excess height bound with application to a harmonic
play

Excess-height bound, with application to a harmonic measure free - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Excess-height bound, with application to a harmonic measure free boundary problem Zihui Zhao Institute for Advanced Study joint work with S. Bortz, M. Engelstein, M. Goering, T. Toro Zihui Zhao 1 / 10 We say a set E R n is a set of locally


  1. Excess-height bound, with application to a harmonic measure free boundary problem Zihui Zhao Institute for Advanced Study joint work with S. Bortz, M. Engelstein, M. Goering, T. Toro Zihui Zhao 1 / 10

  2. We say a set E ⊂ R n is a set of locally finite perimeter , if �� � div ϕ dX : ϕ ∈ C 1 c ( R n , R n ) and � ϕ � ∞ ≤ 1 sup < + ∞ . E It then follows that � � ϕ · ν E d H n − 1 , for any ϕ ∈ C 1 c ( R n , R n ) , div ϕ dX = − ∂ ∗ E E where ∂ ∗ E ⊂ ∂ E is called the reduced boundary of E , ν E the unit normal vector to E and | ν E | = 1 a.e.. We say the vector-valued Radon measure µ E := ν E H n − 1 | ∂ ∗ E is the Gauss-Green measure of E . Note that | µ E | = H n − 1 | ∂ ∗ E is the perimeter measure of E . Zihui Zhao 2 / 10

  3. Proposition (Excess-height bound) Suppose E is a set of locally finite perimeter such that ∂ E = spt µ E and | µ E | is Ahlfors regular. There exists ǫ > 0 such that if the excess | ν E − e n | 2 1 � d H n − 1 < ǫ e n ( x 0 , 2 r ) := r n − 1 2 C ( x 0 , 2 r , e n ) ∩ ∂ ∗ E for x 0 ∈ ∂ E and r > 0 , then 1 1 2( n − 1) . r sup {| q ( x ) − q ( x 0 ) | : x ∈ C ( x 0 , r , e n ) ∩ ∂ E } ≤ Ce n ( x 0 , 2 r ) Moreover, there exists a Lipschitz function u : R n − 1 → R with Lip u ≤ 1 such that H n − 1 ( M ∆ Gr( u )) ≤ Ce n ( x 0 , r ) , where M := C ( x 0 , r , e n ) ∩ ∂ E . r n − 1 Zihui Zhao 3 / 10

  4. Proposition (Excess-height bound) Suppose E is a set of locally finite perimeter such that ∂ E = spt µ E and | µ E | is Ahlfors regular. There exists ǫ > 0 such that if the excess | ν E − e n | 2 1 � d H n − 1 < ǫ e n ( x 0 , 2 r ) := r n − 1 2 C ( x 0 , 2 r , e n ) ∩ ∂ ∗ E for x 0 ∈ ∂ E and r > 0 , then 1 1 2( n − 1) . r sup {| q ( x ) − q ( x 0 ) | : x ∈ C ( x 0 , r , e n ) ∩ ∂ E } ≤ Ce n ( x 0 , 2 r ) Remark This type of excess-height bound has been known for a long time if the set E minimizes the perimeter. This bound was the first step towards proving the regularity of perimeter minimizers. (c.f. De Giorgi) Zihui Zhao 3 / 10

  5. Proposition (Excess-height bound) Suppose E is a set of locally finite perimeter such that ∂ E = spt µ E and | µ E | is Ahlfors regular. There exists ǫ > 0 such that if the excess | ν E − e n | 2 1 � d H n − 1 < ǫ e n ( x 0 , 2 r ) := r n − 1 2 C ( x 0 , 2 r , e n ) ∩ ∂ ∗ E for x 0 ∈ ∂ E and r > 0 , then 1 1 2( n − 1) . r sup {| q ( x ) − q ( x 0 ) | : x ∈ C ( x 0 , r , e n ) ∩ ∂ E } ≤ Ce n ( x 0 , 2 r ) Remark Roughly speaking, it says if the unit normal of a domain Ω has small 1 n − 1 Reifenberg-flat; moreover oscillation (bounded by ǫ ), its boundary is ǫ Ω and Ω c is well-separated by the strip. Zihui Zhao 3 / 10

  6. WLOG we may assume x 0 = 0 and r = 1. Lemma (Separation lemma) Given t 0 ∈ (0 , 1) , there exists δ = δ ( t 0 ) such that if e n (0 , 2) < δ , then | q ( x ) | < t 0 , for any x ∈ M , and |{ x ∈ C (0 , 1 , e n ) ∩ E : q ( x ) < − t 0 }| = 0 , |{ x ∈ C (0 , 1 , e n ) ∩ E c : q ( x ) > t 0 }| = 0 , Zihui Zhao 4 / 10

  7. Proposition (Compactness for sets of finite perimeter) Suppose { E k } is a sequence of sets of locally finite perimeter whose boundaries are Ahlfors regular with uniform constants and ∂ E k = spt µ E k . Assume 0 ∈ ∂ E k , then passing to a subsequence there are a set of locally finite perimeter E and a Radon measure µ such that E k → E in L 1 , µ E k ⇀ µ E , | µ E k | ⇀ µ. Moreover, µ is Ahlfors regular, | µ E | ≤ µ , and 1 If x ∈ ∂ E, then there exist x k ∈ ∂ E k such that x k → x; 2 If x k ∈ ∂ E k and x k → x, then x ∈ spt µ . Zihui Zhao 5 / 10

  8. Proof of the proposition Proof by pictures. Consider the function f : ( − 1 , 1) → [0 , H n − 1 ( M )] defined by f ( t ) = H n − 1 ( M ∩ { q ( x ) > t } ) . Recall that the excess bounds the difference between this measure and the measure of its projection onto R n − 1 . Zihui Zhao 6 / 10

  9. Proof of the proposition Proof by pictures. Consider the function f : ( − 1 , 1) → [0 , H n − 1 ( M )] defined by f ( t ) = H n − 1 ( M ∩ { q ( x ) > t } ) . Recall that the excess bounds the difference between this measure and the measure of its projection onto R n − 1 . We denote the slicings E t = { z ∈ R n − 1 : ( z , t ) ∈ E } and ( ∂ ∗ E ) t = { z ∈ R n − 1 : ( z , t ) ∈ ∂ ∗ E } . By the co-area formula � � � � g d H n − 2 dt = 1 − ( ν E · e n ) 2 d H n − 1 g ( ∂ ∗ E ) t R ∂ ∗ E Zihui Zhao 6 / 10

  10. Application to harmonic measure For any E ⊂ ∂ Ω, its harmonic measure is � � Brownian motion B X ω ( E ) := P t exits the domain Ω from E . Zihui Zhao 7 / 10

  11. Application to harmonic measure Consider the Dirichlet boundary value problem for the Laplacian � − ∆ u = 0 , in Ω u = f , on ∂ Ω . The harmonic measure is the unique measure such that � f d ω X . u ( X ) = ∂ Ω Zihui Zhao 7 / 10

  12. One expects that the harmonic measures for nice domains have good behavior, e.g. ω ≪ σ := H n − 1 | ∂ Ω . See the work of Dahlberg, David-Jerrison, Semmes, Hofmann-Martell, etc. Zihui Zhao 8 / 10

  13. One expects that the harmonic measures for nice domains have good behavior, e.g. ω ≪ σ := H n − 1 | ∂ Ω . See the work of Dahlberg, David-Jerrison, Semmes, Hofmann-Martell, etc. The type of problem we consider is the converse: Harmonic measure free boundary problem Suppose the harmonic measure has nice behavior (for example, suppose log d ω d σ ∈ VMO), what can we deduce about the domain? For previous results in this direction, see Jerison, Kenig-Toro, Azzam-Tolsa-Mourgoglou etc. and Azzam-Hofmann-Martell-Mayboroda- Mourgoglou-Tolsa-Volberg. Zihui Zhao 8 / 10

  14. All previous quantitative results require some a-priori assumptions on the domain (e.g. strong connectivity assumption), so that we have some PDE estimates to start the analysis. Zihui Zhao 9 / 10

  15. All previous quantitative results require some a-priori assumptions on the domain (e.g. strong connectivity assumption), so that we have some PDE estimates to start the analysis. Our approach is: log d ω singular integral excess − height bound d σ ∈ VMO = = = = = = = = = ⇒ ν ∈ VMO = = = = = = = = = = = = ⇒ Ω is nice . ↑ ∇S f ( Z ) = 1 lim 2 ν ( x ) f ( x ) + T f ( x ) Z → x Z ∈ Γ( x ) Zihui Zhao 9 / 10

  16. Thank you! Zihui Zhao 10 / 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend