F unding Mo nta na s Hig hwa y I nfra struc ture Pe rfo rma nc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
f unding mo nta na s hig hwa y i nfra struc ture
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

F unding Mo nta na s Hig hwa y I nfra struc ture Pe rfo rma nc - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Jul 20, 2023 117 likes •362 views

F unding Mo nta na s Hig hwa y I nfra struc ture Pe rfo rma nc e Audit: 17P-06 Co nte nt I nfra struc ture funding b a c kg ro und HB 473 c o mpa riso n o f MDT to o the r DOT s P3 funding distrib utio ns PvMS da ta

slide-1
SLIDE 1

F unding Mo nta na ’ s Hig hwa y I nfra struc ture

Pe rfo rma nc e Audit: 17P-06

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Co nte nt

 I

nfra struc ture funding b a c kg ro und

 HB 473 c o mpa riso n o f MDT

to o the r DOT s

 P3 funding distrib utio ns  PvMS da ta o ve rsig ht  Prima ry hig hwa y syste m distrib utio ns  Distric t pro je c t no mina tio n pro c e sse s  Ce ntra lize d re vie w o f distric t pro je c t no mina tio ns

slide-3
SLIDE 3

I nfra struc ture F unding Ba c kg ro und

 Sta te infra struc ture funding inc re a se d b y HB 473  F

e de ra l F AST Ac t a utho rize d $305 b illio n fo r F F Y 2016-2020

 T

ra nPla n MT

  • utline s hig h le ve l MDT

g o a ls

 P3 a do pte d in 2009 fo r c o re syste m a nd distric t

distrib utio ns

 Co nstruc tio n pro je c ts no mina te d b y distric t sta ff

slide-4
SLIDE 4

F e de ra l F unding to Co nstruc tio n

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Audit Ob je c tive s

 Ho w do o pe ra tio ns o f MDT

c o mpa re with simila r tra nspo rta tio n a g e nc ie s in o the r sta te a nd pro vinc e s?

 Do e s MDT

distrib ute fue l ta x do lla rs b a se d o n a c c ura te a nd c o mple te ro a d c o nditio n da ta a nd industry b e st pra c tic e s?

 Do e s MDT

ha ve a pro c e ss fo r no mina ting sta te infra struc ture pro je c ts sta te wide a nd b e twe e n distric ts a c c o rding to sta te a nd fe de ra l re q uire me nts a nd industry b e st pra c tic e s?

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Ob je c tive 1: HB 473 MDT Ope ra tio ns Co mpa riso n to Othe r DOT s

Re q uire d pe rfo rma nc e a udit o f MDT

to o the r DOT s

Ga the re d tra nspo rta tio n da ta fo r six DOT

s

Co mpa re d da ta pe r la ne mile o r pe r F

T E whe n a pplic a b le

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Sig nific a nt diffe re nc e s in DOT

  • pe ra tio ns

 L

a ne Mile s DOT s a re re spo nsib le fo r ma inta ining

 Sta te infra struc ture funding  Use o f indire c t c o st ra te  Ro a dwa y de finitio ns a nd tre a tme nt type s  E

ng ine e ring divisio n re spo nsib ilitie s

slide-8
SLIDE 8

HB 473 Re sults

 10 Ye a r MDT

Ana lysis

  • F

T E le ve ls ha ve de c re a se d while e xpe nditure s ha ve inc re a se d

 MDT

wa s c lo se st to the a ve ra g e in:

  • % o f F

T E c la ssifie d a s ma na g e r/ supe rviso r

  • F

e de ra l funding pe r la ne mile

 MDT

wa s c o mpa ra b le in:

  • L

a ne Mile s pe r F T E

  • Pa ve me nt pre se rva tio n c o sts
  • Ca pita l c o nstruc tio n c o sts
  • E

ng ine e ring Co sts Va rie d Wide ly

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DOT Priva tiza tio n

 So me DOT

s priva tize e ng ine e ring se rvic e s a t a hig he r ra te tha n MDT

Uta h Alb e rta

 DOT

s did no t ha ve suppo rt fo r priva tiza tio n le ve ls inc luding MDT

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Ob je c tive 2: P3

slide-11
SLIDE 11

P3 Audit F inding s

Po lic y do e s no t c la rify ro le s o f sta ff in P3 P3 no t wide ly unde rsto o d b y MDT

sta ff inc luding PvMS c a pa b ilitie s in P3

Pa st e xpe nditure s do no t a lig n with P3

distrib utio ns

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Re c o mme nda tio n # 1

 MDT

imple me nt pro c e dure tha t inc lude s:

  • Ro le s a nd invo lve me nt o f de pa rtme nt sta ff in P3
  • Outline s de c isio n ma king pro c e ss fo r inputs into PvMS

tha t influe nc e distrib utio ns

  • F
  • rma lize d b usine ss pro c e ss fo r P3
slide-13
SLIDE 13

PvMS Da ta Ove rsig ht

 Distric t sta ff ha d c o nc e rns re g a rding the a c c ura c y o f

PvMS Da ta

 22% o f PvMS da ta re vie we d b y distric t sta ff did no t a lig n

with distric t sta ff’ s judg e me nt

 MDT

do e s no t ha ve ve rific a tio n pro c e ss fo r PvMS da ta a fte r it is g a the re d

 Othe r sta te s re vie w a sa mple o f PvMS ro ute s to re vie w

fo r a no ma lie s a nd o ve ra ll a c c ura c y

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Re c o mme nda tio n # 2

MDT

imple me nt po lic y re q uiring a nnua l re vie w o f PvMS ro a d se g me nts to de te rmine da ta a c c ura c y

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Prima ry Hig hwa y Syste m Distrib utio ns

Curre ntly distrib ute d b y MDT

b a se d o n P3 c a lc ula tio ns

Sta te sta tute o utline s o utda te d pro c e ss fo r

prima ry hig hwa y syste m distrib utio ns

F

HWA suppo rts P3 a nd ve rifie d it wa s in line with the ir mo ve to pe rfo rma nc e -b a se d a sse t ma na g e me nt

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Re c o mme nda tio n # 3

MDT

pursue sta tuto ry c ha ng e to a lig n sta tuto ry prima ry hig hwa y syste m distrib utio ns with c urre nt industry b e st pra c tic e s

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Ob je c tive 3: Distric t No mina tio n Pro c e ss

 Distric ts use va rio us

info rma tio n to ma ke no mina tio n de c isio ns

 I

nfo rma tio n c o nside re d va rie s fo r pa ve me nt pre se rva tio n a nd c a pita l c o nstruc tio n pro je c ts

 Distric t no mina tio n de c isio ns

ma de in a me e ting with distric t a nd ma inte na nc e sta ff

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Distric t No mina tio n Pro c e ss

 Audit Wo rk

  • Re vie we d 25 pro je c ts a c ro ss a ll five MDT

distric ts

  • I

nte rvie ws with sta ff re g a rding the distric t no mina tio n pro c e ss, a nd the no mina tio n o f e a c h pro je c t re vie we d

  • Do c ume nta tio n re vie w fo r e a c h pro je c t

 F

inding s

  • Distric t no mina tio n pro c e sse s no t do c ume nte d
  • I

nc o nsiste nt info rma tio n c o nside re d b y distric ts whe n ma king no mina tio n de c isio ns

  • No sta nda rd c rite ria fo r wha t sho uld b e c o nside re d in no mina tio n

de c isio ns

  • No sta nda rd fo r ho w diffe re nt c rite ria sho uld b e we ig he d
  • Othe r sta te s ha d spe c ific c rite ria fo r no mina tio n de c isio ns
slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Re c o mme nda tio n # 4

MDT

imple me nt po lic y e sta b lishing :

Crite ria upo n whic h pro je c t no mina tio n

de c isio ns sho uld b e b a se d

Ho w c rite ria sho uld b e a pplie d to pro je c ts Re q uire d do c ume nte d suppo rt fo r

no mina tio n de c isio ns

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Ce ntra lize d No mina tio n Re vie w

No c e ntra lize d pro c e ss fo r re vie w o f distric t

no mina tio n de c isio ns

MDT

Pla nning Divisio n re c e ive s no mina te d pro je c ts

T

ra nspo rta tio n Co mmissio n prio ritize s pro je c ts no mina te d b y distric ts

No e sta b lishe d no mina tio n c rite ria ha s limite d a

c e ntra lize d re vie w pro c e ss

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Re c o mme nda tio n # 5

MDT

imple me nt po lic y re q uiring c e ntra lize d re vie w o f distric ts pro je c t no mina tio n to e nsure sta te wide c o nsiste nc y

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Que stio ns?