Effectively and Affordably Debbie Bouton, Central Piedmont Community - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Effectively and Affordably Debbie Bouton, Central Piedmont Community - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Developing Adjunct Faculty Effectively and Affordably Debbie Bouton, Central Piedmont Community College Richard Lyons, NCSPOD President and Consultant 2011 AACC Conference, New Orleans Benefits Part-timers Provide Cost savings Scheduling
Benefits Part-timers Provide
Cost savings Scheduling flexibility Expertise in critical fields Passion for sharing their wisdom Connections to the community Fresh perspectives Diversification of faculty Source of potential full-time faculty
Costs of Inadequate Support
Suboptimal teaching performance Faulty communications with students More “fires” for leaders to extinguish Suboptimal student retention rates
Common Needs of Part-timers
Grounded orientation to institution Basic teaching toolkit Sense of belonging Continuing development of skills Recognition for quality teaching
Myth Busters: Lessons Learned
Won’t come for training unless paid Won’t come for training, schedule conflicts Don’t have time to work on teaching skills Can’t find a full-time teaching position
Continuous Outreach: Fosters Sense of Belonging
Orientation Part-time Faculty Website Semester Community Meeting Teaching Commons Certification Program Evening and Saturday sessions
Orientation
Provide “Welcome Goodie Bag” Offer multiple times, multiple locations Introduce college administrators Include icebreakers Model good teaching practices Offer online option
24/7 Support: PTF Website
http://www.cpcc.edu/parttime
Semester Community Meetings
Response to survey data Provides opportunity to “build community” Selected focused topics: Building community in the classroom Effective use of technology
Evening & Saturday Sessions
Meet needs and schedules of part-time faculty Monthly Sessions: Becoming a Student Advocate Blackboard Team play Active learning strategies
Teaching Commons
Workspace to share ideas and content, develop methodologies, stimulate innovation Promotes and supports: Collaboration, sharing and collegiality Innovation Individual development
Resources for Adjunct Faculty
Email for all part-time faculty Touch-down stations at each campus Assistance from instructional developers Representation on College Senate Professional development opportunities
Certification Program
Teaching for Significant Learning
25-hour, hybrid program Participants recommended by departments Stipend paid upon completion of program Getting Results is primary curriculum AdjunctSuccess.net webinar series
Certification Program
Teaching for Significant Learning Topics
Creating a Community of Learners Planning for Outcomes Active Teaching and Learning Assessing Teaching and Learning Teaching with Technology
Certification Program
Teaching for Significant Learning Evaluation
Instructor Self Assessment (pre and post) Follow-up Instructor Self Assessment (6 mo) Survey of Students Student Success Rates (pre and post) Student Retention Rates (pre and post)
Positive Effects & Sustainability
Increased: PTF completing orientation Retention of PTF Students’ grades Doubled professional development participation Adopted model for use with Developmental Education Initiative
Follow Up Survey Feedback
80% agree: “I feel valued in my department in my roles as a part-time instructor.” “Professional development classes and seminars I have attended have really helped me to evaluate my own teaching.” “I love working for CPCC. I currently adjunct for multiple institutions, and CPCC is the one that really makes me feel well-supported and in touch.”
Results of Certification
Summer 2008 Group Terms ABCS % ABCS AS - UF % AS-UF DFIWU %DFIWU Total Pre-Cert 2007-2008 3062 66.6% 3753 81.6% 1538 33.4% 4600 Post-Cert 2008-2008 6384 71.7% 7793 87.5% 2524 28.3% 8908 Summer 2009 Group Terms ABCS %ABC AS - UF % AS-UF DFIWU %DFIWU Total Pre-Cert 2008-2009 4087 70.2% 5398 92.7% 1734 29.8% 5821 Post-Cert Fall 2009 2849 71.9% 3648 92.1% 1111 28.1% 3960
Retention of Participants
Taught in 2007/2008 Taught in Fall 2008 Not Retained Taught in Fall 2009 Not Retained Participants in Summer 2008 43 43 (100%) 40 (93%) 3 (7%) Participants in Summer 2009 60 56 (93%) 4 (7%)
93-100% retention versus 65% for entire part-time faculty group over same periods.