- Supports minimal student growth by the end of 2024-2025.
- Increases in elementary grades, followed by middle and high school,
through 2020.
Projected Student Enrollment
- Assumption – Past trends predict future trends.
- NTPS enrollment models are consistent with the projected
enrollment increase since 2002.
Facilities Advisory Committee
27
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Recent Residential Development
Facilities Advisory Committee
28
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Recent Residential Development (cont.)
Facilities Advisory Committee
29
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
OSPI Projection
- Six year forecast period.
- Previous six year enrollment trends continue through the next six
years.
- Wa He Lut Indian School starts in 2011, deleted in 2016.
- Distorts OSPI estimate and may underestimate the number
- f students expected in NTPS.
Facilities Advisory Committee
30
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
NTPS Projections
- Uses OSPI October head count data
- NTPS also utilizes:
- Residential construction
- Probability of students in residences (Demographic census
data)
- Average family size data (TRPC)
- Birth rate assumptions (Washington State population data)
- Population projections by Office of Financial Management
(OFM)
Facilities Advisory Committee
31
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Projection 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Actual Change ‘18-’25 Percent Change ‘18-25
OSPI 14,779 14,912 15,084 15,171 15,305 15,461 15,579 15,631 852 5.8% NTPS 14,779 14,955 15,170 15,221 15,349 15,475 15,551 15,550 771 5.2%
Comparison of Student Enrollment Projections North Thurston Public Schools 2018-2025
Facilities Advisory Committee
32
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Projected Student Headcount Enrollment by Grade Span North Thurston Public Schools 2018-2025
Grade Span 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 Elementary (K-5) 7053 7111 7199 7257 7315 7344 7358 7375 Middle School (6- 8) 3395 3519 3569 3504 3470 3486 3537 3565 High School (9-12) 4331 4325 4401 4460 4564 4645 4657 4609 14,779 14,955 15,170 15,221 15,349 15,475 15,551 15,550
Facilities Advisory Committee
33
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Zones – South Bay, Mountain View, Pleasant Glade
2381 Units & 170 Units 55+ Existing Portable Classrooms: 37
Zones – Olympic View, Lacey, Meadows
880 Units and 0 units 55+ Existing Portable Classrooms: 34
Zones – Lydia Hawk, Evergreen Forest, Woodland, Seven Oaks
1823 Units & 1295 Units 55+ Existing Portable Classrooms: 36
Zones – Lakes, Horizons, Chambers Prairie
266 Units & 0 Units 55+ Existing Portable Classrooms: 55
North Thurston Public Schools Mitigation: Pre-sub and Permit
Facilities Advisory Committee
34
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
District Wide Portable Classrooms
Year Installed 1970-1999 39 2000-2019 123 Total Portables 162 Total Sq. Ft. 145,000 8-Plex Modular Buildings 8 Total Classrooms 64 Total Sq. Ft. 57,000
Facilities Advisory Committee
35
- 3. FAC Hot Topics
Demographics
Future Sites & Acreage
Location Acreage Drohman Property 72.09 Vicwood Property 10.74 Meridian Campus Property (on Lanyard) 19.13 Meridian Campus Property (on Campus) 10.87 Madrona Park Property 10.00 McAllister Park Property 44.78 Meridian Road Property 11.00 Mullen Road Property 37.39 Nisqually Park 15.82
Facilities Advisory Committee
36
- 4. Wrap up
Questions?
Facilities Advisory Committee
37