eng ngage agement ment in in th the global gl obal eco
play

Eng ngage agement ment in in th the global gl obal eco conom - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Eng ngage agement ment in in th the global gl obal eco conom nomy A pr prime mer r on th the i e impa pact ct of nati ational onal cul ultures tures on em empl ployee ee en enga gagem gement ent Louis Pike, Ph.D.


  1. Eng ngage agement ment in in th the global gl obal eco conom nomy A pr prime mer r on th the i e impa pact ct of nati ational onal cul ultures tures on em empl ployee ee en enga gagem gement ent Louis Pike, Ph.D. L1pike@ryerson.ca 416-236-0118 February 4, 2016 1

  2. LOST IN TRANSATION? Can we use our North American theories, beliefs and perceptions to accurately describe and assess the engagement of employees from diverse cultures? 2

  3. GOAL  A nomenc mencla latur ture  Describe escribe an and pr predict edict  Impact pact of cu cult ltur ure e on en engagement ement 3

  4. AGENDA What’s ‘engagement’? 1. Video & Diagnosis: “A World of Difference” 2. A nomenclature: how to describe and 3. compare national cultures Application exercises  Seeds for thought: are North American 4. theories universally applicable? 4

  5. ENGAGEMENT UNPACKED • Motivated • Satisfied • Committed 5

  6. MOTIVATION • Emotional and rational effort toward goals. • High absorption in the work. • High self-efficacy. Intense Purposeful Persistence 6

  7. Job Satisfaction Do you like the work and the workplace? 7

  8. 8

  9. Commitment 1. Normative commitment : A sense of loyalty or obligation 2. Continuance commitment : Staying because it’s too costly to quit 3. Affective commitment : Emotional attachment to, identification with, and involvement in an organization 9

  10. MOHAMMAD Egyptian GAVIN English JACK Chinese ALBERTO JESSIE EVA Italian American German 10

  11. WHAT IS A CULTURE? “A set of basic assumptions – shared solutions to universal problems of external adaptation ( how to survive ) and internal integration ( how to stay together ) – which have evolved over time and are handed down from one generation to the next.” (Schein, 2004: 14) Edgar Schein: social psychologist who pioneered the use of concepts from cultural anthropology to understand organizations 11

  12. Schein’s Three Levels of Culture Visible organizational structure and ARTIFACTS processes (hard to decipher) Strategies, goals, philosophies, (espoused ESPOUSED VALUES values), norms Unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs about the world. ASSUMPTIONS Perceptions, thoughts and feelings (the root of values and action) 12

  13. TODN NOMENCLATURE 1. Power Distance 2. Uncertainty Avoidance 3. Individual/Collective 4. Achieve/Nurture 5. Universal/Particular 6. Achieved/Ascribed 7. Inner/Outer directed 8. Specific/Diffuse 13

  14. Hofstede’s Model (1980)  IBM Employees in 70 countries  116,000 questionnaires  Values and opinions Geert Hofstede  Cultural dimensions: “central tendencies” within a culture 14

  15. Power er Di Dist stance ance (Low – High) The degree of inequality among people that a culture considers normal. High-ranking countries : Russia, Spain, Thailand. Tall, centralized structures with a hierarchical management approach. Conflicts are resolved by going through specific levels of formal authority. Low-ranking countries : Netherlands, Denmark, Israel. Value group inputs to decisions and expect their decisions to be challenged and discussed by employees. Flatter structures, smaller span of control. 15

  16. Uncer Uncertainty tainty Avoi oidance dance (Low w - High gh) ) The degree to which people in a country prefer structured over unstructured situations. High scored countries : Germany, Denmark, and Switzerland, demonstrate a strong tendency toward applying a consistent set of rules and laws to manage situations. Low scored countries: Russia, Greece, and Venezuela, are more tolerant of ambiguity and not so structured in their approach. 16

  17. Ind ndividual ividualism ism vs. s. Co Colle llectivism ctivism The degree to which individuals are expected to be part of a group in their organization or in their society. High-ranking countries: Denmark, Singapore, Japan, Sweden expect individuals to participate in group activities. Low-ranking countries: Greece, Italy, Argentina value individualism and personal contribution to task accomplishment. 17

  18. Ach chievem ement/N ent/Nur urturin turing ( P reviously called Masculine/Feminine) Whether a culture expresses attitudes typically associated with ‘Achieving’ or ‘Nurturing’ determines whether it views gender roles as different. High scored countries : Egypt, India, and Turkey give men higher social status than women Low scored countries: Canada, Denmark, Hungary, Poland; women get a higher status in society, play a stronger role in decision making, and they tend to hold positions of power and authority. 18

  19. + Being vs. Doing Cultures 19 Kluckholn & Strodtbeck Live to work? Work to live?

  20. CAN ANAD ADA A and nd US USA DIMENSION CANADA USA POWER DISTANCE 39 40 UNCERTAINTY AVOIDANCE 48 46 ACHIEVEMENT(Masculine) 52 62 NURTURING (Feminine) INDIVIDUALISM vs. COLLECTIVISM 80 91 http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html 20

  21. TROMPENAARS’ FRAMEWORK Fons Trompenaars Over a 14 year period, data collected from over 46,000 managers representing more than 40 national cultures 21

  22. Trompenaars ’ Dimensions of Culture 1. Universalism vs. Particularism 2. Status is Achieved vs. Ascribed 3. Specific vs. Diffuse 4. Inner vs. Outer Directed 22

  23. Trompenaars ’ Cultural Dimensions: Spe pecif cific ic vs. s. Di Diffuse fuse  Specific : large public space shared with others and small private space guarded closely.  Open, extroverted; strong separation work and personal life (e.g., Austria, U.K., U.S.)  We stay “in role”. E.g. I don’t tell you about my relationship with my wife. You’d feel uncomfortable.  Diffuse : public and private spaces similar size, public space guarded because shared with private space; people indirect and introverted, work/private life closely linked (e.g., Venezuela, China, Spain)  Losing face: is making public what is considered private 23

  24. Trompenaars’ Cultural Dimensions Universalism – Particularism Relationships and Rules PARTICULARISM UNIVERSALISM Circumstances and special Ideas and practices can and relationships should be should be applied everywhere factored into how ideas in the world without practices, agreements are modification. applied. Reliance on ‘objective’ laws, rules, contracts. 24

  25. Trompenaars’ Cultural Dimensions Achie hievemen ement t vs vs. Asc scri riptio ption  How one gains social status and privilege.  Is it what you’ve done or who you are?

  26. Trompena penaar ars: s: Th The e En Envi vironment onment  Inner-directed : people believe in control of outcomes  U.S., Switzerland, Canada, Japan  Outer-directed : people believe in letting things take own course  China and many Asian and Middle Eastern countries 26

  27. Fund undamental amental Attri ttribution bution Er Error or  The assumption that someone’s behaviour is caused E.g. personality, personal by something inside them values rather than an external E.g. factor. cultural norms 27

  28. ACHEIVEMENT MOTIVATION THEORY McClelland’s Learned Needs Theory  Need for Achievement  Concern for establishing and maintaining high levels of performance quality.  Aren’t great managers or team players  Like immediate concrete feedback. Want to take personal responsibility for finding solutions to  problems They tend to be moderate risk-takers rather than high or low risk-  takers  Need for Power  Concern for reputation, responsibility, influence, impact, and control over others  Above average attendance. American psychologist David McClelland  Need for Affiliation  Concern for establishing and maintaining social relationships.  Prefer to cooperate vs. compete 28

  29. Selected Countries on the Uncertainty- Avoidance and Masculinity Scales High scores on McClelland’s N(ach) Hofstede, 1980 Saudi Arabia 29

  30. SA Esteem Belongingness Safety & Security Physiological 30

  31. Needs hierarchy in collectivist cultures 31

  32. 32

  33. Outcomes of Equity Theory Comparisons 33

  34. Indivi dividu dualist alistic ic & Collectivis lectivisti tic c App pproa oaches ches to E o Equit uity West stern ern Indi dividu vidualist listic c Cul ultures ures Ea Eastern ern Collectivi lectivist stic ic Cul ulture ures  INPUTS  INPUTS  Effort  Loyalty  Intelligence  Support  Education  Respect  Skills  Tenure  Social status  Status  OUTPUTS  OUTPUTS  Pay  Harmony  Autonomy  Social status  Seniority  Acceptance  Benefits  Solidarity  Job Status  Cohesion 34

  35. GOAL SETTING In what kind of culture would this practice work well? 35

  36. Engagement and Work Centrality  Work centrality: The importance of work in an individual’s life relative to other areas of interest. 36

  37. Variations riations in n Work ork Cen entrality trality  Japan: highest level  Israel: moderately high  U.S. and Belgium: average  Holland and Germany: moderately low  Britain has low levels 37

  38. Eng Engag agem ement ent an and Or d Organiz anizatio ational nal Com omprehe rehens nsio ion Employees are more likely to be engaged if they can understand and identify with the organization’s mission, goals and style. 38

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend