Electroluminescence pulse shape of ReD TPC Argel Sosa Mximo Ave - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

electroluminescence pulse shape of red tpc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Electroluminescence pulse shape of ReD TPC Argel Sosa Mximo Ave - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

University of So Paulo Physics Institute Electroluminescence pulse shape of ReD TPC Argel Sosa Mximo Ave Ivone Albuquerque Nikolas Kemmerich "Electroluminescence pulse shape and electron diffusion in liquid argon measured in a


slide-1
SLIDE 1

University of São Paulo Physics Institute

Electroluminescence pulse shape

  • f ReD TPC

Argel Sosa Máximo Ave Ivone Albuquerque Nikolas Kemmerich

slide-2
SLIDE 2

"Electroluminescence pulse shape and electron diffusion in liquid argon measured in a dual-phase TPC" (Nuclear

  • Inst. and Methods in Physics Research, A 904 (2018)

23–34) The idealized form of the S2 pulse shape assumes that all electrons are extracted out of the liquid at the same time: yideal(t; τ1, τ2, p, T) = p·y′

ideal(t; τ1, T)+(1−p)·y′ ideal(t; τ2, T)

where y′

ideal(t; τ, T) = 1

T        0, if t < 0 1 − e−t/τ, if 0 ≤ t ≤ T e−(t−T)/τ − e−t/τ, if t > T

slide-3
SLIDE 3

τ1 and τ2 are the fast and slow component lifetimes respectively, p is the fast component fraction and T is the transit time of the electrons across the gas pocket. More realistic equation including the diffusion of the cloud

  • f electrons:

y(t; τ1, τ2, p, T, σ) = yideal ∗ gauss(0, σ) = p · y′(t; τ1, T, σ) + (1 − p) · y′(t; τ2, T, σ) where y′(t; τ, T, σ) = 1 2T (y′′(t; τ, σ) − y′′(t − T; τ, σ)) y′′(t; τ, σ) = erf

  • t

√ 2σ

  • − e−t/τeσ2/2τ 2erfc

σ2 − tτ √ 2στ

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Model developed to DS–50 TPC

0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 t ( s) 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 amp (arb) DS-50 data DS50 S2 Model

Effect of the SiPM single photoelectron response (SPE) on the S2 pulse shape?

slide-5
SLIDE 5

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 t ( s) 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 amp (arb) DS-50 data DS50 S2 Model SPE Model included 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 t ( s) 10

2

10

1

amp (arb) DS-50 data DS50 S2 Model SPE Model included 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 t ( s) 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 amp (arb) ReD data DS50 S2 Model SPE Model included 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 t ( s) 10

2

10

1

amp (arb) ReD data DS50 S2 Model SPE Model included

slide-6
SLIDE 6

The analytical model is complicated by SPE. The fit event by event is computationally expensive. We fixed the parameters [τ1=11 ns, τ2=3.45 µs, p=0.08, σ=0.2] except the transit time (T):

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 t ( s) 10

2

10

1

amp (arb) ReD data SPE Model T=0.50 s SPE Model T=1.00 s SPE Model T=1.25 s SPE Model T=1.50 s SPE Model T=2.00 s

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Estimator based on the rise time of the pulse to get the transit time.

s] µ t [

5 10

CDF

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

s] µ T=0.50 [ s] µ T=1.00 [ s] µ T=1.50 [ s] µ T=2.00 [

s] µ T [

0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

s] µ Rise Time [

1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1%-20%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Rise time distribution for run 978 taken the inner and outer channels of the TPC:

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Next steps:

See dependence between transit time and electroluminiscence field. See dependence between transit time and gas pocket height.

Other options?

Maybe deconvolution of SPE + DS50 Model fit

slide-10
SLIDE 10

DD–Gun + MCP (run 1039)

Sa 200 400 600 800 1000 ADC 20 − 20 40 60 80 100

Ch0 - MCP (MCP_Global)

Sa 200 400 600 800 1000 ADC 8000 − 6000 − 4000 − 2000 − 2000

Ch1 - MCP (MCP_Xp)

Sa 200 400 600 800 1000 ADC 3000 − 2000 − 1000 − 1000 2000

Ch2 - MCP (MCP_Xm)

Sa 200 400 600 800 1000 ADC 5000 − 4000 − 3000 − 2000 − 1000 − 1000 2000

Ch3 - MCP (MCP_Yp)

Sa 200 400 600 800 1000 ADC 6000 − 5000 − 4000 − 3000 − 2000 − 1000 − 1000 2000

Ch4 - MCP (MCP_Ym)

Sa 200 400 600 800 1000 ADC 8 − 6 − 4 − 2 − 2 4 6 8

Ch9 - MCP (LSci9)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Charge (Sum)/Norm

0.5 1 1.5 2

Charge(X+ X- Y+ Y-)/Norm

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2

1 10

2

10

X

1 − 0.5 − 0.5 1

Y

1 − 0.8 − 0.6 − 0.4 − 0.2 − 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

10 20 30 40 50 60