Quigley Sub-Area Plan Baseline Discussion February 6, 2017 Don - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

quigley sub area plan baseline discussion
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Quigley Sub-Area Plan Baseline Discussion February 6, 2017 Don - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quigley Sub-Area Plan Baseline Discussion February 6, 2017 Don Kostelec, AICP Alta Planning + Design, Boise, ID Photo Credit: Bike Walk Wichita Purpose A more focused evaluation of transportation network connectivity in the area


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Photo Credit: Bike Walk Wichita

Quigley Sub-Area Plan – Baseline Discussion

Don Kostelec, AICP Alta Planning + Design, Boise, ID February 6, 2017

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Purpose

  • A more focused evaluation of

transportation network connectivity in the area served by Quigley Road and Fox Acres

  • What has happened since the Hailey

Transportation Master Plan was adopted nearly a decade ago?

  • What would be likely impacts of

buildout of Quigley proposed developments and Dumpke property?

  • Help City provide guidance to current

proposed development on analysis and potential requirements

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Hailey Transportation Plan

2026

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Hailey Transportation Plan

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Hailey Transportation Plan

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Collector Streets

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Collector Streets

  • Overall Goal: Distribute transportation users between local streets and

arterials

  • May serve as an “arterial” for pedestrians and bicyclists
  • Are part of a network to support their distribution function
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Collector Streets

?

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Why connectivity?

  • 1. It’s safer—for everyone.
  • 2. Creates redundancy in the network
  • 3. Better serves pedestrians, bicyclists & driver
  • 4. Improves delivery & efficiency of city services
  • 5. Gives you more options for SH 75
slide-11
SLIDE 11

Why connectivity?

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Why connectivity for active transportation?

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Traffic Impacts

  • System disconnect, if

accommodated in final plans disrupts transportation system function

  • May not meet goals and
  • bjectives of past plans
  • Disproportionately impacts Fox

Acres & SH 75 intersections

  • Leaves fewer options for SH 75

in downtown

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Traffic Impacts

  • Roadway links function well and

are generally within acceptable thresholds (very common)

  • Intersections are where

vehicular traffic flow impacts

  • ccur
  • Fox Acres & SH 75 in buildout of

existing phase

  • Also influenced by other, past

developments in the area

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fox Acres & SH 75

  • Currently: 85% of traffic

goes north; 15% goes south

  • Right turn from Fox Acres to

northbound SH 75 currently

  • ver capacity in AM peak

period

  • Assuming similar split and

worst case scenario of existing Quigley proposal (diagram at left)

AM Peak: TODAY

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Fox Acres & SH 75

  • Currently: 85% of traffic

goes north; 15% goes south

  • Right turn from Fox Acres to

northbound SH 75 currently

  • ver capacity in AM peak

period

  • Assuming similar split and

worst case scenario of existing Quigley proposal (diagram at left)

AM Peak: 2020 Buildout

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Conceptual Quigley Design Options

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Traffic Diversion & Traffic Management

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Things to Consider

  • Need for traffic counts along

Quigley at Buckhorn & Eastridge

  • Bullion counts at 8th and 2nd
  • Identification of proportional

impacts to design of Quigley

  • Buildout of future phases and

conceptual buildout of Dumpke property in consideration of traffic counts

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Photo Credit: Bike Walk Wichita

QUESTIONS?