December, 12th 2017
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Cold Quantum Coffee-Heidelberg
Esther Weil
γµ
Dyson Schwinger 101
Research in the DSE approach
Dyson Schwinger 101 Research in the DSE approach Esther Weil - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Dyson Schwinger 101 Research in the DSE approach Esther Weil Justus-Liebig-Universitt Gieen Institut fr Theoretische Physik December, 12th 2017 Cold Quantum Coffee-Heidelberg Dyson-Schwinger 101 Tues , 12.12.17 Esther Weil JLU
December, 12th 2017
Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen
Institut für Theoretische Physik
Cold Quantum Coffee-Heidelberg
γµ
Research in the DSE approach
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 2
Goal:
Compute Hadron Properties (such as spectra, form factors, scattering amplitudes …) using QCD’s Greens functions on a quark-gluon level.
QCD effective action Dyson-Schwinger equations (DSE)
derive “The quantum equation of motion“
Intro
+ Bethe Salpeter equations
describing bound states But for numerical evaluation a truncation is needed. non-perturbative, at all momentum scales, light and heavy quarks.
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 3
Christian Fischers group, JLU Gießen
Group topics include:
Wallbott, Eichmann, Fischer Eichmann, Fischer, Weil, Williams Gunkel, Isserstedt, Haque Eichmann, Sanchis-Alepuz, Williams, Fischer - recent Review (2016) Eichmann, Fischer, PRD 87 (2014) Bonnet, Eichmann, Fischer, Williams eg.
Intro
Söhngen, Eshraim, Williams, Huber
PLB, 753, 1508.07178 (2016) Eichmann, G. Few-Body Syst (2016) 57: 965
eg.
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 4
QCD Lagrangian
quarks, gluons
mesons baryons glueballs? hybrids? tetraquarks?
degrees of freedom in QCD
L = ¯ ψ(x)(i/ ∂ + g / A − M)ψ(x) − 1 4F a
µνF µν a but those can not be seen in nature. We observe only hadrons asymptotic freedom
webific.ific.uv.es/web/en
Intro
calls for non-perturbative methods quark and gluons are confined such as the Dyson-Schwinger approach !
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 5
quark propagator
Theory stuff
Are these included? The so called self-energy includes all possible quark self interactions. Deriving the quark Dyson-Schwinger equation diagrammatically (i) QCD’s action Origin of the equation Starting from we obtain the following action diagrammatically (ii) Take the functional derivative with respect to the quark fields
S = ⁄ d4x 5 ¯ ψ(x)(i/ ∂ + g / A − M)ψ(x) − 1 4F a
µνF µν a
6
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 5
quark propagator
Theory stuff
Are these included? The so called self-energy includes all possible quark self interactions. Deriving the quark Dyson-Schwinger equation diagrammatically (i) QCD’s action Origin of the equation Starting from we obtain the following action diagrammatically (ii) Take the functional derivative with respect to the quark fields
S = ⁄ d4x 5 ¯ ψ(x)(i/ ∂ + g / A − M)ψ(x) − 1 4F a
µνF µν a
6
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 5
quark propagator
Theory stuff
Are these included? The so called self-energy includes all possible quark self interactions. Deriving the quark Dyson-Schwinger equation diagrammatically (i) QCD’s action Origin of the equation Starting from we obtain the following action diagrammatically (ii) Take the functional derivative with respect to the quark fields
S = ⁄ d4x 5 ¯ ψ(x)(i/ ∂ + g / A − M)ψ(x) − 1 4F a
µνF µν a
6
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 6
Theory stuff
(ii) Take the functional derivative with respect to the quark fields (iii) Replace the action by the effective action (iv) Take another derivative and set the field to zero
quark Dyson-Schwinger equation
and there is more! - equations for the different Greens functions
derivation inspired by Gernot Eichmann, Marcus Huber, Reinhard Alkhofer and Kai Schwenzer.
connecting the dots in all possible ways lead to the quantum equation
and are related thru a Legendre-Trafo.
Γ S
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17
+ =
Γµ(p, P)
γµ
K
P
7
Theory stuff
quark propagator
= Bethe-Salpeter equation (BSE)
gluon propagator
Γ
p
=
Γ
q
q+
q−
K
P
quark propagator
ghost propagator
vertices
bound states equation for bound states and vertices + + + = Dyson-Schwinger equation (DSE)
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17
but but we have an infinite set of coupled integral equations!
8
all these equations are rigorous and non-perturbative quark-gluon vertex
gluon propagator
includes higher order Greens functions
Need to introduce a truncation for numerical evaluations !
Theory stuff
quark propagator
vertices bound states + +
gluon propagator ghost propagator
+
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 9
Numerical evaluations
Truncate, but how?
To preserve chiral symmetry we use a consistent truncation in each equation. We choose an Ansatz for higher order Greens function: In the case of the rainbow-ladder approximation we combine the quark-gluon vertex and gluon propagator to a tree-level vertex + effective coupling
K = ∂Σ ∂S =
Σ = ∂Γ ∂S =
Rainbow-ladder truncation
DSE self-energy term BSE kernel Ansatz = tree-level + effective coupling
α(k2) α(k2)
self-energy and kernel are related through a symmetry relation, Axial-Vector Ward-Takehashi identity
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/27 Tues, 12.12.17 10
Λ2, η) + αUV(k2)
scale is adjusted to observables, like .
masses mu=md, ms from m , mK
from perturbation theory - UV: rigorous field theory part parameter : band of results - IR: modeled part
fπ π
Λ η αUV
α(k2)
Combine gluon with quark-gluon vertex to an effective coupling α(k2) + tree-level vertex
Maris, Roberts,Tandy, PRC 56 (1997), PRC 60 (1999)
Ansatz effective coupling:
Numerical evaluations
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/27 Tues, 12.12.17
limitations in kinematic regim due to poles in the calculations, e.g.. quark poles.
11
Numerical evaluations
350 MeV 3 MeV
Bottom Charm Strange Up/down Chiral limit
Quark mass function [GeV]: Fischer J. Phys G. 32 (2006)
DSE results for the quark propagator, for different quark masses: Using the rainbow-ladder approximation: works well for not as well for
pseudo-scalar and vector mesons, also form- factors & decays excited scalar, axial- vector mesons
quark mass generation through dynamical chiral symmetry breaking.
excited state are problematic! Calculations beyond rainbow-ladder similar for the baryons. More complicated, two different approaches. excited bayrons Using RL, we are ready to calculate various QCD observables.
the kinematic regime where we can calculate is limited due to poles in the quark propagators.
Eichmann, Fischer, Williams, Alkhofer PPN 91 (2016)
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 12
Recent Research
Pion transition form factor
Next:
Λµν(Q, Q0) = e2 F(Q2, Q02) 4π2fπ εµναβQ0αQβ
π0
+
π0 → γγ
In the chiral limit ( )
mπ = 0
SU(3) flavor anomaly
ADLER, BELL, JACKIW, 1969
From the anomaly we know F(0, 0) = 1
PLB V 774, 425-429 arXiv:1704.05774v3 [hep-ph]
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 12
Recent Research
Pion transition form factor
Next:
Λµν(Q, Q0) = e2 F(Q2, Q02) 4π2fπ εµναβQ0αQβ
We need these building blocks:
quark propagator
Pion amplitude Quark-photon vertex
π0 → γγ
π0
γµ
In the chiral limit ( )
mπ = 0
SU(3) flavor anomaly
ADLER, BELL, JACKIW, 1969
From the anomaly we know F(0, 0) = 1
PLB V 774, 425-429 arXiv:1704.05774v3 [hep-ph]
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17
Result for the form factor in the asymmetric and symmetric ( ) limit
13
Recent Research
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
cone asym sym
(, ´)
[]
0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
[]
Q2 = QÕ2
Dispersion relation Lattice estimate of the continuum limit
singly-virtual up to
2 ∼ 2GeV2
symmetric limit for all asymmetric kinematic restriction due to the limitations
propagator in the complex plane
Q2
Q2 < 4GeV2
In comparison Non-perturbative input to further electro-magnetic pion decays combined effort of different non- perturbative methods.
DSE (asym) DSE (sym) Belle BaBar CLEO CELLO
2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0 5 10 15 20
[]
)
2 ′
, Q
2
Q ( F
F(Q2, QÕ2) = η+ F(Q2, QÕ2) 4π2f 2
π
Q2
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 14
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
Discrepancy between theory and experiment of 2σ with t0 = −m2
π/4
The branching ratio is given by and the scalar amplitude
BRexp(π0
e+e−) ≈ 6.87(36) × 10−8
theory calculations
A(t) ∼
∆(π0)
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 14
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
Discrepancy between theory and experiment of 2σ with t0 = −m2
π/4
The branching ratio is given by and the scalar amplitude
BRexp(π0
e+e−) ≈ 6.87(36) × 10−8
theory calculations
Integration domain includes poles
A(t) ∼
∆(π0)
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 15
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
BRexp(π0
e+e−) ≈ 6.87(36) × 10−8
A(t) ∼
∆(π0)
Integration domain includes poles!
poles
(i) dispersion relation (ii) “direct“ method Two ways to calculate the integral:
L.Bergström al.(2014), Phys Let. B126, 8117(19839)
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 16
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method
integration path in the complex plane
Our quantities are defined in Euclidean space, from the Minkowski description there is only one rigorous path that corresponds to the physical decay rate, but which?
t = (−1 + i)m2
π/4
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
A(t) = 1 2π2t Z
γ
d Σ2 Z d cos θ Z dφ (Σ · ∆)2 − Σ2∆2 (p + Σ)2 + m2
e
F(Q2, Q02) Q2 Q02 .
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 16
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method
Photon cuts
(opens at )
integration path in the complex plane
Our quantities are defined in Euclidean space, from the Minkowski description there is only one rigorous path that corresponds to the physical decay rate, but which?
t = (−1 + i)m2
π/4
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
A(t) = 1 2π2t Z
γ
d Σ2 Z d cos θ Z dφ (Σ · ∆)2 − Σ2∆2 (p + Σ)2 + m2
e
F(Q2, Q02) Q2 Q02 .
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 16
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method
Photon cuts
(opens at )
integration path in the complex plane
Our quantities are defined in Euclidean space, from the Minkowski description there is only one rigorous path that corresponds to the physical decay rate, but which?
t = (−1 + i)m2
π/4
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
A(t) = 1 2π2t Z
γ
d Σ2 Z d cos θ Z dφ (Σ · ∆)2 − Σ2∆2 (p + Σ)2 + m2
e
F(Q2, Q02) Q2 Q02 .
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 16
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method
Photon cuts
(opens at )
Lepton cuts
(open at )
integration path in the complex plane
Our quantities are defined in Euclidean space, from the Minkowski description there is only one rigorous path that corresponds to the physical decay rate, but which?
t = (−1 + i)m2
π/4
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
A(t) = 1 2π2t Z
γ
d Σ2 Z d cos θ Z dφ (Σ · ∆)2 − Σ2∆2 (p + Σ)2 + m2
e
F(Q2, Q02) Q2 Q02 .
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 16
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method
Im
(1) (2) (3) (4)
0.01 0.00
0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03
Photon cuts
(opens at )
Lepton cuts
(open at )
integration path in the complex plane
Our quantities are defined in Euclidean space, from the Minkowski description there is only one rigorous path that corresponds to the physical decay rate, but which?
t = (−1 + i)m2
π/4
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
A(t) = 1 2π2t Z
γ
d Σ2 Z d cos θ Z dφ (Σ · ∆)2 − Σ2∆2 (p + Σ)2 + m2
e
F(Q2, Q02) Q2 Q02 .
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 16
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method
Photon cuts
(opens at )
Lepton cuts
(open at )
integration path in the complex plane
technical challenge: cuts are almost congruent, due to the small electron mass Our quantities are defined in Euclidean space, from the Minkowski description there is only one rigorous path that corresponds to the physical decay rate, but which?
t = (−1 + i)m2
π/4
arXiv:1704.06046v2 [hep-ph]
A(t) = 1 2π2t Z
γ
d Σ2 Z d cos θ Z dφ (Σ · ∆)2 − Σ2∆2 (p + Σ)2 + m2
e
F(Q2, Q02) Q2 Q02 .
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 17
Recent Research
Rare decay of the pion
Next:
π0 → e+e−
(ii) “direct“ method in the whole complex plane
A(t)
Esther Weil JLU Giessen
Dyson-Schwinger 101
/18 Tues, 12.12.17 18
Summary
Euclidean space.