Economics 2 Professor Christina Romer Spring 2019 Professor David - - PDF document

economics 2 professor christina romer spring 2019
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Economics 2 Professor Christina Romer Spring 2019 Professor David - - PDF document

Economics 2 Professor Christina Romer Spring 2019 Professor David Romer LECTURE 26 DETERMINANTS OF NET EXPORTS May 2, 2019 I. R EVIEW OF T OOLS A. Overview B. Exchange rates C. Balance of payments II. A C RUCIAL D ETERMINANT OF N ET E XPORTS


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Economics 2 Professor Christina Romer Spring 2019 Professor David Romer LECTURE 26 DETERMINANTS OF NET EXPORTS May 2, 2019 I. REVIEW OF TOOLS

  • A. Overview
  • B. Exchange rates
  • C. Balance of payments

II. A CRUCIAL DETERMINANT OF NET EXPORTS

  • A. Net exports only change if net capital inflows change
  • B. Net capital inflows depend positively on the real interest rate
  • C. So, net exports depend negatively on the real interest rate
  • D. The exchange rate adjusts so that NX = −KI
  • III. S, I, AND r IN THE LONG RUN IN AN OPEN ECONOMY
  • A. Saving, net capital inflows, and investment
  • B. Our long-run S and I diagram modified to incorporate net capital inflows
  • IV. APPLICATION #1: A TAX CUT
  • A. The scenario we are considering
  • B. The short-run effect on net exports
  • C. The long-run effect on net exports
  • D. The “twin deficits”

V. APPLICATION #2: HIGHER TARIFFS ON MANY GOODS

  • A. The scenario we are considering
  • B. The impact on net exports at a given exchange rate
  • C. The impact on the exchange rate
  • D. Deducing the effects on net exports from net capital inflows
  • E. How seriously should we take this?
  • VI. THE CURRENT U.S. TRADE DEFICIT
  • A. U.S. trade deficit facts
  • B. Mistaken Implications of the U.S. Trade Deficit
  • C. The key role of increased net capital inflows
  • D. Why have net capital inflows increased?
slide-2
SLIDE 2

LECTURE 26

Determinants of Net Exports May 2, 2019

Economics 2 Christina Romer Spring 2019 David Romer

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4

Announcements

  • You should have turned in Problem Set 6.
  • We will have class next Tuesday (at the usual place

and time).

  • No new material; a summary/synthesis

lecture.

  • We will also discuss the final.
  • We will post a sample final this evening.
slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • I. REVIEW OF TOOLS
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Net Exports

  • Exports: The value of all the goods and services we

sell abroad.

  • Imports: The value of all the goods and services we

buy from abroad.

  • Net Exports (NX):

NX = Exports − Imports

  • Another term for net exports is the “trade balance”:
  • NX < 0 is a trade deficit.
  • NX > 0 is a trade surplus.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

Where Net Exports Enter Our Analysis

  • They are one component of planned aggregate

expenditure: PAE = C + Ip + G +NX

  • When we derived S* = I*, we assumed net exports

were zero.

  • We’ll see that when net exports are not zero,

things are more complicated than S* = I*.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Foreign Exchange Market for Dollars

Price of $ in Yen (¥ per $1) Q of $ Traded in

  • For. Exch. Market

D e1 Q1 S

slide-9
SLIDE 9

A Key Feature of the Foreign Exchange Market

  • The exchange rate does not affect purchases of

assets.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

The Balance of Payments – Step 1

  • Equilibrium in the foreign exchange market for

dollars: Value of foreign purchases of American goods and services and of American assets = Value of American purchases of foreign goods and services and of foreign assets

  • That is:

Exports + Capital Inflows = Imports + Capital Outflows

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Net Capital Inflows

  • Capital Inflows: The value of all the U.S. assets

purchased by foreigners.

  • Capital Outflows: The value of all the foreign

assets purchased by Americans.

  • Net Capital Inflows (KI):

KI = Capital Inflows − Capital Outflows

slide-12
SLIDE 12

The Balance of Payments – Step 2

  • Recall:

Exports + Capital Inflows = Imports + Capital Outflows

  • We can rewrite this as:

(Exports − Imports) + (Capital Inflows − Capital Outflows) = 0

  • In symbols:

NX + KI = 0

  • In words:

Net Exports + Net Capital Inflows = 0

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Net Exports (NX) and Net Capital Inflows (KI)

Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis

KI NX

  • 1000
  • 800
  • 600
  • 400
  • 200

200 400 600 800 1000

1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015

Billions of $

slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • II. A CRUCIAL DETERMINANT OF NET EXPORTS
slide-15
SLIDE 15

NX Only Moves If KI Moves

  • Since NX + KI = 0:

NX = −KI

  • So:
  • If something does not change net capital

inflows, it does not change net exports.

  • If something does changes net capital

inflows, it changes net exports in the

  • pposite direction.
slide-16
SLIDE 16

What Determines Net Capital Inflows?

  • The real interest rate, r: If r rises, American assets

become more attractive relative to foreign assets, and so net capital inflows rise.

  • Foreign real interest rates: If real interest rates abroad

rise, American assets become less attractive relative to foreign assets, and so net capital inflows fall.

  • Also, “tastes” for assets: If Americans and/or

foreigners find American assets more attractive at a given r, net capital inflows rise.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Implication for Net Exports: The Real Interest Rate Is a Crucial Determinant of NX

NX = −KI

  • A rise in the real interest rate raises KI; a fall in the

real interest rate lowers KI.

  • Therefore: A rise in r lowers NX; a fall in r raises

NX.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

A Rise in the Real Interest Rate in the U.S. Foreign Exchange Market for Dollars

D1 Q of $ S1 e1 S2 D2 e2 Price of $ in Euros

The dollar appreciation lowers exports and raises imports, and so lowers NX.

slide-19
SLIDE 19
  • III. SAVING, INVESTMENT, AND THE REAL INTEREST

RATE IN THE LONG RUN IN AN OPEN ECONOMY

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The Real Interest Rate

  • r is a crucial determinant of KI, and hence of NX.
  • So: we need to figure out what determines r.
  • We will continue to assume (realistically!)

that in the short run and in the medium run, r is determined by the Fed responding to inflation according to its reaction function.

  • But, what determines r in the long run?
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Saving and Investment in the Long Run

  • Recall:

Y* = C* + I* + G + NX*

  • So:

Y* − C* − G – NX* = I*

  • Grouping the first 3 terms together:

(Y* − C* − G) − NX* = I*

  • Using NX = −KI and the definition of saving:

S* + KI* = I*

  • Intuition: Investment has to be financed either by

domestic saving or by foreigners.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

r* I*, S*+KI* I 𝐽1

S + KI

The Real Interest Rate in the Long Run

𝑠

1 ∗

Note: Both saving and net capital inflows are increasing in r.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Key Messages

  • NX = −KI.
  • The real interest rate is a crucial determinant of KI

(and therefore of NX).

  • In a world of international trade and capital flows,

the real interest rate in the long run is the one that causes S* + KI* to equal I*.

slide-24
SLIDE 24
  • IV. APPLICATION #1: A TAX CUT
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Application #1: A Long-Lasting Tax Cut

  • The scenario we’re considering:
  • The economy starts in long-run equilibrium.
  • There is then a long-lasting cut in taxes, T.
  • As always when we change T (unless we

explicitly say otherwise), we are holding G fixed.

  • Determining the behavior of net exports:
  • To figure out what happens to NX, we need to

figure out what happens to KI.

  • To figure out what happens to KI, we need to

figure out what happens to r.

slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Short-Run Effect on Net Exports

  • r is determined by the Fed responding to inflation

according to its reaction function.

  • Inflation doesn’t change in the short run (because
  • f nominal rigidity).
  • So, r does not change.
  • So, KI does not change.
  • So, NX does not change.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

r* I*, S*+KI* I1 𝐽2

∗ 𝐽1 ∗

S1 + KI1

The Long-Run Effect on Net Exports

𝑠

1 ∗

r rises, so KI rises, so NX falls. S2 + KI1 𝑠

2 ∗

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Foreign Exchange Market for Dollars The Long Run Effects of a Tax Cut in the U.S.

D1 Q of $ S1 e1 S2 D2 e2 Price of $ in Euros

e rising is what makes NX fall (as we know it must from the I*–S*+KI* diagram).

slide-29
SLIDE 29

A Little about Going from the Short Run to the Long Run: The Short Run

Y PAE1 PAE Y=PAE Y* PAE2 Y2

The tax cut shifts up the PAE line in the short run, as usual.

slide-30
SLIDE 30

A Little about Going from the Short Run to the Long Run: Returning to Potential Output

  • As usual, inflation does not change immediately

(and so r does not change immediately).

  • Y > Y*, so after a while inflation starts to rise.
  • As inflation rises, the Fed, following its reaction

function, raises r.

  • The increases in r reduce C, I, and NX at a given

Y − T, and so shift the PAE line down and lower Y.

  • The process continues until we are back at Y*.
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Returning to Potential Output

Y PAE1,PAELR PAE Y=PAE Y* PAE2 Y2

slide-32
SLIDE 32
  • V. APPLICATION #2: HIGHER TARIFFS ON MANY

GOODS

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Application #2: Higher Tariffs on Many Goods

  • The scenario we’re considering:
  • The economy starts in long-run equilibrium.
  • There is then a long-lasting increase in tariffs
  • n many goods.
  • We assume that other countries don’t raise

their tariffs in response.

  • We’ll start by analyzing the short-run effect.
slide-34
SLIDE 34

What Happens to Net Exports at a Given Exchange Rate?

  • At a given exchange rate, imports will fall, and so

net exports will rise.

  • But, does the exchange rate stay the same?
slide-35
SLIDE 35

Foreign Exchange Market for Dollars The U.S. Raises Tariffs on Many Goods

D1 Q of $ Price of $ in Euros S1 e1 S2 e2

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Determining the Effect on Net Exports

  • At a given exchange rate, imports will fall, and so net

exports will rise.

  • But that the exchange rate appreciates, which reduces

exports and raises imports, and so causes net exports to fall.

  • What is the overall effect?
  • Recall: Determining the behavior of net exports:
  • To figure out what happens to NX, we need to

figure out what happens to KI.

  • But nothing happens to KI!
  • So nothing happens to NX.
slide-37
SLIDE 37

How Seriously Should We Take This?

  • Will higher tariffs on many goods have literally no effect on

NX?

  • Almost surely not: All models are approximations.
  • Is there a force that clearly works against the direct effect
  • f the tariffs on NX?
  • Yes! The reduced supply of dollars will drive up the

price of dollars in foreign currency markets.

  • Will the tariffs have approximately no effect on NX?
  • Very likely yes: As long as KI doesn’t respond a lot to

the exchange rate (which is realistic), the impact on NX is small. (We assume KI doesn’t respond at all to the exchange rate, which is why we find no impact on NX.)

slide-38
SLIDE 38

r* I*, S*+KI* I1,I2 𝐽1

,𝐽2

S1 + KI1, S2 + KI2

The Long-Run Effect on Net Exports

𝑠

1 ∗,𝑠 2 ∗

The tariffs do not affect NX in the long run as well as the short run.

slide-39
SLIDE 39
  • VI. THE CURRENT U.S. TRADE DEFICIT
slide-40
SLIDE 40

U.S. Imports and Exports (as a % of GDP)

The U.S. been running a large trade deficit for decades.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Mistaken Explanations of the U.S. Trade Deficit

  • We aren’t productive enough; our goods and

services are of low quality.

  • Americans have strong tastes for foreign goods.
  • Foreign countries engage in widespread

protectionist polices.

  • The problem: These theories predict a weak dollar,

not a large trade deficit.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Foreign Exchange Market for Dollars The Quality of U.S. Goods Deteriorates

D1 Q of $ S1 e1 S2 D2 e2 Price of $ in foreign currency

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Understanding the Persistent U.S. Trade Deficit

  • Recall: NX* = −KI*.
  • So, to understand why NX* is large and negative

(that is, a persistently large trade deficit), we need to understand why KI* is large and positive.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

One Factor That Has Contributed to the Persistent U.S. Trade Deficit

  • Large U.S. budget deficits.
  • Recall our earlier example of a permanent tax

cut.

  • You might also want to work through the

effects of a permanent increase in G.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Another Factor That Has Contributed to the Persistent U.S. Trade Deficit

  • U.S. assets look highly attractive.
  • Perhaps because people think risky U.S. assets

are likely to pay off especially well (for example, tech in the 1990s, housing in the early 2000s).

  • As a result, KI is big and positive—so NX is big and

negative.

  • To put it another way: the increased attractiveness of

U.S. shifts the supply and demand curves in the foreign exchange market, leading the dollar to appreciate, and so causing NX to fall.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Foreign Exchange Market for Dollars Change in Tastes Toward U.S. Assets

D1 Q of $ S1 e1 S2 D2 e2 Price of $ in foreign currency

The dollar appreciates.