F
- x Ca nyo n Gro undwa te r
Ma na g e me nt Ag e nc y’ s
Gro undwa te r Susta ina b ility Pla n
Ma rc h 2016
F o x Ca nyo n Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Ag e nc y s Gro - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
F o x Ca nyo n Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Ag e nc y s Gro undwa te r Susta ina b ility Pla n Ma rc h 2016 Susta ina b le Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Ac t T he Susta ina b le Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Ac t (SGMA) o f 2014 a
Ma rc h 2016
he Susta ina b le Gro undwa te r Ma na g e me nt Ac t (SGMA) o f 2014 a llo ws fo r the c re a tio n o f Gro undwa te r Susta ina b ility Ag e nc ie s (GSAs)
(GSPs) fo r b a sins tha t the Sta te De pa rtme nt o f Wa te r Re so urc e s (DWR) ha s de sig na te d a s e ithe r hig h o r me dium prio rity a nd in c ritic a l o ve rdra ft
he se re g ula tio ns re q uire lo c a l pub lic a g e nc ie s to de fine a c o urse o f a c tio n to a c hie ve susta ina b le g ro undwa te r ma na g e me nt within 20 ye a rs o f pla n imple me nta tio n
imple me nt to re so lve the se pro b le ms a s we ll a s mile sto ne s to tra c k pro g re ss
impro ve d c o nditio ns within the b a sins
(F CGMA) pro vide d the DWR with no tific a tio n o f its inte nt to b e c o me a GSA pe r SGMA
CGMA e nte re d into a c o ntra c t with Hydro Me tric s Wa te r Re so urc e s I nc .
e c hnic a l Adviso ry Gro up (T AG) wa s fo rme d to a ssist in re vie wing the c o nsulta nt’ s wo rk
t wa s de c ide d tha t spe c ific GSP will b e de ve lo pe d fo r e a c h o f the fo ur b a sins within the purvie w o f the Ag e nc y
he c o nsulta nt a nd T AG a re c urre ntly
ha ve b e e n c re a te d fro m prio r re po rts a nd stud ie s
Bud g e t
ma na g e me nt a lte rna tive s
b e c a use it pro vide s dive rse e xpe rtise , e xpe rie nc e a nd vie wpo ints
his kind o f pro c e ss a llo ws fo r g re a te r sha ring
so lutio ns
CGMA will b e re a c hing o ut to a va rie ty o f g ro ups inc luding :
nviro nme nta l o rg a niza tio ns
sta b lishe d fo r e a c h Critic a l Pa ra me te r
hre sho lds will b e q ua ntita tive ly me a sure d
hre sho ld
Qua ntita tive o b je c tive s tha t a re ma na g e me nt “ta rg e ts”
T hre sho lds
he diffe re nc e b e twe e n the Minimum T hre sho ld a nd the Me a sure a b le Ob je c tive (no t de fine d in the re g ula tio ns)
a c to r”
AG re c o mme nds slo wing the pro c e ss do wn (the c urre nt sc he dule is to ha ve a fina l GSP b y1-31-17)
he F CGMA Bo a rd ma y dire c t sta ff to a djust the c o nsulta nt’ s Sc o pe o f Wo rk a nd sc he dule
a nd pro po se d a c tivitie s e a sie r fo r sta ke ho lde rs
ide a s
me e ting da te a nd time s c a n b e fo und a t fc g ma @ ve ntura .o rg