driver at fault crashes and proximity to
play

Driver At-Fault Crashes and Proximity to Rest Areas and Truck Stops - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Association between Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes and Proximity to Rest Areas and Truck Stops Terry Bunn, Svetla Slavova, Peter Rock Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center Fatigue in Transportation Meeting 2017, San Diego,


  1. Association between Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes and Proximity to Rest Areas and Truck Stops Terry Bunn, Svetla Slavova, Peter Rock Kentucky Injury Prevention and Research Center Fatigue in Transportation Meeting 2017, San Diego, CA March 20, 2017 1

  2. Background • 10% to 20% of all truck and bus crashes involve drivers who are fatigued (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, 2016) • Ongoing concern at national level about availability of adequate commercial vehicle rest areas and truck stops for commercial vehicle drivers to rest – Jason’s Law Truck Parking Survey, August 2015 • Kentucky ranked in bottom half of states for number of commercial vehicle truck parking spaces per 100,000 of daily combination vehicle miles traveled 2

  3. Study Objectives 1) Characterize and compare sleepiness/fatigue-related vs. all other human factor-related commercial vehicle driver at-fault crashes 2) Map geographical locations of available rest areas and truck stops on the federal authorized national network for trucks 3) Examine association between at-fault commercial vehicle driver crashes involving fatigue and/or sleepiness and distances to nearest rest areas/truck stops 4) Map rest area/truck stop geographical locations relative to commercial vehicle driver at-fault crashes involving sleepiness/fatigue vs. those involving all other human factors 3

  4. Methods Retrospective population-based case-control study to evaluate if at- fault commercial motor vehicle driver crashes were more likely to involve sleepiness/fatigue vs . other human factors on roadways with low concentrations of rest areas and truck stops Cases- At-fault commercial vehicle drivers where sleepiness and/or fatigue were listed as factor(s) in the crash reports Controls- At-fault commercial vehicle drivers where other possible human factors were listed in the crash reports 4

  5. ArcGIS • Rest areas identified through Kentucky Transportation Cabinet rest area directory listing • Truck stops identified using ArcGIS Business Analyst 2015 that matched truck stop descriptions within 25 miles of Kentucky’s borders 5

  6. Chi-square and Stepwise Logistic Regression Possible Confounders 1. Total number of roadway lanes (1-2 vs. 2+) 2. Time of day of crash (7am < collision time < 6pm) indicating daylight and nighttime hours 3. Roadway character (straight vs. curved) 4. Commercial vehicle driver age (21-24, 25-54, and 55+) 5. Roadway condition (dry vs. wet) 6. Roadway type (interstate vs. parkway) 6

  7. Location of Truck Stops and Rest Areas in Kentucky, 2016 7

  8. Roadways With at Least One Rest Area or Truck Stop Within the Federal Authorized National Network for Trucks in Kentucky, 2016 8

  9. Demographic and Crash Characteristics of Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes in Kentucky, 2005-2014 Characteristic Cases (n= 284) Controls (n=7,254) Chi-Square Commercial Vehicle Driver Age Category p=0.0805 21-24 years of age 8 (3%) 240 (3%) 25-54 years of age 222 (78%) 5232 (72%) 55+ years of age 54 (19%) 1782 (25%) Time of Day of Crash p<0.0001 Daytime (7am-6:69pm) 76 (27%) 5026 (69%) Nighttime (7pm- 6:59am) 208 (73%) 2228 (31%) Commercial Vehicle Unit Type p=0.8218 Truck and trailer 51 (18%) 1245 (17%) Truck-single unit 28 (10%) 796 (11%) Truck tractor and semi-trailer 198 (70%) 5077 (70%) Truck-other combination 7 (2%) 136 (2%) Distance (in miles) to Rest Area/Truck Stop p<0.0001 <20 miles 241 (85%) 6800 (94%) 20- 39.9 miles 39 (14%) 435 (6%) 40+ miles 4 (1%) 19 (<1%) 9

  10. Demographic and Crash Characteristics of Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes in Kentucky, 2005-2014 Characteristic Cases (n= 284) Controls (n=7,254) Chi-Square Manner of Collision p<0.0001 Angle 4 (1%) 219 (3%) Rear End/Rear to Rear 35 (12%) 2195 (30%) Sideswipe-Opposite Direction/ 20 (7%) 3015 (42%) Sideswipe-Same Direction Single Vehicle 223 (79%) 1645 (23%) Other 2 (1%) 179 (2%) Commercial Vehicle Driver Injury Severity p<0.0001 Fatal injury 7 (2%) 55 (1%) Incapacitating injury 17 (6%) 103 (1%) Non-incapacitating injury 49 (17%) 295 (4%) Possible injury 41 (14%) 228 (3%) None 170 (60%) 6566 (91%) Commercial Vehicle Driver Restraint Use p<0.0001 No 18 (6%) 139 (2%) Yes 266 (94%) 7115 (98%) 10

  11. Roadway Characteristics of Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes in Kentucky, 2005-2014 Characteristic Cases (n= 284) Controls (n=7,254) Chi-Square Roadway Character p=0.8678 Straight roadway 222 (78%) 5640 (76%) Curved roadway 62 (22%) 1614 (22%) Roadway Condition p=0.0026 Dry roadway 239 (84%) 5547 (76%) Wet roadway 45 (16%) 1707 (24%) Number of Roadway Lanes p=0.4518 1-2 lanes 49 (17%) 1381 (19%) >2 lanes 235 (83%) 5873 (81%) Roadway Type p<0.0001 Interstate highway 203 (71%) 6595 (91%) Parkway 81 (29%) 659 (9%) 11

  12. Location of Commercial Vehicle Driver At-Fault Crashes Relative to Proximity to Rest Areas/ Truck Stops in Kentucky, 2005-2014 12

  13. Odds Ratios for Commercial Vehicle Driver At- Fault Crashes Involving Sleepiness/Fatigue in Kentucky, 2005-2014 Commercial Vehicle Crash Characteristic Odds Ratio 95% CI (p<0.05) 6.340 4.845-8.297 Nighttime vs. Daytime Hour of Commercial Vehicle Crash Rest Area/Truck Stop Distance of 20-39.9 Miles 2.321 1.615-3.335 vs. <20 Miles to Commercial Vehicle Crash Site Rest Area/Truck Stop Distance of 40+ Miles vs. 6.788 2.112-21.812 <20 Miles to Commercial Vehicle Crash Site Dry vs. Wet Roadway at Time of Commercial 1.915 1.379-2.658 Vehicle Crash 13

  14. Odds Ratios for Commercial Vehicle Driver At- Fault Crashes Involving Sleepiness/Fatigue in Kentucky, 2005-2014 Commercial Vehicle Crash Characteristic Odds Ratio 95% CI (p<0.05) Nighttime vs. Daytime Hour of Commercial Vehicle Crash 6.524 4.965-8.572 Dry vs. Wet Roadway at Time of Commercial Vehicle Crash 1.921 1.378-2.678 Interstate-24 vs. Interstate-75 2.574 1.449-4.574 Interstate-64 vs. Interstate-75 2.519 1.678-3.781 Interstate-65 vs. Interstate-75 1.299 0.882-1.912 Interstate-71 vs. Interstate-75 1.549 0.950-2.526 Audubon Parkway vs. Interstate-75 15.256 3.135-74.238 Bluegrass Parkway vs. Interstate-75 5.940 3.086-11.435 Cumberland Parkway vs. Interstate-75 3.384 0.976-11.731 Pennyrile Parkway vs. Interstate-75 7.260 4.278-12.320 Purchase Parkway vs. Interstate-75 4.536 2.024-10.165 Western Kentucky Parkway vs. Interstate-75 3.931 2.207-7.001 William H. Natcher Parkway vs. Interstate-75 6.578 3.216-13.454 14

  15. Odds Ratios for Commercial Vehicle Driver At- Fault Crashes Involving Sleepiness/Fatigue in Kentucky, 2005-2014 Commercial Vehicle Crash Odds Ratio 95% CI Characteristic (p<0.05) Nighttime vs. Daytime Hour of 6.199 4.733-8.119 Commercial Vehicle Crash Parkway vs. Interstate 3.747 2.834-4.954 Dry vs. Wet Roadway at Time of 1.909 1.373-2.655 Commercial Vehicle Crash 15

  16. Conclusions • Regression analysis coupled with ArcGIS mapping provided opportunity to statistically determine and visualize association between rest area/truck stop distances and commercial vehicle driver at-fault crashes involving sleepiness/fatigue • Results can be used by state and local highway transportation officials to inform and increase truck parking availability, especially on parkways • Implementation and evaluation of commercial vehicle employer fatigue-prevention policies and interventions may help reduce fatigue and sleepiness in commercial vehicle drivers 16

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend