EU-Project OPEN HOUSE Dr. Natalie Eig (Architect, DGNB Auditor) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
EU-Project OPEN HOUSE Dr. Natalie Eig (Architect, DGNB Auditor) Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics (IBP) SB 11 Special Forum: Core Indicators October 23 rd 2010, Helsinki Contact: natalie.essig@ibp.fraunhofer.de The Objective
EU-Project OPEN HOUSE
Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics (IBP) SB 11 Special Forum: “Core Indicators” October 23rd 2010, Helsinki Contact: natalie.essig@ibp.fraunhofer.de
The Objective
EU-Project: Seventh Framework Programme Timeframe: 36 months, Febuary 2010 – January 2013 Coordination: Management: Acciona Infrastructuras, Spain (Daniel Hiniesto) Technical: Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics (IBP), Germany (Dr. Natalie Eßig) Objective: Development of a common transparent European building assessment approach Bottom-up-Approach: OPEN House baseline will complement the existing ones and is based on existing standards, methodologies and assessment methods Now new system: overview about country specific assessment methods/ actual building standards and supporting sustainability all over Europe and giving advice to existing systems
Country 3
Biodiversity and depletion of habitats Risks from materials Global Warming Potential (GWP) Environmental Quality
Country 2 Country 1 Indicator Category
European Overview about sustainability building standards:
The Consortium
20 partners from 11 EU countries covering the whole construction sector
The Consortium
More than 50 faces behind: junior and senior sustainability experts
WP1: Awareness and methodology for sustainable building assessment baseline definition WP2: Designing OPEN HOUSE model and tools WP3: Selection of case studies and mechanisms for decision making WP4: OPEN HOUSE Platform Operation WP0: Project Management
OPEN HOUSE baseline
WP5: OPEN HOUSE Platform Dissemination and Exploitation
OPEN HOUSE Methodology
All Partners + External Experts
Environmental and energy-efficient approach: „Green-Building-Approach“
Life-cycle-orientated approach based on sustainability pillars: „Sustainable-Building-Approach “
Source: Essig, N. 2010
OPEN HOUSE Baseline
Evaluation of „all“ indicators
(560 indicators)
1.LEED 2.BREEAM 3.DGNB 4.HQE 5.SB-TOOL 6.VERDE 7.LENSE 8.…..
Preselection „Full System“
(56 indicators)
1.Objectives 2.Evaluation 3.Documentation 4.Resources
„Core System“
(30 indicators)
1.Objectives 2.Evaluation 3.Calculation 4.Rating 5.Documentation 6.Resources 7.Weighting
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Identification and evaluation of 37 international and 64 European rating tools from
Preselection of suitable indicators
(95 indicators)
evaluation areas
their applicability/ feasibility in the EU-27 countries
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Analyses of the applicability/feasibility of the 95 pre-selected indicators in the EU-27 countries by a questionnaire in every country – Outcome: 56 indicators
1‐ ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS ‐ ACCEPTABILITY
0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 3,0 Global Warming Potential (GWP) Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) Acidification Potential (AP) EutrophicationPotential (EP) Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) Risks from materials Certified wood Microclimate / Heat‐Island‐Effect Biodiversity Light Pollution Non‐Renewable Primary Energy Demands (PEne) Total Primary Energy Demands and Percentage of Renewable Primary Energy Abiotic Resource Depletion Non‐renewable freshwater resources depletion Depletion of habitats Contamination of undisturbed areas ustion of solid waste sites suitable for non‐hazardous waste Waterbody pollution excluding Eutrophication Hazards from disposal of non‐radioactive hazardous waste Hazards from disposal or storage of radioactive waste Responsible Material Sourcing
CAN THE CLIENT PROVIDE INFORMATION NEEDED FOR DETERMINATION OF PARTICULAR INDICATOR? IS THERE AN EXISTING AVAILABLE METHOD FOR DETERMINATION OF INDICATORS' VALUE IN YOUR COUNTRY? COULD THE BENCHMARK BE SET FOR THIS INDICATOR? COULD THIS INDICATOR BE APPLIED? LEGEND 3 ‐ Yes 2 ‐ Yes, but... Partly 1 ‐ No 0 ‐ no answer, n.a. OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Example: Economic Quality and Technical Characteristics
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Indicators Full System Core System Category Nb.
Core System (30 Indicators)
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Responsible Material Sourcing
Social/ functional Quality
Local Material Quality of the Building Shell
Technical Characteristics
Options for Transportation Risks at the Site
The Location
Commissioning Construction Site impact/ Construction Process Quality of the Project’s Preparation
Process Quality
Ease of Deconstruction, Recycling and Dismantling Building-related Life Cycle Costs (LCC)
Economic Quality
Bicycle Comfort Conversion Feasibility Public Accessibility Electro Magnetic Pollution Operation Comfort Visual Comfort Acoustic Comfort Indoor Air Quality Thermal Comfort Barrier-free Accessibility Waste Land Use Water and Waste Water Total Primary Energy Demands/ Percentage of Renewable Primary Energy Non-Renewable Primary Energy Demands (PEne) GWP, ODP, AP, EP und POCP (1.1-1.5)
Environmental Quality
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
68 case studies along Europe will be deployed by actors inside and outside the OPEN HOUSE consortium The case studies will be selected by tenders “Call for Tender” (finish: October 29th 2011) – more information: www.openhouse-fp7.eu Building types: new office buildings (less than 10 years) and office buildings at design stage - at least 70% office use
Assessment workshop with project partners Foto documentation at the building site Collecting building documents Analyzing the building documents Further meetings (if it is necessary) Overgiving the documents to the OH review committee Review by the OH review committe (4‐eyes‐principle)
OH Case Study OH Certificate
OPEN HOUSE Assessment Process
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
„Basic and quick sustainability assessment” – for case studies outside the consortium: gives first idea of sustainability level and proposes actions to improve the level, no stringent documentation needed, based on estimations, but must be reasonable “Complete assessment” – for case studies inside the consortium: complete documentation needed for “OPEN HOUSE – core indicators“ and no stringent documentation for the rest of the indicators from the „OPEN HOUSE – full system“
Assessment Workshop
Architect Design Investor E xpert E nergy E fficiency Project Developer E xpert Light
Life Cycle Assessment OH Assessor Sustainability E xpert
Structural E ngineer User Neighbours Landscape Architect Fire Consultant Site Manager Facility Manager
Life Cycle Costs
Architect Construction City and Regional Planers Politicians Financial E xperts
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
Online: OPEN HOUSE building sustainability assessment portal
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
Complete Documentation
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
OPEN HOUSE Paket for the Case Studies
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
everybody who is interested
OPEN HOUSE Training Course
OPEN HOUSE Case Studies
training
Handbook of Indicator Templates: Example “Barrier-free Accessibility”
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Manual for Documentation
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Manual for Documentation
Case Study: Zentrum für Umweltbewusstes Bauen, ZUB Kassel
Manual for documentation
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Example: Indicator „2.1 Barrier-free accessibility” (Social-functional Quality)
Documentation
more than 150*150 space in front of the elevator
Manual for documentation
OPEN HOUSE Baseline (Pilot Version)
Example: Indicator „2.1 Barrier-free accessibility” (Social-functional Quality)
Glossary Glossary of terms: barrier free: barrierefrei not barrier free: nicht barrierefrei: gesamt: total net floor area: NGF % accessible parts of the net floor area: Anteil der barrierefreien Bereiche an NGF
Now we are ready for SUPER, PERFECT und OPEN buildings!