Evi vidence to su supp pport virtu irtual si simul ulation as - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶
evi vidence to su supp pport virtu irtual si simul
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evi vidence to su supp pport virtu irtual si simul ulation as - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Sep 27, 2022 241 likes •535 views

Evi vidence to su supp pport virtu irtual si simul ulation as as an an ef effectiv ive ped pedagogy du durin ing the the pa pand ndemic: Res esearch an and d po polic licy im impl plic ications. Cynthia Foronda, PhD, RN,

slide-1
SLIDE 1

Evi vidence to su supp pport virtu irtual si simul ulation as as an an ef effectiv ive ped pedagogy du durin ing the the pa pand ndemic: Res esearch an and d po polic licy im impl plic ications.

Cynthia Foronda, PhD, RN, CNE, CHSE, ANEF Associate Professor of Clinical University of Miami School of Nursing and Health Studies Macy Faculty Scholar 2018-2020 President, International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Disclaimers

  • Statements may or may not represent the view of INACSL
  • Served as a paid educational consultant of virtual simulation products

in the past

  • The activities reported here were supported (in part) by the Josiah

Macy, Jr. Foundation, United States

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Objectives

  • Summarize the evidence associated with virtual simulation in nursing

education

  • Consider policy implications related to substituting virtual simulation

for clinical practice hours

  • Identify resources to assist nurse educators with the transition of

providing clinical experiences virtually.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Objectives

  • Summarize the evidence associated with virtual simulation in nursing

education

  • Consider policy implications related to substituting virtual simulation

for clinical practice hours

  • Identify resources to assist nurse educators with the transition of

providing clinical experiences virtually.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Synthesis of Research

  • Virtual simulation
  • Improved knowledge compared to

customary methods (Gu, Zou, Chen, 2017)

  • Decreased time to skill achievement (Farra, et

al., 2015)

  • Increased retention of material over time

(Farra, Miller, Timm, & Schafer, 2013)

  • Fun/Satisfied (Foronda, et al., 2016; Liaw, et al, 2014;

Sunnqvist, et al., 2016; Tilton, et al., 2015; Ulrich, et al., 2014; Verkuyl, et al, 2017).

slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Systematic Review

  • Team of 5 individuals
  • Reviewed articles from 1996-2018
  • Applied PRISMA Guidelines
  • Appraised articles using Melnyk and

Fineout-Overholt’s (2015) Levels of Evidence

  • “How does virtual simulation impact

learning outcomes?”

Foronda, C.L., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C.N., & Henry, M.N. (2020, February). Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review Spanning 1996-2018. Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), 46-54.

slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Appraising the Evidence

Melnyk, BM, Fineout-Overholt, E. Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice.3rd ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Results

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Results

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Results

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Results

The majority of the evidence (n=69 studies, 86%) suggested that the intervention of virtual simulation resulted in improved student learning outcomes.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Results

When looking at the 17 RCT’s, the majority (n=12, 70%) of studies demonstrated that virtual simulation led to statistically significant gains in learning outcomes when compared to traditional methods.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Conclusion

  • The preponderance of evidence suggests

virtual simulation improves learning outcomes.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Evidence regarding debriefing virtual simulation

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Objectives

  • Summarize the evidence associated with virtual simulation in nursing

education

  • Consider policy implications related to substituting virtual simulation

for clinical practice hours

  • Identify resources to assist nurse educators with the transition of

providing clinical experiences virtually.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Coronavirus

slide-19
SLIDE 19

INACSL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM

  • INACSL Standards can and should be applied to virtual simulation
slide-20
SLIDE 20

Policy Implications

  • Advocate that virtual simulation hours can be substituted for clinical

practicum hours

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Policy Implications

  • If virtual simulation can be substituted, what ratio is allowed?
  • Hayden et al. (2014)/NCSBN study – up to 50% of manikin-based simulation could be

substituted

  • Sullivan, et al. (2019) study – suggests that manikin-based simulation can be substituted at a

2:1 clinical hour ratio

  • Evidence r/t clinical hour substitution with virtual simulation is lacking
  • Research is needed but we do not have the luxury of time

Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized, controlled study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing

  • education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2S), S3-S64.

