elementary school program capacity
play

Elementary School Program Capacity Planning Team Facilities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Elementary School Program Capacity Planning Team Facilities Planning, Design & Construction January 21, 2020 1 Background Many school districts struggle with calculating, understanding, and utilizing school capacity data. Reason is


  1. Elementary School Program Capacity Planning Team Facilities Planning, Design & Construction January 21, 2020 1

  2. Background • Many school districts struggle with calculating, understanding, and utilizing school capacity data. • Reason is that different stakeholders can have conflicting definitions of the term. • For instance, a County planning department may refer to “ design capacity ,” which is the number of students a school can hold based on the building’s proto-typical design. • Conversely, a school system typically may refer to “ program capacity ,” or how many students a school can hold based on the specific instructional program at a particular school. 2

  3. Why is program capacity computed annually? • Student enrollment, demographics and classroom needs change annually • Account for new classroom spaces added (i.e., computer lab converted into K-5 classroom) or changes to staffing standards • Ensure that students have optimal learning environments 3

  4. Program Capacity Puts Students First By considering: • Current class size requirements and teacher-student ratios • Student demographics in the attendance zone • Free lunch population • ESOL • Program offerings • K-3 class size reduction • Special education • Gifted education • Resource classroom needs in the building • Reading /math specialists • Learning disabled • Occupational therapy / physical therapy 4

  5. Why is Capacity Important? Capacity helps to inform: • Overcrowding or under-utilization at schools • Future construction projects • School boundary planning • Availability of space for student transfers 5

  6. Process • Facility Planning staff will annually review the instructional program at each elementary school. • Classroom-use information will be provided by the school principal and verified by Staff. • Program capacity is influenced by SCPS, State and Federal standards. • Program capacity will be published annually in the Student Accommodation Plan. 6

  7. Class Sizes Staffing Standards* Class Size Reduction (30% < 45%)** Class Size Reduction (45% < 55%)** SCPS Maximum: Maximum: Maximum: State State Grade Standard No Larger Average Grade No Larger Average Grade No Larger Average Standard Standard Ratio Than Than Than K 22 24 23 K 19 24 21.5 K 18 23 20.5 1 24 26 25 1 19 24 21.5 1 18 23 20.5 2 24 26 25 2 19 24 21.5 2 18 23 20.5 3 24 26 25 3 19 24 21.5 3 18 23 20.5 4 25 27 26 4 25 27 26 4 25 27 26 5 25 27 26 5 25 27 26 5 25 27 26 Average 24 26 25 Average 21 25 23 Average 20.33 24.33 22.33 * SCPS Staffing Standards Plan ** VDOE K-3 Primary Class Size Reduction Program • Special education rooms are assigned a capacity of 8 (for Autism or Multiple Disabilities) or 10 (from Emotional Behavioral Support and Learning Support I or II students). • Resource pull-out rooms assigned capacity of zero (0) students 7

  8. K-3 Class Size Reduction Program • Under current Virginia K-3 Class Size Reduction (CSR) program guidelines, a school must have a free lunch population above 30% to participate • Ten years ago zero (0) SCPS elementary schools had free lunch populations above 30% • Today, over half (53%) of our elementary schools have free lunch populations above 30% and participate in either SCPS or State funded K-3 Class Size Reduction (CSR) programs • K-3 CSR schools have smaller class size and pupil-teacher ratios that reduce the capacity of the building because 12% fewer students are allowed in kindergarten through third grade classrooms • Current design capacity does not take into account smaller class size requirements for over half of our elementary schools 8

  9. Program Capacity Formula K-5 classrooms X Average class size + Self contained special education classrooms X Program multiplier 2 = Elementary school program capacity Notes: 1. Three (3) full-size classrooms allocated for resource pull-out spaces • Could be more depending on programmatic need of students at a school 2. Special education classrooms are assigned a capacity of 8 (for Autism or Multiple Disabilities students) or 10 (for Emotional Behavioral Support and Learning Support I or II students). 9

  10. Resource Pull-Out Room Calculations • English for Speakers of Other Languages (ESOL): less than 2 teachers = office space. 2-3 teachers = 0.5 classroom. 4+ teachers = 1 classroom • Math Specialist: half a classroom per specialist • Reading Specialist: half a classroom per specialist • Learning Disabled (LD): half a classroom per Specific Learning Disability teacher • Occupational Therapy/Physical Therapy: any combination of 2 or more programs of LS I, LS II, or MD at the same school gets 0.5 classroom equivalent for OT/PT • Primary Support Teacher (PST), Speech Therapist: small group pull-out--half classroom not needed, office plenty Note: 1. Space needs provided by Learning and Organizational Development and Student Services on 9/24/2018. 10 10

  11. 2019-20 Program Capacity* Design Capacity School: Grafton Village ES Average # # Teaching # Teaching # Pupils Per Pupils Per Capacity Capacity Stations Stations Room Room** Grafton Village ES Permanent Spaces** • Non-Class Size Reduction School • 722 students enrolled as of 5 x 23 115 9 x 24 216 Kindergarten Rooms: 9/30/2019 16 x 25 400 10 x 24 240 First-Third Grade Rooms: • 89% program capacity utilization 10 x 26 260 10 x 25 250 Fourth - Fifth Rooms: • 96% design capacity utilization *** 2 x 8 16 6 x 8 48 Self-Contained Rooms: (Autism,Multiple Program Capacity Design Capacity Disabilities) 2 x 10 20 1 x 0 0 Self-Contained Rooms: (Resource Rm counted as 0) (EBS, LS1, LS11) 811 754 3 x 0 0 Allow 3 Resource Rooms (Needs 3) 38** 811 36 754 TOTAL * Average from SCPS Staffing Standards Plan ** Room designations and numbers are based on the 2019-20 GVES floor plan and includes with conversion of 2 computer labs to classrooms. *** Design capacity is less than program capacity because it does not include the conversion of 2 computer labs to classrooms. 11

  12. 2019-20 Program Capacity* Design Capacity School: Kate Waller Barrett ES # Teaching # Pupils Per # Teaching # Pupils Per Capacity Capacity Stations Room** Stations Room Barrett ES Permanent Spaces** • Class Size Reduction School Kindergarten Rooms: 6 x 21.5 129 6 x 24 144 • 858 students enrolled as of First-Third Grade Rooms: 20 x 21.5 430 19 x 24 456 9/30/2019 • 101% program capacity Fourth - Fifth Rooms: 12 x 26 312 13 x 25 325 utilization Self-Contained Rooms: 1.5 x 8 12 4 x 8 32 • 91% design capacity utilization *** (Autism, Multiple Disabilities) Self-Contained Rooms: 0 x 10 0 (EBS, LS1, LS11) Program Capacity Design Capacity Allow 3 Classrooms for Pullouts*** 3 x 0 0 849 950 (Needs 5) 2 x -23 -46 (Using 3.5) 0.5 x 23 12 957 (Rounded to 950) TOTAL 43 849 42 950 * Average from Class Size Reduction 30%-45%. ** Room designations and numbers are based on the 2019-20 KWBES floor plan and includes with conversion of 1 computer lab to a classroom. *** Design capacity is more than program capacity because it does not take into account class size reduction for grades K-3. 12

  13. Program versus Design Capacity 9-30-19 Program Design Capacity School Name Difference Enrollment Capacity Capacity Barrett ES* 858 849 950 -101 Brent ES 805 931 950 -19 Burns ES* 760 844 950 -106 Conway ES*** 885 863 950 -87 703 794 Falmouth ES* 649 -91 743 732 Ferry Farm ES 645 11 801 768 Garrisonville ES 543 33 Grafton Village ES 722 811 754 57 Hampton Oaks ES** 871 859 950 -91 Hartwood ES* 548 582 649 -67 Moncure ES*** 882 841 964 -123 864 843 Park Ridge ES 793 21 865 843 Rockhill ES 668 22 Rocky Run ES* 845 881 950 -69 Stafford ES 726 785 794 -9 Widewater ES* 662 801 843 -42 Winding Creek ES 803 943 925 18 13,966 Total 12,665 14,609 -643 *Class Size Reduction School 30% < 45% **Class Size Reduced 45% < 55% ***SCPS Class Size Reduction 30%,45% NOTE: There is a difference of -643 (or 4%) less seats under the program capacity calculation. 13

  14. Why Did Capacity Change? Decreases in capacity: Increases in capacity: • K-3 Class Size Reduction • Computer lab conversion Program, • Omitted from design • More special education capacity, increases to net programs rooms needed effective class size beyond the design capacity • Special education room being • More resource “pull-out” used as a general classroom spaces needed to • Counted as 8 in design accommodate students capacity, increases to net effective class size 14

  15. Key Takeaways • Design capacity is based on a proto-typical school • Program capacity is based on “real-world” student needs today • This year 53% of SCPS schools are restricted by CSR caps • K-3 CSR reduces seating capacity 12% for kindergarten through third grade classrooms, due to smaller class size and pupil-teacher ratio requirements • Changes in student demographics over the last decade have increased the demand for more classrooms and pull-out spaces in school buildings 15 15

  16. Elementary School Program Capacity Planning Team Facilities Planning, Design & Construction January 21, 2020 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend