The Perceptual Proxies of Visual Comparison Presented by: Youssef - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

the perceptual proxies of visual comparison
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

The Perceptual Proxies of Visual Comparison Presented by: Youssef - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The Perceptual Proxies of Visual Comparison Presented by: Youssef Sherif 1 Visual comparison Bigger Mean? Bigger Range? 2 A bit of History Examine the precision of comparison tasks with different arrangements Max Correlation Max Delta 3


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The Perceptual Proxies of Visual Comparison

Presented by: Youssef Sherif

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Visual comparison

2

Bigger Mean? Bigger Range?

slide-3
SLIDE 3

A bit of History

Examine the precision of comparison tasks with different arrangements

Max Correlation Max Delta

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Arrangements

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Dimensions

  • 2 comparison tasks
  • 3 marks
  • 5 arrangements

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

2 more tasks to experiment with

  • Max Mean
  • Max Range

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

2 more tasks to experiment with

  • Max Mean
  • Max Range

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

How to increase difficulty?

Staircase procedure Which set in each pair has a bigger mean?

Easy Hard

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

What is visually compared?

12

What steps do our brain do in

  • rder to reach for a conclusion?
slide-13
SLIDE 13

What is visually compared?

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

What is visually compared?

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Proxies for scatter plots

15

Bounding Box Prediction Ellipse What does your brain do to know the correlation between two factors in a scatterplot?

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Proxies for bar charts

  • Different from scatterplot
  • Allows for different tasks like comparing mean and

comparing range instead of only one task

  • Different tasks map to different proxies

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Proxy bots

  • Not computer vision systems
  • Only know how to do one thing
  • Simple algorithms

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

What do these proxy bots do?

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Example: Top-Item proxy bot

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Example: Range proxy bot

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Example: Convex hull proxy bot

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Example: Convex hull proxy bot

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Example: Convex hull proxy bot

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Example: Convex hull proxy bot

24

Which have a centroid farther to the right?

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Convex hull proxy bot

25

Which have a larger area?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Focal proxies

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Global proxies

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

What to do with the proxy bots?

We need to answer two questions 1. Which proxies are accurate for each task (useful)? 2. Which proxies are used by humans for each task (used)?

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Results

  • Global visual features are better candidates for the MAXMEAN comparisons
  • Focal visual features are better candidates for MAXRANGE compar-isons.
  • People tend to make decisions consistent with using the most useful visual

features

30

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Strengths

  • Novel idea which is to build proxy bots and use these bots to understand what

humans do to for specific visualization tasks

  • Provided clear examples of what proxy bots are and clear examples of tasks

and arrangements

  • Were generous to provide a video for their paper
  • Did not shy away from mentioning their failed attempts in proving a correlation
  • f two tasks
  • Used visualizations in their paper to make it easier for readers to comprehend
  • Clearly mentioned their limitations and caveats in the paper

31

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Weaknesses

  • Were discouraged of establishing a correlation between arrangements with

tasks after conducting two extra tasks only

  • Did not show clearly on which basis did they categorize proxy bots into two

categories (item based and set-based)

  • Looks like they had 2 unrelated contributions

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Future work

  • How can different datasets affect what proxy the user uses
  • Example: “In a visualization with two charts with one large item outlier, the

single item outlier might capture attention provoke a focal comparison.”

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

References

  • https://vimeo.com/371939151
  • https://vimeo.com/360050277

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Thank you

35