examples of non algebraic classes in the brown peterson
play

Examples of non- algebraic classes in the Brown-Peterson tower - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Apr 09, 2024 β€’192 likes β€’1.79k views

Examples of non- algebraic classes in the Brown-Peterson tower Freie Universitt Berlin November 16, 2017 Gereon Quick NTNU Lefschetz s theorem: X projective complex surface Lefschetz s theorem: X projective complex surface 2-dim.

  1. 𝜍 Topological realization: Sm C Man X(C) X ”complex e.g. P 1 P 1 (C)=CP 1 ≃ S 2 manifold of solutions in C” motivic induced map spectrum 𝜍 E a,b (X) E a (X(C)) mot top β€œalgebraic” β€œtopological”

  2. 𝜍 Topological realization: Sm C Man X(C) X ”complex e.g. P 1 P 1 (C)=CP 1 ≃ S 2 manifold of solutions in C” motivic induced map spectrum 𝜍 E a,b (X) E a (X(C)) mot top β€œalgebraic” β€œtopological” Question: How to detect whether classes in E* (X(C)) are algebraic, i.e., top are in the image of 𝜍 ?

  3. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum

  4. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum E 2 * , *(X) mot 𝜐 H 2 * , *(X;Z) mot

  5. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot 𝜐 𝜐 H 2 * , *(X;Z) H 2 *(X;Z) mot singular cohomology

  6. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) H 2 *(X;Z) mot singular cohomology

  7. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 =cl H 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) H 2 *(X;Z) mot singular cohomology

  8. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 =cl H 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H singular cohomology

  9. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot E β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 =cl H 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H singular cohomology

  10. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot E must β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 factor through =cl H 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H singular cohomology

  11. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot E must β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 factor through =cl H 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H singular cohomology Easier task:

  12. 𝜐 motivic Obstruction: Given E HZ. Eilenberg-MacLane Thom map spectrum 𝜍 E Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† E 2 *(X) E 2 * , *(X) top mot E must β†Ί 𝜐 𝜐 factor through =cl H 𝜍 H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H singular cohomology Easier task: describe using E 2 *(X(C))\Alg 2 *(X) H 2 *(X;Z)\Alg 2 *(X) top E H

  13. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H

  14. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H

  15. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) MGL 2 * , *(X) βŠ— L* Z MU 2 *(X) βŠ— L* Z 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H

  16. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) MGL 2 * , *(X) βŠ— L* Z MU 2 *(X) βŠ— L* Z Totaro ⟳ 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H

  17. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) MGL 2 * , *(X) βŠ— L* Z MU 2 *(X) βŠ— L* Z Levine + Totaro Levine-Morel β‰ˆ ⟳ 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H

  18. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) MGL 2 * , *(X) βŠ— L* Z MU 2 *(X) βŠ— L* Z Levine + ≉ in general Totaro Levine-Morel β‰ˆ ⟳ 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H

  19. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) MGL 2 * , *(X) βŠ— L* Z MU 2 *(X) βŠ— L* Z Levine + ≉ in general Totaro Levine-Morel β‰ˆ ⟳ 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H β€’ Atiyah-Hirzebruch: cl H is not surjective onto integral Hodge classes.

  20. Atiyah-Hirzebruch, Totaro, Levine-Morel: 𝜍 MGL MGL 2 * , *(X) MU 2 *(X) MGL 2 * , *(X) βŠ— L* Z MU 2 *(X) βŠ— L* Z Levine + ≉ in general Totaro Levine-Morel β‰ˆ ⟳ 𝜍 H =cl H H 2 * , *(X;Z) Alg 2 *(X) βŠ† H 2 *(X;Z) mot H β€’ Atiyah-Hirzebruch: cl H is not surjective onto integral Hodge classes. β€’ Totaro: new classes in kernel of cl H .

  21. A different perspective: Fix a prime p.

  22. A different perspective: Brown-Peterson, Fix a prime p. Quillen |v i |=2(p i -1) MU (p) splits as a wedge of suspensions of spectra BP with BP = Z (p) [v 1 ,v 2 ,…]. *

  23. A different perspective: Brown-Peterson, Fix a prime p. Quillen |v i |=2(p i -1) MU (p) splits as a wedge of suspensions of spectra BP with BP = Z (p) [v 1 ,v 2 ,…]. * quotient map BP BP/(v n+1 ,…) =: BP ⟨ n ⟩ For every n: with BP ⟨ n ⟩ = Z (p) [v 1 ,…,v n ] *

  24. A different perspective: Brown-Peterson, Fix a prime p. Quillen |v i |=2(p i -1) MU (p) splits as a wedge of suspensions of spectra BP with BP = Z (p) [v 1 ,v 2 ,…]. * quotient map BP BP/(v n+1 ,…) =: BP ⟨ n ⟩ For every n: with BP ⟨ n ⟩ = Z (p) [v 1 ,…,v n ] * The Brown-Peterson tower (Wilson): … … BP BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ 1 ⟩ BP ⟨ 0 ⟩ BP ⟨ -1 ⟩ p=2: 2-local HZ (p) HF p connective K-theory

  25. Milnor operations:

  26. Milnor operations: For every n: stable cofibre sequence v n |v n | |v n |+1 βˆ‘ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ βˆ‘

  27. Milnor operations: For every n: stable cofibre sequence v n |v n | |v n |+1 βˆ‘ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ βˆ‘ with an induced exact sequence (for any space X) +|v n | BP ⟨ n ⟩ * (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ *(X) q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ *(X)

  28. Milnor operations: For every n: stable cofibre sequence v n |v n | |v n |+1 βˆ‘ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ βˆ‘ with an induced exact sequence (for any space X) +|v n | BP ⟨ n ⟩ * (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ *(X) q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ Thom map +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) HF p H*(X;F p ) H* Q n

  29. Milnor operations: For every n: stable cofibre sequence v n |v n | |v n |+1 βˆ‘ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n ⟩ BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ βˆ‘ with an induced exact sequence (for any space X) +|v n | BP ⟨ n ⟩ * (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ *(X) q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ nth Milnor Thom operation: map Q 0 =Bockstein p n-1 p n-1 +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) Q n =P Q n-1 -Q n-1 P HF p H*(X;F p ) H* Q n

  30. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) ⟲ q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Q n

  31. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) ⟲ q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Q n 𝝱

  32. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) ⟲ q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  33. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) ⟲ q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  34. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT ⟲ q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  35. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT ⟲ 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  36. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT ⟲ 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  37. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT ⟲ q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  38. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT if ⟲ = 0 q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  39. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then if ⟲ = 0 q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  40. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then if ⟲ = 0 q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n Q n 𝝱 𝝱 Question: Is 𝝱 algebraic?

  41. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then if ⟲ = 0 q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n Q n 𝝱 𝝱

  42. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then if ⟲ = 0 q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n Q n 𝝱 𝝱 Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction:

  43. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then if ⟲ = 0 q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n β‰  0 Q n 𝝱 𝝱 if Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction: If Q n 𝝱 β‰  0,

  44. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then ⟲ q n 𝝱 n-1 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n β‰  0 Q n 𝝱 𝝱 if Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction: If Q n 𝝱 β‰  0,

  45. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then ⟲ q n 𝝱 n-1 β‰  0 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n β‰  0 Q n 𝝱 𝝱 if Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction: If Q n 𝝱 β‰  0,

  46. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then ⟲ ✘ q n 𝝱 n-1 β‰  0 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n β‰  0 Q n 𝝱 𝝱 if Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction: If Q n 𝝱 β‰  0,

  47. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then ⟲ ✘ ✘ q n 𝝱 n-1 β‰  0 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n β‰  0 Q n 𝝱 𝝱 if Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction: If Q n 𝝱 β‰  0,

  48. The LMT obstruction in action: BP 2 *(X) LMT then ⟲ ✘ ✘ q n 𝝱 n-1 β‰  0 𝝱 n 𝝱 n-1 q n BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 * +|v n |+1 (X) BP ⟨ n ⟩ 2 *(X) BP ⟨ n-1 ⟩ 2 *(X) β†Ί +|v n |+1 (X;F p ) H 2 *(X;F p ) H 2 * Z*(X) Q n β‰  0 Q n 𝝱 𝝱 if Levine-Morel-Totaro obstruction: If Q n 𝝱 β‰  0, then 𝝱 is not algebraic.

  49. Voevodsky’ s motivic Milnor operations:

  50. Voevodsky’ s motivic Milnor operations: There are motivic operations mod p-motivic Q n ∈ 𝓑 2p n -1,p n -1 mot Steenrod algebra

  51. Voevodsky’ s motivic Milnor operations: There are motivic operations mod p-motivic Q n ∈ 𝓑 2p n -1,p n -1 mot Steenrod algebra For a smooth complex variety X: mot Q n i+2p n -1,j+p n -1 (X;F p ) i,j H (X;F p ) H mot mot mod p-motivic cohomology

  52. Voevodsky’ s motivic Milnor operations: There are motivic operations mod p-motivic Q n ∈ 𝓑 2p n -1,p n -1 mot Steenrod algebra For a smooth complex variety X: mot Q n i+2p n -1,j+p n -1 (X;F p ) i,j H (X;F p ) H mot mot mod p-motivic cohomology 2i,i Recall: = CH i (X;Z/p) H (X;F p ) and mot i,j H (X;F p ) = 0 if i>2j. mot

  53. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H mot mot β†Ί topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n

  54. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n

  55. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n

  56. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n 𝝱

  57. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n Q n 𝝱 β‰  0 𝝱 if

  58. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί ✘ topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n Q n 𝝱 β‰  0 𝝱 if

  59. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί ✘ topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n Q n 𝝱 β‰  0 𝝱 if Observation: The LMT-obstruction is particular to smooth varieties and bidegrees (2i,i).

  60. Obstructions revisited: X smooth complex variety mot Q n mot Q n 2i,i 2i+2p n -1,i+p n -1 (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) H = 0 mot mot β†Ί ✘ topological realization 2i+2p n -1 H 2i (X;F p ) H (X;F p ) Q n Q n 𝝱 β‰  0 𝝱 if Observation: The LMT-obstruction is particular to smooth varieties and bidegrees (2i,i). Example: Q n 𝛋 β‰  0 for 𝛋 the fundamental class of a suitable Eilenberg-MacLane space, though 𝛋 is algebraic.

  61. Back to our task:

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

Examples of non- algebraic classes in the Brown-Peterson tower Institut Mittag-Leffler April 20,

Examples of non- algebraic classes in the Brown-Peterson tower Institut Mittag-Leffler April 20,

Examples of non- algebraic classes in the Brown-Peterson tower Institut Mittag-Leffler April 20, 2017 Gereon Quick NTNU Algebraic classes: smooth complex schemes Let E be a motivic spectrum over Sm C . Algebraic classes: smooth complex

1.81k views β€’ 144 slides
Discovering the roots: Uniform closure results for algebraic classes under factoring 1.

Discovering the roots: Uniform closure results for algebraic classes under factoring 1.

To appear at STOC 2018 Pranjal Dutta (CMI) Nitin Saxena (IIT Kanpur) Amit Sinhababu (IIT Kanpur) WACT18, Universit Paris Diderot Discovering the roots: Uniform closure results for algebraic classes under factoring 1. Introduction 2.

2.06k views β€’ 172 slides
Algebraic index theorems Polyvector fields Formality for cochains Index problem Examples

Algebraic index theorems Polyvector fields Formality for cochains Index problem Examples

Algebraic index theorems Ryszard Nest L algebras Examples Deformation functor Algebraic index theorems Polyvector fields Formality for cochains Index problem Examples Ryszard Nest Local trace density Formality for chains

972 views β€’ 75 slides
Nature Education Kickoff 2018 Years of Service Recognition Heidi Brown 10 years Lois Peterson 10

Nature Education Kickoff 2018 Years of Service Recognition Heidi Brown 10 years Lois Peterson 10

Nature Education Kickoff 2018 Years of Service Recognition Heidi Brown 10 years Lois Peterson 10 years Tom Taber 10 years Gary Keeth 15 years Betty Murray 15 years Bob Walker 15 years Jackie James 25 years Carol Matthews 25 years Program

396 views β€’ 22 slides
Open Non-uniform Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition Christopher W. Brown Department of Computer

Open Non-uniform Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition Christopher W. Brown Department of Computer

Open Non-uniform Cylindrical Algebraic Decomposition Christopher W. Brown Department of Computer Science U. S. Naval Academy ISSAC 2015 C. W. Brown (USNA) Open Non-uniform CAD ISSAC 2015 1 / 16 Context C. W. Brown (USNA) Open Non-uniform

825 views β€’ 78 slides
Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks David Zureick-Brown Emory University, Department of

Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks David Zureick-Brown Emory University, Department of

Rigid Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks David Zureick-Brown Emory University, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science 2012 Joint Meetings Special Session on Arithmetic Geometry Boston, MA January 7, 2012 Slides available at

890 views β€’ 46 slides
Greg Peterson Peterson Farm Brothers Who are the Peterson Farm Bros? From L to R: Nathan

Greg Peterson Peterson Farm Brothers Who are the Peterson Farm Bros? From L to R: Nathan

Greg Peterson Peterson Farm Brothers Who are the Peterson Farm Bros? From L to R: Nathan (23), Greg (25), Kendal (20), and honorary bro Laura (16) About Us We live on a 5 th generation family farm near Assaria, KS Our farm

373 views β€’ 34 slides
Some logical aspects of topos theory and examples from algebraic geometry (Part II) Matthias

Some logical aspects of topos theory and examples from algebraic geometry (Part II) Matthias

Some logical aspects of topos theory and examples from algebraic geometry (Part II) Matthias Hutzler Universit at Augsburg June 29, 2020 Recap of Part I Interpreting IZF in Sh ( X ) Classifying toposes De fi nition A geometric formula is a

369 views β€’ 20 slides
B-HUNT: Automatic Discovery of Fuzzy Algebraic Constraints in Relational Data Paul G. Brown

B-HUNT: Automatic Discovery of Fuzzy Algebraic Constraints in Relational Data Paul G. Brown

B-HUNT: Automatic Discovery of Fuzzy Algebraic Constraints in Relational Data Paul G. Brown & Peter J. Haas IBM Almaden Research Center San Jose, CA VLDB 2003 A Motivating Example n Shipment data: orderID shipDate orderID deliveryDate

588 views β€’ 28 slides
Some logical aspects of topos theory and examples from algebraic geometry Matthias Hutzler

Some logical aspects of topos theory and examples from algebraic geometry Matthias Hutzler

Some logical aspects of topos theory and examples from algebraic geometry Matthias Hutzler Universit at Augsburg June 15, 2020 Definition An (elementary) topos is a category with finite limits and power objects. Example For a

633 views β€’ 12 slides
Digital Circuits and Systems Algebraic Minimization Examples Shankar Balachandran* Associate

Digital Circuits and Systems Algebraic Minimization Examples Shankar Balachandran* Associate

Spring 2015 Week 1 Module 5 Digital Circuits and Systems Algebraic Minimization Examples Shankar Balachandran* Associate Professor, CSE Department Indian Institute of Technology Madras *Currently a Visiting Professor at IIT Bombay Summary

335 views β€’ 11 slides
Overconvergent de Rham-Witt Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks David Zureick-Brown (Emory

Overconvergent de Rham-Witt Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks David Zureick-Brown (Emory

Overconvergent de Rham-Witt Cohomology for Algebraic Stacks David Zureick-Brown (Emory University) Christopher Davis (UC Irvine) Slides available at http://www.mathcs.emory.edu/~dzb/slides/ 2013 Joint Math Meetings Special Session on Witt

391 views β€’ 18 slides
Topological recursion from an algebraic perspective Gatan Borot HU Berlin Oct. 2, 2020 I.

Topological recursion from an algebraic perspective Gatan Borot HU Berlin Oct. 2, 2020 I.

Algebraic and combinatorial perspectives in mathematical sciences May Angeli Topological recursion from an algebraic perspective Gatan Borot HU Berlin Oct. 2, 2020 I. Bottom-up : how 2d topology arises from algebra II. Two examples : 2d

365 views β€’ 36 slides
Algebraic Holography in Asymptotically AdS Space-Times: Functional Framework, Examples and Steps

Algebraic Holography in Asymptotically AdS Space-Times: Functional Framework, Examples and Steps

Algebraic Holography in Asymptotically AdS Space-Times: Functional Framework, Examples and Steps Towards Rigorous Bulk Reconstruction Pedro Lauridsen Ribeiro pedro.ribeiro@ufabc.edu.br Centro de Matem atica, Computa c ao e Cogni c

539 views β€’ 24 slides
Complexity Amir Shpilka Tel Aviv University 1 Algebraic Complexity February 14, 2020 Rough

Complexity Amir Shpilka Tel Aviv University 1 Algebraic Complexity February 14, 2020 Rough

Crash course on Algebraic Complexity Amir Shpilka Tel Aviv University 1 Algebraic Complexity February 14, 2020 Rough Plan Lecture 1: Models of computation, Complexity Classes, Reductions and Completeness, Connection to Boolean world,

1.47k views β€’ 146 slides
Week 3 - Friday What did we talk about last time? Wrapper classes Examples if

Week 3 - Friday What did we talk about last time? Wrapper classes Examples if

Week 3 - Friday What did we talk about last time? Wrapper classes Examples if statements So far we have only considered Java programs that do one thing after another, in sequence Our programs have not had the ability to

638 views β€’ 34 slides
A Talk on Protein Homology Detection by HMM-HMM comparisons[1] Sding, J Qing Ye Department of

A Talk on Protein Homology Detection by HMM-HMM comparisons[1] Sding, J Qing Ye Department of

A Talk on Protein Homology Detection by HMM-HMM comparisons[1] Sding, J Qing Ye Department of Computer Science University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign March 15, 2017 1 / 16 Qing Ye qingye3@illinois.edu Protein homology detection by

631 views β€’ 16 slides
Modelling binding site with 3DLigandSite Mark Wass m.n.wass@kent.ac.uk CASP MEEYKVVVCGSGPVALGCF

Modelling binding site with 3DLigandSite Mark Wass m.n.wass@kent.ac.uk CASP MEEYKVVVCGSGPVALGCF

Modelling binding site with 3DLigandSite Mark Wass m.n.wass@kent.ac.uk CASP MEEYKVVVCGSGPVALGCF Target sequence (2 per day) Human predictors Server predictors 3 days 3 weeks Predicted Binding site Results Predicted Performance

725 views β€’ 41 slides
ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR A RESPONSIVE AND INCLUSIVE LAND GOVERNANCE A study developed by HFH

ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR A RESPONSIVE AND INCLUSIVE LAND GOVERNANCE A study developed by HFH

ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOR A RESPONSIVE AND INCLUSIVE LAND GOVERNANCE A study developed by HFH Brazil and Cendhec implementing partners of the Empowering Women and Vulnerable Groups to Exercise their Rights for Inclusion and Secure Land Tenure

178 views β€’ 15 slides
MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY GDP ESTIMATES FOR INTERWAR BRITAIN James Mitchell (NIESR) Solomos Solomou

MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY GDP ESTIMATES FOR INTERWAR BRITAIN James Mitchell (NIESR) Solomos Solomou

MONTHLY AND QUARTERLY GDP ESTIMATES FOR INTERWAR BRITAIN James Mitchell (NIESR) Solomos Solomou (Cambridge) National Institute of Economic and Martin Weale (BOE and NIESR) Social Research Monthly GDP estimates Derive monthly series of

582 views β€’ 15 slides
Variants Chris Yates UCL Cancer Institute c.yates@ucl.ac.uk Outline SAVs and Disease

Variants Chris Yates UCL Cancer Institute c.yates@ucl.ac.uk Outline SAVs and Disease

Using SuSPect to Predict the Phenotypic Effects of Missense Variants Chris Yates UCL Cancer Institute c.yates@ucl.ac.uk Outline SAVs and Disease Development of SuSPect Features included Feature selection

655 views β€’ 33 slides
Universal Sequence Maps of Arbitrary Discrete Sequences By Almeida and Vigna Presented By

Universal Sequence Maps of Arbitrary Discrete Sequences By Almeida and Vigna Presented By

Universal Sequence Maps of Arbitrary Discrete Sequences By Almeida and Vigna Presented By Chris Standish chriss@cs.tamu.edu 1 Motivation Sequence alignment techniques assume there is conservation of contiguity between homologous

325 views β€’ 31 slides
Learning outcomes Learning outcomes in UCC in UCC International Symposium on Implementing

Learning outcomes Learning outcomes in UCC in UCC International Symposium on Implementing

Learning outcomes Learning outcomes in UCC in UCC International Symposium on Implementing Learning Outcomes UCC 10 11 Feb 2006 Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, UCC Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, UCC 1 1

433 views β€’ 40 slides
The effect of rate of presentation Article in Attention Perception & Psychophysics March

The effect of rate of presentation Article in Attention Perception & Psychophysics March

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/226459408 The effect of rate of presentation Article in Attention Perception & Psychophysics March 1966 DOI: 10.3758/BF03210038

424 views β€’ 4 slides

More recommend