e nvironme nt al comparison of t he rmoche mical and
play

E NVIRONME NT AL COMPARISON OF T HE RMOCHE MICAL AND BIOCHE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 E NVIRONME NT AL COMPARISON OF T HE RMOCHE MICAL AND BIOCHE MICAL WAYS F OR PRODUCING E NE RGY F ROM AGRICUL T URAL SOL ID RE SIDUE S: COF F E E CUT - ST E MS CASE CARL OS A. GARCA, AL VARO GOME Z, RAMIRO BE T


  1. 1 E NVIRONME NT AL COMPARISON OF T HE RMOCHE MICAL AND BIOCHE MICAL WAYS F OR PRODUCING E NE RGY F ROM AGRICUL T URAL SOL ID RE SIDUE S: COF F E E CUT - ST E MS CASE CARL OS A. GARCÍA, AL VARO GOME Z, RAMIRO BE T ANCOURT , CARL OS A. CARDONA INST IT UT O DE BIOT E CNOL OGÍA Y AGROINDUST RIA, DE PART AME NT O DE INGE NIE RÍA QUÍMICA. UNIVE RSIDAD NACIONAL DE COL OMBIA SE DE MANIZAL E S.

  2. Outline 2 I ntro duc tio n  Ag ric ultura l Re sidue s in Co lo mb ia  Co ffe e Cut-Ste ms (CCS)  Ga sific a tio n a nd E tha no l F e rme nta tio n  Ob je c tive  Me tho do lo g y  CCS Cha ra c te riza tio n  Simula tio n Pro c e dure  E ne rg y a nd E nviro nme nta l Asse ssme nt  Re sults  Co nc lusio ns  Re fe re nc e s 

  3. Ag ric ultura l Re sidue s 1. I ntro duc tio n 3 Cro p Re sidue s Ag ric ultura l Cro ps Ha rve sting Ag ro industria l Pro c e ssing Re sidue s

  4. Co ffe e Cut-Ste ms 1. I ntro duc tio n 4 Co lo mb ia is the fo urth la rg e st pro duc e r o f Co ffe e in the Wo rld. 80,000 he c ta re s o f Co ffe e tre e Wo o d a re c utte d to re ne w the pla nts 17 to nne o f dry Wo o d pe r da y c a n b e o b ta ine d 690 GWe c a n b e He a ting a nd g e ne ra te d Co o king

  5. T ra nsfo rma tio n Me tho ds 1. I ntro duc tio n 5 Pyro lysis T he rmo c he mic a l Co mb ustio n T e c hno lo g ie s Ga sific a tio n Cro ps Re sidue s Se le c te d T e c hno lo g ie s E tha no lic F e rme nta tio n Bio c he mic a l T e c hno lo g ie s Da rk F e rme nta tio n

  6. Ga sific a tio n 1. I ntro duc tio n 6 Ga sifying Ag e nt Air Ra w Ma te ria l Bio e tha no l Po we r Ge ne ra tio n Synthe sis Ga s Hydro g e n, Ca rb o n Mo no xide , Me tha ne , Ca rb o n Dio xide a nd Nitro g e n

  7. E tha no l F e rme nta tio n 1. I ntro duc tio n 7 E nzyma tic Ac id Hydrolysis Sac c har ific ation Sulfuric Ac id 2%wt. Ce lluc la st 1.5L a nd T e mpe ra ture 115°C Visc o zyme T e mpe ra ture = 50°C Ra w Ma te ria l Solid Re sidue s Co g e ne ra tio n E thanol F e r me ntation De toxific ation Ove rliming with L ime Z . Mo bilis T e mpe ra ture = 33°C T e mpe ra ture = 60°C E tha no l, b io ma ss, CO 2 ,

  8. Ob je c tive 8  T he a im o f this study is to e va lua te a nd c o mpa re the e ne rg y a nd e nviro nme nta l a sse ssme nt o f two pro c e sse s fo r e ne rg y pro duc tio n (e tha no l fe rme nta tio n a nd g a sific a tio n) fro m Co ffe e Cut- Ste ms.

  9. Ge ne ra l De sc riptio n 2. Me tho do lo g y 9 Simula tio n • Ga s Co mpo sitio n • CCS c ha ra c te riza tio n • E tha no l Yie ld • Pilo t-sc a le g a sific a tio n • Aspe n Plus V8.0 • E nviro nme nta l • E tha no l F e rme nta tio n • Wa ste Re duc tio n I mpa c t Alg o rithm (WAR) • E ne rg y E ffic ie nc y E xpe rime nta l Re sults

  10. Ra w Ma te ria l 2. Me tho do lo g y 10 Che mic al Composition Ho lo c e llulo se L ig nin Ash E xtra c tive s E E le me nta l le me nta l Co nte nt Co nte nt Co nte nt Co nte nt • � � 0.635 ∗ �� � 0.460 ∗ �� � 0.095 ∗ ��� Ana lysis Ana lysis • � � 0.059 ∗ �� � 0.060 ∗ �� � 0.010 ∗ ��� • � � 0.34 ∗ �� � 0.469 ∗ �� � 0.023 ∗ ��� •NRE L / T P- •AST M Sta nda rd •T APPI T 222 •NRE L / T P- 510-42619 D1104 510-42622 Ca lo rific Ca lo rific Ash F ixe d Ca rb o n Vo la tile Ma tte r �� ��� �� • ��� � 19.2880 � 0.2135 � 1.9584 � 0.0234 Va lue Va lue �� �� ��� •NRE L / T P-510- •AST M D3175 - 11 •AST M D3172 - 13 42622 10

  11. Simula tio n Pro c e dure 2. Me tho do lo g y 11 Air Gasific ation Pyrolysis Coffee Cut ‐ Stems ������� � ���� → � � � ��� ����� Dryer Water Combustion Electricity � � , ��� ����� � � � → �� � � � � � � ���� Steam Generation Chipper ��� ����� � ���� → �� � � � LP ‐ Steam Gasifier Reduction Turbine � � � �� 2 ↔ 2�� Electricity � � � � 2 � ↔ �� � � 2 Air Exhaust Gas Syngas � � � 2� 2 ↔ �� 4 Gas Engine �� 4 � � 2 � ↔ �� � 3� 2 Ash �� � � 2 � ↔ �� 2 � � 2 Re ac tion Me c hanism

  12. 12 me ntation Simula tio n Pro c e dure e r thanol F E

  13. ithm (WAR) Waste Re duc tion Algor

  14. What topic s ar e e valuate d? • Huma n to xic ity po te ntia l b y ing e stio n (HT PI ) • Huma n to xic ity po te ntia l b y de rma l a nd inha la tio n e xpo sure (HT PE ) • T e rre stria l to xic ity po te ntia l (T T P) • Aq ua tic to xic ity po te ntia l (AT P) • Glo b a l wa rming po te ntia l (GWP) • Ozo ne de ple tio n po te ntia l (ODP) • Pho to c he mic a l o xida tio n po te ntia l (PCOP) • Ac idific a tio n po te ntia l (AP)

  15. Physic o c he mic a l Cha ra c te riza tio n 3. Re sults 15 Coffe e Cut- Ste ms Mo isture Co nte nt (%wt) 8.7 Che mic al Composition (% wt dr y) Ce llulo se 40.39 He mic e llulo se 34.01 L ig nin 10.13 Raw Mate rial HHV (Mj/ kg) E xtra c tive s 14.18 Sug a rc a ne Ba g a sse 17.70 Ash 1.27 Pr oximate Analysis (% wt dr y) Ric e Husk 16.47 Vo la tile Ma tte r 82.15 F ixe d Ca rb o n 16.78 Ash 1.07 E le me ntal Analysis (% wt dr y) Ca rb o n 48.35 Hydro g e n 5.93 Oxyg e n 44.21 HHV (MJ/ K g ) c a lc ula te d 19.32 HHV (MJ/ K g ) e xpe rime nta l 18.26

  16. Pilo t-sc a le g a sific a tio n 3. Re sults 16 Zainal e t al., Composition (% Vol) Coffe e Cut- Ste ms Pinus Radiata 17.41 15.23 Hydr oge n 3.13 1.58 Me thane 12.88 16.42 Carbon Monoxide 15.8 23.04 Carbon Dioxide 49.6 42.31 Nitr oge n 4.74 3.92 Calor ific Value (Mj/ kg) Za ina l, Z. a ., Ali, R., L e a n, C.H., Se e tha ra mu, K .N., 2001. Pre dic tio n o f pe rfo rma nc e o f a do wndra ft g a sifie r using e q uilib rium mo de ling fo r diffe re nt b io ma ss ma te ria ls. E ne rg y Co nve rs. Ma na g . 42, 1499–1515.

  17. E tha no l F e rme nta tio n 17 Pre tre a tme nt Re sults Hig h de to xific a tio n te mpe ra ture Pr oc e ss Conc e ntr ation (g/ L ) Conve r sion Yie ld (% ) re duc e s the c o nte nt o f to xic Ac id Hydro lysis 33.4 74 c o mpo unds b ut inc re a se s the de c o mpo sitio n o f sug a rs a nd De to xific a tio n 19.5 43 thus re duc e s the a c id hydro lysis E nzyma tic yie ld. 18.3 45 Sa c c ha rific a tio n E thanol Yie ld (g/ g substr ate ) L o we r e tha no l pro duc tio n due T his study 0.41 to the lo w a c id hydro lysis yie ld a fte r the de to xific a tio n pro c e ss Aristiza b a l e t a l., 0.495 Aristizá b a l M, V., Gó me z P, Á., Ca rdo na A, C.A., 2015. Bio re fine rie s b a se d o n c o ffe e c ut-ste ms a nd sug a rc a ne b a g a sse : F ura n-b a se d c o mpo unds a nd a lka ne s a s inte re sting pro duc ts. Bio re so ur. T e c hno l. 196, 480–9.

  18. Simula tio n Re sults 18 Hig h syng a s pro duc tio n b ut lo w Platfor m Yie ld Units fe rme nta b le sug a rs whic h is 2.84 kg syng a s/ kg CCS Synthe sis g a s hinde re d ma inly b y the ra w ma te ria l a nd the pre tre a tme nt 0.38 kg sug a rs/ kg CCS me tho ds F e r me ntable sugar s Pr oduc tivity Yie ld De spite the hig he r e ne rg y Pr oduc t c o nte nt o f the e tha no l, the Va lue Units Va lue Units pro duc tio n yie ld o f e le c tric ity is hig he r due to 21.5 MW 7.09 Mj/ kg CCS Powe r the hig h pro duc tivity o f synthe sis g a s fro m CCS. 2,056.52 kg / h 5.44 Mj/ kg CCS E tha nol

  19. E nviro nme nta l Asse ssme nt 3. Re sults 19 Po te ntia l E nviro nme nta l I mpa c t 5 4,5 E thanol – HT PI and T T P Impact (PEI/kg product) 4 F ina l dispo sitio n o f the 3,5 stilla g e fro m the 3 do wnstre a m pro c e ssing . Ethanol 2,5 2 Gasification Gasific ation – GWP 1,5 CO 2 e missio ns a s a 1 c o nse q ue nc e o f the synthe sis g a s c o mb ustio n 0,5 0 HTPI TTP GWP PCOP TOTAL

  20. Co nc lusio ns 20  T his wo rk e va lua te d a the rmo c he mic a l a nd b io c he mic a l ro ute to o b ta in b io e ne rg y (e tha no l a nd e le c tric ity) fro m the e nviro nme nta l po int o f vie w. T he mo st pro mising te c hno lo g y to pro duc e b io e ne rg y se e ms to b e the g a sific a tio n due to the hig h syng a s/ b io ma ss ra tio in c o mpa riso n to the pla tfo rm to o b ta in sug a rs to b e use d in a fe rme nta tio n.  Be side s, the a mo unt o f e ne rg y tha t c a n b e o b ta ine d fro m the dire c t use o f CCS to g e ne ra te e le c tric ity thro ug h the synthe sis g a s pla tfo rm pre se nts a no ve l sc e na rio fo r its imple me nta tio n in zo ne s whe re the po we r supplie d is no t c a rrie d o ut.

  21. Co nc lusio ns 21  T he g e ne ra tio n o f e le c tric ity thro ug h g a sific a tio n c a n b e c o nside re d a s a ve ry lo w e missio n pro c e ss sinc e pa rt o f the e ne rg y is use d in the sa me pro c e ss a nd the re ma inde r c a n b e so ld to the g rid.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend