Enhancing Governance Through Internal Audit Activities
Kaveh Rikhtegar, CPA, CA, CISA, CIA Director of Internal Audit Canadian Commercial Corporation
Enhancing Governance Through Internal Audit Activities Kaveh - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Enhancing Governance Through Internal Audit Activities Kaveh Rikhtegar, CPA, CA, CISA, CIA Director of Internal Audit Canadian Commercial Corporation Key Points Understanding your audience and the Governance framework, Building an
Kaveh Rikhtegar, CPA, CA, CISA, CIA Director of Internal Audit Canadian Commercial Corporation
framework,
the annual audit plan, and
Committee.
the Minister of International Trade
trade between Canadian exporters and international buyers.
Negative Assurance Positive Assurance No Assurance
Board Members Operation Management Set and maintain polices and key priorities Develop and implement practices and procedures in order to role out the policies & accomplish key priorities Perform the day to day activities based on established practices and procedures
Measure, Monitor Measure, Monitor
Changes in Our Focus & Approach
Governance, Risk and Compliance:
timeframe that is appropriate to the recipient,
TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................. 3 BACKGROUND ......................................................... 3 AUDIT OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE ............................... 3 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY ............................ 3 STRENGTHS ............................................................ 3 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............ 4 KEY OBSERVATIONS ........................................................ 4 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION ................................. 5
High: a key control does not exist, is poorly designed or is not operating as
intended and the financial and/or reputation risk is more than inconsequential. Corrective action is needed to ensure process objectives are achieved.
Medium: a key control does not exist, is poorly designed or is not operating
as intended and the financial and/or reputation risk to the process is more than inconsequential. However, a compensating control exists. Corrective action is needed to avoid sole reliance on compensating controls.
Low: a minor weakness in the design and/or operation of a key control. Ability
to achieve process objectives is unlikely to be impacted. Corrective action is suggested to strengthen controls.
Effective: Key controls are effectively designed and operating as
intended.
Needs I mprovement: One or more key controls do not exist, are not
designed properly or are not operating as intended. The impact to the audited process is more than inconsequential. Timely action is required.
Unsatisfactory: Multiple key controls do not exist, are not designed
properly or are not operating as intended. The impact to the audited process is material. Immediate action is required.
approved by the Audit Committee.
to achieve the objectives.
Timing Low Business Impact, Easy to Implement High Business Impact, Difficult to Implement High Business Impact, Easy to Implement Low Business Impact, Difficult to Implement Detailed Finding
a- b-
Rating Accountable
Ease of Implementation Business Impact LOW LOW HIGH HIGH a b
Q1
2013 -14
Q2 Q3 Q4
Audit Activities Annual Planning Activity 1 Activity 2 Activity 3 Activity 4 Activity 5 Activity 6 Internal Audit Follow Up Consulting and Advisory
Complete In Progress Not Started
Color Legend
Key Upcoming Activities
Current Forecast Resourcin g Schedule Scope Overall
Period Ending (Date)
On Target On Target On Target On Target
Identify groups within/outside the organization such as ERM, Quality Control, External Auditors to ensure a more effective risk assessment:
Resulting in a more integrated audit activities
current and future talent needs
and Critical Thinking, Business Acumen
1. Establish a knowledge base within the team:
information is easily available, 2. Attention to Retention:
department is viewed as a great place to work.
the available opportunities for advancement.
ALL the above must be in line with the Annual Corporate Plan
Internal Audit Time line 2013 - 2014
Audit project Sub activity Total Hours 1-Apr 8-Apr 15-Apr 22-Apr 29-Apr 6-May 13-May 20-May 27-May 3-Jun 10-Jun 17-Jun 24-Jun 1-Jul 8-Jul 15-Jul 22-Jul 29-Jul 5-Aug 12-Aug 19-Aug 26-Aug 2-Sep 9-Sep 16-Sep 23-Sep 30-Sep 7-Oct 14-Oct 21-Oct Auditor 1 Annual planning 90 30 20 30 10 Audit Activity 1 Planning 50 20 30 Execution 90 30 30 30 Reporting 60 30 30 Audit Activity 2 Planning Execution Reporting Audit Activity 3 Planning Execution Reporting Audit Activity 4 Planning Execution Reporting Audit Activity 5 Planning Execution Reporting Audit Committee Support MLP follow up Vacation Stat Holiday Year end audit coordination with External Auditors Training Advisory and Consulting activities TOTAL 290 30 20 30 10 20 30 30 30 30 30 30 April May June July August September October
Summary of Audit Surveys
# Survey Question Audit 1 Audit 2 Audit 3 Audit 4 Overall Average 1 The audit scope and objectives were relevant and clearly conveyed. 3 3 4 4 3.50 2 The audit report is objective, accurate, succinct and clearly written. 3 3 3 4 3.25 3 The audit recommendations are constructive and actionable. 3 3 3 4 3.25 4 Communication lines were open and positive. 4 3 4 4 3.75 5 The audit staff were objective, qualified and professional. 4 3 4 4 3.75 6 The audit was well managed and performed in a timely and efficient manner. 4 3 4 4 3.75 7 The audit provided value to my organization. 3 3 4 4 3.50
Very Unsatisfied Unsatisfied Satisfied Very Satisfied 1
Legend
2 3 4
Must have a Voice, Participate and Contribute
groups,
perspective,
with those of other organization
calendar
accordance with the IIA performance and attribute standards,
and your IA size in performing EQA
& efficient. Remain open-minded about suggestions
risk and significance;
services while providing consulting services to further enhance our processes;
resources available during the period covered by the plan; and
requested by the Audit Committee or President of CCC.
CCC I nternal Audit Plan
President & CFO Prioritize Audit Areas & Draft Plan Corporate ERM Review of various internal/external documents
Valid lidat e BOD OD Appr pproval
Discussion with Other Corporations Self assessment
Prio iorit it iz ize Rev eview ew I nput
Internal Audit Risk assessment including FS decomposition Discuss with External Auditors Discuss with Subject Matter Experts Discuss with Senior Mgt
Admin PO T & H Work order / Operational Purchase Order Cuba Processing Goods Receipt and Payment Processingn Account Receivable and Cash Receipt China Offices Acquire assets Depericiate assets Period End Close Tax Accounting Cash Management Appropriations Hire and Terminate Calculate Payrol and Disbursment Triggers TimeSheet Transactions Approval, Goods Receipt and Payment Processing Approval and Payment Processing 10010 Bank - CAD Account X X X X X X X X X 10011 Bank - USD Account X X X X X 10012 Bank - USD Account Quito X X X X 10013 Bank - AUD Account X X X X 10014 Bank - GBP Account X X X X GL Account # GL Account Name GL Account $ 2013 Contract M gt and Financial Administration Assets Financial Close HR and Payrol Other
end General Ledger (GL) accounts,
Business Environment Organizational Mandate Reputational Financial Policies and Process People I nformation Management I nformation System Business continuity Planning Foreign Environment Export Foreign Exchange Corporate Social Responsibility Fraud Supplier performance Contract Materiality Process Volatility Volume of transaction Relevance Susceptibility to error Susceptibility to fraud Last Audited Prior Audit I ssues Quarterly Financial Close Process L L L L M H M H H M L L L H Travel and Hospitality L L L M M M L M L L L M
Audit Comments
Internal Audit Risk assessment
Auditors Overall Rating ( Judgm ental) ERM Assessm ent Other factors RISK RATING CRITERIA (H-High, M-Medium, L-Low)
Auditable unit
Qualitative Factors RISK
Factor Definition LOW MEDI UM HI GH ERM score Risks identified through the ERM process. See ERM – Low and Low/ Medium See ERM - Medium See ERM – Medium/ High, High and Damage Control Materiality Dollar impact of the transition/ process on the financial statements. Less than 10% of the External Auditors Materiality. More than 10% but less than 25% of the External Auditors Materiality. More than 25% of the External Auditors Materiality. Process Volatility Risk of error increases with amount of change. No significant change. Process subject to limited change (people, technology and processes). Process subject to significant change (people, technology and processes). Volume and size of transactions processed Size and volume of individual transactions. Small balance, few transactions (i.e. yearend bookings). Small balance, few transactions (weekly or monthly transactions). Large balance, many transactions daily. Relevance The degree that the processes directly impact the corporate objectives. Low likelihood and impact on corporate plan
Medium likelihood and impact on corporate plan
High likelihood and impact
Susceptibility to error Susceptibility of loss due to error. Processing of transactions are not subject to error or misinterpretation. Processing of transactions are subject to limited error or misinterpretation. Processing of transactions are subject to error or misinterpretation. Susceptibility to fraud Susceptibility of loss due to fraud. Assets not easily moved
potential for fraud. Assets not easily moved
medium potential for fraud. Assets highly mobile or convertible to cash, higher potential for fraud. Last Audited Date the process was last audited. Within one year. Less than two years. More than two years. Internal and External Audit Management Letter Points Previously identified issues. No significant previously identified issues. Medium rated previously identified issues. Significant previously identified issues.
COBIT Domain COBIT Ref COBIT Process Description Comments
Audit 1 Audit 2 Audit 3 Audit 4 Audit 5 Audit 6 Audit 7 Audit 8 Audit 9 Audit 10
Plan and Organize PO1 Define a strategic IT Plan To strike an optimum balance of information technology opportunities and IT business requirements as well as to ensure that further accomplishments are undertaken through the strategic planning process. In turn the long-term plans should periodically be translated into
short-term goals. The IT strategic plan is included in the business units plan which is approved by its VP and which in turn feeds into the 5 year corporate plan which is approved by the BOD.
x
Plan and Organize PO2 Define the Information Architecture Optimizing the organizations information systems by creating and maintaining a business information model and ensuring that appropriate systems are defined to optimize the use of this information.
x x x
Plan and Organize PO3 Determine Technological Direction Take advantage of available and emerging technology in order to executive the business strategy by creating and maintaining a technological infrastructure plan that sets and manages clear and realistic expectations of what technology can offer in terms of products, services and delivery mechanisms.
x x x x
Plan and Organize PO4 Define the IT
and relationship To deliver the right IT services suitable in numbers and skills with roles and responsibilities defined and communicated, aligned with the business and that facilitates the strategy and provides for effective direction and adequate control.
x x x x
High Medium Low Significance (to strategy, reputation, etc.)
Low High
Likelihood (considering controls and inherent risks)
Low High
21 1 15 8 4 6 5 12 9 7 10 11 16 13 17 18 19 20 3 2 14 22 24 23 25
This matrix summarizes the results of the risk assessment process. Each audit unit was evaluated based on the importance to Corporate strategy and the likelihood of control / process issues.
Documentation of Key Controls Quarterly Testing of Key Control Quarterly Reporting
Annual Scoping of Significant Processes Q1
Transactional Processes - Automated and Manual
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Policy Instrument Review
1
ERM Assessment
1
Annual Training Plan
1
Annual Disaster Recovery Exercise
1
Annual Access Review
1
Structuring & Approving Contracts
5 5
Approving Purchase Order
4
Processing Supplier Invoice
4 4
Processing Loans
2 1
Processing Supplier Payment
5 7
Processing Customer Invoice
11
Performing Finance Close
6 4 Total
27 36 Process
EXAMPLE ONLY
# of Manual Controls Key controls that impact a SINGLE PROCESS Key controls that impact MANY PROCESSES
Overall Results
# of Automated Controls 12 3 62 1 8 4 1 10 1 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 1 1 10 4 8 3 11 12 10 62 1 11
Effective
Key control is effectively designed and operating as intended.
Needs Improvement
Key control does not exist, is not designed properly or is not operating as intended and the risk is more than inconsequential. However, a compensating control exists. Corrective action is needed to avoid sole reliance on compensating controls.
Unsatisfactory Key control does not exist, is poorly designed or is not operating as intended and the risk is more than inconsequential. Corrective action is needed to ensure
process objectives are achieved.
Select Sample Size Perform Testing Document Results Execute Test Reporting Assess Magnitude Planning Evaluate Design Review Documentations Perform a Walkthrough Recommend Corrective Action Complete Plan Memo Report and Follow up Recommend Corrective Action
Table of contents BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................
..............................................................................................................
..................................................................
RISK INDICATORS ...................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................
.................................................................................................................
..............................................................................................
OVERVIEW OF AUDIT ENGAGEMENT ..............................................................................
..............................................................................................................
............................................................................................................
..................................................................................................................
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS .......................................................................................
“Management Action Plan”,
practical, supportable and forward thinning, and
including funding and resourcing if required.
.
changes (Change Management Plan)
Activity Date Auditor Sign off Reviewer Sign off Planning section Planning memo approved Execution section All working papers signed off All review notes actioned Reporting section Opinion criteria completed MAPs have been received Report finalized and distributed File closure section Survey completed and summarized Electronic files finalized Physical working papers have been filed Observation included in the follow up binder Budget Analysis
Actual Budget Variance
Planning Start Date Audit Report Date Audit Report Issuance Date Total time in hours
5 OVERALL
Status of Management Action Plan
Total Observations
Audit Date Audit
Completed On target Revise target date Target date at risk
Unit 1 Oct 2012 4
Q1 - 2013/ 1 4
1 1 3
Feb 2013 Unit 2 1
3
Q2 - 2013/ 1 4
1 1
at the table”.Be a collaborator, not a policeman,
plan, objectives and timing,
Kaveh Rikhtegar, CISA, CPA, CA, CIA Director of Internal Audit Canadian Commercial Corporation krikhtegar@ccc.ca