Evolution model for the Absheron mud volcano (GIMS 14 - - - PDF document

evolution model for the absheron mud volcano gims 14
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evolution model for the Absheron mud volcano (GIMS 14 - - - PDF document

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328450132 Evolution model for the Absheron mud volcano (GIMS 14 - Presentation) Presentation October 2018 CITATIONS READS 0 144 4


slide-1
SLIDE 1

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328450132

Evolution model for the Absheron mud volcano (GIMS 14 - Presentation)

Presentation · October 2018

CITATIONS READS

144

4 authors, including: Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: The role of gas in mud volcanoes occurrence and growth, close-up on Azerbaijan edifices. View project Sivas Salt Tectonic project View project Arthur Blouin Fugro France

9 PUBLICATIONS 3 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

Patrice Imbert TOTAL

112 PUBLICATIONS 1,152 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Arthur Blouin on 25 February 2019.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Evolution model for the Absheron mud volcano: from in-situ

  • bservations to numerical modeling

Arthur Blouin1,2,3, Patrice Imbert2, Jean-Paul Callot3, Matthieu Dupuis4

1 Ifremer, Lab. Aléas géologiques et Dynamiques sédimentaires, géosciences marines, REM, Centre de Bretagne, Pointe du diable,

29280 Plouzané

2 R&D/EP Total S.A., Avenue Larribau, 64000 Pau 3 E2S-UPPA, Lab. des Fluides Complexes et de leurs Réservoirs, IPRA, Univ. Pau & Pays Adour, Avenue de l’Université, 64013 Pau

cedex

4 Lab. d’Océanologie et de Géosciences – Univ. Lille 1 – UFR Sciences de la Terre – 596355 Villeneuve d’Asq

2 km

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

In Introduction

11/09/2018 2

  • The South Caspian Basin

Modified from Oppo et al., 2014

  • SCB: remnant of the Thetys sea
  • Maykop Fm: regional source

rock with high TOC, gas mature, and detachment level for folding

  • Productive Series: 6 Km of

Pliocene sediments deposited in 3 Myrs

  • Anticline crests: traps for HC

and location of MVs

slide-4
SLIDE 4

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Scientific questions
  • What is the stratigraphic source of the mud?

11/09/2018 3

Based on Deville, 2009

slide-5
SLIDE 5

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Scientific questions
  • What is the stratigraphic source of the mud?
  • Can we reproduce field pore pressure

measurements with a numerical model?

11/09/2018 4

Based on Deville, 2009

slide-6
SLIDE 6

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Scientific questions
  • What is the stratigraphic source of the mud?
  • Can we reproduce field pore pressure

measurements with a numerical model?

  • What mechanisms control the stratigraphic and

lateral positions of the source?

11/09/2018 5

Based on Deville, 2009

slide-7
SLIDE 7

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Scientific questions
  • What is the stratigraphic source of the mud?
  • Can we reproduce field pore pressure

measurements with a numerical model?

  • What mechanisms control the stratigraphic and

lateral positions of the source?

  • Based on observations and modeling results, can

we propose a qualitative formation model for the Absheron mud volcano?

11/09/2018 6

Based on Deville, 2009

slide-8
SLIDE 8

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Dataset and methodology

11/09/2018 7

  • 3D seismic survey
  • Geotechnical survey with sediment

cores in the mud  Mineralogy  Biostratigraphy  Geomechanics (compressibility, permeability)

  • 2 exploration wells

 Pressure regime  Temperature  Hydraulic conductivity

  • Numerical modeling of overpressure

distribution and methane migration

slide-9
SLIDE 9

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Results – Seismic Interpretation

11/09/2018 8

slide-10
SLIDE 10

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Results – Seismic Interpretation

11/09/2018 9

 Absheron anticline cored by a deep thrust  Several folding phases based on thickness variations between flanks and crest  Maximum folding activity during Absheron deposition  Normal faults network on the fold extrados

slide-11
SLIDE 11

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 10

  • Results – Seismic Interpretation
slide-12
SLIDE 12

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 11

 Blind seismic facies spreading horizontally into four distinct arm  MV deposits  Mud volcano located at the exact vertical from the main thrust  First mudflows during post-Absheron interval, after the main folding stage

  • Results – Seismic Interpretation
slide-13
SLIDE 13

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 12

  • Results – Seismic Interpretation
slide-14
SLIDE 14

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 13

 Bowl-like geometry for all the horizons between Top Absheron and Top Productive Series  Anhydritic Surakhany is discontinuous and downlap on the younger interval  Continuous horizons below 3.5 sec TWTT  Normal faults flanking the bowl- shaped area

  • Results – Seismic Interpretation
slide-15
SLIDE 15

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 14

  • Results – Mud properties
  • All natural mud samples have the same compressibility and hydraulic conductivity
  • Coarse material input decrease the compressibility and increase the hydraulic conductivity
  • Mud mineralogy composed essentially of clays (illite and I/S) and quartz
  • Biostratigraphy: Productive Series origin
slide-16
SLIDE 16

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 15

  • Results – In-situ physical data

 Anhydritic Surakhany: 380 m of interstratified claystones and evaporites.  Shale overpressure peaks near fracturing pressure (notably in Anhydritic Surakhany)  Shallow reservoirs in equilibrium with shales. Deep reservoirs are 20 Mpa below shale pressure  Unstable interval during drilling with a mineralogy close to the

  • ne of the mud

CONFIDENTIAL

slide-17
SLIDE 17

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 16

  • Results – Numerical modeling

 Modeling of the physical conditions before extrusion  Results of 1D sedimentation-related

  • verpressure calculation injected at the

South of the structural model (Structural model from Green et al., 2009)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

11/09/2018 17

  • Results – Numerical modeling

 Modeling of the physical conditions before extrusion  Results of 1D sedimentation-related

  • verpressure calculation injected at the

South of the structural model (Structural model from Green et al., 2009)  Overpressure propagates at different rates depending on hydraulic conductivities  Faults designed to model advection. Fast methane circulation in faults, slow diffusion through the sediments  Near fracturing conditions in the area of methane saturation

slide-19
SLIDE 19

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Discussions

11/09/2018 18

  • The Anhydritic Surakhany is the more plausible source for the mud.
  • 2D diffusion model is able to reproduce the measured overpressure trend but not the exact pressure

magnitudes

  • High values of Du /s’v fit with high dissolved methane concentrations (similar to Lusi eruption model)
  • Hydrofracturing in this area would lead to P decrease and gas exsolution/expansion  critical factor for

sediment damage (Sultan et al., 2012)

  • Initiation and location of the mud volcano is controlled by the superposition of overpressure and gas

saturated zones

slide-20
SLIDE 20

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Discussion – Conceptual model for the mud volcano formation

11/09/2018 19

2 km

slide-21
SLIDE 21

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Discussion – Conceptual model for the mud volcano formation

11/09/2018 20

2 km

slide-22
SLIDE 22

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Discussion – Conceptual model for the mud volcano formation

11/09/2018 21

2 km

slide-23
SLIDE 23

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Discussion – Conceptual model for the mud volcano formation

11/09/2018 22

2 km

slide-24
SLIDE 24

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Discussion – Conceptual model for the mud volcano formation

11/09/2018 23

2 km

slide-25
SLIDE 25

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa

Evolu lution model for the Absheron mud volc lcano

  • Conclusions, limits and perspectives

11/09/2018 24

 Stratigraphic mud source: Anhydritic Surakhany  Overpressured and methane-saturated areas may explain the mud volcano location (e.g. 2-D model and LUSI)  Trigger: hydrofracturing. Necessary preliminary condition: clay-rich sediment saturated with methane  Roles of methane: exsolution creates the mud from clay-rich layers; lowers sediment density; expansion keeps mud pressure high  Conceptual formation model closely fits the observations and the analysis of the available dataset and is partly based

  • n the numerical modeling results

BUT…  Dataset could be improved  Numerical model is not complete and can be improved

What are the gas saturation, pressure and pre-consolidation of the sediments allowing mud generation?  Laboratory tests…

slide-26
SLIDE 26

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa 11/09/2018 25

Thank you for your attention!

slide-27
SLIDE 27

GIMS 2018 - Haïfa 11/09/2018 26

References:

  • ASTM International. (1996). D 2435 – 96 - Standard test method for one-dimensional consolidation properties of soils. American Society for Testing and Materials, (August),

196–205.

