Evaluation of skin mucous cells of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

evaluation of skin mucous cells of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Evaluation of skin mucous cells of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Evaluation of skin mucous cells of Atlantic salmon ( Salmo salar ) fed plant- based diets and probiotics Nimalan N , Fekaninov A, Koov J, Mudroov D, Vatsos I, Kiron V, Srensen M Content 1. Background 2. Methodology 3. Results


slide-1
SLIDE 1
slide-2
SLIDE 2

Evaluation of skin mucous cells of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) fed plant- based diets and probiotics

Nimalan N, Fečkaninová A, Koščová J, Mudroňová D, Vatsos I, Kiron V, Sørensen M

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Content

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion
slide-4
SLIDE 4
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

Nutrient sources in Norwegian salmon feeds

Modified from Ytrestøyl et al., 2015

65.4 33.5 24.8 18.3 24 31.1 16.6 10.9 22.2 35.5 36.7 12.5 19.2 9.6 11.2 8.4 11.2 1 2 2.2 3.7

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%

1990 2000 2010 2013 Percentage of nutrient sources Microingredients Starch Plant oil Plant protein Marine oil Marine protein

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • Nutritional profile

Effects of changing dietary ingredients

Marine ingredients Plant-based diets

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

Favourable Unfavourable

  • EPA & DHA
  • Health impacts
  • n-3 : n-6 ratio
  • Presence of ANFs
  • Enteritis (SBM)
  • Mucosal health
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Aim of the study

– investigate the effect of feeding plant-based diets, with or without probiotics, on the skin mucous cells of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar).

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Experimental diets

Source: Unpublished work, Sørensen et al., 2019

Ingredient composition (%) of experimental diet

  • without probiotic

+ with probiotic

Feed ingredients

Diet1- Diet1+ Diet 2- Diet2+ Diet3- Diet3+ Fishmeal 50 50 10 10 30 30 Fish oil 25 25 7.7 7.7 26.4 26.4 Wheat source 18.8 18.8 16 16 16.5 16.5 SPC + PPC + Corn 38 38 Rapeseed oil 19.8 19.8 Soybean meal 20 20 Other ingredients 6.2 6.2 8.5 8.5 7.1 7.1 Probiotic (log10 CFU/g) 8.75 8.75 8.75

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion
slide-8
SLIDE 8

Experimental Design, Fish and Feeding

D1- D3- D2- D1+ D3+ D1+ D2+ D3+ D2+ D1- D3- D2-

Experimental set up:

  • Atlantic salmon, fed to satiation, 6

weeks duration

  • Flow through tanks, 1000 l, 35 fish/ tank
  • Initial mean weight = 147 g

Diet 1 (D1) Diet 2 (D2) Diet 3 (D3)

  • : without probiotic

+: with probiotic Water quality:

  • Temperature = 7.6 oC
  • Salinity = 35‰
  • Oxygen saturation = above 85%
  • Photoperiod = 24 h
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Sampling and data collection

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

Sampling (Dorsal skin, 0.5 cm2) Fixation (4% formalin,72 h) Decalcification (10% formic acid, 5 h) Processing (for 17 h) Embedding (Cross, Paraffin) Sectioning (at 4µm) Staining (H&E, AB-PAS) 12 fish/treatment

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Skin mucous cell parameters

1) Total area of mucous cells/ 1 μm2

  • f epidermis (percentage) - ME
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

108 images per diet Total area of epidermis Total area of mucous cells 2) Average size (µm2) of mucous cell - MA 3) Number of mucous cells/ 1000 μm2 of epidermis - NM

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Data Analysis

  • Normality of data
  • Homogeneity of variance
  • Two-way ANOVA
  • Microphotograph – Image J (1.52)
  • R software environment (Version 3.6.1)
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion
slide-12
SLIDE 12

1) Total mucous cells area per epidermis area (ME)

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

0% 5% 10% 15% 20%

ME

D2- D2+ D1- D1+ D3- D3+ Two-way ANOVA: Diet: p = 0.148 Probiotic: p = 0.533 Interaction: p = 0.790

slide-13
SLIDE 13

2) Average size (area) of mucous cell (MA)

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

40 80 120 160

MA (µm2)

Two-way ANOVA: Diet: p = 0.072 Probiotic: p = 0.381 Interaction: p = 0.936 D2- D2+ D1- D1+ D3- D3+

slide-14
SLIDE 14

3) Number of mucous cells per epidermis area (NM)

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

0.5 1 1.5

NM (per 1000 µm2)

a b A A B Two-way ANOVA: Diet: p = 0.001 Probiotic: p = 0.008 Interaction: p = 0.542 D2- D2+ D1- D1+ D3- D3+

slide-15
SLIDE 15
  • Size and number of skin mucous cells:

1) 15 to 17 % epidermis area is covered by mucous cells. 2) Average size (area) of mucous cell is 128 to 149 µm2. 3) 0.9 to 1.3 mucous cells per 1000 µm2 of epidermis.

  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion
  • No significance difference:

1) Total area of mucous cells per 1 μm2 of epidermis (ME). 2) Average size (area) of mucous cell (MA).

  • Significance difference:

3) Number of mucous cells per 1000 μm2 of epidermis (NM).

slide-16
SLIDE 16
  • Diet affected number of skin mucous cells.
  • Probiotic affected number of skin mucous cells.
  • 1. Background
  • 2. Methodology
  • 3. Results
  • 4. Summary
  • 5. Conclusion

Dietary intervention influences the number of skin mucous cells of Atlantic salmon.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Our research team…

  • Prof. Mette Sørensen
  • Prof. Ioannis Vatsos
  • Prof. Kiron Viswanath
  • Dr. Adriána Fečkaninová
  • Prof. Dagmar Mudroňová
  • Prof. Jana Koščová
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Thank you very much for your attention

Tusen takk