Sullivan, N., Swoboda, S. M., Breymier, T., Lucas, L., Sarasnick, J., Rutherford-Hemming, T., ... & Kardong-Edgren, S. S. (2019). Emerging evidence toward a 2: 1 clinical to simulation ratio: A study comparing the traditional clinical and simulation settings. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 30, 34-41

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Policy Implications

Recommendations

  • Cautiously suggest allowing a 2:1 ratio of replacing clinical practicum hours with virtual

simulation during the pandemic (1 hour of virtual simulation = 2 clinical hours)

  • Ask Boards of Nursing/Policymakers for flexibility r/t limitations of clinical hours completed in

simulated settings (i.e. > 25%, 50%*)

  • *Remember that substituting with 50% or more statement is valid only when educators are

adequately trained, using quality, vetted simulations to meet course objectives, along with standardized high level debriefing

Bradley, C., Johnson, B., Dreifuerst K., White, P., Conde, S., Meakim, C., Curry-Lourenco, K., & Childress, R. (2019, August). Regulation of Simulation Use in United States Prelicensure Nursing Programs. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Volume 33, 17-25. INACSL Simulation Regulations Committee. (2020, March 12). INACSL Simulation Regulation Map. Retrieved from https://www.inacsl.org/simulation-regulations/.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Policy Implications

  • Recommendations
  • Ask Boards of Nursing/Policymakers to include the terms “virtual simulation”,

“screen-based simulation” or “computer-based simulation” in the interpretation of the verbiage of “interactive simulation”

  • Advocate for both prelicensure and advanced practice

students to be able to substitute virtual simulation for clinical hours

  • Support legislation to help educate and graduate nurses!
slide-24
SLIDE 24

Objectives

  • Summarize the evidence associated with virtual simulation in nursing

education

  • Consider policy implications related to substituting virtual simulation

for clinical practice hours

  • Identify resources to assist nurse educators with the transition of

providing clinical experiences virtually.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Resources

  • INACSL COVID-19 and Virtual Learning Resource List

https://www.inacsl.org/covid-19-update/resource-list/

  • NLN Coronavirus Resource Center

http://www.nln.org/coronavirus-resource-center

  • Society for Simulation in Healthcare Helpful Links

https://www.ssih.org/COVID-19-Updates/-Helpful-Links-and- Information

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Key References

  • Bradley, C., Johnson, B., Dreifuerst K., White, P., Conde, S., Meakim, C., Curry-Lourenco, K., & Childress, R. (2019, August). Regulation of Simulation Use in United

States Prelicensure Nursing Programs. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Volume 33, 17-25.

  • Foronda, C.L., Fernandez-Burgos, M., Nadeau, C., Kelley, C.N., & Henry, M.N. (2020, February). Virtual Simulation in Nursing Education: A Systematic Review

Spanning 1996-2018. Simulation in Healthcare, 15(1), 46-54.

  • Goldberg, E. (2020, March 20). Coronavirus may keep California’s nursing students from graduating. Retrieved from

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/20/health/coronavirus-nurses-healthcare.html?smid=em-share

  • Hayden, J.K., Smiley, R.A., Alexander, M., Kardong-Edgren, S., & Jeffries, P.R. (2014). The NCSBN national simulation study: A longitudinal, randomized, controlled

study replacing clinical hours with simulation in prelicensure nursing education. Journal of Nursing Regulation, 5(2S), S3-S64.

  • INACSL. (2020, March 23). COVID-19 and Virtual Learning Resource List. Retrieved from https://www.inacsl.org/covid-19-update/resource-list/.
  • The INACSL Standards Committee (2017, December). INASCL Standards of Best Practice: SimulationSM: Operations. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, Volume 13, 681-

687.

  • INACSL Simulation Regulations Committee. (2020, March 12). INACSL Simulation Regulation Map. Retrieved from https://www.inacsl.org/simulation-regulations/.
  • National League for Nursing. (2020, March 23). Coronavirus Resource Center. Retrieved from http://www.nln.org/coronavirus-resource-center.
  • Sullivan, N., Swoboda, S. M., Breymier, T., Lucas, L., Sarasnick, J., Rutherford-Hemming, T., ... & Kardong-Edgren, S. S. (2019). Emerging evidence toward a 2: 1

clinical to simulation ratio: A study comparing the traditional clinical and simulation settings. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 30, 34-41

  • Verkuyl M, Atack L, McCulloch T, et al. (2018). Comparison of debriefing methods after a virtual simulation: An experiment. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 19, 1–7.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

Questions, Comments, or Ideas

c.foronda@miami.edu