efgect of cow dung inoculum on biogas generation from
play

Efgect of Cow Dung Inoculum on Biogas Generation from Anaerobic - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Efgect of Cow Dung Inoculum on Biogas Generation from Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste A Case Study of India ATUL KUMAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (INDIAN SCHOOL OF MINES) DHANBAD, INDIA 7 th


  1. Efgect of Cow Dung Inoculum on Biogas Generation from Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste – A Case Study of India ATUL KUMAR INDIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (INDIAN SCHOOL OF MINES) DHANBAD, INDIA 7 th International Conference on Sustainable Solid Waste Management, 2019 1

  2. What are we going to learn today? • Motivation for this study • Objectives • Materials and methods • Key results • Conclusions 2

  3. Motivation for this study • One-third of total world food production gets wasted every year. • Most of the organic wastes meets with the traditional disposal techniques. • Scarcity of suitable land for landfilling. • Stringent regulations. • Potent renewable energy source. • Reduce the environmental impacts. Fig. 1: Anaerobic digestion process 3

  4. Objectives • T o identify the optimum combination of OFMSW and CM for effjcient anaerobic digestion. 4

  5. Materials and methods • Feedstock materials • Leftover food waste and other degradable wet organic waste. • The co-digestion substrate was cow dung (CM) collected from a farm. • Reactor Set-up • Aspirator glass bottles of capacity 1000 mL with bottom sampling port were used. • The experiments were performed in batch. 5

  6. Fig. 2: Experimental set-up of the anaerobic batch reactor 6

  7. Reactor Set-up (Continue..) • The reactors were filled with four different substrate to inoculum ratio (0.5, 0.63, 0.75 and 1.0) based on VS contents. • The inoculum and substrate were thoroughly mixed in the blender before being added to the reactor. • All the reactors were operated at mesophilic temperature (35 ± 1 °C). • Water displacement method was used for biogas production measurement at a fixed time every day. • The other end of silicone tube was inserted in an inverted 50 ml graduated measuring cylinder filled with water, whereas in duplicate it was 1.5 N NaOH solution. • The reactors were terminated at the end of 30 th day. 7

  8. Analytical methods • The Characteristics of the collected samples were analysed in the laboratory. Parameter OFMSW CM Table 1: Characteristics of feedstock materials Moisture content (%) 81.2 84.4 pH 5.3 7.4 Total Solid (TS) (%) 18.8 15.6 Volatile Solid (VS) (% d.b.) 90 79.3 COD (mg/L) 79800 19600 Carbon, C (% d.b.) 45.12 37.34 Nitrogen, N (% d.b.) 1.58 3.03 C/N ratio 28.56 12.32 8

  9. Table 2: Combinations of feedstock in batch reactors Reactor Mixing ratio of OFMSW (g CM (g VS/L) Organic loading (g VS/L) OFMSW and CM (on VS/L) VS basis) R1 - 0 10 10 R2 0.50 5 10 15 R3 0.63 6.3 10 16.3 R4 0.75 7.5 10 17.5 R5 1.00 10 10 20 9

  10. Key results Variation of pH in the reactors 8,5 • During hydrolysis, the substrates get 8 converted into amino acids and fatty acids 7,5 which lead to accumulation of volatile fatty 7 6,5 acids (VFA) resulting in a decrease in pH of pH 6 the reactor. 5,5 • Till 12-15 days the pH in all the reactors 5 4,5 gradually decreases. 4 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 • Due to CM as a co-substrate, the pH of the Time (days) reactors again increases which creates favourable environment for the R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 methanogenic bacteria. Fig. 3: Variation of pH of the reactors 10

  11. Biogas generation B io g a s g en era tio n (m L ) • The maximum biogas production was found in reactor R2. • The percentage of methane in the 1800 generated biogas was 62%. 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Reactors Fig. 4: Biogas generated in the reactors 11

  12. • The biogas production of 1594 1800 1600 mL at S/I ratio of 0.5, followed 1400 Cumulative biogas (mL) by 1301 mL at 0.63, 1152 mL at 1200 0.75 and 1037 mL at 1.0. 1000 800 • The biogas generation was very 600 less from mono-digestion of CM 400 200 (R1). 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Time (days) R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 Fig. 5: Cumulative biogas generation 12

  13. Conclusions • The biogas yield in the different reactors are not very encouraging. • The maximum biogas yield of 106.27 mL/g VS was observed in reactor R2. • The order of biogas yield in all the reactors are R2>R3>R4>R5>R1. • The reason for lesser biogas production in all the reactors was due to the drop in pH of the reactors at initial stage of the reaction. 13

  14. Acknowledgement: I want to thank Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, for providing me funding opportunity for attending this conference. Thank You & Questions? 14

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend