dynamics in land tenure local power and the peasant
play

Dynamics in land tenure, local power and the peasant economy: the - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Dynamics in land tenure, local power and the peasant economy: the case of south- east Petn, Guatemala Markus Zander, GI Z/ Pastoral Social del VAP Jochen Drr, GI Z/ I DEAR-CONGCOOP 1 Introduction Guatemala historically marked by


  1. Dynamics in land tenure, local power and the peasant economy: the case of south- east Petén, Guatemala Markus Zander, GI Z/ Pastoral Social del VAP Jochen Dürr, GI Z/ I DEAR-CONGCOOP 1

  2. Introduction  Guatemala historically marked by strong social inequalities and conflicts related to land distribution: GINI-efficient land 0.84  Civil war from 1960 to 1996; Peace Accords don‘t resolve social inequalities  In Petén from 1960 on government-induced colonization process: from 26,000 inhabitants to 600,000 today.  Land distribution: up to 45 ha for small scale farmers, up to 675 ha for large investors. Regularization process still not finished  Today internal migration exceeds migration from other departments 2

  3. Agricultural production  Campesino farmers  83% of farms in 2003  Subsistence economy with swidden agriculture  Main production for sale: maize and black beans  Average family income through cash crops: about 2600 $ US/ year  Cattle farming  17% of farms in 2003  Extensive production on large extensions (average 1.2 cattle/ ha) with very low profit margins  Often for status reasons or speculation  Strong inequalities also within livestock sector 3

  4. Present land situation  Economy highly dependent on agriculture:  47% of mestizo and 72% of indigenous households live primarily from agriculture  Only about 35 % of campesino families still hold parcels of their own, 65% don’t.  Land scarcity. Reasons:  natural population growth,  migration from other departments  displacement of small scale agriculture through cattle farming and large scale plantation farming. 4

  5. Available land per family 60 60 in campesino 50 41 communities, per micro- 42 40 38 31 30 30 26 region of south-eastern 28 31 27 20 18 17 13 Petén 18 10 10 9 8 6 10 0 5 MR2 MR3 MR4 MR5 MR6 average ha/family (for all MR7 MR8 MR9 MR10 San Luis total families) average ha/family (for San Luis Municipality land owning families) 45 70 43 44 40 65 40 60 53 35 35 36 50 30 43 25 40 37 33 25 18 37 20 29 30 16 15 12 18 26 15 20 19 10 20 14 18 7 10 6 8 5 10 11 7 11 0 12 0 8 MR2 MR3 MR2 MR4 MR3a MR5 MR3b MR6 MR4a MR7 MR4b MR8 MR5a Poptún total MR5b Dolores total Dolores Municipality 5 Poptún Municipality

  6. Expansion of oil palm plantations in Petén From 20,700 ha in productive stage in 2007, to 44,300 ha in 2010. Additional areas apt for oil palm: 37,540 ha Area of oil palm production 6

  7. Expansion of cattle farm ing in south- east Petén: 30% of campesino families in area sold their land • 63,495 ha land lost for small farmers • 2326 families left landless, or up to 15% of actual rural population. <15% sold 15%-24,9% sold 25%-34,9% sold 35%-44,9% sold 45%-54,9% sold >54,9% sold 7

  8. Change of land use in South-eastern Petén 8

  9. Why do campesino families sell their land? Reasons for sale False assum ptions about availability of 31% land: - No m ore “free” land 15% 15% 11% 8% 6% 6% available 9% - Land prices have m ultiplied by factor 1 0 and m ore since 1 9 9 6 a t n u t i m o o h n c e n t r s i h c e g s p e u e i d t d r a a a f r a y f t e s f r i t s o e c t n i , o r d i b t e p n m o u l n r o r s t e t o o a i s i p n n l n s l U e e r n s u o S s y e r d s s e u s o c r t i o v i n o 9 . . .

  10. Factors boosting land concentration 1 End of civil war and improvement of road infrastructure  Better security situation for transport and investment  Road access to nearly all villages  Travel times considerably shortened  Improvement of investment climate for production, especially for export to other departments 10

  11. Factors boosting land concentration 2 Cadastral process with “market – assisted land reform”  Titling and cadastral process creates judicial security for individual properties and incentivates land transactions  Existing mecanisms to resolve conflicts about land ownership in regularization process not adapted to strong economical and power disparities, favour rich and powerful  World-Bank advocated “land-reform” fails to reach majority of landless farmers and doesn’t provide adequate conditions for beneficiaries 11

  12. Factors boosting land concentration 3 Drug-trafficking  Drug trafficking related activities create high financial returns in Guatemala, which are re- invested in land for speculation purposes and territorial control.  Petén offers ideal conditions because of large extensions, low population density and lack of state control.  Narco-ganaderos don’t hesitate to threaten with or apply violence to meet their aims.  General climate of fear and impunity leaves campesino families without government support in case of threats 12

  13. Consequences of land concentration 1  Campesino families who sold their land in their majority are not able to buy new parcels, stay landless and with few alternatives to agricultural work  Most stay in their communities to rent land from neighbours: land scarcity and intra-communal conflicts  Depletion of natural ressources like soil, water and forest through overuse  Occupation of land in Nature Reserves, rising conflicts and state repression  Migration to urban centers in Petén and to country capital 13

  14. Consequences of land concentration 2  Growing unskilled and unemployed labour force which cannot be acommodated by labour needs of cattle ranching and plantation farming Em ploym ent generation on regional level ( including agricultural production) per ha: Corn and bean: 2 8 m an days/ ha Cattle Farm ing: 8 m an days/ ha The conversion of 6 3 ,4 9 5 ha of m ilpa land into pastures in SE Petén lead to a loss of approxim ately 4 0 0 0 jobs in agriculture in the last years 14

  15. Consequences of land concentration 3  Food security Local production (SE Petén) contributes with 38,909 metric tons (mt) of corn and 15,909 mt of beans to consumption at national level. Loss through conversion: 24 thousand mt of maize, and 4 thousand mt of beans.  Regional economy: Value added/ ha: cattle: $US 165, corn: $US 244, beans: $US 265 Land concentration and conversion of milpa land in pastures create annual losses of $US 5.5 million for local economy 15

  16. Recommendations  Improvement of structural conditions for small scale farmers (credits, tecnical assistance adapted to local needs)  Support for campesino organisational efforts  Training of cattle farmers in more intensive and less area-consuming breeding methods  Adaptation of cadastral process to Guatemala’s reality and the needs of campesino and indigenous population  Implementation af agrarian legislation and courts  Government must garantee security for small farmers against violent and powerful actors 16

  17. What can be done by international organisations?  Pressure on Guatemalan government and congressmen to approve and implement legislation in favour of campesino population  Support for human rights and campesino organizations against repression by state and non state actors  Support for organisations and institutions in fight against impunity  Awareness raising campains in consumer countries about social and ecological consequences of Oil Palm and agrofuel monocultures in producing countries 17

  18. Thank you! 18

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend