estimation of lift coefficient
play

Estimation of Lift Coefficient Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estimation of Lift Coefficient Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4 2-D and 3-D Lift Coefficient Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2 nd ed,


  1. Estimation of Lift Coefficient Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  2. 2-D and 3-D Lift Coefficient Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2 nd ed, AIAA Education Series, 2004, pp 96 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  3. Estimation of span efficiency factor e AR = Wing Aspect Ratio  t max = sweep of maximum thickness line = sweep at 30% of chord for low speed aircraft = sweep at 50% of chord for high speed aircraft Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2 nd ed, AIAA Education Series, 2004, pp 107 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  4. Concept of Absolute AoA  It is difficult to keep track of α L=0 in design  It is affected by aerofoil camber and twist distribution  Hence, we define Absolute AoA ( α a )  α a = α – α L=0  When Lift = 0, α a = 0  Max. AoA α max limited to ~15 deg  Take-off or Landing Considerations  Thus α a max = ( α max – α L=0 ) = (15 – α L=0 ) AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  5. ESTIMATION OF C L,MAX AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  6. Drivers of Max. Lift Coefficient  Wing geometry  Increase in Λ reduces C Lmax  Increase in AR increases C Lmax  Airfoil shape  Increase in t/c and L. E. radius increase C Lmax  Reynolds Number  Surface Texture  Interference from Fuselage, Pylons, Nacelles  T. E. Flap and/or L.E. Slat Geometry & Span  Larger chord and Span increase C Lmax  Swept Flaps have lower C Lmax AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  7. Flaps as High Lift Devices  Landing Setting  30 ≤ δ flap ≤ 60  C L,Land = C Lmax  Lower Landing Distance  Takeoff Setting  15 ≤ δ flap ≤ 30  C L,TO = 0.80 C Lmax  Better climb performance AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  8. Types of Flaps C Lmax = A C Lmax = 1.5A C Lmax = 1.6A C Lmax = 1.65A C Lmax = 1.9A Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2 nd ed, AIAA Education Series, 2004, pg. 102 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  9. Types of Flaps- 1/4 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  10. Types of Flaps-2/4 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  11. Types of Flaps-3/4 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  12. Types of flaps- 4/4 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  13. Typical Values of Max. Lift Coefficient  Unflapped wings  Swept wing ( Λ 0.25c = 60 o ) 0.75  Swept wing ( Λ 0.25c = 45 o ) 1.00  Unswept wing 1.50  Flapped Wings  Plain Flap 1.75  Slotted Flap 2.25  Fowler Flap 2.50  Double Slotted Flaps 2.75  Double Slotted Flaps and Slats 3.00  Triple Slotted Flaps and Slats 3.50  Blown Flaps ≈ 5.00 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  14. Effect of Sweep on C L,max Source: Daniel P Raymer, Aircraft Design, A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Publications AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  15. Estimation of Wing C L,max General Cases Wings with low Λ 0.25c , AR > 5, λ ≈ 0.5, large flaps Wing C Lmax ≈ 0.9 Airfoil C Lmax Wings with partial span flaps         S S   flapped unflapped   C 0.9 C C L L L   max max S max S  flapped unflapped  ref ref AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  16. Flapped & Unflapped Area Source: Daniel P Raymer, Aircraft Design, A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Publications AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  17. Effect of LeX and Strakes For low AoAs, in which strakes are not effective AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  18. Effect of Horizontal Tail & Canard AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  19. Effect of Horizontal Tail & Canard     o C       21 c 10 3 z    L avg       h 1         0 725 . 7 AR l b h AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  20. Effect of High Lift Devices  Most Flaps increase α L=0 but don’t change C L α  Equivalent to increase in α a  For full span flaps,  α a3-D   α a2-D   α a2-D = increment in absolute AoA for airfoil   α a3-D = increment in absolute AoA for 3-D wing  For Partial Span Flaps,  α a =  α a2D (S f /S) Cos Λ h.l.  S f /S = Ratio of Flapped Area to Wing Ref. Area  Λ h.l. = Sweep of Flap Hinge Line  C Lmax, flapped = C Lmax, no flaps + C L α .  α a  Note:  α a-2D = 10 0 @ Takeoff, 15 0 @ Landing AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  21. Definition: Flapped Area Hinge Sweep Line AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  22. Example LIFT COEFFICIENT ESTIMATION AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  23. Lift Coefficient Estimation of F-16 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  24. F-16 Aircraft Geometry AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  25. Useful Data for F-16  NACA 64 A -204 airfoil, c l α = 0.1 per degree  Sweep of Max. Thickness line = Λ tmax = 24 o  Max. Absolute AoA = 14 deg  Distance from the quarter chord of the main wing’s mean chord to the same point on horizontal tail, l h = 4.48 m  Wing taper ratio, λ = 1.07 m/5.03 m = 0.21  Height of center line of HT from Wing = 0.3048 m AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  26. Estimation of Wing Efficiency Factor  NACA 64 A -204 airfoil, c l α = 0.1 per degree  Λ tmax = 24 o  Calculate Wing and Tail aspect ratios 2 2 b 5.49 2 2 b 9.144       t AR 3 AR 3 t S 10.03 S 27.87 t  Estimation of span efficiency factor e 2 2   e          2 2 2 o 2 AR 4 AR ( 1 tan ) 2 3 4 9 1 ( tan 24 ) t max = .703 = e t AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  27. Estimation of Lift Curve Slope c l  C  = 0.0536 / o = C L  L t  57 3 . c l   1  e AR  S S  strake C C L ( with strake ) L ( without strake )   S  27.87 1.86 = (0.0536 / o ) = 0.0572 / o 27.87 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  28. Estimation of Lift Curve Slope contd.     o C       21 c z 10 3    L  avg      h 1         0 725 . AR l 7 b h    o o      21 0.0572/ 3.048 m 10 3 (0.21) 0.3048 m      1 =     0.725 3 4.48 m 7 9.14 m = 0.48     S C C C L 1    t + ( whole aircraft ) ( with strake ) L L       t S = 0.0572 / o + 0.0536 / o (1-.48) (10.03/27.87) = .067 / o = 0.067 / o AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  29. Comparison of Lift Coefficient Slopes for various aircraft AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  30. Estimation of Max Lift Coeff. S       f cos = 4.9 o a a h l . .  S 2 D C Lmax = 0.067/ o (14 o +4.9 o ) = 1.27 for takeoff S       f cos = 7.36 o a a h l . .  S 2 D C Lmax = 0. 067 / o (14 o +7.36 o ) = 1.43 for landing AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

  31. Military Aircraft DRAG ESTIMATION AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend