Education Daniel F. ONeill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

education
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Education Daniel F. ONeill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CHOICES: An Innovative Approach to Alcohol Education Daniel F. ONeill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. Millersville University Freshman Year Experience National Conference February 9, 2009 Orlando, Florida CALL TO ACTION A Call to


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CHOICES: An Innovative Approach to Alcohol Education

Daniel F. O’Neill, Psy.D. Linda L. McDowell, Ph.D. Millersville University Freshman Year Experience National Conference February 9, 2009 Orlando, Florida

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CALL TO ACTION

 A Call to Action, 2002 NIAAA  What Colleges Need to Know Now: Update

  • n College Drinking, 2008 NIAAA

 Millersville University Task Force on

Alcohol, 1999

slide-3
SLIDE 3

THE All-TOO-FAMILIAR BAD NEWS

 1700 alcohol related unintentional injury student

deaths ages 18-24 in 2001 (6% increase from 1998)

 500,000 students between the ages of 18 and

24 are unintentionally injured under the influence of alcohol (Hingson et al., 2002).

 696,000 students 18-24 assaulted by another

student who has been drinking

 97,000 students 18-24 victims of alcohol related

sexual assault or date rape

  • (Hingson et al 2005)
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Millersville University

 8,300 students  Founded 1855  One of 14 state owned PA State System of

Higher Education

 79% full time undergraduates  56% of undergrads are women  Most students from PA or contiguous states  32% residential students

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Millersville University

 American College Health Assessment (2007)

 21.9% students did not use alcohol in past year  36.5% students did not use alcohol in past 30 days  59.9% drink 4 or less when they partied or socialized  85% use designated drivers  84.7% ate before or during drinking occasion  14.1% used marijuana in last month

(727 randomly selected respondents to self-report online survey)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Prevention Efforts

 Prevention Programming

 Wellness Center Peer Educators  Alcohol Screening @ Counseling Center  Late Night Activities through Student Program Office  E-chug  Stall Talk  Facebook “flyers”  CHOICES for students who violated the Alcohol Policy

slide-7
SLIDE 7

CHOICES: Background

 Marlatt & Parks (2005)  University of Washington  Alcohol Skills Training Program  BASICS  Published by The Change Companies

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CHOICES

 Facilitated Discussion  Non Judgmental  Harm Reduction NOT Abstinence Based  Motivational Interviewing (Miller)  Four sections

 Reflections on personal relationship with alcohol  Facts  Risk  Strategies

slide-9
SLIDE 9

 http://www.changecompanies.net/flash/pages

/prevention/choices/journal/index.html

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Orientation Program

 2007 Fall Orientation Program  First formal Orientation activity for students  Faculty and Staff facilitators  Orientation Groups

 25students  Orientation Leader (upperclassman)

 90 minute groups  ~$5000 cost for all first year students  Grant Supported Funding: PA. Liquor Control Board

slide-11
SLIDE 11

RECRUITING FACULTY & STAFF

Appeal across the University Letter to potential facilitators Follow up phone calls Diverse voices: More than “the choir” (e.g.. Football Coach, Priest, Head of Admissions…)

slide-12
SLIDE 12

FACULTY TRAINING

 Pilot Program Training

 George Parks, Ph.D.  Follow up small group training

 Second Year Training

 Small group training for new facilitators  Veteran “brush ups”

slide-13
SLIDE 13

 Background information: defining the problem  Careful review of journal  Tips for running an effective group  How to involve the Orientation Leader  Encouraging discussion  Preventing student “war stories”  Keeping track of time

Training Guidelines

slide-14
SLIDE 14

STUDENT TRAINING

 Orientation Leaders  CHOICES group  Expectations—encouraging participation  Working with a facilitator  Appropriate “sharing” of college experience

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Packets for First Year Students

 Interactive Journal  BAC cards  Alcohol Poisoning Information  MU Alcohol Brochure  Pens  Pre-Test and Post-Test

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Assessment

Student Satisfaction Survey Pre/Post test data Faculty/Staff feedback

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Student Evaluation

“The Choices program was helpful.”

 2007

  • Strongly Agree 9.82%
  • Agree

49.65%

  • Did not attend

7.47%

  • Disagree

23.65%

  • Strongly Disagree 9.41%
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Student evaluation: “The Choices Program was helpful.”

 2008

 Strongly Agree

24.19%

 Agree

35.40%

 Neutral

25.58%

 Disagree

9.95%

 Strongly Disagree

6.46%

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

I thnk it’s important to have A plan in mind to limit my drinking before I go to a Party

 Strongly Agree: 52.20%  Agree: 39.96%  Disagree: 6.27%

 Strongly Disagree: 0.39%

 SA

66.99%

 A

26.93%

 D

2.56%

 SD

0.20%

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Question 9: If a friend passes out…

 SA

62.68%

 A

28.31%

 D

5.78%

 DS

1.86%

 SA

77.38%

 A

14.69%

 D

1.57%

 DS

2.84%

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Facilitator Feedback

 “In the end, I asked them if they had

learned anything new. They said that a lot

  • f the CHOICES material was covered in

high school classes, but they did learn:

 how to recognize alcohol poisoning  how quickly alcohol gets in the bloodstream  how long it takes to leave  the 24/7 Safe Haven rule at Health Services”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

FACILITATOR FEEDBACK

 Well I survived! It was a great experience. My

first group was barely awake and except for 3 were very reluctant to talk. My second group was much different. They were very outgoing and a little too honest for comfort! Their Orientation Leader was probably more involved that she should have been but it was very helpful.

slide-25
SLIDE 25

FACILITATOR FEEDBACK

 I wish I had a better feeling about my performance

  • yesterday. The second session was a bit better than the
  • first. About half the group showed up late to the first
  • session. In both groups but especially the first, only 2 or

3 where slightly vocal. Some would have rather died then lift the pencil or read the booklet. Tough crowd. I wish I had observed a group or been able to co-facilitate with another staff person. I don’t think everyone showed up to Choices. In the second group one of the freshmen was a member of my Brownie troop several years ago. I don’t think that was a problem for her but I can’t be sure.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

IMPACT

 Common Language  Over four years all students will have

participated in a CHOICES group

 Strong foundation for follow-up prevention

efforts

 Consistency in both prevention and

intervention efforts: CHOICES…..BASICS

slide-27
SLIDE 27

GOALS FOR THE FUTURE

 Expand faculty participation  Reduce group size  Involve Orientation Leaders more

effectively

 Expand Assessment to include follow up  Connect CHOICES and ACHA

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Lessons Learned Lessons Learned

 Program Integrity  Orientation Leader

expectations/training

 # of Facilitators  Timing  Late Attrition  Assessment

slide-29
SLIDE 29

QUESTIONS?

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Contact Information

 Daniel O’Neill

 daniel.oneill@millesville.edu  717.872.3127

 Linda McDowell

 linda.mcdowell@millersville.edu  717.871.2388