Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer
Tom Stinchcombe Duke Thoracic Oncology Program
Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer Tom Stinchcombe Duke - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer Tom Stinchcombe Duke Thoracic Oncology Program Extensive stage (ES) small cell lung cancer Patient with SCLC who presented with extensive-stage disease and received carboplatin and etoposide as
Tom Stinchcombe Duke Thoracic Oncology Program
and received carboplatin and etoposide as first-line therapy
Baseline Confirmatory scan
Tom Stinchcombe Duke Thoracic Oncology Program
Slotman et al. NEJM 2007.
Chemotherapy (4-6 cycles) No response Any response PCI 20-30 Gy in 5-12 fractions R A N D O M I Z E No PCI Stratify by:
< 5 weeks 4-6 weeks n=286
Primary endpoint: time to symptomatic brain metastases defined as signs of increased intracranial pressure, headache, nausea and vomiting, cognitive or affective disturbances, seizures, and focal neurologic symptoms Secondary end-points: OS, Qol, toxicity, cost
(months) 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 32 36 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
PCI Control
1 year: 27.1% vs. 13.3% HR: 0.68 (0.52-0.88); p = 0.003
Slotman et al. NEJM 2007.
Stratification by Age (<70 / ≥70), PS (0-1 / 2) Response (CR / PR+MR) Institutions
Follow-up by MRI imaging evaluated every 3 months
Primary endpoint: Overall Survival Secondary endpoints: Time to brain metastases (BM), Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Safety, Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE)
1st line chemo Platinum-based doublet R PCI: 25 Gy 10 fractions no PCI
assessment No response < 6 weeks 3-8 weeks
ASCO 2014 Abstract 7503: Presented by Takashi Seto
n=163
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 Stratified log-rank test: P=0.091 (2-sided)
Arm B: No PCI Arm A: PCI
Arm A: PCI n=84 Arm B: no PCI n=79
61 50 Hazard ratio (95%CI) 1.38 (0.95-2.02) Median OS (95%CI), mo 10.1 (8.5-13.2) 15.1 (10.2-18.7)
ASCO 2014 Abstract 7503: Presented by Takashi Seto
Treatment Patient population ORR (95% CI) Duration of response Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Unselected (n=98) 10% (5-18) Not reached (4.4 to NR) Nivolumab 3 mg/kg Ipilimuab 1 mg/kg Unselected (n=54) 19% (9-31) 4.4 (3.7 –NR) Nivolumab 1 mg/kg Ipilimumab 3 mg/kg Unselected (n=61) 23% (13-36) 7.7 (4.0-NR) Pembrolizumab 10 mg/kg PD-L1 ≥ 1%* (n=24) 33% (15.6-55.3) 19.4 (3.6+ to 20.0+)
Antonia et al. Lancet Oncology 2016; Ott et al. WCLC 2016. * 147 evaluable samples and 42 PD-L1 positive (28.6%)
Progression-free survival Overall Survival
Antonia et al. Lancet Oncology 2016.
Median PFS Nivolumab: 1.4 months Nivolumab 3/ Ipilimumab 1: 1.4 months Nivolumab 1/ Ipilimumab 3: 2.6 months Median OS Nivolumab : 4.4 months Nivolumab 3/Ipilimumab 1: 6.0 months Nivolumab 1/ Ipilimumab 3: 7.7 months
Progression-free survival Overall survival
Ott et al. WCLC 2016.
carcinomas with limited expression on other tissues
agent
and 35 with 2 previous lines (47%)
pleural effusions (8%), increased lipase (7%)
Rudin et al. Lancet Oncology 2016.
Rovalpituzumab Tesirine (Rova-TÔ, SC16LD6.5)
Rudin CM et al. Proc ASCO 2016;Abstract LBA8505.
Objective response rate Swimmer’s plot
DLL-3 0-49% (n=6): 0% DLL-3 ≥ 50% (n=26): 31% DLL-3 ≥ 50% Duration of response: 4.6 months Progression-free survival: 4.6 months Rudin et al. Lancet Oncology 2016.
Adverse event (n = 74) Grade 1-2 Grade ≥3 Thrombocytopenia 4 (5%) 8 (11%) Pleural effusion 17 (23%) 6 (8%) Increased lipase 1 (1%) 5 (7%) Fatigue 23 (31%) 3 (4%) Peripheral edema 18 (24%) 2 (3%) Pericardial effusion 7 (9%) 2 (3%) Acute kidney injury 0 (0%) 1 (1%)
Rudin et al. Lancet Oncology 2016.
Disease setting Comparison Phase NCT trial # Primary end-point First line Platinum/etoposide +/- pembrolizumab 2 02580994 PFS First line Carboplatin/etoposide +/- atezolizumab 3 02763579 OS and PFS First line Cisplatin/etoposide + Rova-T in DLL-3 positive 1 0281999 Safety Maintenance Pembrolizumab 2 (single arm) 02359018 PFS Maintenance Nivolumab, nivolumab/ipilimumab or placebo 3 02538666 OS and PFS Second line Nivolumab vs topotecan or amrubicin 3 02481830 OS Second line Pembrolizumab vs topotecan 2 02963090 PFS Second line 3 arm: Rova-T+nivolumab, Rova-T+ipilimumab Rova-T+ nivolumab/ipilimumab 1/2 03026166 Safety
carefully selected patients
but durable responses
and chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations will be defined by current trials
with progression ≤ 6 months from primary therapy
trial as 3rd line therapy. Future development most likely a part of combination therapy
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/sclc.pdf
Tom Stinchcombe Duke Thoracic Oncology Program