  • Das, B. M. (2013). Principles of Geotechnical Engineering - 7th edition. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (Vol. 53). CENGAGE Learning.
  • Deville, E. (2009). Mud Volcano Systems. In N. Lewis & A. Moretti (Eds.), Volcanoes: Formation, Eruptions and Modelling (p. 95–125 (404)). Nova Science

Publishers.

  • Eaton, B. A. (1975). The equation for geopressure prediction from well logs. In Fall meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME (p. 11). Dallas, Texas: Society of

Petroleum Engineers.

  • Fialips, C. I., Labeyrie, B., Burg, V., Mazière, V., Munerel, Y., Haurie, H., … Sa, T. (2018). Quantitative Mineralogy of Vaca Muerta and Alum Shales From Core Chips and Drill

Cuttings by Calibrated SEM-EDS Mineralogical Mapping.

  • Green, T., Abdullayev, N., Hossack, J., Riley, G., & Roberts, A. M. (2009). Sedimentation and subsidence in the South Caspian Basin, Azerbaijan. Geological Society, London,

Special Publications, 312(1), 241–260.

  • Javanshir, R. J., Riley, G. W., Duppenbecker, S. J., & Abdullayev, N. (2015). Validation of lateral fluid flow in an overpressured sand-shale sequence during development of

Azeri-Chirag-Gunashli oil field and Shah Deniz gas field: South Caspian Basin, Azerbaijan. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 59, 593–610.

  • Kirkham, C., Cartwright, J., Hermanrud, C., & Jebsen, C. (2017). The spatial, temporal and volumetric analysis of a large mud volcano province within the Eastern
  • Mediterranean. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 81, 1–16.
  • Mazzini, A. and Etiope, G. (2017) ‘Mud volcanism: An updated review’, Earth-Science Reviews. Elsevier B.V., 168, pp. 81–112.
  • Oppo, D., Capozzi, R., Nigarov, A., & Esenov, P. (2014). Mud volcanism and fluid geochemistry in the Cheleken peninsula, western Turkmenistan. Marine and Petroleum

Geology, 57, 122–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2014.05.009

  • Ren, X., Zhao, Y., Deng, Q., Kang, J., Li, D., & Wang, D. (2016). A relation of hydraulic conductivity — void ratio for soils based on Kozeny-Carman equation. Engineering

Geology, 213, 89–97.

  • Ryzak, M., & Bieganowski, A. (2011). Methodological aspects of determining soil particle-size distribution using the laser diffraction method. Journal of Plant Nutrition and

Soil Science, 174(4), 624–633.

  • Stewart, S. A. and Davies, R. J. (2006) ‘Structure and emplacement of mud volcano systems in the South Caspian Basin’, AAPG Bulletin, 90(5), pp. 771–786.
  • Sultan, N., Cochonat, P., Canals, M., Cattaneo, A., Dennielou, B., Haflidason, H., … Wilson, C. (2004). Triggering mechanisms of slope instability processes and sediment

failures on continental margins: A geotechnical approach. Marine Geology, 213(1–4), 291–321.

  • Sultan, N., De Gennaro, V. and Puech, A. (2012) ‘Mechanical behaviour of gas-charged marine plastic sediments’, Géotechnique, 62(9), pp. 751–766.
  • Tingay, M. et al. (2017) ‘An alternative review of facts, coincidences and past and future studies of the Lusi eruption’, Marine and Petroleum Geology, (December).
View publication stats View publication stats