Estimation of Lift Coefficient Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

estimation of lift coefficient
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Estimation of Lift Coefficient Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Estimation of Lift Coefficient Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4 2-D and 3-D Lift Coefficient Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2 nd ed,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Estimation of Lift Coefficient

  • Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant

Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay

slide-2
SLIDE 2

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

2-D and 3-D Lift Coefficient

Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2nd ed, AIAA Education Series, 2004, pp 96

slide-3
SLIDE 3

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Estimation of span efficiency factor e

AR = Wing Aspect Ratio t max = sweep of maximum thickness line = sweep at 30% of chord for low speed aircraft = sweep at 50% of chord for high speed aircraft

Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2nd ed, AIAA Education Series, 2004, pp 107

slide-4
SLIDE 4

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

 It is difficult to keep track of αL=0 in design

  • It is affected by aerofoil camber and twist distribution

 Hence, we define Absolute AoA (αa )  αa = α – αL=0

  • When Lift = 0, αa = 0

 Max. AoA αmax limited to ~15 deg

  • Take-off or Landing Considerations

 Thus αa max = (αmax – αL=0) = (15 – αL=0)

Concept of Absolute AoA

slide-5
SLIDE 5

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

ESTIMATION OF CL,MAX

slide-6
SLIDE 6

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

 Wing geometry

  • Increase in Λ reduces CLmax
  • Increase in AR increases CLmax

 Airfoil shape

  • Increase in t/c and L. E. radius increase CLmax

 Reynolds Number  Surface Texture  Interference from Fuselage, Pylons, Nacelles  T. E. Flap and/or L.E. Slat Geometry & Span

  • Larger chord and Span increase CLmax
  • Swept Flaps have lower CLmax

Drivers of Max. Lift Coefficient

slide-7
SLIDE 7

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Flaps as High Lift Devices

 Landing Setting

  • 30 ≤δflap ≤ 60
  • CL,Land = CLmax
  • Lower Landing Distance

 Takeoff Setting

  • 15 ≤δflap ≤ 30
  • CL,TO = 0.80 CLmax
  • Better climb performance
slide-8
SLIDE 8

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Types of Flaps

Source: Brandt et al., Intro. To Aeronautics: A Design Perspective, 2nd ed, AIAA Education Series, 2004, pg. 102

CLmax = A CLmax = 1.5A CLmax = 1.6A CLmax = 1.65A CLmax = 1.9A

slide-9
SLIDE 9

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Types of Flaps- 1/4

slide-10
SLIDE 10

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Types of Flaps-2/4

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Types of Flaps-3/4

slide-12
SLIDE 12

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Types of flaps- 4/4

slide-13
SLIDE 13

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

 Unflapped wings

  • Swept wing (Λ0.25c = 60o)

0.75

  • Swept wing (Λ0.25c = 45o)

1.00

  • Unswept wing

1.50

 Flapped Wings

  • Plain Flap

1.75

  • Slotted Flap

2.25

  • Fowler Flap

2.50

  • Double Slotted Flaps

2.75

  • Double Slotted Flaps and Slats

3.00

  • Triple Slotted Flaps and Slats

3.50

  • Blown Flaps

≈ 5.00

Typical Values of Max. Lift Coefficient

slide-14
SLIDE 14

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Effect of Sweep on CL,max

Source: Daniel P Raymer, Aircraft Design, A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Publications

slide-15
SLIDE 15

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Estimation of Wing CL,max

General Cases Wings with low Λ0.25c, AR > 5, λ ≈ 0.5, large flaps Wing CLmax ≈ 0.9 Airfoil CLmax Wings with partial span flaps

   

max max max

0.9

flapped unflapped L L L flapped unflapped ref ref

S S C C C S S            

slide-16
SLIDE 16

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Flapped & Unflapped Area

Source: Daniel P Raymer, Aircraft Design, A Conceptual Approach, AIAA Publications

slide-17
SLIDE 17

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Effect of LeX and Strakes

For low AoAs, in which strakes are not effective

slide-18
SLIDE 18

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Effect of Horizontal Tail & Canard

slide-19
SLIDE 19

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Effect of Horizontal Tail & Canard     

                     21 10 3 7 1

0 725

  • C

AR c l z b

L avg h h .

slide-20
SLIDE 20

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

 Most Flaps increase αL=0 but don’t change CLα

  • Equivalent to increase in αa

 For full span flaps, αa3-D

 αa2-D

  • αa2-D = increment in absolute AoA for airfoil
  • αa3-D = increment in absolute AoA for 3-D wing

 For Partial Span Flaps, αa = αa2D (Sf/S) Cos Λh.l.

  • Sf/S = Ratio of Flapped Area to Wing Ref. Area
  • Λh.l. = Sweep of Flap Hinge Line
  • CLmax, flapped = CLmax, no flaps + CLα . αa

 Note: αa-2D = 100 @ Takeoff, 150 @ Landing

Effect of High Lift Devices

slide-21
SLIDE 21

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Definition: Flapped Area Hinge Sweep Line

slide-22
SLIDE 22

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

LIFT COEFFICIENT ESTIMATION

Example

slide-23
SLIDE 23

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Lift Coefficient Estimation of F-16

slide-24
SLIDE 24

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

F-16 Aircraft Geometry

slide-25
SLIDE 25

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

 NACA 64A-204 airfoil, clα = 0.1 per degree  Sweep of Max. Thickness line = Λtmax = 24o  Max. Absolute AoA = 14 deg  Distance from the quarter chord of the main wing’s

mean chord to the same point on horizontal tail, lh = 4.48 m

 Wing taper ratio, λ = 1.07 m/5.03 m = 0.21  Height of center line of HT from Wing = 0.3048 m

Useful Data for F-16

slide-26
SLIDE 26

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

 NACA 64A-204 airfoil, clα = 0.1 per degree  Λtmax = 24o  Calculate Wing and Tail aspect ratios

Estimation of Wing Efficiency Factor

2 2

9.144 3 27.87 b AR S   

2 2

5.49 3 10.03

t t t

b AR S   

e AR AR

t

          2 2 4 1 2 2 3 4 9 1 24

2 2 2

( tan ) ( tan )

max

  • = .703 = et

 Estimation of span efficiency factor e

slide-27
SLIDE 27

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

C c c e AR

L l l   

   1 57 3 .

= 0.0536 /o =

t L

C

C C S S S

L L strake

 

( ) ( ) with strake without strake

 

= (0.0536 /o)

27.87 1.86 27.87 

Estimation of Lift Curve Slope

= 0.0572 /o

slide-28
SLIDE 28

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

    

                     21 10 3 7 1

0 725

  • C

AR c l z b

L avg h h .

  

  • 0.725

21 0.0572/ 3.048 m 10 3 (0.21) 0.3048 m 1 3 4.48 m 7 9.14 m              

= 0.48 =

C C

L L   ( ) ( ) whole aircraft with strake

CL

t 

1        

S S

t

+ = 0.0572 / o + 0.0536 / o (1-.48) (10.03/27.87) = .067 /o

Estimation of Lift Curve Slope contd.

= 0.067 /o

slide-29
SLIDE 29

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Comparison of Lift Coefficient Slopes for various aircraft

slide-30
SLIDE 30

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

Estimation of Max Lift Coeff.

    

a a f h l

D

S S 

 2

cos

. .

= 4.9o CLmax = 0.067/o (14 o +4.9 o) = 1.27 for takeoff

    

a a f h l

D

S S 

 2

cos

. .

= 7.36o CLmax = 0. 067 /o (14 o +7.36 o) = 1.43 for landing

slide-31
SLIDE 31

AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4

DRAG ESTIMATION

Military Aircraft