emtunga offshore ab emtunga offshore ab emtunga offshore
play

Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB - PDF document

Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB Lightweight construction application at sea LSS Lightweight in Living Quarters SP, Bors, Sweden 31-OCTOBER-2007 Peo Svrd Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga


  1. Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB

  2. Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB Lightweight construction application at sea LÄSS Lightweight in Living Quarters SP, Borås, Sweden 31-OCTOBER-2007 Peo Svärd

  3. Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB •What is a Living Quarter •Fabrication - Modular concept •Why lightweight •Weight of a Living Quarter •Weight saving in a Living Quarter •Aluminum design

  4. What is a Living Quarter? What is a Living Quarter? • A living Quarter consists of: – Accommodation for crew – Safe area (Fire/gas/blast) Dining area – – Recreation – Central Control Room – Airport (baggage handling, sky lobby, etc) – Medical center Office – – Galley – Laundry – 20-250 POB 500-4000m 2 – – 250-2000 metric ton

  5. What is a Living Quarter? What is a Living Quarter? • Characteristics • Assembly phase • Load out • Sea transport • Installation (Lifting/skidding/etc.)

  6. What is a Living Quarter? What is a Living Quarter? Load out Helideck Testing On barge Sea tranport Installation

  7. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  8. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  9. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  10. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  11. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  12. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  13. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  14. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  15. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  16. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  17. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  18. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  19. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  20. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  21. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  22. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  23. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  24. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  25. Overview – Modular concept Overview – Modular concept

  26. Why lightweight? Why lightweight? Customer requirements • Increased capacity – POB – – Modification New regulations – – HSE requirements (regulations/Company) • Challenge – Cover all new requirements using same support structure. • This trend are global – Lightweight is important

  27. Why lightweight Why lightweight • Investment in modification project in Norway are expected to increase by near 100% next 8 years. Modification market in Norway only 50% Production increase 25% HSE 40 000 25% Maintain integrity 35 000 30 000 25 000 20 000 Million [SEK] 15 000 10 000 5 000 0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 • This trend are global – Lightweight design has a market

  28. Weight of a Living Quarter Weight of a Living Quarter • Weight drivers – Temporary construction phases – Blast requirements – Deformations – Fire and Gas requirements – Wall panels – External items (HD, staircases, walkways, platforms, laydown areas.

  29. Weight of a Living Quarter Weight of a Living Quarter Weight distribution in a LQ (typical) 1000 ton Reference project Stressed skin by Emtunga Structure Archutect HVAC EIT Piping Total Exteral Helideck ural Items UDW 180 125 20 15 5 345 % 52 36 6 4 1 100 Weight 470 326 52 39 13 1000 40 60 • Hot spots – Structure Temporary phases – – Architectural – wall panels

  30. Weight saving in a Living Quarter Weight saving in a Living Quarter • Structure – High strength steel • Applicable in a few areas since deformation is the driver. • Possible items is limited to lifting points/support points. – Aluminum • 1/3:rd weight and 1/3 stiffness - equal? • Form section properties that is suitable for deformation. d=5*qL^4/384/E/I • The structure is approximately a factor of 3 more expensive compared to steel • Longer lead time • Require more Passive Fire Protection • Typical structural weight saving is 25% compared to steel. Overall weight saving is 12-13%

  31. Weight saving in a Living Quarter Weight saving in a Living Quarter • Wall panels – Saving is up to approximately 3 % – Generates questions from customer regarding references, certification, etc. but possible Rule of thumb – heavy material good acoustic – properties…….! – Can be adopted for both aluminum and Steel alternative

  32. Weight saving in a Living Quarter Weight saving in a Living Quarter • Temporary construction phases – Newer accept that temporary phases adds on structural material that are dead weight during in-place operation – Focus on (Spend money on): • temporary structures • Lifting aids • Installation aids • Bottom lift – Weight saving is ~6%

  33. Weight saving in a Living Quarter • Temporary construction phases Installation Loadout Sea transport UPPER LATERAL SUPPORT FOR SEA FASTENING DURING TRANSPORT BASEFRAME LOWER LATERAL SUPPORT FOR SEA FASTENING DURING TRANSPORT VERTICAL SUPPORT FOR SEA TRANSPORT BARGE

  34. Weight saving in a Living Quarter • Temporary construction phases Bad example !!

  35. Weight saving in a Living Quarter Weight saving in a Living Quarter • Weight saving on hot spots – Using aluminum structure ~13% – Temporary construction phases ~6% – Using light weight wall panels ~3% Total: ~22% • It should be noted that additional weight saving is possible in the support structure.

  36. Aluminum design Aluminum design • Focus on aluminum solution and wall panels in LÄSS project – New structural design adopted to modular construction (Emtunga) Development in conjunction with SAPA –

  37. Aluminum design Aluminum design • Basic panel alternatives investigated – Extruded panels 400mm – FS welded – Both alternatives can be used as wall panel as well as floor panel. Final design decided in each individual project.

  38. Aluminum design Aluminum design • Basic panel alternatives investigated – Both alternatives meet following criteria’s. • Shear load of 550 kN/m Blast load of 30 kN/m 2 as shown below •

  39. Aluminum design Aluminum design • Basic panel alternatives investigated Solid panel Alt A Reference - Steel Solid panel Alt B

  40. Aluminum design Aluminum design • Basic panel alternatives investigated – Structural calculations and production feasibility study performed by SAPA shows following • Possible weight saving of 40-50% in the panel • Possible embedded feasibility to decrease fabrication time

  41. Emtunga Offshore AB Emtunga Offshore AB • Next step? – Improve/verify/approve PFP design – Detail design – Temporary support structure for lifting and handling of each module

  42. End of presentation! Questions? Thanks for listening!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend